In an interview Sunday on Comcast SportsNet's SportsNite Phillies GM Ruben Amaro Jr. said that the team is looking to add a "low-risk, high-reward starter" to increase competition in the back-end of the rotation.
Plenty of these guys are out there. They all come with flaws, but so does Tyler Cloyd, who was 15-1 with a 2.26 ERA in the minors last season but struggled to keep the ball in the park when he got to the majors (8 HR in 33 IP). Cloyd's stuff might not play at this level and the Phillies need to at least give a free agent starting pitcher the chance to beat him out in spring training.
Here are some guys that fit the "high-reward" description, though they come with varying risk levels:
• Jair Jurrjens - A surprise non-tender by the Braves, Jurrjens is just a season removed from going 13-6 with a 2.96 ERA. He was terrible in 2012 and spent most of the year in Triple A. He comes with injury risks, but when he's on he generates a ton of ground balls. He's killed the Phillies in his career (.201 opponents' batting average, 2.11 ERA at Citizens Bank Park). Get him on a cheap one- or two-year deal and it may pay dividends.
• Shaun Marcum - A bit more of a risk just because he's always hurt and he's due to make more money than anyone on this list. Marcum has one of the best righthanded changeups in baseball and is more of a No. 3 starter than a No. 4/5. He'd be a luxury, but the Phillies do have about $20 million more to spend. Over this last four seasons, Marcum has a 3.57 ERA and a 1.18 WHIP.
• Carlos Villanueva - The most unheralded name of this bunch, Villanueva has been a successful swingman for several seasons. He can start or reliever, strike batters out, has good command and he misses bats. His swinging-strike rate was over 10 percent last season. You probably remember Villanueva from all the games he stifled the Phillies. Another pitcher with a strong changeup. Villanueva would be a solid No. 5.
• Erik Bedard/Dallas Braden - Over the last two seasons, Braden has made three starts and had two shoulder surgeries. The year before, though, he went 11-14 with a 3.50 ERA and walked just 43 batters in 192 innings. He also threw a perfect game.
Bedard is always hurt and last year was the worst of his career. He went 7-14 with a 5.01 ERA and was released by the Pirates. But he did have nine fairly dominant starts, including one against the Phillies on Opening Day.
• Daisuke Matsuzaka/Rich Harden/Jonathan Sanchez - Stay far, far, far away.




I like Zolecki's predicted opening day lineups...
vs. RHP
Jimmy Rollins, SS
Michael Young, 3B
Chase Utley, 2B
Ryan Howard, 1B
Laynce Nix, LF
Domonic Brown, RF
Erik Kratz, C
Ben Revere, CF
vs. LHP
Jimmy Rollins, SS
Michael Young, 3B
Chase Utley, 2B
Ryan Howard, 1B
John Mayberry Jr., RF
Darin Ruf, LF
Erik Kratz, C
Ben Revere, CF
Posted by: Cyclic | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 07:55 PM
>> "Right now tcans oils win maybe 84-85 games. Need another bat, & pitching help."
Ya, but they're set in the field, having long been known for their slick infield defense.
Posted by: Unikruk | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 07:56 PM
Unikruk: No worries. Having an "elite" CF makes up for all defensive deficiencies at all other positions.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 07:59 PM
Phils will face RHP James Shields on Opening Day.
Posted by: lorecore | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:06 PM
Tcans oil > Mini Mart
Posted by: norbertods | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:07 PM
Awesome story, the Dodgers are looking to extend Kershaw...so they basically have unlimited money if that's the case.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:11 PM
Phils will face RHP James Shields on Opening Day.
0-1.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:12 PM
NEPP: you were still doubting that before the Kershaw news?
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:17 PM
Depends...is Hamels getting the nod or are we going with Doc because he's the "Ace" of the squad?
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:17 PM
***you were still doubting that before the Kershaw news?***
Well, they had floated that $220 Million number...signing Kershaw (assuming he gets an AAV in the $20-25 million range like he's probably worth) would put them around $235 Million.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:18 PM
Depends...is Hamels getting the nod or are we going with Doc because he's the "Ace" of the squad?
Ah, the difference between losing 3-2 or 6-2.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:30 PM
I like how Roy Halladay has now become an object of ridicule. Seriously, the guy sucks and is a total a$$hole, I hear. Plus he sucks and is washed up. Like this whole team. Sucky washed up sucksters. You SUCK Halladay!!!!
