Preview: Vance Worley (2-1, 2.16), who has allowed one run or less in three of four starts, leads the Phillies through the April exit door tonight at 7:05 p.m. Chris Volstad (0-3, 6.14), who was a punching bag for the Phils during his days in Florida, goes for the Cubs. The Phillies, who've tried and failed to establish day-to-day consistency for a month, go Rollins SS, Polanco 3B, Victorino CF, Pence RF, Wigginton 1B, Nix LF, Ruiz C, Galvis 28. Jimmy Rollins is a .458 hitter lifetime off Volstad, who owns a 5.88 lifetime ERA against the Phils. Chin up: The Phillies have arguably less problems offensively than the Nationals, who have a worse OPS than the Phillies, have lost four straight and lead by only four games in the division.




"But before chiding people relentlessly that April record means nothing, show WHY it means nothing. "
Fata - maybe you should take that up with someone who said that?
What I said is that it isn't predictive of much. Good teams tend to win. You don't need a study to realize that.
On the other hand, we have you reading a study (apparently without applying common sense) and concluding, "But a poor 23 game sample in May, which would qualify as the beginning of the season, if not early in the season, has shown to have real predictive power."
The direct significance of the Phils' record is that they're three games off the pace. That isn't terribly predictive of anything after 23 games with @140 games left.
After back-pedaling, you get back to the obvious point: The real question is whether their record after 23 games is predictive of how they will perform over the rest of the season. I'd say you can't answer that question with stats because there are too many uncontrolled variables. Is Worley's early success a fluke? Is Rollins really shot? When will Utley and/or Howard come back and how will they perform? Trying to make a prediction based on decontextualized data is basically meaningless here. Just because you can find a correlation doesn't make it predictive of anything in the real world. That's the problem when stats' geeks get pumped up with themselves because they read a study.
Posted by: Phlipper (getting cable installed on the Benny Frank) | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:20 AM
joe d: well i'm reaching as is with that comment, just trying to find some ryhme or reason to think they'll play better soon.
But in general, while they are professionals, its not a perfect world. There are countless examples of teams/individuals playing down to their competition. Theres no concrete stat to express it, so im sure there will be some who argue that it doesn't exists - but they are kidding themselves that human beings are somehow transformed into mindless robots with predetermined outcome ratios once they take the field.
Posted by: lorecore | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:24 AM
Antonio paid homage to JC last night.
Posted by: Joe D | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:24 AM
I'm sure somebody covered this, but one of the many reasons I can't stand T-Mac: at least be realistic and accurate when describing the action. On the replay of Polanco's double, he mentions how he hit to the wall.
Other than the fact that if the left fielder was playing Polly like they do 90% of the other hitters, it would have been an easy, line drive out and the ball rolled a ways to the fence, sure, that was 100% accurate.
Posted by: Pblunts | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:25 AM
@lore...no I hear you on the whole getting up for bigger series theory. I think there is something to it but good/great teams shouldn't fall into that trap. That's all I'm saying.
Posted by: Joe D | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:34 AM
I realize that there is a lot to gripe about with regard to the team's performance in April, and that there will likely be plenty more to legitimately complain about going forward.
But for me, it was really enjoyable seeing the Phils get down a run and come back immediately to score 2 with two outs and take the game in late innings, to see Jimmy and Polly be a key part of it, to see Polly have two hits and a couple of great defensive plays, watching Papelbon get his 8th save out of 8 tries, and watching Polly after the game note that the entire team is really fighting hard to get out of the mire.
Sorry, but count me as one of the unwashed who was really happy last night after the game.
Posted by: Bob | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:37 AM
Oh...has Papelbon finally closed out the 9th? I figured its only been 11 hours so he might still be pitching.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:38 AM
@Bob...it very justified to feel that way about last night. While I think the long-term outcome of Jimmy back to 1 will bring some of the same results as years past but at least for now it has gotten his panties unbunched. Polly has been big lately and has hit over .300 for the past 2 weeks. That's big. I still need to see some pop from the middle of the order but if they can weather the storm until it comes they should be ok.
