The Beerleaguer commentariat is intelligent, so it probably doesn't have to be told to ignore rumors of the Phillies making a run at Giancarlo Stanton, but just in case...
I had never heard of Chris May until 1:30, and as a general rule I don't believe any trade rumors from people I hadn't heard of until five minutes 20 minutes ago. From the looks of it, this isn't May reporting it, it's him simply regurgitating something he heard on WIP. May is an anchor for CBS, and WIP is a CBS radio station.
Either way, WIP doesn't exactly have the best track record with MLB player movement.
There are a whole host of reasons this makes no sense. The Phillies have so very little to trade for Stanton. The Marlins are in the Phillies' division. If Stanton is actually on the block, all 29 salivating teams will be informed so they can trip over themselves to build a trade package.
In other news, the Eagles are in talks to acquire J.J. Watt from the Texans for Darryl Tapp and a seventh-round pick.




The package would be Tommy joseph, jesse biddle, darin ruf, cesar hernandez, carlos tocci, cody asche, and phillippe aumount would that get it done?!?
Posted by: Mikey ro | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:22 PM
"The Phillies have so very little to trade for Stanton."
Incorrect. Amaro is finalizing a deal for Stanton in exchange for 'productive players' that 'produce production.'
Honestly though, until we can rule out that Amaro has Loria at gunpoint, I'm keeping my hopes high on this.
Posted by: Iceman | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:25 PM
rolo: My last word on this.
The problem is, "chop-busting" is conveyed by intonation and doesn't translate over the Internet. So, it comes across as, "Here goes our lawyer poster twisting the truth, just like he does in his job."
I mean, how would you like it if someone accused you of making a living by twisting the truth? It's kind of a dickish thing to say.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:28 PM
"Please ignore WIP until further notice"
Fixed it for you.
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:32 PM
Roman Quinn comes at #100, on the BA Top 100.
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:35 PM
BAP, it's really the beauty of the actuarial profession. So few people, including the actuaries sometimes, know what we do, we never:
1) Get asked for helps from friends and family members, and
2) Get made fun of.
It's the reason I got into the profession.
I also work with plenty of lawyers, and I find them to be a great group of folks. Lawyer on, my friend.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:40 PM
Biddle has made every major outlet's top 100. Quinn, Morgan, Joseph, and Martin have all made an appearance, but never on the same list.
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:41 PM
If Rube were able to get Stanton, he'd be the greatest GM in team history.
There is basically zero chance of it ever happening though...unless Rube found the "Force Trades" button in his MLB13 Franchise mode.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:42 PM
Brief discussion on DC SportsTalk 980 yesterday was if the Nats lineup is the best all time. Not the best Nats lineup, but the best lineup from any team...ever.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:44 PM
bbeard: "brief" because its a no-brainer, HELLYEA!
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:45 PM
I just found that rumor on CBS sports page, too. Surprised they would even write it. Can't imagine it's real, but can you imagine if it was?
Posted by: Outta Here | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:50 PM
FUnny, I was just thinking to myself "'27 Yankees or 2013 Nats"...what are the odds?
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:51 PM
Oh boy, crazy talk hour. This Stanton rumor nonsense is crazier than signing Lee.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:53 PM
What's the going rate for a 23 year old RF who just posted a 158 OPS+ season at Age 22 and who is under team control through 2016?
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:55 PM
Thanks Corey. Now I will have to paddle through all the $hit that will be thrown around. And some BL posters who have not a single clue of how this works. They Will be posting all the little ideas and Harry the K packages. I said Harry the K. Because LF is still too close with crap...... Haha
Posted by: The hook | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:55 PM
What cost controlled MLB talent would the Phils have to give up in addition to the prospects, as prospects alone probably don't get it done?
So let's make a list of who the Phillies have that are 1) reasonably young, and 2) have some MLB experience, and 3) are cost-controlled for at least a couple more years:
(*Note: This is simply a list of such players, not an editorial as to whether they're viewed as talented enough to be trade fodder for Giancarlo Stanton.)
Dom Brown
Darin Ruf
Ben Revere
Kyle Kendrick
Bastardo
Mayberry (though he's not young)
Stutes
Galvis
Horst
DeFratus
Schwimer
Diekman
Savery
Cloyd
Aumont
Rosenberg
Someone on the list above would probably have to be included, probably at least 2 of the first 5 guys on the list, so it's hard to make that trade without hurting the 2013 team in another area.
For instance, suppose they requested Kendrick and Bastardo? That's hurts the rotation and the 'pen. If it's "only" Brown and Ruf then you do it in a second, but I suspect they don't have neough ttalent to get Stanton anyway.
