Cliff Lee makes his first spring training start this afternoon in Clearwater against the Tigers, who the Phillies tied 5-5 on Sunday. If the first two games were any sign, Lee will get two innings like Roy Halladay and Cole Hamels.
Phillies vs. Tigers -- TCN, 1:05 p.m.
Hamels and Halladay combined to allow one run and two baserunners in four impressive innings over the weekend. Now it's Lee's turn to shake off the winter rust and finally turn the page on an incredibly unlucky 2012 season.
Lee received 3.2 runs of support per game last season, the fourth-fewest in all of baseball to Josh Johnson, Anibal Sanchez and Jeff Samardzija. He won six games despite registering the second-best K/BB ratio of his career and leading the majors in pretty much every category pertaining to control: walk percentage (3.3%), first-pitch strikes (71.6%, only pitcher over 70%), balls thrown (915 in 3,099 pitches, or 29.5%).
That balls thrown stat is insane. Lee threw 915 and Ross Detwiler was next on the list at 917. But Lee threw 558 more pitches than Detwiler. Among pitchers who threw 3,000 pitches last season, only Lee and Jordan Zimmermann threw fewer than 1,000 balls. (And Zimmermann was at 996, so he barely qualifies.)
Lee has a fun (translation: not fun) defensive alignment behind him. Have a look at the lineup:
1) Yuniesky Betancourt, SS
2) Chase Utley, 2B
3) Michael Young, 3B
4) Ryan Howard, 1B
5) Darin Ruf, LF
6) Carlos Ruiz, DH
7) John Mayberry, RF
8) Erik Kratz, C
9) Michael Martinez, CF
Ben Revere needs days off and these games obviously don't matter, but what more the Phillies can possibly learn about Martinez is beyond anyone's comprehension.
The interesting part of this lineup (vs. LHP Drew Smyly) is Utley batting second. I explain it in further detail here, but suffice it say Utley belongs in the two-hole. He has great career numbers with no outs and a man on first, second or third, and with one out and nobody on. Those are the types of situations he'd face batting second, a spot that best suits a high-OBP run producer like Utley.
It also splits up he and Ryan Howard and creates situations where your best hitter is batting directly behind either Jimmy Rollins or Revere. Though if Michael Young bats third, there will also be at least a half-dozen first-inning GIDPs with no outs and runners on first and third.
A top-four of Revere-Utley-Rollins-Howard would make a lot of sense. Rollins led off an inning 271 times last season. Utley, predominantly batting third, averages 92 such situations per season. That's a 3-to-1 difference that would have Jimmy leading off less and batting with men on more. Also gives you a ton of speed at the top.




Yuniesky and MiniMart in the same lineup, and batting 1st/9th have the chance to bat in the same inning.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM
re: fangrpahs top phillies prospects
Good to see some optimistic views on Austin Wright. 6'4 230lb lefties with mid 90s fastballs don't grow on trees. Excited to see if he can make the jump to AA with success as a starter.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 10:52 AM
Can't wait to see Mini-mart and Yuni bat back to back! It's like the return of the Bash Brothers!
Posted by: jbird | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 10:53 AM
Is Brown hurt? Why is he not playing two days in a row?
Posted by: Reverend | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 10:56 AM
MLB odds came out today:
Every sports book has the Phils right around 83-84 wins with the 'Over' at pretty negative odds and the 'Under' at Even.
I really like the 83.5 as an over but the payout outs suck at -130. If that was -115 or -110, I would be all over it. Need to look around a bit more.
I have seen the Phils as low as 15:1 to win the WS and as high as 20:1. Basically between 8-12.
Personally I would have set it at 84.5/85 but they would have had to make the 'Over' with a slightly weaker negative payout to attract money. If this team can get out of the gate entirely healthy, I think they are a 86-90 win team.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM
I think the splitting of Utley and Howard is a must now. I know some people think that Young needs to hit 5 to protect Howard but does he really strike any fear in anyone to come after Howard? Put him 3 and hope he has something left and will see some pitches to hit.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM
Reverand, lefty on the mound today which is why Mayberry gets the start. But really if there is ever a time for Domonic to learn to hit lefties it is now in the spring. I guess they really are just hoping for a platoon with Brown and Mayberry.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:00 AM
Reverend - It's a LH starter (Smyly) and Mayberry has yet to start a game. That's all.
