Alert Beerleaguer, EastFallowfield, informs us that Tuesday's charitable eighth pushed the Phillies to the head of the NL East pack in runs (309).
No reason to feel guilty for enjoying the fruits of a massive bullpen fail like this (four walks, two hit batters, five hits, nine runs). The Phils haven't benefitted from such a meltdown all season and have mostly needed to scratch and claw for every single run since the opening weeks. All the gift runs from Tuesday's win are more than enough to cover the five shutouts the Phils have suffered this season. The Phils earned a few of them, too, with hard RBI hits by Chase Utley and Jimmy Rollins, and Ross Gload's seventh-inning pinch RBI, adding to his recent tear of big pinch hits, shows exactly why the Phils couldn't afford to lose him to the DL.
All things equal, the Phils have risen to the status of "league average offense," and there's comfort in that. For every below-average category, like slugging, they're above average in another, like walks or on-base. The Phils still trail the Mets in the division in average runs-per-game (4.18 to New York's 4.21), but they're in much better standing than the run-starved Braves, a team considered the Phillies' stiffest competition by a wide margin in Monday's vote. With the win, the Phils climbed back to their season-best 18 games over .500. If they can somehow sweep this series, they'll get another monkey off their back by improving to .500 against .500 or better competition.
Phillies in on Ludwick: According to a FoxSports report, the Phillies are among the teams that have inquired on the availability of Padres 32-year-old left fielder Ryan Ludwick, who is hitting .255/.322/.393 with nine homers playing half his games at hitter-unfriendly Petco. Comparatively speaking, Ludwick rates 10th among left fielders with a 1.2 WAR, while Raul Ibanez and his -1.2 rates 20th, which is dead last among left fielders and the lowest among all qualified outfielders.
Five-hole woes: Finally, check out these mindblowing numbers from Ryan Lawrence. Good grief.




The Phils also lead all of baseball in fewest runs allowed, but we all know that already...
Posted by: Dan in Philly | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM
And as an aside, I take exception to you calling Ibanez a "qualified" left fielder (ba-dum-ba).
Posted by: Dan in Philly | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:16 AM
repost:
interesting note from David Murphy:
On the season, Phillies five-hole hitters had combined to produce the third-lowest batting average (.210) and slugging percentage (.322) in the NL.
Little Ollie - they are rentals b/c, obviously, they are free agents after the season. they MAY sign here, but who knows.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:20 AM
any answer to why Bastardo was in the game let alone pitched a fulling inning?
Posted by: pb | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:22 AM
full inning, whoops
Posted by: pb | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:22 AM
pb - he was already warmed up. i'm assuming charlie thought the inning would be over sooner than it was and didn't want to get another reliever up.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:23 AM
WHY BEERLEAGUER TALKS ABOUT PROSPECTS:
So yesterday we spent a limited amount of time bashing Altherr and Jiwan James, while highlighting how Valle had been raking and noting that Singleton was still struggling.
Last night, Altherr managed an RBI double (no big deal but); James went 3 for 4 with a walk, and Singleton went 3 for 4 with a double, a homer and 6 RsBI. Valle took an 0-5 collar with 3 Ks.
Galvis, of course, continued to be his torrid, real deal self going 2/4 with a double.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:24 AM
with a few more steroids galvis may be ready to replace jimmy next year.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:29 AM
Andy: so Tyson Gillies should be going on a tear any day now.
Posted by: lorecore | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:31 AM
It's funny to read stuff like "the Phillies scored 9 runs despite only 5 hits" (philly.com) after watching the game.
Were Howard and Polanco supposed to leap backwards and swing the bat like some sort of mutant Ichiro?
And if some of the other guys swung at the awful pitches being thrown think of what they'd come up with to describe that.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:31 AM
On the fifth spot problem. What about Utley hitting fifth?