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:56 PM
not that it matters, but I'm pretty sure that any deal for Stanton would require a team to take on Nolasco's contract.
I am amazed he's still there.
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:59 PM
Ben Revere, Dom Brown plus 2 or 3 prospects would likely be enough.
Revere, Brown, Morgan and Biddle...
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 02:59 PM
Yeah, we'd also have to take on Nolasco (which really isnt a brutal deal as its only for 1 season)
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:00 PM
Mandy Housenick @inthephilshouse
#PHILLIES FILES: Rollins tells The Morning Call, "This is probably the most complete team I've ever had." http://fb.me/2wg1HiPd3
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:00 PM
NEPP, that would mean RFD in CF for another season.
Still, I would probably do that trade.
Lineup?:
Rollins
Utley
Stanton
Howard
Chooch
MYoung
Ruf LF (if he's "real")
Mayberry
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:02 PM
"Brief discussion on DC SportsTalk 980 yesterday was if the Nats lineup is the best all time. Not the best Nats lineup, but the best lineup from any team...ever."
That's probably the second most outlandish baseball-related comment I've ever heard. The only one I can think of that topped it was when I was a kid and a local sports radio talk show host said, "There are those who say that Johnnie Lemaster is the finest shortstop in the history of baseball."
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:03 PM
rolo: "For instance, suppose they requested Kendrick and Bastardo? That's hurts the rotation and the 'pen."
Right. Because if there's one untouchable in the system, who you wouldn't give up for Stanton, it's Kyle Kendrick. Of course.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:13 PM
Jack: I hope that wasn't sarcasm.
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:21 PM
NEPP and lore, the fish would also probably want Kendrick in return, because he's cost controlled for 2 more seasons.
I'm not joking. Reason?:
Nolasco 2010 - 2012: 554 IP, 87 ERA+
Kendrick 2010 - 2012: 454 IP, 98 ERA+
Some interesting comparisons:
Phils Hughes 2010 - 2012: 442 IP, 95 ERA+ (yes, BL, KK has, by that measure, actually been a better pitcher the last 3 years than Phil Hughes).
Tommy Hanson 2010 - 2012: 507 IP, 103 ERA+
Ubaldo Jiminez 2010 - 2012: 586 IP, 102 ERA+
Ricky Romero 2010 - 2012: 616 IP, 105 ERA+
James MacDonald 2010 - 2012: 413 IP, 90 ERA+
Rick Porcello 2010 - 2012: 521 IP, 88 ERA+
Jason Vargas 2010 - 2012: 611 IP, 96 ERA+
Gavin Floyd 2010 - 2012: 549 IP, 102 ERA+
Jeff Samardzija 2010 - 2012: 282 IP, 102 ERA+
Paul Maholm 2010 - 2012: 536 IP, 94 ERA+
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:24 PM
Oh, Jack, please show me where I stated I would be unwilling to give up Kendrick or Bastardo, or anyone for that matter, for Stanton.
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:29 PM
The only way I can see a Stanton trade -->
Cliff Lee to TX, Brown or Ruf, Biddle or Morgan, Quinn or Franco to MIA, Jurickson Profar to MIA, Low Level Lottery Ticket from TX** to Phils, Stanton and Nolasco to PHL.
Or LLLTfT goes directly to MIA and Quinn/Franco stay here.
Let the mocking begin ...
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:34 PM
rolo: if you were the marlins GM, how many players would you have to ask for first, before getting to Kyle Kendrick?
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:38 PM
Halladay and Kendrick plus cash and a prospect for Stanton and Nolasco & a PTBNL.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:40 PM
lorecore, a LOT, but I'd ask for Kendrick as a throw in to eat Nolasco's innings.
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:41 PM
can we try to be these people, please?
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=19297
Posted by: GhostsofGlennWilson | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:42 PM
Yes, because a team trying to obviously cut costs and rebuild with only young, cheap players clearly wants to trade for a 28-year old #4 starter set to make $4.5 million this season and somewhere around $6 million next season.
Kendrick is not without positives--he makes sense for a team like the Phillies. But the idea that he has some sort of trade value to a team like the Marlins is ludicrous. They're not trying to win, and they can find a dirt-cheap pitcher who is younger to fill the same spot.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:43 PM
I understand you're supposed to take emotion out of these things, and Meyer's trade would be a win for the Phils. But moving Halladay to a 60-win team in one of the few seasons he has left in the league would actually upset me. They owe him more than that.
Of course his trade value is nil until he throws a regular season pitch.