Posted by: Michael Martinez's Tools | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:33 PM
So, if Greinke gets $24+ million AAV, does Clayton Kershaw get $30 million?
ERA+ 2010-2012:
Kershaw: 148
Greinke: 106
WHIP 2010-2012:
Kershaw: 1.055
Greinke: 1.215
ERA 2010-2012:
Kershaw: 2.56
Greinke: 3.83
Granted its an extension instead of a FA deal but Kershaw is 25 and basically the best pitcher in baseball. And he's not even in his peak yet.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:36 PM
If the Dodgers keep this up, the Yankees will soon be complaining about teams trying to buy championships.
Posted by: Dragon | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:36 PM
Its not ridicule to say a younger Cole Hamels might be a better option to Halladay at this point.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:36 PM
air quote "Ace" signifies ridicule in my book. And my book is hollowed out to store weed that makes me smarter than everyone here.
Posted by: Michael Martinez's Tools | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:38 PM
And my comment was meant to be more of a cut on the lack of offense than on Halladay's newfound tendency to melt down like a Russian nuclear device when the sun comes out.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:40 PM
Then you're an idiot and you should probably work on that.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:40 PM
why don't "you" work on it, Ace.
Posted by: Michael Martinez's Tools | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:41 PM
I've tried. Living in Philly keeps me stoopid.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:42 PM
I'm not the idiot...or the troll.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:42 PM
Wasn't talking to you, GTown.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:42 PM
I know. Trying to lighten the mood. Failing.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:44 PM
Doc will start Opening Day and hopefully his shoulder is 100% after a full winter of rest. Even at Age 36, he should still be a solid option.
I really hope we dont get a BS story in Spring Training again about his velocity if there are issues.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:46 PM
I construed NEPP's use of the word "ace" to be a term of mild ridicule, but I understood Cholly, not Halladay, to be the object of that ridicule.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:47 PM
Well bap, that's because you actually post here regularly and know that was my intent.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:48 PM
The Phillies, by the way, open the season against Atlanta, not KC. They face the Royals in their 2nd series.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:54 PM
That's true, bap...as that KC game is our 4th game in 5 days, its probable that Kyle Kendrick will start the Home Opener.
Or mystery pitcher that Rube signs if its actually a 3/4 starter instead.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 08:58 PM
The Phillies, by the way, open the season against Atlanta, not KC. They face the Royals in their 2nd series.
0-4
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 09:15 PM
and a decent pitching prospect in Bonilla
_______________________________________
a decent "fungible reliever" pitching prospect in Bonilla
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 09:16 PM
'Tools' summed up his negativity a lot more coherently than GTown and the rest of the BL doomsday toolshed ever have.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 09:32 PM
"Obligatory "awh thinks Michael Young = Hank Aaron" post"
No, Cyclic, just pointing out that even HOF players have bad years late in their careers, so why would we expect it from someone like Young.
You needn't be a douche, you know.
Posted by: awh | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 09:32 PM
Jack- you'll probably rip me for this, but I've got Young and Revere giving us 1.5-2 WAR more, combined, than what we got from the pu pu platter at third and Vic/Mayberry, etc in CF. We'll see how it shakes out.
Either way, even the best case scenario is only an incremental gain over what we had at those positions to begin with- I don't think anyone would argue otherwise. That's sort of the reason it was so cheap to make the moves. Instead of shooting the salary cap wad on Upton/Youk, and cheaping out on corner OF/bullpen, Amaro clearly feels that gains can be made elsewhere that would be a smarter use of available assets. Two of the places that could have the biggest increase in production- Halladay and Howard- are already on the team. The other two are corner OF and bullpen. Those additions have yet to be made. So it's kind of foolish to judge the incremental moves now before the other shoe(s) drop, because that's supposedly what the money is being saved for and where production can be increased the most through FA. But you're going to believe what you want to believe.
The amazing thing to me, looking at the cumulative production position by position, was looking at how good the Phils were at 2B. Felt like Utley was out 3/4 of the year, and he still had them in the top 5-10 in production at the position. Amazing.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 09:50 PM
I know people are being sarcastic and/or stupid, but the truth is that Halladay does have a moderate form of heat illness and that simply doesn't disappear. They're going to have to be wary of pitching him in day games when the heat and humidity are high. It should become standard procedure to move him back a day to avoid those conditions.
