Pitching headline's Monday's drama when Roy Halladay (2-0, 0.60) and the Phillies open a set in San Francisco against Tim Lincecum (0-1, 12.91) and the Giants. First pitch is 10:15 ET.
They hold the same records (4-5), but the Phillies' outlook is simply brigher than their counterparts. Giants closer Brian Wilson is headed for season-ending surgery on his right elbow after an MRI revealed structural damage. Then there's the curious case of the Freak, who has been horrible despite striking out 11.7 batters per nine. The problem? He's allowed 14 hits, three walks and a pair of bombs in 7 2-3 innings. On the other side, Doc, who has never beaten the Giants in the regular season, has been the model of precision, finessing breaking stuff rather than overpowering opponents. His curveball hasn't been fair.
Lineup: Pierre LF; Polanco 3B; Rollins SS; Pence RF; Victorino CF; Nix 1B; Galvis 2B. Laynce Nix (pictured right missing a pitch by 10 inches) delivered one of the game's big hits in Sunday's win and has given clues that he's the Phillies' best defensive option at first. As always, Beerleaguer Game Chat is brought to you by the Drexel Lebow MBA.




We just need the freak to be horrible one ore time...You can do it...
Posted by: Luis | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 08:57 PM
Anyone feeling lucky against Lincecum and/or whoever closes? My head tells me that Halladay gives up 1-2 runs early while Lincecum shuts us down - all what one would normally expect - but I have some crazy optimistic feeling that we'll win tonight.
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:23 PM
Doc has never beat the Giants?
Didn't Halladay best Lincecum in Game 5 of the 2010 NLCS???
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/SFN/SFN201010210.shtml
Posted by: 3r0ck | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:23 PM
No game chat for me for the next 3 nights, as I'll be watching on my tv instead of the computer. Fortunately, my feelings about tonight's game can be summed up pithily, and before I've even seen the first pitch: This feels like a loss.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:25 PM
On what channel is the game being broadcast?
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:28 PM
On what channel is the game being broadcast?
Posted by: awh
TCN
Posted by: 3r0ck | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:31 PM
Per Zolecki, surprise! Still no timetable on Howard's or Utley's return. Howard stayed in Philly & visited a "wound specialist" today.
Will we see either of these guys play this season?
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:33 PM
From the end of the last thread, some people threw around the idea of letting Hamels go to get some mystery force on offense. This is so stupid that it deserves the clout treatment:
Interesting.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:34 PM
3r0ck, thanks!
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:35 PM
3r0ck, thanks!
Posted by: awh
Welcome! Sux for us Verizon FIOS subscribers as it's not in HD
Posted by: 3r0ck | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:36 PM
Here's to slipping below the .400 mark in San Francisco. 17-26, coming right up.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:36 PM
Iceman, since you brought it up, I'll repost my responses (combined) to GBrett from the last thread:
GBrett, that article has one of the Top Ten stupid ideas by an ostensible baseball writer:
Andre Ethier in the Phillies lineup?
Ryan Howard vs. LHP: .231/.311/.438
Andre Ethier vs. LHP: .243/.304/.362
Stupid, Casey. Plain effin' stupid.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:11 PM
___________________________________________________________________
As for letting Hamels go?
WTF are you people thinking?
Do you even remember 3 - 4 years ago?
Do you know how old Halladay and Lee are?
Who is going to anchor the rotation 4 years from now?
If anything, you keep the younger guy and trade the OLDER guy.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:38 PM
Iceman, it was Casey Feeney's suggestion (on csn.com) to let Hamels go.
I'd rather keep Hamels, but I am curious in exploring options as to whether a good bat at 3B, for example, could be procured. I think it's a discussion worth having, although I might still conclude it's best to go after Hamels.
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:39 PM
Feel like a loss already, GTown?
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:39 PM
"From the end of the last thread, some people threw around the idea of letting Hamels go to get some mystery force on offense. This is so stupid that it deserves the clout treatment."
Perhaps we might want to wait until the results are in on the 2012 all-pitching, no-hitting experiment, before we declare the idea stupid on its face.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:41 PM
GBrett: a "wound specialist"? That doesn't sound good. infected incision, maybe?
Posted by: Jbird | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:42 PM
awh: History argues strongly in favor of one. It's unfortunate that two of the most widely lauded parks in MLB -- PNC & AT&T -- are the two worst parks in the league in which to play, insofar as Phillies winning percentage goes.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:43 PM
Pierre gets a bunt base hit, steals 2nd, sacrificed to 3rd, scores on a SF. Phils win 1-0. You heard it here first. In other developments, Ryan Howard continues to put on weight at such an alarming rate that he'll soon be a candidate for gastric bypass surgery.