Posted by: Joe D | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:41 AM
It's interesting how different last night's game might have looked six or seven years ago. Maybe after a similar game at a similar point in the season, GTown, Fata, and BAP would have written a post something like the following:
"A win when one of the big three didn't start. Polly and Rollins looking better after struggling. The continued solid performance of Chooch and Pap. Two key injuries and the Phils are hanging in the race despite not playing as well as we might expect. I'm cautiously optimistic about this team!"
Posted by: Phlipper (getting cable installed on the Benny Frank) | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:50 AM
Honestly, at this point, I'm prepared to start lumping Worley in with the Big Three when it comes to pitching. He's 14-5 with a 2.70 ERA in 28 career starts (35 appearances).
Keep it up, Vanimal!!!
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:52 AM
Yeah with each passing start I'm starting to think Worley is the real deal and not some Kyle Kendrick-JA Happ mirage.
Posted by: Joe D | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:56 AM
It's interesting how hard it is to believe that Worley's success isn't some kind of a fluke. I don't know if MLB scouts ever projected this level of success, but judging from what I read at BLer, I can't recall anyone predicting much success for him at all, and I don't gather that his performance at the minor league level was particularly notable.
Is it possible that the Phils' coaching staff might deserve some credit?
Posted by: Phlipper (getting cable installed on the Benny Frank) | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 09:57 AM
I think Dubee deserves some credit for helping to get Vance to develop his secondary pitches. That's always what separates the "throwers" from "pitchers". Vance came into the organization with some good stuff and the size to be something. But with his secondary pitches developing as quickly as they have he has taken root faster. I know he toyed with the change in the spring and ditched it but if he picks that back up then wow the league better watch out.
Posted by: Joe D | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Has anoyone on BL ever predicted any success for anyone? Even after success occurs people will claim it isn't success.
Posted by: gobaystars! | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:19 AM
"Has anoyone on BL ever predicted any success for anyone? "
Jack's been predicting huge success for the Braves for a couple of years running.
Posted by: Phlipper (getting cable installed on the Benny Frank) | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:20 AM
As bad as our hittings been at times and as mediocre as the team record is right now, at least we aren't the Angels.
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:26 AM
The prediction when he was drafted was "RH setup man".
He's just slightly outshined that so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:28 AM
"Has anoyone on BL ever predicted any success for anyone? "
I believe I predicted success for Dom Brown after his first AB. Whadda dope I was, huh?
The one thing that holds me back on Worley is that I still find it hard to believe he can sustain his "caught lookings". Even if those revert to more common levels, he will still be a solid starter.
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:30 AM
Todd Zolecki making the point many here have also made: that it's the (lack of) production from the regurlars that's hurting the Phils more than the absence of Howard & Utley.
From his blog:
Here is the difference in OPS by position from April 2011, when the Phillies ranked fifth in the league averaging 4.62 runs per game and finished 18-8, and April 2012:
Catcher: +208
First base: -46
Second base: +54
Third base: -375
Shortstop: -184
Left field: +95
Center field: -155
Right field: -63
You can see here the Phillies got more production this month at catcher, second base and left field than they got last April. You can see the combination of mostly Ty Wigginton and Laynce Nix have almost matched Howard’s production at first base. You also can see the big drop offs at third base, shortstop and center field. Pence isn’t too far removed from the production in right field last season, but that is nothing to be proud of. The Phillies were so unhappy with their right field production last season they sent four prospects to the Houston Astros to acquire Pence.
And it’s not like the Phillies need Polanco, Rollins, Victorino and Pence to overachieve. They just need them to play to their career OPS. Here is how far behind they are from their career averages:
Polanco (.750 career OPS): -179
Rollins (.759): -228
Victorino (.779): -123
Pence (.824): -115
Posted by: GBrettFan | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Edmundo: But don't those "caught lookings" have a lot to do with his ability to locate pitches? And don't a lot of successful pitchers have this ability? It also has to do with getting an umpire who will call his zone, but that's an unpredictable variable.
Posted by: mm | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Phils are going to lose this game and 3 out of 4 to arguably the worst team in the NL right now.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 30, 2012 at 09:23 PM
You forgot to mention they are on pace to go 70-92 on the season.
