Preview: Cole Hamels, who is just 2-9 with a 4.35 ERA in 14 starts against the Mets and winless at Citi Field, take another crack at it tonight under the lights on Fox. Mike Pelfrey, who was belted in both starts against the Phils this season, is scheduled for the Metropolitans. The Phillies will go Rollins, Utley, Polanco, Howard, Ibanez, Ruiz, Brown, Mayberry. With Shane Victorino’s return looming, time may be running out for guys Brown, Mayberry and Michael Martinez to make last impressions.
Phillies resign Walrond: The Phillies have reconnected with journeyman left-hander Les Walrond, who pitched briefly for the Phillies during their 2008 World Series campaign. Walrond, 34, had been pitching with the Lancaster Barnstormers of the Atlantic League where he was 1-0 with a 1.38 ERA in nine relief appearances. He was assigned to Double-A Reading. Since pitching for the Phillies, Walrond has spent time in the Orient, pitching in Japan and Korea in 2009-10. He’s appeared in 23 Major League games divided between the Royals, Cubs and Phils. [Link]
Sullivan released: According to IronPigs radio, the IronPigs have officially added Scott Podsednik and have released veteran Cory Sullivan. Sullivan, who is kind of like a poor-man’s Podsednik anyway, was hitting just .210/.336/.250 with the Pigs. [Link]
Miller retires: Outfielder Matt Miller, who was a non-roster spring invitee and had been playing for Reading, has announced his retirement, according to the Reading Eagle. The 28-year-old veteran of the Rockies farm system arrived as one of the more touted minor league signings by the Phils this winter, bringing along a .325/.404/.436 line from 586 plate appearances with Triple-A Colorado Springs the year before. Expected to start in Lehigh Valley, he was quickly bumped down to Reading and hit just .236/.303/.283 between the two affiliates. Perhaps he was another example of PCL smoke and mirrors. [Link]
Lidge pitches in extended spring training game: On a scale of 1-10, my excitement is around 3.




At this point, Walrond would be an upgrade to Romero.
Posted by: Scott | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:24 PM
You beat me to the punch Scott!
Posted by: Scotch Man | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:26 PM
a 3 rating for lidge is generous. i'm between a 1 and a 2.
Posted by: Dukes | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:33 PM
Lidge pitches in extended spring training game: On a scale of 1-10, my excitement is around 3.
Agreed.
Unless/until Charlie makes a definitive statement RE: Lidge's role once he returns to the team, the prospect of his coming back causes me far more anxiety than anticipation ... & that's when I even bother to think about it at all.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:35 PM
That Liscio's ad makes me want a cheesesteak. Bad. Sometimes I hate living out of the Philly area.
Posted by: krukker | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:39 PM
GTown.
Runs averaged over a significant period of time is the best measure of a team's offensive performance. Bar none.
In the unusual case that there might be some deviation above normal statistical variability to show that a particular team is more inconsistent than other teams that score similar amounts of runs (i.e., more games where they score very few and very many runs), it would just be a statistical fluke or explainable by something like key offensive players being injured.
I love it when negative Nancy's try to support their hand-wringing with theories that there is something about the Phillies' character (compared to other teams) that leads them to only score a lot of "wasted" runs against bad pitchers and get shut down more frequently than other teams.
Even if the Phillies offense was more variable than the few other NL offenses that scored similar amounts of runs, I'm quite sure that any deviation would fall within the normal range of statistical invariability.
The notion that there is something unique about the Phillies that leads them to score "wasted" runs is beyond laughable.
Runs scored = the quality of a teams offense.
Posted by: Phlipper | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:39 PM
From Crashburn Alley - Sept., 2010:
"The Phillies’ offense isn’t any more inconsistent this year than it was last year, believe it or not. The standard deviation on runs per game this year is 3.42; last year, it was 3.43."
Posted by: Phlipper | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:44 PM
I want to personally take responsibility for cutting Sullivan's career early. I initially started the taunting "Sull-ah-van" chant back in 05 and I could see, even in the early days that it got to him. I trace his decline to that series. The rest, as they say, is history. I also must claim responsibility for Langerhans falling off, though it is a much easier chant.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:49 PM
I see this Kratz guy is now hitting cleanup at AAA and had another dinger last night. He must be atrocious defensively because we're going to be watching the Great Dane flail again tomorrow.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:51 PM
GTown Dave wrote: "But in how many games did the Phillies score either 4 or 5 Runs in '10? 28 Games, or barely 17% of the time. Runs/Game is a bullshit stat."