Posted by: Bert Wedemeyer | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:45 PM
Jbird, I hope not infected. It sounded more like the doc is just checking to make sure the wound is closing.
Here's the exact quote from Todd Zolecki:
* * *
He visited a wound specialist at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital today. “His wound is still healing,” Ruben Amaro Jr. said. “He’s doing well. We’re continuing the same deal.” There is no timetable for Howard’s return. “The biggest challenge was for the wound to get to the skin from how deep it was,” Amaro said. “It’s getting there. It’s getting pretty close. … The question is when does he start doing stuff so it doesn’t compromise the healing process? We’re still on hold as far as that is concerned. Hopefully we’ll know more in the next couple of days.”
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:45 PM
GBrett- I definitely agree that if Hamels proves to be unsignable, there will have to be a substantial upgrade on offense to even come close to offsetting the loss. I'm not sure where they'd go to get it, though.
I can't get on board with the idea of trading Hamels mid-season, however, unless people are looking to completely concede the 2012 season. He's one of the three players this team can't possibly afford to lose. The return would have to be other-worldly to even think about it.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:46 PM
Any team that would want Hamels would be in contention and thus very, very unlikely to return major league talent. Phils would have to be out of contention.
Posted by: Sophist | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:52 PM
I think there are many fans and a few posters here who prefer runs to wins, despite protestations to the contrary. Those who favor letting Hamels go and using the $20 million + in annual salary that Hamels would cost to acquire offense are in that category.
Posted by: derekcarstairs | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:56 PM
awh, you hit the nail on the head Re: Hamels and age. As much as I shudder to think about it, Doc and Lee are eventually going to decline. I think both are physical specimens and should provide good value for the remainder of their contracts, assuming something catastrophic doesn't happen- but they aren't getting any younger.
Hamels is just entering the prime of his career. This is a guy that could anchor your rotation for the next decade, if you're lucky enough to have him. Losing him would be devastating for the team in the present, and, more importantly, going forward.
I'm also curious who we would sign on offense to offset the loss of a #1 starting pitcher. First base is already locked in (much to the chagrin of most on BL). So is SS. So is RF. So is C. No one is taking Utley, but I suppose we could eat the salary and spend some money on Maicer Izturis or Kelly Johnson (the two best available 2B). We could let Vic walk and sign Bourn in CF (I would be in favor of this). In LF, we're either going to have Brown, or perhaps Josh Hamilton (also would be a net positive, but I get the feeling Texas keeps him). At 3B, you could let Polanco walk and almost anything would be an upgrade, although not much if you take Wright out of the equation. Youkilis could be bought out, but he's 35 and isn't exactly aging well.
I guess what I'm saying is, unless you sign 2 or 3 top of the line free agents, you ain't replacing Hamels productivity, and even if you do, you are really hurting the rotation long-term.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:58 PM
Sophist: I wouldn't trade Hamels unless we're far out of contention in July (which we won't be). But letting him go at season's end, and using his would-be salary to upgrade the offense, is not an idea I would rule out on April 16. Of course, Vic's free agency complicates the issue because most of the good FA bats are outfielders. If you lose Hamels AND Vic, and sign a big bat for the OF, then you've lost an ace pitcher and you haven't really upgraded the offense at all.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:58 PM
For what it is worth, I like the Phils tonight. Radio while I work tonight.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 09:59 PM
bap, which is more expensive to replace and harder to replace when you lose it top notch pitching or top notch hitting?
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:06 PM
Yeah, I wouldn't let Hamels go unless we could get his equal in return, but even so, I've been in favor of a strong rotation. And have thought exactly the same thing about wanting to keep our youngest ace simply because he is young and an ace.
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:06 PM
awh: I didn't say I'd do it. I said I wouldn't rule anything out until we see how the season plays out.
But if our offense really stinks for the entire year, it wouldn't be a matter of which is more expensive to replace. It would be a matter of which area we need more in the short-term future.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM
"It would be a matter of which area we need more in the short-term future."
And that is exactly the thinking that couses teams to fall out of contention after a few years.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:12 PM
The one problem with the Phillies broadcast is TBag.
Ugh.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:15 PM
Re: trading Cole.
McGriff and Fernandez for Carter and Alomar was a very long time ago. Teams do not trade top talent for top talent anymore. Bad teams unload veteran contracts for minor league potential. no blockbuster coming. Nor should there be.
Posted by: gobaystars! | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:18 PM
I believe the Phils are able to sign Hamels, Pence and Vic to extensions if they so choose. This may cost a little in luxury tax in 2013, but the team can get a fresh start in 2014 when the threshold rises to $189 million.