What I don't understand is why this team continues to insist that MiniMart is an OF. Even a Jr. High coach could want him catch fungoes and know within 15-20 minutes he has no business in the OF.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:02 AM
Hopefully Young can field a couple balls cleanly today. That would be fun.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:04 AM
Mini Mart is easily the worst defensive CF I have ever seen. He simply has no idea out there as he's never played the position prior to coming to Philly. Hell, he probably never even played it in a pickup game before UC decided to throw him out there.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:06 AM
I know Revere isn't necessarily the guy you would want leading off but a top of the order of Revere-Utley-Rollins-Howard is kind of intriguing (even though I think Rollins has poor numbers out of the 3 spot- can't confirm that on my phone though).
Revere's speed and Utley's patience could really put pressure on pitchers early in the game and you might be able to jump out to a lot of early 1-0, 2-0 leads. Plus Ruiz in the 5 hole you would take some pressure off Brown and Ruf as they would have Michael Young to mix in there as well.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Smart to give JRoll a limited number of starts and innings before the WBC.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM
Corey, I disagree with your top 4.
Rollins has historically been awful in the 3-hole: .241/.301/.316, 383 PA
OTOH, in a linited sample size batting 6th: .344/.364/.456, 129 PA
Please read my moniker. All are free to join...
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:08 AM
I understand that a lefty is starting but to have Martinez out there in center is a slap in the face. Or maybe they are trying to send a message to all the players who are trying to make the team out of ST that no matter how bad you suck there is still a chance you can do it.
Why not put the rule 5 kid out there and see what he can do? Why not Savery, he can play 1B and pitch, why not see if he can play center? Find out how versatile he really is.
Posted by: Reverend | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:11 AM
TTI - He does. .241/.301/.316 (.617 OPS) with 1 HR with 30 BBs/46 Ks in 383 PAs in 86 GS.
Ideally JRoll would hit 6th in this lineup at this point and would have done so the past year or two (moderate AVG/OBP & power with some speed).
He's going to bat leadoff and Utley/Howard will hit 3rd/4th. Cholly is too much of a stubborn codger to change at this point.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM
Corey:
Revere
MYoung
Utley
Howard
Ruf/RFD/Brown/Nix
Rollins
Chooch
Brown/Nix/Ruf/RFD
(IMHO, Chooch should bat 6th - .322/.428/.486, 173 PA, or 7th - .308/.376/.466, 623 PA.)
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:13 AM
I never want to see Yuni and Mini-Mart batting back to back. EVER!
Posted by: Scotch Man | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:16 AM
I tried to post this about 5 times last week but it never went through. When Manuel was talking about Rollins last week and how people undervalue him etc. he said that Jimmy drives the ball and brings runners in. Isn't that what you want hitting 5/6 and not 1? Everything he was saying about Jimmy contradicting having him hitting leadoff.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM
I don't care that minimart is in CF today. He's not on the 40-man, and he's not coming North, except for a trip to Allentown, where, hopefully, he'll spend the entire summer. Unless, of course, RAJ has another seizure that causes him to becomes delusional agains and think minimart belongs on an MLB roster.
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM
I wouldn't worry about Mini Mart in center. The Phillies are just showcasing his goods so they can trade him to the Yankees who now have a need there.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM
"Why not put the rule 5 kid out there and see what he can do?"
This.
Though as I previously posted, I really don't care about the 3rd ST game.
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM
Mini Mart should be batting 10th.
Posted by: denny b. | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM
TTI - If the Phils go Revere & Utley, I would rather see Chooch hit 3rd in front of Howard.
Break up the LH but more importantly but 2 relatively high OBP guys directly in front of Howard.