Obviously this creates a lefty-heavy bottom of the order, which is the main reason Polly is in the five, but Howard and Utley have proven they can hit lefties, and late in games, Ben Francisco becomes a high option bat in exchange for Raul or Dom. You can even move Chooch up a spot or two to lessen the blow:
Rollins
Victorino
Polanco
Howard
Utley
Ibanez (Francisco)
Ruiz
Brown (Francisco)
Posted by: Malcolm | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM
Ludwick's numbers are better away, as you'd expect, but there's a few intriguing difference. Here's his basic splits;
PA/AVG/OBP/SLG/sOPS+
Home: 156/.232/.321/.370/92
Away: 143/.279/.324/.419/113
Same OBP but very different AVG numbers. I think he's a more aggressive hitter outside Petco Park. He works a lot more walks at home. Some more stats:
K/BB/HR/RBI/BaBIP
Home: 23/16/4/16/.252
Away: 32/9/5/29/.326
Not sure how good that would really be but it's certainly better than what Ibanez, Brown, or Francisco have contributed. Although, Ibanez has been pretty good at home (OPS .849 this year).
Posted by: The_GodfatherSJP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM
***so Tyson Gillies should be going on a tear any day now.***
No doubt he will...unfortunately it will likely be his hamstring.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:35 AM
Galvis deserves his own thread. Encouraging season. Terrific month. Glove might be best in all of the minors. Really need to start paying attention to SS.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:40 AM
I was giving the Phillies stats against certain pitchers in the game thread last night.
Howard and Utley both have very good numbers off Miller in their careers. (4 for 11 and 3 for 9) respectively.
They both have bad numbers against Tallet. LaRussa should've went to Tallet in that spot.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:41 AM
On another note, and one which will make Jack happy, Ryan Howard's walk rate has really been soaring lately. He is now 8th in the league in walks and on pace to draw 81, which would be his highest total since 2008. Last year, he drew only 59 walks and finished 36th in the NL.
One suspects that these soaring walk totals are related to the complete absence of a No. 5 hitter. Nonetheless, if the pitchers aren't going to pitch to him, I'm happy to see Howard resist the temptation to swing at slop. Earlier this year, he went through a long period where he was absolutely refusing to take a walk.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Galvis has really turned a corner this year in AA.
He's gone from non-prospect to potential Top 20 guy with an impressive physical maturation that has added a good 15-20 lbs to his frame. He's got a JRoll build now.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM
That's Top 20 in our System, not the Minors...just to clarify.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:44 AM
BAP - good point, and very encouraging.
JW - make it happen cap'n.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:47 AM
Murphy's article:
Pretty good article on how is available in RF. Usual OF suspects (Willingham, Cuddyer, Ludwick, Rivera) and a few other names including R. Johnson & Spilborghs. Also mentions Keppinger and J. Baker.
One of the commentators brings up Heisey on the Reds.
If Contreras isn't able to prove he is healthy the next month, I would still rather see them acquire a solid bullpen arm especially one under contract next year that would give them a bit of leverage with Madson who I think is going to ask for a 8-figure annual salary on his new deal.
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/phillies/20110622_Phillies_Notebook__Will_right_bat_be_available_at_right_time_for_Phillies_.html
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:50 AM
Wouldn't surprise me in the least if the Phils double-down on the bullpen given the middling options available for a right-handed OF bat. If you are going to pay a retail price, you want quality. Ludwick or Willingham aren't it.
Almost wonder if the Phils couldn't get that stud bullpen arm and then pick up a right-hand bat via a waiver deal in August for a secondary guy like a R. Johnson or Rivera to give them an upgrade for the postseason.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM
I just had a crazy visual of mutant ichiros
Posted by: Shawn | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM
"It's funny to read stuff like "the Phillies scored 9 runs despite only 5 hits" (philly.com) after watching the game."
not really that funny. scoring 9 runs on 5 singles is pretty unusual. i don't think the sentence was meant to be disparaging the hitters, just stating a fact.
i mean, if someone told you that a team had five singles in an inning and asked you to guess how many runs were scored, you'd probably think 2 or 3, 4 tops. and that's accounting for a reasonable number of BBs you might guess the team also collected.