What you mean is, RPG is not a good predictor of a team's performance in any individual game. That is true, and I don't think anybody who understands statistics would disagree.
However, RPG is a decent composite measure over time, and teams showing a larger RPG over time can be expected to perform better offensively than teams with significantly lower RPG. If you're trying to answer the question, "Which teams have been performing better offensively than others," RPG is a better statistic than most, since scoring runs is the purpose of hitting, slugging, getting on base, and so forth, after all.
Posted by: philwynk | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:54 PM
I don't share the negative feelings about Lidge. I have more of a neutral feeling. I really like Lidge and have lasting appreciation for him based on his work in '08. But no one can deny he stunk in '09. Was injured, faltered, and lost confidence - a downward spiral if ever there was one.
However, I felt like once he got healthy again - which took a long time - he was effective again, too.
Since he seems one of those guys who tries to downplay injuries and is naturally optimistic, I have some caution about him. But I think that if he's really and truly healthy when he comes back - and has had time to get back on his game - that he will be a boon to this team.
I wouldn't necessarily bump Madson from closer. Madson's been outstanding, there's no denying it. I also wouldn't re-sign Lidge. But I'd fit him into the BP and feel the stronger for it. Depending on what he demonstrates when he returns.
It's also good to have Contreras back.
After the 19-inning game, I've lost all patience with Romero, on the other hand.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 05:59 PM
Interesting article related to the supposed advantages of consistency of small ball versus "take and rake" (getting walks and hitting HRs).
The article points out that it is only probable that teams which score more runs overall (as in 2nd in the league last year in runs scored) would show more variability in the # of runs scored per game.
Apparently GTown would be happier with a "consistent" team like the Padres?
Posted by: Phlipper | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:00 PM
Sorry - article link:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4125
Posted by: Phlipper | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:00 PM
From the article:
" Neither the small-ball nor the take-and-rake index are even close to significant, with p-values above .6. Hitting approach has no effect on the consistency of runs scored. In fact, once the number of runs scored is controlled for, it seems nothing else effects the variance in runs scored:"
Posted by: Phlipper | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:02 PM
Last year:
Team ranking by runs scored, team ranking by OPS
1: Cincinnati 1: Cincinnati
2: Philly 2: Colorado
3: Colorado 3: Milwaukee
4: Milwaukee 4: Philly
5: Atlanta 5: Arizona
6: St. Louis 6: Atlanta
7: Florida 7: St. Louis
8: Arizona 8: San Fran
9: San Fran 9: Florida
10:Cubs 10:Cubs
Notice a pattern there? I guess it's just coincidence that runs per game matches so closely to OPS. Because, you know, runs per game is such a meaningless stat.
Posted by: Phlipper | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:13 PM
Phlipper: Let me phrase this in a different manner, as you've devolved into tackling about 15 separate arguments, none of which I raised --
The Phillies are averaging 4.12 Runs/Game in '11. What, if anything, is the practical application of such knowledge?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:19 PM
Hamels (.250 in 24 ABs) will have the 3rd highest average in tonight's lineup....
Posted by: PhillyJoe | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:24 PM
Maybe Walrond should have been a LOOGY all along?
Message to Romero?
Posted by: awh | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:25 PM
Iceman: To address your comments/question from the last thread . . . I use RPG as a handy shortcut statistic the way I use ERA+ as a handy shortcut statistic. Like any convenient shortcut statistic, it is neither infallible nor nuanced. However, in most (not all) cases, it provides a decent snapshot.
In this case, I used RPG to prove what I didn't think was a terribly controversial point: that the Reds' offense is the best in the National League. However, if you can demonstrate that the Reds' RPG is an inaccurate measure of their overall productivity, I am more than open to hearing you out. Of course, you've never taken much interest in trying to understand anyone's point -- let alone debate that point. You exist on Beerleaguer solely for the purpose of taking gratuitous potshots at Jack, me, MG, and 1 or 2 others.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:42 PM
The best thing Walrond could do for his career is to grow a huge bushy mustache and rebrand himself Les "The Walrus" Walrond. Do this and he's be recalled to the bigs by next Tuesday, book it.
Posted by: jbird | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:59 PM
"The Phillies are averaging 4.12 Runs/Game in '11. What, if anything, is the practical application of such knowledge?"
There is nothing. Runs/Game only matters relative to runs allowed/game.
Posted by: Old Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:05 PM
@jbird: He also needs to learn how to pace around the mound, pick up and toss the rosin bag, look pleadingly at the sky (or the stars at night), pound his glove and stride purposefully to to the mound for each pitch. Accomplish that feat, and he's your LOOGY for life.