Howard has much better numbers when a man is on base even the last few years:
Man on/Nobody on
2012: .773 OPS/.660 OPS
2011: .898 OPS/.771 OPS
2010: .877 OPS/.839 OPS
2009: .968 OPS/.896 OPS
2008: 1.044 OPS/.723 OPS
I would be curious to see a more detailed analysis but I would imagine that the two main factors in play are:
1. Teams can't put the extreme infield shift (and sometimes OF shift) they do against Howard
2. Howard sees a slightly higher % of 4-seam fastball overall with a man on
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:22 AM
MG, clutchness.
It's all clutchness.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:25 AM
MG dropping knowledge like Mini Mart drops fly balls.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:25 AM
Fielder/Cabrera: punch
Mini/Yuni: counterpunch
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:26 AM
I really don't see it happening but I think Revere should be the leadoff man with Rollins batting 3rd while Chooch is out. I do not think Michael Young should consistently be at the beginning of the lineup but we all know Manuel will bat Rollins leadoff and not split up Utley and Howard.
Posted by: AlexRosie | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Imagine that Young is going to be penciled into the No. 2 spot too. Where he has spent most of his career and in the past where he said he feels most comfortable hitting.
The issue with his is that unless he hits at least .285-.290 or better, his OBP isn't great because he doesn't take that many BBs either.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM
Iceman, Mini/Yuni are more of a gut-punch, possibly a crotch-punch.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM
Once Chooch is back, I imagine the lineup will
JRoll
MYoung
Utley
Howard
Chooch
Brown
LF
Revere
Given how every NL team now plays the shift against Howard in the INF (and some even do in the OF), I wish the Phils would put two of their higher OBP guys directly in front of him.
That would be Utley & Chooch.
Utley
Chooch
Howard
Build the rest of the lineup around that by helping Howard a bit and take advantage of what is by far the best power hitter this team has. I hope we don't see that many solo shots from Howard this year but I have a feeling we might with JRoll/MYoung in the 1/2 spots.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:34 AM
More of a fallacy: A pitcher's career stats against a specific team over the years or a batter's splits in a specific position batting order?
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:34 AM
i'll add a third: A pitcher's performance based on this position of the sun.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:35 AM
The Chooch ones are especially worthless given that he was moved up in the order because he was hitting well, he didnt hit well because he was moved up.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM
lorecore - Probably the later but what you can tease out if just how comfortable a hitter feels mentally in a certain spot. It probably doesn't make that much difference on their stats but I do think it is something that has to be considered too.
Pitchers owning certain teams largely just depends on if they have good stats against certain hitters. If those hitters aren't on the team anymore or his impressive numbers were several years ago against that team, it means essentially nothing.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:39 AM
lorecore - There is definitely a difference between day/night splits. I just haven't seen a through analysis to see if there is anything to it in regards to certain pitchers who more effective at day/night due to their pitches/release point/etc.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM
"it splits up he" ?!?!? jeebus.
Posted by: Jelltzian | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM
I will concede that like everything, there are outliers. Jamie Moyer vs Marlins immediately comes to mind.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM
I think the major takeaway about how a hitter performs in a certain order is that typically each spot in the order serves a certain role which welcomes a particular approach.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM
"Mini Mart is easily the worst defensive CF I have ever seen."
If you can get a bat like Mini-Mart's into the lineup, it's worth the drop-off in defense.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM
Love MG's idea of Ruiz third and it's been my preferred lineup idea for the last two years.
Despite claims to the contrary, Manuel has tried to split up the lefties before- with Pence, at the end of the 2011 season. It failed miserably not because it was a bad idea, but because Pence the hacker was the wrong guy to put in the #3-hole. He doesn't belong there.
Ruiz would be a great 2 or 3 hitter because he's shown the ability to hit for average and get on base. That's a rarity in this lineup. Cholly will never do it of course, not just because he has been scared off from splitting the lefties, but because he has this stupid idea that if a runner isn't fast, he shouldn't be at the top of the lineup. It's kind of baffling how many dumb, outdated ideas Manuel subscribes to (for this reason, Amaro should love him).