Posted by: Iceman | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:45 PM
The word on the street is that for the Phillies to pull off a trade for Stanton they would also have to include 25,000 fans. This way they can have someone show up to the games.
Posted by: Reverend | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:46 PM
"I mean, how would you like it if someone accused you of making a living by twisting the truth?"
Yes, the reputation is so very undeserved.
Posted by: Iceman | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:46 PM
I figured pairing him with Kyle would ease the pain.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:47 PM
I imagine they could get Stanton if they gave Loria a shopping cart, the keys to the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and a 30-minute head start.
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:49 PM
Considering there's about $1 billion of art just in the Manet room, I dont know that that's a fair trade.
Maybe offer him 2-3 good paintings and that's it.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:51 PM
That's why he only gets the one cart.
But fine, if you really want to make sure he can't get away with too much, you could give him a hand truck and the keys to the Rodin.
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 03:55 PM
Brilliant, Reverend!
In Meyer's scenario, who takes over in the rotation for Doc & KK? Would Giancarlo make up for the wins we're hoping to get from having them on the mound?
(And I agree with Iceman about not wanting that for Halladay.)
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:00 PM
b_a_p, my comrade, you appear to lack a necessary asset for the profession - thick skin. Preferably shark-like skin.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:04 PM
Re: Paintings:
Loria gets his choice of 1 painting each from the Phila Museum of Art, the Barnes and the Brandywine**, a sculpture of his choice from the Rodin, Dom Brown and Cecily Tyson. If need be, we can throw in a halberd and a gauntlet from the armor collection to sweeten the pot.
** The N. C. Wyeth "Treasure Island" is exempted.
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:07 PM
Edmundo: I can think of a number of commentators/sportscasters that Phillies fans (as a general set) would be willing to include in any deal for Stanton.
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:09 PM
May as well throw William Penn's hat in the cart.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:09 PM
Whoops, not Cecily Tynan.
Well that's different, then.
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:11 PM
The Gross Clinic (Eakins) is worth around $70 million...that alone should be enough for Stanton.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:12 PM
Philibuster, c'mon now. :) I didn't offer up TMac or Wheels or Sarge. Or Eskin. I offered Cecily Tyson, we're talking real value. That pink dress that she wore on Valentine's Day ...
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:12 PM
It is always funny when BAP gets indignant about things. Just remember, he told us years ago it doesn't matter what you say on here because you shouldn't be held accountable for it.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:12 PM
What's the WAR value of all that art?
Posted by: Conway Twitty | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:13 PM
Depends on if the Dali exhibit is back in town, Conway.
Edmundo: Mea culpa, I misread and thought you said Tynan, the ABC "meteorologist."
That said, just imagine if they got Merrill Reese to be the color guy for TMac.
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:17 PM
Philib, a big DOH on my part.
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:18 PM
Oh, you did mean her?
Well, I must admit, I'd probably be more loathe to trade Glenn Schwartz's bowtie...
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:32 PM
Sources are saying this could happen. Centered around Brown, Revere, Biddle and Morgan with other pieces. I'm not sure it will happen but if so, its about time.
Posted by: DPatrone | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:35 PM
Todd Zolecki @ToddZolecki
Jimmy Rollins discusses the Phillies' age, their chances to win and why leading off is not terribly important to him: http://bit.ly/VGnefX
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:35 PM
But I was told that Jimmy is forcing UC to bat him leadoff...
Well, if DPatrone's sources are saying it...it MUST be true, eh?
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:37 PM
Here's a link to an article about how well organizations have drafted and developed young pitching talent.
The Phillies have traded a fair amount of it away to get other players, but nonetheless, it's worth a read:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/yankees-shouldn-t-brag-about-recent-track-record-of-homegrown-arms-090939543.html
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:39 PM
I assume that was a fake DPatrone post. It was too perfect to be true.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:40 PM
Jack, I thought the same.
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:41 PM
Its funny how it mirrored my completely baseless musings of earlier today on the bare minimum it would take to even start a conversation with Miami.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:41 PM
stubhub: Phillies tickets will have a minimum list price of $3. There will also be a $1.50 MLB fee on all MLB tickets sold.
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:42 PM
Is Ben Revere's nickname "Tootsie Pop"?
This from the Zolecki article linked by GBrett:
"The little man out in center field, Tootsie Pop, Ben Revere, he’s going to bring that energy."
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:43 PM
NEPP, if the Phillies actually did trade for Stanton DPat would have a stroke.
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:45 PM
TTI: In an attempt to elevate the level of Beerleaguer discourse above the ignominious levels to which it too often declines, I have opted to delete what I was about to say in response to your 4:12 post.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 04:59 PM
How about rumors about me hitting cleanup?