Posted by: aksmith | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:01 PM
Re: The Royals trade. People are calling Wade Davis a reliever because he was in the bullpen last season. In fact, the Royals will use him as a starter and he's not a bad #4. So they get two MLB starters for 4 prospects, two of whom are longshots.
The best prospect in the deal is Wil Myers, the most highly touted Royals hitting prospect since Alex Gordon. But it took Gordon 5 years to become the player scouts projected. How long will it take 22-year-old Myers?
While this deal smells of desperation and I nwouldn't have done it, I don't think it's quite the lopsided disaster it's being portrayed as.
Posted by: clout | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:08 PM
Last year the Phillies were in the playoff hunt into mid September and then finished 7 out of the playoff spot.
That despite: having Utley for only 83 games, Howard for 71, Victorino having a down year, and losing Lee for a little, Halladay being a shell of himself after April, a bullpen that imploded regularly, and guys in Mayberry and Wigginton that saw 441 and 315 at bats a piece and combined for an OPS just above .300
Is it really that far fetched that people believe if Howard and Utley play more and Halladay returns to form that this team wins more games? Why is that a crazy thought?
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM
TTI, you forgot Worley's trip to the DL and him pitching to a 4.75 ERA until he got shut down for surgery.
There were other things too.
Point: Just about everything that could have gone wrong for the Phillies last season went wrong.
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:37 PM
TTI-
"Last year the Phillies were in the playoff hunt into mid September and then finished 7 out of the playoff spot. "
That must be incorrect, I read , right here on BL, season=over every day from July 4th on.
Posted by: Bubba | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:41 PM
TTI- all that will be canceled out by Ruiz missing 25 games, and other guys getting hurt and stuff.
Besides, it's not like their record improved in the second half of the season or anything.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:44 PM
Iceman, yep!
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM
Surely you jest, Bubba, as the season had been declared over on this site since at least the previous Winter Meetings.
Posted by: Unikruk | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:01 PM
Unikruk- I stand corrected.
Posted by: Bubba | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:06 PM
If guys like Correia are getting $5/year and that is the floor apparently for a 4th/5th starter, the Phila are looking at table scraps if they are only going to spend $2-3m on a base of a 'low-risk' high reward starter as Amaro described.
Posted by: MG | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:42 PM
Where did Amaro say they are only spending $2-3 million?
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:47 PM
MG, surprised you didn't say anything about your boy Grilli. What do you think of his deal?
Personally I can't believe he got more than Uehara in years and guaranteed money. Uehara must've really wanted to pitch in Boston.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:50 PM
Season = over last year at the ASB. As well as the Phils played through Memorial Day at a few games above .500 and after the ASB, they collapsed for 6 weeks starting in early June.
Basically what could go wrong though did last year. Why I am cautiously optimistic about this team next year although the Nats are the clear favorites right now and probably will be regardless of what the Phils do for the remainder of the offseason.
Posted by: MG | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:52 PM
Iceman - glad for grilli and wasn't surprised he turned down a bit more money supposedly to stay in Pittsburgh instead of heading to Toronto or Chicago (Cubs).
What did he sign for?
I'm surprised Uehara wanted to head to Boston given that he has no apparent ties there & it's hard to see them being a playoff contender.
Posted by: MG | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:56 PM
Zolecki has Nix batting 5th against RHP? Now excuse me if I don't adhere to traditional thinking, but I don't give a hoot about handedness if it means Nix is getting the majority of the at bats in left. I'd much rather just throw Ruf and Brown out there every day in left and right respectively, and see if they can keep up rather than throw a scrub like Nix out there. Of course this is all moot if Ruben picks up another outfielder like everyone expects. But still, given this current team, do people agree with Zolecki and having Nix bat 5th against RHers?
Posted by: socks_optional | Monday, December 10, 2012 at 11:56 PM
Grilli's deal is a really nice singing for the Pirates. Got a discount and a setup caliber reliever for less than $3.5m/year when others have already gotten $6.
Posted by: MG | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 12:07 AM
Socks-
I have a feeling that Nix' number of Ab's are probably more dependent on Ruf and/or Brown not hitting than on his own performance.