I like your thought process.
Posted by: mainerob | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:06 PM
Old Phan: The Phillies have Scored an average of 4.12 Runs/Game while Allowing an average of 3.27 Runs/Game. So should the Phillies be 51-0? Or does Runs/Game Scored relative to Runs/Game Allowed really not tell us anything we couldn't figure out by simply looking at the team's W/L Record?
b_a_p: St. Louis leads the NL in BA, OBP, SLG, OPS & OPS+. Why wouldn't they be considered the "best Offense in the league"?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:14 PM
These MLB local blackout rules are starting to get on my nerves.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:14 PM
Game blacked out for some odd reason. Is it on national tv or is it just a big FU from MLB?
Its after 7:05 pm on a saturday so it should be available on MLB.tv.
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:15 PM
Replace Victorino with Mayberry in this order (obviously with Vic in a different spot in the order) and this is the lineup that should see the majority of starts this year.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:17 PM
I love that our 2nd baseman takes pitches these days...
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:18 PM
Polly shot his wad in April.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM
Godam put Polanco back in the 2-hole
Posted by: John Jitbag | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM
Batting Polly behind a non-base stealer is a mistake, if you ask me. He's ground into considerably less double plays if he were battinb behind Jimmy.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM
G-Town: St. Louis is right up there although, if you also take last year into consideration, I'd give the edge to the Reds.
Anyway, at the time of my original statement, the Reds led the league in runs per game. Iceman doesn't have much going on in his life, so he's still taking me to task for a statement I made about 5 days ago -- even though I've still never even heard him say that he disagreed with the statement.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM
Nepp- game is on FAUX
Posted by: John Jitbag | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:21 PM
NEPP, I was wondering the same thing. I can't find it anywhere on Extra Innings. I started to wonder if it was in a rain delay or something
Posted by: Old Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:21 PM
Oh...on Fox? Good to know.
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:22 PM
Is there another Fox game on tonight? If so, that's the reason for the blackout. They want you to watch the other game.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:22 PM
FAUX is doing a Saturday Night "six pack" of regional games
Posted by: John Jitbag | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:23 PM
The only thing that's p*ssing me off more than MLB's blackout rule right now is Jose Reyes.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:24 PM
Well damn.
Posted by: Andrew | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:26 PM
son of a smelly whore...
Posted by: John Jitbag | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:26 PM
I didn't realize it was on Fox.
Fie!
Posted by: Old Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:26 PM
Cincy and now NY running wild our pitchers.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:27 PM
Well, if Hamels had gotten just 2 runs in each of 2 games last year, his record would be 4-7, which wouldn't be so "stunning", now would it?
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:28 PM
Reyes was out. He overslid the base. Polanco was tagging him when he was out of contact with the bag.
Posted by: phatti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:28 PM
Polanco GIDP 6 times in March/April, but batted .398, Walked 10 times & Struck Out 5 times. In May, Polanco has only GIDP twice, but he's batting .232 while Walking 5 times & Striking Out 11 times. For a selective, contact-type guy, this has been a terrible month.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:28 PM
I thought so as well, phatti, but I doubt that will ever get called.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:28 PM
I suppose Polly's not allowed to go into a slump. I'll be sure to let him know that the general rules of baseball don't apply to him.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:29 PM
Ruiz just can't throw runners out. One of his shortcomings.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:30 PM
Better hope Cole settles down for the next few innings. Threw 23 in that inning.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:32 PM
Didn't Ruiz throw out a few guys this week?
Posted by: Old Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:34 PM
I don't know what Howard's pissed off about, he should have killed that pitch.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:37 PM
Ruiz isn't the problem. Most of our pitchers can't be bothered to hold runners.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:37 PM
Ruiz has thrown out fewer than 30% of opposing base runners in all but one season of his career. I'm not sure what the average is for major league catchers, but I generally think of around 35% or better as being pretty good.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:41 PM
curt: Agreed. Even Halladay hasn't been paying attention to base runners in his past couple of starts.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:41 PM
For all of his flaws Blanton does a nice job holding runners.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:44 PM
That one, however, was all on Chooch.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:45 PM
This feels like a loss.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:45 PM
The Mets are just running crazy on us. Every single is turning into a double. This doesn't forecast to be a good game for us.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:45 PM
Good job by Hamels to take care of that runner.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:46 PM
Real hanger there.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:47 PM
So, basically, if they make contact with the bat, it's a hit. The only way Cole is getting outs is with strike-outs.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:48 PM
Cole's not super sharp tonight. Hopefully he figures it out as the game goes on.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:49 PM
Gonna need the BP tonight.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:50 PM
not ready
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:54 PM
Where the hell did that hit the bat?