Posted by: Mini Mart | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:05 PM
Actually, Mini Mart, I read that you might not even make the team.
"Among those likely to be reserves on the team's 25-man roster, there's not really a candidate to back up center fielder Ben Revere. Michael Martinez is unlikely to make the team"
from Mandy Housenick of The Morning Call
http://www.mcall.com/sports/baseball/phillies/mc-phillies-spring-training-rotation-0218-2-20130218,0,3656548.story
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:23 PM
Of course, if Mini-Mart did make the team as Revere's CF, it would obliterate BAP's argument that backups are actually much better than replacement level would have you believe.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:24 PM
Jack: Not really. It would just show that the Phillies are clueless.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:29 PM
BAP: They've had Mini-Mart on the 25-man roster for the last two years.
You need more evidence?
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:29 PM
Jack: I'm more than convinced when it comes to the Phillies' stupidity. But I don't think you can point to the single worst player in baseball as proof about the quality of your typical major league backup.
GBrett: I don't really follow the logic of that article. Isn't Mayberry a perfectly viable backup centerfielder?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:35 PM
Mayberry is obviously not a backup CF...its not like they gave him 52 starts there last year or something.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:36 PM
"BAP: They've had Mini-Mart on the 25-man roster for the last two years.
You need more evidence?"
Thanks for the reminder, Jack.
Posted by: rolo | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:44 PM
the other day in an interview on DNL chollie called his new cf toy, "rivera." jimmy probably gave him a nick that chollie can remember. he can just call him "tootsie."
Posted by: bullit | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:52 PM
What are the odds that if Ruf & Dom both bust RAJ gets Alfonso Soriano to play LF?
UGH. It makes me sick just thinking this is a possibility.
Posted by: Lynsk | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 05:54 PM
Lynsk: If Dom & Ruf BOTH bust, it is far more likely that the Phillies will be trading their veteran players for prospects than trading their prospects for veteran players.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 06:04 PM
BAP, that's a good point about Mayberry.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 06:10 PM
Man. Re-watching the 9/20/12 really helps to improve your mood. Especially the 1st.
Posted by: Phillibuster | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 06:18 PM
To any/all entertaining the idea that your Philadelphia Phillies have anywhere near the amount of available talent necessary to acquire Giancarlo Stanton:
DAB THE SWEAT OFF YOUR SYPHILITIC FOREHEAD AND GO BACK TO DRINKING MERCURY
Posted by: dlhunter | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 06:21 PM
I dont care as long i still hit lead off says J-Roll..
Posted by: "Pedro's lucky midget" | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 06:47 PM
Obviously you would want a guy like Stanton but the cost is probably way too high for this team. It would really strip what little we have farm wise with our pitching.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 07:05 PM
We dont have enough on the Farm, we'd obviously have to give up MLB players too and that's the non-starter part of the deal...at least if its a trade they make trying to compete in 2013. If its a deal aimed towards 2014 or 2015 then it might work but by then he'd be well into his Arb years anyway and nearly a FA.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 07:07 PM
Babe Ruth was bought for good old fashioned cash, $100,000. to an owner who wanted to finance a Broadway play. Substitute some of cigar-guy's billion to an owner who wants to buy art, adjust for inflation, and give MM a one-way ticket to deliver the money.
Posted by: Conway Twitty | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 07:50 PM
Stanton's on track to be the next Mickey Mantle, so what do you give up?
Everything you need to give up for him.
Posted by: kuvasz | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 08:01 PM
We get Stanton yet?
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 08:20 PM
http://www.thegoodphight.com/2013/2/19/4001918/2013-phillies-player-preview-jimmy-rollins
Very good write-up on Rollins. The Good Phight became barely readable during last season, but they've become a bit better over the off-season.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 08:42 PM
TTI: Our farm is barren enough at the top levels that you might as well trade what little you still have for a 23-year old stud.
Put it this way: who do you think provides more value over the next four seasons? Brown, Biddle, Adam Morgan and Tommy Joseph combined, or Stanton plus whatever other guys you use in the spots those guys would have been in?
I will take Stanton and whoever is left. It's not like your trading all your prospect depth for a year of Hunter Pence. This is four years of a guy who projects to be one of the best players in baseball. Sure, you're taking some risk. But the Phils are probably gonna stink in a couple years, and none of those guys you'd trade for Stanton are likely to change that. But Stanton might change things.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM
That's all hypothetical of course. There is no way in hell they're actually going to come close to getting him. The Fish aren't dealing him now, and the Phil's would get outbid in five seconds if he was on the block.