Posted by: Bubba | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 12:15 AM
Grilli was actually amazingly good last year and quite good in 2011, as well. But he's 36, the quintessential journeyman, and has struggled with his control throughout his career. He strikes me as the classic case of the "fungible" good stuff/erratic command reliever who managed to harness his command long enough to put together a couple of really nice years, but who will likely come crashing back to earth pretty hard next year.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 01:07 AM
If I'm buying insurance that will help me if one or the other of the Howard/Utley tandem fails to come through, I'm buying "Hamilton Mutual." Think about it, who else is out there that would be a difference-maker who would get us into the postseason should Howard or Utley or Halladay, for that matter, fail to return to normal. The only guy is Josh Hamilton. Spend the money, Ruben!
Posted by: Dragon | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 02:39 AM
Where did Amaro say they are only spending $2-3 million?
____________________________________________
He didn't. MG is just making things up again. I am starting to think he might be DPat's source.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 06:12 AM
norbertods was right on the money. If there ever was a BL meet-up, Iceman and TTI would just be hovering around MG, waiting for him to say anything, and then jumping all over him.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 06:49 AM
Hopefully MG knows we're just messing around with him. He's one of the most knowledgeable posters on BL. Sometimes he says some weird stuff.
Apparently the Phils were discussing Worley for Asdrubal Cabrera "and prospects." Ugh.
Posted by: Iceman | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 07:54 AM
Yeah I mean clearly I made a joke about it with the DPat stuff.
I contacted MG and wrote an article with him so I have some level of affinity for his thoughts. I think sometimes he goes overboard in what he says and sometimes think he fires up his complaint meter based off something he thinks might happen. And those were things I said when I talked with him over the phone too so it is not as if I haven't said it to him personally.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 08:00 AM
MG does have some good posts, but frankly, a lot of what he types is pure speculation on his part, the "2-3 MM" being one example thereof.
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 08:42 AM
Article on the Phils newest addition:
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/12/10/12/Young-ready-for-fresh-start-with-Philade/landing_rangers.html?blockID=833529&feedID=3582
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 08:46 AM
Apparently the Phils were discussing Worley for Asdrubal Cabrera "and prospects." Ugh.
Ugh? Carbrera's nice player. Or were you saying "Ugh, we could have had Cabrera instead of Young and Revere".
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 08:51 AM
Oh, I know that MG puts some weird stuff out there. I've called him out on a thing or two myself. It just seems that every time I hop on BL, there's a "battle" between MG and TTI/Iceman.
Not that that's a bad thing. Every site needs its hook. Just like clockwork these days.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 08:59 AM
"Or were you saying "Ugh, we could have had Cabrera instead of Young and Revere".
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
Posted by: Iceman | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 09:00 AM
Iceman, where did you here that?
I would have done that trade too. My guess is that it's CLE that wouldn't pull the trigger. Maybe they thought they had a better offer elsewhere?
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 09:10 AM
awh: I saw it on buster olney's twitter link. I must say, I second iceman's ugh.
Posted by: norbertods | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 09:15 AM
From MLBTR:
"In a separate piece, Gelb writes that the Phillies figure to sign one of Cody Ross, Nick Swisher and Josh Hamilton to fill a corner vacancy. They've long coveted Ross, but aren't as big on Swisher, perhaps due to his price tag. Gelb notes that the Phillies could offer Hamilton a shorter-term deal with a high annual value if his demands decrease."
So they're OK to sign Hamitlon at big dollars, but not Swisher, who's been marginally less valuable over the last two years than Hamilton, and comes with significantly less injury and "other" question marks. I'd rather spend $15 M on Swisher any day of the week than $25 on Hamilton. That's not even question.
And unless Ross is coming here for basically nothing, I'd rather spend the money on Swisher. It just baffles me that the Phillies would be this sour on Swisher (if they actually are).
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 09:27 AM
What does "figure" to sign mean?
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 09:38 AM
Fatalotti: Thanks for the post. I really, really, REALLY hope the Phils do not sign Ross. I think that would be a huge mistake, even if he signs for peanuts. I think Swisher is the better fit. Of course, Hamilton is far and away the best player of the three -- but at what cost?
I'm good with Swisher. Ok with Hamilton. 100% against Ross.