In addition to the $11 million increase in the luxury tax threshold, Blanton's, Utley's and Polanco's salaries will be off the books. That's another $26 million for salary cap purposes. I think the $37 million is enough to cover the salary increases for Hamels, Pence and Vic and to find adequate replacements for Utley, Polanco and Blanton. If Trevor May continues to improve, Blanton's replacement will be cheap.
Posted by: derekcarstairs | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM
I know there are beat writers who read this, so I'm going to start this campaign:
DEAR BEAT WRITERS, PLEASE ASK MANUEL WHY HE CONTINUES TO BAT POLANCO SECOND. LOVE, BL
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM
Ugh. There's a small number of 3B on the FA market at the end of the season. Rolen, possibly Wright, Youkilis.
On to the game at hand now that it's started. Gift from the Giants' defense there. Capitalize, Jimmy!
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:21 PM
Icewman, because he hits luck, bloop doubles off of Lincecum.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:22 PM
Nice AB by Jimmy.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:23 PM
Great AB by Rollins, not biting on the change-up with a full count.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:23 PM
A wound specialist is not a bad thing necessarily. Just checking to make sure it is healing the way it should be.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:23 PM
First blood!
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Nice Pence!
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:25 PM
sweep the legs!!!
Posted by: Jbird | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Sorry, they keep talking about Timmy losing 20 lbs in the offseason. What is that supposed to do for him? Fit in his Grammy's wedding dress?
Posted by: Raul's grandpa | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Nice job, Phillies!
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:27 PM
Great approach so far with Lincecum. Just take what he gives you. Wait until he leaves a pitch up in the zone and make good contact.
Here comes Nix to blow that all to hell.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:28 PM
I think Lincecum will end up regretting his decision to turn down all those long-term deals he got from the Giants over the years...simply not the same pitcher he used to be.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:28 PM
You can't contain Laynce Nix!
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Well, now I'm convinced that Timmy isn't pitching healthy.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Laynce!!!
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Game over?
Posted by: BobbyD | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM
YE, son. Is Timmy losing it? What is happening to this guy?
Posted by: gobaystars! | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Man. Can this team hit.
Posted by: curt | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM
baba ba ba-baaaah, I'm loving it!
Posted by: Darren McDaulton | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:30 PM
Hey Mitchy! Mitchy Mitchy Mitchy Mitch Kramer, we're talking to you, pal! Your ass is gonna be purple before the night is done!
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:30 PM
Sounds like Lincecum is not getting any help from his outfielders today either. Pagan and Cabrera seem to have something of a Keystone Kops routine going out there.
Posted by: Dan Koch | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:30 PM
I think Howard is on track for July 1, which would be nice!
Utley is done. Not sure what "rehabbing aching knees" means, but it definitely isn't good.
Posted by: nonamePHame | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:31 PM
Tim Lincecum lost 20 lbs? really? From where? a haircut?
Posted by: Jbird | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Howard will be back by July 1.
Utley? He is done. "Rehabbing his aching knees" does not sound positive at all.
Posted by: nonamePHame | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:33 PM
Galvis has had some big hits, but he's got to work on his strike zone judgement. That was a horrible 3-2 pitch. It would have been nice to get Halladay out of the way.
But still, great inning.
Posted by: phatti | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:34 PM
Halladay feels he's getting squeezed.
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:37 PM
is doc returning the favor?
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:38 PM
Roy needs to shut them down and not give anything back.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:38 PM
Come'on Freddy. That was a dead DP ball.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:38 PM
Phils' defense is doing Doc any favors this inning. Tough play but a weak throw by JRoll.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:40 PM
Babiptastic.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:41 PM
FG hesitatated - cost them the dp
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:41 PM
crap.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:42 PM
I've got Pence and Vic, fantasy baseball guy has Lincecum. I'm loving this right now. 31 pitch 1st inning could likely mean that we won't be seeing him go much farther than the 4th or 5th. Seen a lot of Lincecum lately, and he doesn't look like the pitcher he used to be. His velocity is down from mid 90s to low 90s/high 80s. His split-changeup used to drop out of the zone, and with the lower 4SFB velocity making the speed differential less combined with its it's now catching too much of the strike zone, he's going to get pounded, with the last Colorado start as proof. I believe it was the worst of his career, statistically.
Too early to jump on the "oh, his velocity is down, he's injured!" bandwagon, but he seems to be pitching about the same pitches and proportions that have previously given him success, which lead it to be poor pitches, poor locating, or a combination of the two.
Do you catch him much, BAP? If so, what say you?
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:42 PM
Halladay can glare all he wants to this inning at the ump but he isn't throwing strikes.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:44 PM
he is gifting the game back to them
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Squeezed.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Big K because a base hit there especially to LF scores 2 runs.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:46 PM
That was one ugly inning of work by Halladay. Very fortunate to get out of that with only 1 run.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:47 PM
sdphillie, one thing to keep in mind is that there is a big difference between a 90MPH fastball and a 95MPH fastball. While it doesn't seem like that much mathematically, to the hitter, the extra 5MPH cuts down the decision making time (swing or take, and where to swing) by about 50%.