The best lineup, when healthy, would be (taking the 'Revere bats 9th fantasy out of the equation):
Rollins
Utley
Ruiz
Howard
M Young
Brown
Rufberry/D Young
Revere
P
Ideally Brown would hit fifth, but until he shows more he hasn't earned that yet.
And please save the 'Ruiz can't hit without Adderall' argument.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:45 AM
mg: disagree. The lighting in MLB stadiums is pretty good in 2013. And if your argument is day time creates shadows/altered visability... then it would for every pitcher, not just certain ones.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:45 AM
Utley's skills make him such a perfect fit in the two-hole. High on-base guy and your best natural hitter. Why not put him in the most important lineup spot?
Jimmy makes the most sense batting third, too, the spot that sees the fewest plate appearances leading off an inning. Good spot for a low-OBP, high-SLG guy.
Also gives you a ton of speed to play with at the top of the order. And, of course, splits up the lefties.
Posted by: Corey Seidman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:46 AM
I'm ready for the Charlie era to end. You just know we're gonna see Rollins hitting leadoff all season and a healthy smattering of Martinez and Nix. JRoll is no longer a leadoff batter.
Posted by: Todd | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:47 AM
Revere in the 8hole is such a bad idea to me. Talk about cancelling the guy out. Revere can bunt single and steal all the way to third...all so the pitcher can hit something weak/strikeout?
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:47 AM
Corey, I thought Jimmy was going to thrive in the 3-hole last year given his skill-set. Boy was I wrong. He has said though that he isn't hung up on hitting leadoff anymore. Did he want to be hitting leadoff when he underperformed in the 3-hole last year? Was that part of his struggles?
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Hamels day/night split difference really has diminished the last 2 years.
What hasn't though is that Hamels is a notably better pitcher at CBP which is kind odd given his tendency to give up HRs in what is a HR-friendly ball park. It wasn't as notable a split last year for the first time in his career.
If Hamels is pitching at CBP at night, he's pretty damn good and I have made nice coin the past few years betting on the Phils depending upon the odds/matchups.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:49 AM
Exactly lorecore. It is pointless to have Revere hitting 8th. He can't drive anyone in down there (unless he singles home someone) and his baserunning bonuses are marginalized. He has to hit leadoff. That's really all there is to it. Or he has to hit 9 with the pitcher 8. That isn't going to happen. So our best bet is Charlie hits him leadoff.
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:49 AM
If D young is on the team, then 1 of Brown/Ruf/Mayberry is not. Signs point to Ruf since he's RH and has options to the minors.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM
Random question: Are there any good baseball radio shows to stream online?
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:51 AM
lorecore - I went back and looked quickly at the last 5 years and MLB numbers at equal or slightly better at night than during the day.
Curious to a more detailed look at those numbers over time.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:53 AM
MG: Hamels day/night split difference really has diminished
the last 2 yearsas his career IP increase to a larger sample.Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:53 AM
"Iceman, Mini/Yuni are more of a gut-punch, possibly a crotch-punch."
Fatti, are you referring to this:
http://www.filmjunk.com/images/weblog/top10stoner_8.jpg
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM
Shouldn't day games create more offense generally, in part due to warmer game time temperatures?
Posted by: jbird | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:57 AM
lorecore- But the home/away split didn't. The reason I always thought that split existed in part is because Hamels has said before that he is very much a creature of habit with his daily regimen during the season and that it was a bit more difficult on the road to stick to it.
Posted by: MG | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM
What scares me about today's lineup is that I could totally see Cholly batting Betancourt leadoff in a real game.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM
lorecore: Why Brown/Mayberry/Ruf and not Nix. I feel that if there will be an odd man out when Delmon Young is back it will be Nix.
Posted by: AlexRosie | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:05 PM
If Revere can become a better hitter, then he starts to give you a wonderful "dilemma" of how to adjust the best lineup.
I exepct him to improve, but the fact remains that the 2011-2012 verison of Ben Revere is not a better leadoff hitter than Jimmy Rollins.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:16 PM
Alex: Nix is a capable fielder at both corner OF positions, bats LH, and has a guaranteed money. I think he would stay if Young returns.