So, look for the Phils to sign Cody Ross to 4/$55M in the next day or two.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 09:48 AM
Awh...re: Asdrubal Cabrera.....the article that Olney links says the Phil's offered Worley and two prospects. Didn't say who they were. The Indians asked them to sweeten the deal and they declined. Said they wanted Cabrera to play 3rd.
Posted by: Mike G | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:00 AM
What does "figure" to sign mean?
Jethro Bodine called it "cipherin'"?
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:03 AM
Swisher is the best option, but I'll slowly warm to Ross provided they don't pay close to what Swisher would have cost and then fail to use any savings to upgrade the lost rotation spot.
I was thinking again how Soriano was a good low risk option. 3-year averages.
Soriano (37): .255/.312/.489 -- 113 OPS+ -- average 145 games, 27 HR
Ross (32): .260/.324/.434 -- 105 OPS+ -- average 135 games, 17 HR
Swisher (32): .274/.366/.478 -- 125 OPS+ -- average 149, 25 HR
The difference between Ross and Soriano may be closer than that, and Ross can play all OF positions. And Soriano turns 37 in a month. Swisher just seems to be far and away the best player unless Ross builds on 2012 (where he had enormous home/road splits -- he OPSed under .700 away from Fenway).
I'd honestly prefer Soriano to Ross.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:04 AM
Yeah, Sophist, I was wondering that myself. Weird terminology.
I think he means logically they'll sign one of those guys, but there's no real information he has to back any of those specific players (with the exception of the Phils 'coveting Ross' for whatever reason).
Put me on the 1) Swisher, 2) Hamilton, 3) Anyone other than Ross bandwagon. I'd probably be equally pleased with the two, because the ceiling for Hamilton is much higher- but I admit the smarter signing is Swisher.
I liked Ross as a complimentary signing- not as the sole significant offensive upgrade at corner OF. I don't think Ross would be a disaster, but I fail to see why the FO is so enamored with him.
Posted by: Iceman | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:04 AM
I think that any free agent starting pitcher needs to be on a 1 year deal. Everyone keeps forgetting that we have a bunch of pitching prospects that deserve a shot. Pettibone has been solid and he should get a shot, as well as Martin and Morgan are just on the doorstep. I think that adding one or two vets on minor league deals (Harden, Pavano, Millwood, Matsuzaka, Wang) with invites and letting them battle Pettibone, Martin and Cloyd. If we decide to spend some money I would like to see them go after Pelfrey.
Posted by: Alex | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:04 AM
Edmundo with the score!
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM
I was under the impression that Amaro just threw prospects into deals fairly recklessly. Cabrera would have been a great fit at 3B.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:06 AM
If they "covet" Ross it's because they're taking the cheapest route to stay under the luxury tax. Swisher is a much better player and the same age. Of course he is going to cost more.
Posted by: Steve | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM
Sophist, maybe the Fo is looking at this:
.271/.323/.542, with 8 HR and 16 RBI, which is what Ross has done in 127 PA at the 'Zen.
I'd prefer a higher OB, but can find little fault with the other #s.
(P.S. I still hate the guy after 2010.)
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM
But the impression so far that FO wants a low cost SP option would make the Ross signing pretty much a downer.
I guess you don't have to go into the season with a complete lineup -- you can wait and see what shakes out by June/July -- but they'd be well under the luxury tax and gambling on good first halves from a bunch of players who had down 2012s. Don't want to fall out early in the season again.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM
"Phillies figure to sign one of Cody Ross, Nick Swisher and Josh Hamilton" - that's a fairly wide spectrum of players from a sometimes starter to a sometimes all-star to a HoF talent (career will be too short to actually make it). Why not just write, "Phillies will sign an power hitting corner outfielder"?
Posted by: jbird | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM
awh - 127 PA? The chances CBP turns Ross into Carlos Gonzalez are slim to none.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:19 AM
But awh spent last offseason touting the sample size creation that was JMJ Jr. so it shouldn't be surprising.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM
Is there a prospect that the Phillies shouldn't have been willing to part with for Asdrubel Cabrera? Including presumed top prospect Biddle wouldn't have been an overpay in my mind.
Posted by: jbird | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM
Also, maybe RAJ's judgement is clouded by the "personal scouting" on which the Phillies say they like to rely.
Swish has never had a PA at the 'Zen, but has done this in 27 PA against Phils pitching:
.074/.138/.185
Hey, maybe the sample size is big enough the convince the FO that Swish is the lesser player?