Posted by: f4f | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM
I have a hunch the Phillies wouldn't say Galvis was ever a "non prospect", considering they were raving about his glove all along, and moving him up through the minors, despite his relative youth. He's not exactly hitting like a young ARod, but he did bulk up a bit (hopefully, not the same way as a young Arod).
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:58 AM
"He's got a JRoll build now."
When can we expect Galvis's effort to hit the longest home run (highest infield popup)?
Posted by: David $$$$ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:59 AM
Pass on Reed Johnson. And especially pass on Spillbourghs. I hope if they begin considering him they look at his home/away splits. He's IRL away from Coors. ("Ibanez Replacement Level")
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 11:59 AM
***I have a hunch the Phillies wouldn't say Galvis was ever a "non prospect", considering they were raving about his glove all along, and moving him up through the minors, despite his relative youth. He's not exactly hitting like a young ARod, but he did bulk up a bit (hopefully, not the same way as a young Arod). ***
He went from around 155 lbs to 170 lbs from Age 20 to Age 21.
That's a pretty normal maturation. He'll probably add a little bit more as he enters his mid-20s.
I also agree that he was never a "non-prospect" as he did make it to AA at Age 19 but that was purely on his awesome glove. He's gone from possible John McDonald type upside to maybe Adam Everett type upside with his nice half-season so far. He's finally, for the first time, actually driving the ball with authority whereas before he was always overpowered and got soft singles/grounders.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:05 PM
Galvis may only be 17 if the Phillies signed him at age 12.
Posted by: Meyer | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:06 PM
For a comp, Everett posted a .741 OPS in his Age 22 season in AA Trenton. Galvis, a similar level of defender, is posting a .736 OPS right now in his Age 21 season.
Rollins posted a .798 OPS in his Age 21 season in AAA Scranton for another comparison and to show how superior Rollins was as a prospect.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Make jokes if you want about Galvis' increase in bulk, but the data state that he is tie for 9th in home runs in our minor league system - ahead of folks like Singleton, Valle and Bozeid.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Andy - Is 'IRL' or 'Ibanez Replacement Level' ~.250 AVG/~.700 OPS?
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:10 PM
I have a hunch the Phillies wouldn't say Galvis was ever a "non prospect"
agreed. a guy who they were saying had a major league ready glove at SS when he was 19 wouldn't really be in the non-prospect category. i think they thought/think he at least projects to a utility player.
that said, his jump in offense is extremely encouraging - probably at the top of my list for minor league positives this year. if he continues, it is going to make the decision on what to do with jimmy really interesting. i was in the camp that looking at the totality of circumstances, the phillies only real option was to commit to a 3 year/$35-$40M extension for him and hope for the best. if galvis continues to progress, it's going to be that much harder to bite the bullet for that many years and that much money.
Posted by: f4f | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM
If Galvis ever learns to take a walk, then his prospect status will reach something pretty close to elite status.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:15 PM
Assuming his improved hitting continues, that is.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:16 PM
Spillbourghs away split for this year is ~.203/~.452; but for his career, yeah, those are right.
I'm thinking that they are equally "talented" this year.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:16 PM
i should have went to the minors, beerleaguer would rave about my ability to never swing at a pitch and pray for a walk every time up.
Posted by: lorecore | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:18 PM
I want the Phils to clinch early; then they can bring up Freddy for September and let him see the bigs for a while. It'd be fun to see a) how his glove plays and 2) how he handles real pitching.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:18 PM
lore - We don't need to rave about you; you're raving all by yourself.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:19 PM
I wouldn't be upset with a trade for Ludwick if his contract wasn't worth $6.7 mil...Anyone know how much of that the Phils would have to absorb?