The best choice is obviously: Don't let Young return in the first place.
But after that, there are varying opinions of who should be the odd man out, and without any performance to go of off at this point in time, I think Ruf would be the likely choice.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM
Seidman: "Though if Michael Young bats third, there will also be at least a half-dozen first-inning GIDPs with no outs and runners on first and third."
So you're telling me Michael Young will be an RBI machine?
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:24 PM
lorecore- if Revere shouldn't hit 8th then where should he hit? He's a singles hitter with an average OBP. If/until he bumps his OBP up to .340-.350, he should be at the bottom of the order.
Ideally he gets on with one or no outs and either steals and is bunted to third, or steals to prevent a double play and get in scoring position for Rollins.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM
Why not just move Howard to 5?
Posted by: Kevin | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:31 PM
Until Delmon Young returns from the DL,its a moot point. Ruf will almost certainly make the team unless he has 20 errors in LF this Spring (sadly a possibility).
Hitting Revere 8th is a complete waste because UC will almost automatically bunt him over which negates his speed completely. Bat him 7th at least.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:32 PM
Shouldn't day games create more offense generally, in part due to warmer game time temperatures?
Posted by: jbird | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Not if all of the players are hung over from the night before...
Posted by: nonamePHame | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:32 PM
***Why not just move Howard to 5? ***
Howard bats 4th and will do so until UC is gone. That's why.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Revere should bat 9th until his OBP improves.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:37 PM
Revere will likely have a higher OBP than our actual leadoff hitter in 2013 if Rollins continues his trend of diminishing OBP skills.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:39 PM
Baseball Musings lineup analysis suggests that batting Ruiz 3rd is a terrible idea. Third is a good place for one of your weaker hitters, although one with mild power.
Ruiz should bat leadoff or second. When Delmon starts, he'd be perfect for 3rd.
Posted by: clout | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:41 PM
NEPP, be that as it may, I'll take the slight hit in OBP from Revere to Rollins to be offset by the probably 80 point increase in slugging that Rollins provides.
Mind you, Rollins isn't a good leadoff hitter, but unless Revere can get his OBP above .340, Rollins is probably a better leadoff hitter than Revere.
Now if Rollins OBP dips below .300, we'll talk.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:41 PM
Fata: Revere should indeed bat 9th, behind the pitcher.
Posted by: clout | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM
What skills do you value in Rollins more? His ability to drive the ball or get on base?
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:43 PM
Rollins is walking much better in recent yeras, sadly his avg has been dropping moreso. I can't whine about his crappy BABIP recently either, because its his own fault he has the most infield flies in the entire league over the past two years.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:48 PM
I'm making a leap of faith that Ben Revere will add .10 to .15 points to his OBP in 2013. Based on that leap of faith, plus my long-held desire to get Rollins out of the lead-off spot, I'm taking the view that Revere should bat leadoff.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:50 PM
I want to see more of Enciarte. Few times I've seen him he's had a good eye at the plate and we know he can cover it in CF. I think he's a darkhorse to make the team.
Posted by: Nik | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:50 PM
Nik, fortunately, they have another month to decide about Inciarte.
Worst case is that they have to offer him back.
Actually, worst case is Revere gets injured and Inciarte makes the opening day roster as the starting CF. He's never played above high-A ball so he's probably not MLB ready.
Darkhorse? Only if he magically starts tearing the cover off the ball.
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 12:59 PM
"Actually, worst case is Revere gets injured and Inciarte makes the opening day roster as the starting CF. He's never played above high-A ball so he's probably not MLB ready."
If your hypothetical doesn't include Mini-Mart in the starting lineup, it doesn't qualify as the worst case scenario.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:07 PM
While there is a small marginal value in maximizing your order by lineup spot, the much more important step would simply be to put your best hitters in the first few spots.
Once you've done that, then you can tinker and try and maximize the value of the order. But whatever best order you put your 2-3-4 hitters probably provides less positive value than the decision to, say, hit Ben Revere leadoff and Carlos Ruiz 6th would provide negative value over the course of the season.