Soriano, OTOH, has done this in 109 PA at the 'Zen:
.314/.358/.520, 11 XBH (5 HR), 10 RBI.
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:23 AM
How can anyone have "long coveted" Cody Ross?
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:24 AM
Sophist, I didn't say I agreed with the conclusion, just that maybe the FO is looking at it, and that personally I would prefer a higher OB - but, then again, I'd prefer that in any circumstance.
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM
The problem with Soriano is that he pushes the winner of the Ruf/Brown competition to right field. If Soriano's in Left and Ruf's in Right, I hope Revere is as fast as everyone says he is.
Posted by: jbird | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM
"How can anyone have "long coveted" Cody Ross?"
It's funny you should ask that, because I was going to ask literally the exact same question.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:26 AM
awh - Scouts travel. They don't just wait for a player to come to CBP. They also have televisions and friends. I can't imagine the Phils make decisions based on 27 PA. Do you really think that's what they would do?
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:26 AM
Sophist, go back and look at my posts and show me where I stated that JMJ's sample sizes were meaningful in any way, other than they confirmed (as do minor league splits of his I posted) that he mashes LHP.
"IF" was always the most important word in those posts, and I frequently capitalized it.
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:28 AM
"I can't imagine the Phils make decisions based on 27 PA. Do you really think that's what they would do?"
I wouldn't think so, Sophist, but nothing in MLB surprises me anymore.
Posted by: awh, Founder, JRoll in the 6-Hole Club | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Even the people who aren't particularly fond of this front office wouldn't think they make decisions based on 27 plate appearances.
I mean, that's just unimaginable, isn't it?
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:35 AM
awh - Complete speculation, but FO is dumber than even Gtown thinks they are if they're basing these decisions on 127 and 27 PA samples, although I guess they could have good support (backed by further analysis) to believe that Ross' bat is particular suited to CBP for some reason with that 127 sample (with most PA from a few years ago anyway) as added support.
I could see them looking at $$, and HR, BA, SO, defense, and, to a lesser extent, RBI to make a decision. But I can't imagine they give, say, Swisher's performance against them that much weight. I don't know. Seems crazy.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM
If the team does end up signing Ross instead of Swisher (who'd be a much better fit), I think it'll show that they were really intent on keeping that draft pick.
Posted by: jbird | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM
For the record, even I don't think the FO bases this sort of decision on a 27 PA appearance sample.
Considering this is the Phillies we're discussing, I'd say it's far more likely they want to sign the least expensive player, & avoid losing a draft pick.
So I guess I'd say that this appears to be more of a case of Cheap than Stupid, although one might rightfully speculate as to where in the big picture those two points intersect.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:44 AM
I can also see them making some BS statement at the press conference like: he's got great numbers at CBP / against us.
I'm with Gtown. I think it would be a decision about the value of Swisher vs Ross (contract and draft picks), and possibly based on looking at the wrong numbers / input from scouts (who I imagine have seen Swisher bat plenty of times against all kinds of pitchers).
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:47 AM
Cody better be reeeally a bargain price.
Posted by: Bonehead | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM
I don't know. I can't stand the guy and I don't know why they're looking for savings, but I do think Phils fans undervalue Ross a bit.
Posted by: Sophist | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:50 AM
... I do think Phils fans undervalue Ross a bit.
In all fairness, I do agree w/ this statement. However, Ross is a downgrade from Pence, & (as has been discussed) a lesser player than others available. I don't have half the angst of many (most?) Phillies fans over what Ross did in the '10 NLCS, but I would still be incredibly disappointed if he turns out to be the club's "big move".
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:57 AM
I do not accept the premise that the Phils have only $20 million to spend. If that be true, the team is not trying very hard to win.
Posted by: derekcarstairs | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Cody Ross isn't a bad player. He's a league average corner OF. He has decent power, slightly below average OB skills, and seems to have a decent glove.
But I don't see him commanding so much less than Swisher as to make the choice of Ross one that is defensible.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Ross only makes sense if he costs considerably less than Swisher. Like, 3yr/$18M vs. 5yr/$60M difference.
But if it's anything like 3/25 vs. 5/50, then just pay the premium to get Swisher.
Posted by: nokwurst | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Fatalotti: I guess the Phillies really value that draft pick, then.
(And yes, that's still indefensible)
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 11:02 AM