If we can afford someone in that range, I don't know why the Phils wouldn't at least make an attempt at Carlos Quentin, who's making $5 mil this year, and would slide in seamlessly as a #5 hitter, bring rejuvenated life to the left field bleachers, and give Howard a ton of lineup protection compared to whoever we decide to slot in at the 5 spot now...He's arb-eligible in 2012 and a FA in 2013, but we will free up some cash once Ibanez is gone and at least hold onto him through next year if not longer. Am I missing something or what?
Posted by: Terrence | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:31 PM
Terrance: You're missing this: why on earth would a team that's only 4.5 games out of 1st place trade away a guy with a .906 OPS?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM
I don't dispute that Ludwick may provide an upgrade over Ibanez, but I'm still on the fence. .802 career OPS (114 OPS+) and he'd be a pure rental as he's signed only through the end of this season.
Has anyone seen any speculation on what the Padres would want in return? (please say an injured, overweight, overpaid "innings eater"...)
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:37 PM
There's about 3 months left in the season so Ludwick would cost about $3.4 million give or take.
Bell would cost about $3.75 million the rest of the way.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Re the 'just 5 hits' deal:
It's the idea that somehow hits are the only things that can lead to runs. If the headline would say "Phils get 11 baserunners in inning" is 9 runs so unexpected?
It's the same kind of thinking that had Mike Schmidt always lamenting he didn't hit .300.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:40 PM
Schmidt was a career .267 hitter...clearly mediocre overall.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:42 PM
EFF, it's a pretty common assumption, and not an unwarranted one, by baseball fans that a 9 run innings comes on the back of a team racking up lots of hits, including XBH. That's generally how 9 run innings work.
To say that the Phillies scored 9 runs "despite" 5 hits is not in any meant to denigrate the Phillies offense. It's just to showcase the unusual nature in which they scored 9 runs.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM
hmm, those rollins' comp numbers sort of put things in perspective regarding galvis. excitement officially tampered.
it is possible that rollins' numbers in AAA where actually higher than they might have been in AA because there are few elite prospects in AAA? or is that totally reaching?
Posted by: f4f | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM
Well, you know what they say about when you assume...
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Rollins posted a .740 OPS in 598 PA in his Age 20 season in AA for comparison.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:50 PM
How is it a common assumption that huge innings are fueled by hits?
They are almost always fueled by walks and errors.
How many hits would you have to get (on average) to score 9 runs in an inning without walks or defensive miscues?
Posted by: Gsl | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM
Well, one thing to keep in mind is that in his prime, Rollins was an offensive force and one of the best shortstops in the game. Galvis doesn't have to hit like Rollins did to be a good starting shortstop, although it would be nice.
Posted by: David $$$$ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:02 PM
Last night's game was a direct result of the day's run differential discussion.
It's like the reverese Beerleaguer jinx. Nothing proves the futility of analyzing daily run differential swings like last night's affair.
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:12 PM
CJ: eh, i dont know - if the conclusion of analyzing last nites run differential is - the cardinals bullpen sucks - then I think thats a pretty solid evaluation.
Posted by: lorecore | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:21 PM
Rollins SO/BB ratio was much better in the minors than Galvis...even if you just looked at Freddy's numbers from this season. Rollins simply didn't SO in the minors with a SO% of just over 7.8%.
Galvis is striking out about 14.8% of the time this year...basically double that of Jimmy.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:24 PM
I also wonder, though, if one dynamic is that Galvis is learning the hitting trade in an era where pitchers are throwing effective cut fastballs. I'm of the opinion that the next generation of hitters to emerge will have learned to discern that pitch and will have better adjusted to it than the current crop of old dogs.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:34 PM
Gsl: minimum of 11 singles
(assuming every hit allows going First to Third for runner on first) OR
10 Doubles or Triples
Posted by: Shane | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:35 PM
And Galvis doesn't have to have a season with more than 20 of every kind of XBH and SB to be a valuable property.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:36 PM
8 singles and a homer.