But it won't be because the Phils aren't willing to give up some mediocre prospects to get him. That's laughable, especially coming from people on here who defended trading away a bunch of prospects to get Hunter Pence.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 10:06 PM
Jack: I don't dispute that Stanton COULD be a difference maker, but your whole rationale is a little too Pollyannaish for me.
I think your conclusion is a little spotty too. You are operating from the belief that the Phillies will stink in a few years (something you have been saying for like 2 years now), but there is a huge risk in going all in on him.
Stanton could come in and absolutely rake and be worth every thing you gave up. He could come in and get hurt and flame out. He could wilt under the pressure of playing in a big market. Those are three conclusions that could happen and in two of them you basically screwed your future and guaranteed being non-contenders.
Look if it were me as the GM- of course I would be trying to get him. But you would be doing so realizing that you are basically starting over rebuilding the farm system which is something you did just this past season. At some point all that reset button pushing catches up with a team.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 10:12 PM
The art trades mentioned earlier for Stanton were interesting. Maybe a combo of art and players would get it done.
How about the Rocky statue, some artifacts from the Mummers Museum(which would tie in nicely in the Miami stadium and uniforms), MiniMart and D. Young.
I know we would miss the Mummers artifacts, but you gotta give something to get something.
Posted by: Bubba | Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 11:23 PM
TTI: Your points are valid, to a certain extent. But your logical flaw is in equating all three of those scenarios. You're saying there are three possible scenarios, two of them are bad, and therefore it's not worth it to do it. That ignores that those scenarios aren't created equally, either in terms of likelihood or in terms of risk/reward. To me, scenario 1 is more likely to happen than either 2 or 3 (though both are possibilities, obviously), and the reward to 1 happening is bigger than the downside to 2 or 3 (mostly, yes, because I think the Phils are not in a particularly good spot the next couple years whether they have Jesse Biddle and Dom Brown or not). To me, while your points are valid, the calculus still seems fairly obvious. I admit the inputs are subjective. If you have legit worries about Stanton as a player, that's your subjective view, and it may change the calculus for you.
But where were your concerns about the farm system when we dumped three top prospects for Hunter Pence? You weren't worried about the future when we acquired a lesser player with less years of control? Yes, at some point all the reset button pushing *does* catch up. What makes me somewhat question the sincerity of your belief here is that you don't think it already has.
Anyway, this is all moot because it has no chance of happening. Which, one suspects, is why you're saying it would be a bad thing anyway.
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 12:18 AM
Jack: I wasn't a huge fan of the Pence trade for similar reasons. Obviously though Stanton has way more upside than Pence did.
Also, I think there are far more than 3 outcomes of a Stanton trade.
Additionally, I don't think reset button pushing has caught up to us yet. It is close though.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 06:25 AM
TTI, interesting point about the reset button.
I'm not sure it's as close as you think. Do there appear to be any Chase Utleys or Jimmy Rollins in the minors right now?
No, but let's recall a little history:
I distinctly remember the articles on Rollins as he was making his way up the system, and while I will concede he was highly touted, no one was talking about him being a future MVP. And as touted as Utley was, no one was talking about him becoming the second best player in baseball, which is what he was for about 4 - 5 years. For that matter, no one was drooling over Albert Pujols on draft day either as he was passed over by EVERY TEAM IN MLB twelve times - he was picked in the 13th round.
My point is that prospects flame out, andvance slowly, and sometimes make quantum breakouts and get on the radar - sometimes those breakouts stick, sometimes not. Who on this board was talking about Darin Ruf in February last year? No one - not one poster. Who here mentioned Roman Quinn as a possible future SS?
That's not to knock anyone's scouting skills, but even the professional scouts and player development people get it wrong more often than not.
My point simply is that the perception of the Phils prospects could change in one season - grant you, for the good or the bad - so I think it might be a little premature to be talking about reset buttons.
With all the money coming off the books next season, maybe they let Utley walk and make a play for Cano? If one of Ruf or Brown can earn a regular job this Spring that could change things a bit as well.
So let's see. It's going to be fun to watch no matter what happens.
Posted by: rolo | Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 07:45 AM
kind of embarassing that BL has went a full day with this joke of a headline. I feel like i'm on bleacher report.
Posted by: lorecore | Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 09:38 AM
I know it isn't going to happen, but I think if you can get Stanton, you go for it. Getting a guy like him would probably change the FO's whole rebuilding/tooling model.
lorecore: Make a suggestion then. I hate posts like yours.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 09:56 AM