I'd say 80% of lineup construction is just that--putting your best hitters at the top of the lineup. The rest is tinkering at the margins.
Posted by: Jack | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:11 PM
Very nice play by Utley there... ranging to his left, going to the ground, jumping up to get Torii Hunter.
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:12 PM
Cliff walks the third batter he faces.
Season = over
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:13 PM
"If your hypothetical doesn't include Mini-Mart in the starting lineup, it doesn't qualify as the worst case scenario."
bap, I stand corrected.
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:13 PM
Well, here we go.
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:16 PM
So... is Betancourt competing for the utility IF role with Galvis and Mini Mart?
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:20 PM
Wow, what a surprise!
Utley tried to pull a ball on the outer half.
If he had ever learned to go the other way he could have hit .400. :)
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:22 PM
KAS, mini is no longer on the 40-man.
I suspect an Act of God could get him a spot on the 25-man, and it would probably take that.
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:23 PM
I absolutely love the way they made teh pitcher work that inning.
Posted by: rolo, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:24 PM
... was Victor Martinez pitching?
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:25 PM
***I absolutely love the way they made teh pitcher work that inning.***
How many pitches? 7?
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:30 PM
Howard pulled a ball against a lefty through the shift for a base hit.
Optimist: Hit against a lefty!
Pessimist: Ground ball into the shift against a lefty.
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:33 PM
With his speed, Howard should be hitting the ball on the ground and legging them out.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:35 PM
How are you guys watching this? No one works?
Posted by: Joe D | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:36 PM
How long will Ruf have to stink up the joint in ST before BAP bails on him? Will the betrayal come before clout day? I say yes.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:37 PM
Joe D: Sometimes it pays to be the boss :-)
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:38 PM
I'm a consultant, and even if I was at a client site, I'd probably have the TWC streaming the MLB Network feed on the browser.
Back to important things, seems everybody is wanting to test their swings early, that last inning seemed to go 7-8 pitches as well. Howard saw a few, Ruf DP'd like the 2nd pitch, as did Ruiz.
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:38 PM
rolo: As it happens, RAJ says that the reason he traded Schwimer was because they need the space on the 40-man roster. Lest you needed any more reason to hate that trade: it could be the impetus for adding Mini-mart back to the 40-man roster.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:39 PM
Not to jump on the spring training nit-picking bandwagon, but what could they possibly need to see from Tyler Cloyd at this point to throw him against the Tigers starters? Don't they have one of the younger relievers due to throw today that they could put out there to face this type of competition?
All anyone needed to see was Cloyd's first MLB start last year to know that he's not going to be anything more than a fringe starter at best. Let him school the AAAA guys, which is what he'll be doing most of the year (barring an injury) and give someone who has a shot at making the roster an opportunity to make an impression against Detroit's starting lineup.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:41 PM
Iceman: I won't bail on him based on spring training performance. But I'll certainly be concerned that the Phillies will bail on him.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:43 PM
Iceman: Really? 33 innings is enough to make a declaration on a pitcher? That doesn't make any sense at all.
Who is this team's 6th starter this year?
Posted by: Kendrick Appreciation Society | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:47 PM
KAS- it shouldn't be Cloyd. I'd like to see them give Pettibone a chance.
I'm usually all for giving guys more of a rope than just a few outings. But the writing is on the wall with Cloyd.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:52 PM
Tyler Cloyd is Org Filler...moving on.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:52 PM
Cook and Pettibone are probably above Cloyd on the depth chart.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:52 PM
I wanted to give Ethan Martin a chance last year in Sept for God's sake. I'm all for letting guys try and fail repeatedly, as long as they have the stuff there that, if they ever do figure it out, will play at the MLB level. Aumont comes to mind as a guy that hasn't 'figured it out,' but has the stuff to be dominant if/when he does- so I think he should get extended looks on the big-league team.
Cloyd has basically figured out how to pitch. It's his stuff that's the problem.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, February 25, 2013 at 01:58 PM