Posted by: Andy | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:37 PM
lorecore: We didn't need last night's game to know St. Louis' bullpen sucked! :-)
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:43 PM
Dan Uggla with a 2-run homer, Braves lead 2-0 over the Blue Jays.
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:43 PM
I love how after every hit by Uggla, Braves fans declare "he's back!"
After Uggla went 5-11 against Houston earlier this month, he went 5 for his next 38.
I've yet to see any stretch by Uggla this year that tells me he's come around.
Since May 12th, Uggla is actually hitting worse than he was before May 12th.
Through 5/11: 159 PA, 209/264/392, 656 OPS, 6 HR
Since 5/12: 145 PA, 137/214/237, 450 OPS, 4 HR
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:49 PM
Jose Bautista gets one back on a solo shot, his 2nd HR in his last 23 games (he's off the juice, I heard).
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:55 PM
Maybe Uggla is auditioning to be the Phils #5 hitter.
Posted by: Charlie Hayes | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:56 PM
Freddy Garcia shutting down the Reds today - allowed 1 hit thru 4 innings.
Posted by: Bobby Cocks | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 01:57 PM
Brian McCann with a 2-run homer, Braves lead 4-1.
Unlike Uggla, McCann is the real deal. Best hitting catcher in baseball, right?
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:04 PM
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1187578/index.htm
Posted by: R | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:10 PM
7 more k's for Beachy today.
that's 53 k's in 47 innings. where is this coming from??
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:10 PM
conshy matt: Beachy definitely has the stuff to be a big strikeout pitcher. He averaged 11.9 K/9 in his 119.1 IP in AA and AAA last year. He's a really good prospect, much better than Mike Minor.
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:13 PM
Toronto flat out sucks. Lost to Minor and now on their way to losing to Beachy.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:17 PM
"much better than Minor"
Minor was ranked #37th best prospect in all of baseball heading into 2011.
Posted by: lorecore | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:35 PM
11k's in 5 innings for Beachy. on my fantasy bench.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:35 PM
Good news is we have Toronto next weekend.
Posted by: Little Ollie | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:44 PM
Little Ollie: Don't worry. By next weekend, Toronto's pitchers will be out of their funk and pitching like Cy Youngs against the Phils.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:47 PM
lorecore: You're right, somehow I had them flipped. Beachy is a year older than Minor... I thought it was the other way around.
Bottom line: As usual, Atlanta is flush with starting pitching prospects.
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 02:59 PM
A galvis that can't hit is just a younger Wilson Valdez
Posted by: Tjack | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:07 PM
Bottom line is they've got to get a RH bat. We all knew that as soon as Werth left. Another LH bat wouldn't hurt either as Gload cannot run. A reliever from each side would be nice as well.
All of those "needs" obviously will not be filled externally so RAJ must make a decision on what's most important to him. He may do something or he may do nothing. We'll see.
Posted by: DPatrone | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:08 PM
Blue jays are awful
Posted by: jess L | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:09 PM
Long day of travel tomorrow. Heading to Philly to catch the A's v Phillies series. Been looking forward to attending this series since the schedules came out!
Posted by: out of my league | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:12 PM
leave wilson alone... hey he ended he rally last night - didn't he? like only a good rally killer can
besides with valdez & martinez at the back end of the lineup.. we have our own self- service gas station convenience store..
Exxon Mini Mart!
Posted by: phillyinnyc | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:12 PM
A lot of insight there DPat, thanks!
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:16 PM
Thanks BB. That made me laugh.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:20 PM
DPatrone,
I just want to clarify. Is that info from you directly, or one of your sources?
Posted by: JJG | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:20 PM
I would add to DPat's list a 19 year old shortstop with 60 homerun power and 60 SB potential. I mean as long as we are asking for the moon and the stars. Also a winning lottery ticket wouldn't be a kick in the nuts either. What a preposterous post.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:23 PM
There is nothing not to like about Ludwig in this park and Bell especially since Bell may be easier to resign than Madson at this point being a Borasite. But honestly, what cheap "ready for the show" talent can the Phils afford to give up at this point?