Figures with Scott Barry behind the plate, we'd get some questionable calls tonight.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:54 PM
Send Dom?
Posted by: SLO Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:55 PM
Big Pelf is getting some questionable calls. Of course, when you're the staff ace of the famed NY Mets, you're going to get those calls.
Posted by: David $$$$ | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:56 PM
It baffles me how a lefty like Hamels has never developed even a semi-decent pick-off move. Best Phils' lefty I can remember was the one Mulholland had. It was incredibly deceptive and quick.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:56 PM
Joe Buck is generally intolerable, but his voice just sounds like garbage lately, as if he just woke up from a long night of drinking.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:57 PM
Geezer kept them baffled on 1B too.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:58 PM
MG: Mulholland had one of the best pick-off moves I have ever seen from any pitcher. Truly outstanding.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 07:59 PM
Mulholland did have an excellent pickoff move, although Steve Carlton certainly belongs in any discussion about best pickoff moves in Phillies history.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:01 PM
Reyes would look fine in red next year.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:01 PM
Moyer had a really good pickoff move. And very few lefties of the last 15 years coudl match Pettite's move.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:02 PM
Another single by Reyes. I already know how the rest of the story goes.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:03 PM
How the hell has McCarver never heard of a 'AAAA' player? That's been around for at least 15 years. Probably longer.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:04 PM
Petitte has the best pickoff move of anybody I can remember the last 15 years.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:04 PM
I think the Phils are going to need about 7 runs to win tonight.
Posted by: SLO Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:05 PM
This is absolutely zero energy in this game or this broadcast.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:06 PM
Hopefully the unimpressive tenure of Jason Bay as a Met continues for this AB.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:07 PM
SLO: That's how Pelfrey has a career record of 6-5 vs. the Phillies despite a corresponding 5.25 ERA.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:07 PM
This is plain ridiculous.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:09 PM
Hamels ought to be embarrassed by that SB.
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:09 PM
Dave - Pelfrey has been 'Jekyll and Hyde' vs. the Phils. He's been very good vs. them at Shea/Citi and horrendous at CBP.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:09 PM
Being run on this much should be embarassing for the Phillies.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:09 PM
Since I'm stuck on Gameday . . . are the Mets stealing these bases on Hamels or is Ruiz just making poor throws? Or is it a little of both?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:11 PM
This is nothing new though. Mets have run against the Phils early and often vs Phils especially at Citi Field.
Frankly I don't understand why more teams don't run against the Phils almost every chance they get. Ruiz is average at best at throwing out runners. Schneider is below average.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:11 PM
That's the upside of the game being blacked out. I don't have to hear Joe Buck.
Posted by: Old Phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:12 PM
BAP - Its both. Hamels is making almost no attempt to keep the runners at 1B anywhere near the bag. They are getting crazy leads. Gives Ruiz little chance unless it is a fastball.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:12 PM
Geez it's embarrassing to be losing to this freakin' team.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:13 PM
Jose Reyes can learn a thing or two about how to run the bases from Utley there. Great job to be at 2nd.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:13 PM
Jose Reyes = Joe Disaster in Espanol
Posted by: whitey | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:14 PM
These are the situations where the Phils have to get runs. YOu get a leadoff double, get him in, even if it involves two productive outs.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:15 PM
MG: Thanks. Hamels might want to work on that part of his game. No lefty should be run on like this.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:15 PM
Good to know the guy dressed in that foolish dog custom hasn't escaped from Bellevue or even worse a 'furry.'
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:16 PM
What the hell were they trying to talk about with "sees him as a dog, but he sees him as a man dressed as a dog"? I am not drunk or high and cannot follow this.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:16 PM
MG: Is that the guy what just bought a $200 Million stake in the team?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:17 PM
That's NOT what you want to do.
Ugh.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:17 PM
"Professional hitter."
Posted by: curt | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:17 PM
So much for the 2 productive outs.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:18 PM
Pelfrey isn't not a freaking frontline starter. Every time he is on Fox, McCarver blathers about how Pelfrey has frontline starter stuff. No, no he doesn't. He isn't anything more than a mediocre starter who would get hit hard in the AL or if he didn't pitch in a pitcher's park like Citi.
All you need to know is his career road ERA is 5.62 in 55 GS.
Posted by: MG | Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 08:18 PM