If Lincecum is throwing 90 - 91 as opposed to 95 - 96, that makes a big difference to the hitter, and also could make his changeup less effective because the hitter has that extra split second to look at the pitch.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:47 PM
i dont think he is being squeezed on all of the pitches, maybe a couple
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:48 PM
let's eat, a couple of pitches can make all the difference.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:50 PM
Another weird and predictable Doc start. Presumably he's about to cruise for the next 6 innings.
Posted by: curt | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:50 PM
He didn't look good that inning, but did anyone really expect him to give up multiple runs there? The guy is JC Romero with the bases loaded. Harry Houdini.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:50 PM
Juan Pierre, after a long inning by his pitcher, goes up and gets himself out on two pitches.
Yep, baseball IQ, that guy.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:51 PM
fantastic offensive inning by the phillies
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:52 PM
Oh, and neither Pierre of Polanco called a timeout, or stepped out of the box.
Way to give Roy a rest. Dopes.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:52 PM
Not much rest for Halladay after that long half-inning.
I hope he settles in to his normal excellent self.
Posted by: GBrettFan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:52 PM
awh - That's exactly what I'm saying. The mph difference on his 4SFB not only makes that pitch more hittable, but it makes the speed differential on his split change much smaller than it normally would, so if people are able to adjust to the 4SFB being slower, they're more apt to grab something and foul it off, or even put it in play, whereas before, they'd be swinging through. It should be dropping out of the strike zone, but certainly isn't as violently as it used to.
He looks more human than he ever has before, but I wouldn't go far enough to compare him to an Adam Eaton or Freddy Garcia... yet.
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM
awh - how true, how true
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM
"Juan Pierre, after a long inning by his pitcher, goes up and gets himself out on two pitches."
I'm not giving a pass to Halladay either. I realize his job isn't to hit but there's no excuse for not running on that strike 3 PB. He might well have been on 1st base, which could have changed the entire inning.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM
"I'm not giving a pass to Halladay either. I realize his job isn't to hit but there's no excuse for not running on that strike 3 PB. He might well have been on 1st base, which could have changed the entire inning."
Yeah, would have been nice to have him forced out at 2nd on Pierre's double play ball. Put down the scotch.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:55 PM
bap, I cannot argue with that. Roy should have run.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:56 PM
And Doc has settled in as always. I predict 8 IP, 1 ER.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:57 PM
OK, Roy Halladay is officially Superman and doesn't need much rest.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Would have been an entirely different set of circumstances. Pierre may have bunted. He might also have beaten the DP throw, which would have left a fast runner on base instead of Halladay.
There's simply no excuse for standing at home plate when you have a chance to make it to first.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:58 PM
@bap, @awh -- you mean the one that wasn't even appealed until posey had the ball back in his glove???
he didn't think he went... why would he run. please.
Posted by: HammRadio | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:58 PM
Wow, how does Jimmy follow up a great AB with an AB THAT bad?
It's like he was a different hitter.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 10:59 PM
Good thing the Phils scored 4 runs in the 1st because it looks like their offense is going to settle in for a slumber.
Posted by: MG | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:02 PM
vs. Pence
#1 - 90 FB down middle
#2 - 91 FB around face
#3 - 84 SP whoops.
Pence has a tendancy to hack at low stuff, and Vic popping a first pitch doesn't help. Some plate discipline would certainly help their chances of winning and chasing Timmy out of the game much sooner.
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:02 PM
I am watching this game on mlb.tv and listening to the Giants announcers. They are much, much better than the local clowns. They don't feel the need to fill the air with constant noise.
Posted by: AFish | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:03 PM
i think the phillies just gave timmy an easy inning, by swinging at bad pitches, or first pitches, not being patient at the plate.
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:03 PM
gOLD glove work by the NIX
Posted by: let's eat | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:06 PM
I can't believe this is even a discussion. As long as Halladay pitches like a Hall of Famer I could care less if he goes up without a bat in his hands, or even stays in the dugout while the pitcher throws 3 BP fastballs. I just don't care. He's not paid to swing the bat. Go out there and do a crossword puzzle for all I care.
Posted by: Iceman | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:06 PM
Doc is kinda good.
Like "best pitcher to ever wear a Phillies uniform" good.
Posted by: NEPP | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:09 PM
PtB throws out tomorrow's first pitch.
That traitor.
Posted by: sdphillie | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:10 PM
Iceman, I disagree, good baseball is good baseball.
It's the NL, not the AL.
Posted by: awh | Monday, April 16, 2012 at 11:11 PM