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:31 PM
"He may do something or he may do nothing. We'll see."
i think he's going to throw the whole offense back and start anew, kinda like you can do in scrabble.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:31 PM
RG - i agree, the acoustics in CBP would be perfect for Ludwig. i'd take him over Mozart, Bach or Chopin.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:34 PM
Any status on the severity of Polly's hand?
Posted by: D.Wright | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:42 PM
Phillies game notes on CSN ends with a good question:
Are there any active (or former) managers that you dislike more than Tony La Russa?
Bobby Cox? maybe
No current mgrs.
Posted by: Bubba | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:42 PM
Nope that's all me. I don't see what's so crazy about the post. People have said in lieu of Conteras' possible health issues, a RH reliever might be a need. The Phils are reported to be linked to Kerry Wood. With only 1 LH in the 'pen another one might be necessary. But when I chime in I get killed. Gload cannot run. Every time he's used, someone has to run for him if he gets on.
There was nothing in that post that was not accurate. Why do you think I put "needs" in quotes? I DO NOT have to defend what I say here to ANY one of you. The BS I take here, is unbelievable.
Last week I said I wouldn't be surprised if they got awept in Seattle. Well guess what, it almost happened. Maybe I might just know a little more about things than what any of you care to admit. I done here.
Posted by: DPatrone | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:45 PM
"Last week I said I wouldn't be surprised if they got awept in Seattle. Well guess what, it almost happened."
small sample size, and not even right.
"I done here."
no need to take pot shots at asian posters on your way out. classless.
Posted by: conshy matt | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:49 PM
Sorry DPat it's just that you sounded like a kid on Santa's lap is all. No kidding the Phillies have needs. Fortunately those needs are not as glaring as most other teams in baseball. It silly to think every hole will be filled with someone we'll all aprove of. Or filled at all for that matter. I don't think we have that sense of entitlement yet.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:50 PM
That was a nice rant, dpat!
Posted by: nonamePHame | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:52 PM
Losing 2 out of 3, when the one win was the middle game and a very solid win at that, is not a sweep that "almost happened".
Posted by: R | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 03:53 PM
CJ: McCann is probably the best catcher in baseball, period (as long as Mauer has injury issues).
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:08 PM
@conshy: "i think he's going to throw the whole offense back and start anew, kinda like you can do in scrabble."
Actually, I think it's more like 5 Card Draw, where you can toss in 4 cards if you have an Ace. Since we actually have multiple Aces, we'll hang on to those and scrap the rest.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:08 PM
The John Lackey implosion currently in progress is threatening to rival that of the Cards' pen last night. 3 straight runs scoring on a BB, a HBP, and a wild pitch before a single scored another one.
Posted by: RM | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:08 PM
I gotta say, I thought DPat's initial post, stating that the Phils may or may not do something was "post of the day" worthy. Then, he went ahead and obliterated that with his follow-up, explaining the first post.
I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for the follow-up to his "I done here" post.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:10 PM
Hey, leave my friend Mr. Patrone alone.
How would you like it if you came on here and people treated you like that.
If you want to behave like a bunch of d8ckless douchebags, go over to that 'other' site where when someone disagrees with their collective "wisdom" they set upon people like flies on sh8t. Watching it is like being an observer to a shout down at a National Socialist Party Conference in Nuremburg in the 1930's. (And they're always right, you know...at least according to them.)
Posted by: Anon II | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:14 PM
Someone's a little touchy today...
DPat: The reason people joked about your post is that you pointed out the obvious needs... and then declared the GM may do something or may do nothing.
Not a whole lot to a post like that...
Posted by: CJ | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:14 PM
Come Back DPat. I apologize if I was harsh. I was just messing with you. CJ very adeptly covered the reasons why. Just being a wise ass.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:17 PM
"He may do something or he may do nothing."
Gee you think?
Hilarious post there by DPat. Followed lovingly by his "I done here" post.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 04:19 PM