Posted by: polly | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 10:59 AM
"As bad as our hittings been at times and as mediocre as the team record is right now, at least we aren't the Angels. "
Albert Pujols = Albatross
Posted by: Albert Ross | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Trevor May pitched another gem last night. It will be interesting to see if he survives the trade deadline. If the Phils can turn him into a competent long term solution at 3rd, I wouldn't be too upset about seeing him go. Don't know who that would be at this point though.
Jesse Biddle's number's aren't good, but it could be a small sample size issue with only 4 starts under his belt.
Brody Colvin may be working his way back to prospect status after last years horrible stats. He's been up and down in 5 starts but has a sub-4 era. not great, but better.
Jiwan James has fallen off a little after a hot start and is hitting .250 now. He's a lottery ticket type player who I could see as a 3rd piece in a deal (hopefully for a 3b).
Tyson Gillies has started hitting again after a brief lull in production. Hitting .325 over his last 10 games with a solid .836 ops over that span. I still see him as an enigma who may or may not pan out. Who knows what'll happen there. If he can stay healthy, he might just make it.
Most of the team's other hitting "prospects" are scuffling.
Dom Brown continues to struggle in the field and not hit at the plate. I still believe, but he might just need a change of scenery a la Gavin Floyd. Dom Brown for Travis Snider. Who hangs up the phone 1st?
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Is anyone other than me excited about the possibility of a Jake Diekman call-up to replace our fallen soldier Herndon? Is there anyone else to be excited about potentially coming up to fill the 'pen at this point?
Posted by: epicurean | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:14 AM
But don't those "caught lookings" have a lot to do with his ability to locate pitches? And don't a lot of successful pitchers have this ability?
Yes, on both counts. 3 concerns for me:
1. Worley is simply pitching above his true talent level (sort of like Happ). He's starting to build enough of a sample that this concern is lightening up for me.
2. The batters will adjust. This will happen. I imagine it will take all forms -- aggressively going after earlier pitchs, looking for the comebacker, etc. If hitters start getting more success, will Worley be able to adjust? Or his stuff so nastily late moving that it won't matter?
3. Will the umps adjust? My very fallable eyes perceive that he's getting something of a Maddoxian strike zone.
I'm very happy so far this year as he seems to have picked up where he left off. And I love his disposition, his attackiness (if I may), everything about him.
Posted by: Edmundo | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:16 AM
As added info to my Brown-Snider proposed swap. Snider is putting up great stats, but it's a Las Vegas, a known launching pad.
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Expecting anything more than a
~.650 OPS out of Polanco this year is going to be asking a lot. Just has no power at all anymore.
At best, he continues to play stellar defense at 3B, win another GG, and hit .270 or so.
JRoll/Vic are both notoriously slow starters. It is likely that JRoll is now primarily a singles' hitter but he is a better hitter than what he has shown. Vic too.
Pence is the guy I wonder about because he is going to get any time off & I wonder just how healthy his shoulder is right now.
Posted by: MG | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:18 AM
We'd have to play hardball in such a proposed swap: Demand AA also throw in Travis d'Arnaud.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 11:22 AM
Although I guess it first happened a couple of days ago, I just noticed for the first time that the stat "% chance of making playoffs" has the Phils' has the Phillies behind a division rival (Braves 50.7%, Phils 49.0%). I guess that's based on run differential plus current record?
Anyone know what factors go into that stat? Given their respective records and run differentials, why would the Phils be so close to the Braves and actually ahead of Washington - strength of opponents?
Posted by: Phlipper (trying to get my Barcalounger and beer cooler atop the Benny Frank) | Tuesday, May 01, 2012 at 12:15 PM
The superior bass along with the exceptional isolation technologies make SOLO HD more outstanding. http://monsterbeatsstudio.us
Posted by: Monster Beats Dre | Saturday, May 05, 2012 at 02:13 AM
If you have turbine,you will not put it down. http://monsterbeatsstudio.us
Posted by: Monster LadyGaga | Monday, May 07, 2012 at 02:27 AM
Finally got to see Orr actually put that speed to use.
http://monsterbeatsstudio.us
Posted by: Monster Beats Headphones | Monday, May 07, 2012 at 03:33 AM