The brightest hope for middle infield help beyond Chase Utley and Jimmy Rollins could rest in the hands of 20-year-old infielder Cesar Hernandez.
Hernandez, an elfin, switch-hitting defender who demonstrated some genuine ability to handle the stick in the New York-Penn League last season, has surfaced on a pair of prominent offseason rankings, including a strong endorsement from MLB.com’s Jonathan Mayo, who rated him as the seventh-best 2B prospect in baseball this week. That’s terrific news for a team that hasn’t had a young middle infielder to get chubbed up about since Rollins and Utley came through the system. The Phils have groomed a fair share of petite run, catch and throw farmhands over the years, but most of them have fallen short on offensive ability, which is the understatement of the year. But Hernandez appears to be cut from a different cloth. His 32 steals rated second in the league and he was sixth in hitting (.325). He finished with a nice .325/.390/.392 in 286 plate appearances.
He doesn’t possess much power potential, and isn’t especially young, but unlike shortstop prospect Jonathan Villar, who was traded Houston in the Roy Oswalt deal, he’s strikingly disciplined (27/26 K/BB) and booted just seven balls in 321 chances, compared to 153 hacks and 53 errors for Villar, albeit in twice as many games. Mayo isn’t the only impressed insider. Jon Sickels of minorleagueball.com listed Hernandez as the club's 11th-best prospect, and best infielder, citing excellent speed and defense in a pitcher-friendly New York-Penn League. “I think he is overlooked,” he writes.
Beer nuts: Right-hander San Larazo Solano, 20, a member of the Phillies' Dominican Summer League team, was suspended 50 games for testing positive for performance enhancers. He was 4-3 with a 2.57 ERA in a 12 appearances, eight as a starter. ... In other news, the Phillies, in their quest to lead the league in sensory overload, have installed a giant scoreboard 2.5-times bigger than the old one. They also plan to raise the volume of their PA system by several decibels to cancel out the noise of passing airplanes, fighter jets and alien invasion.




He's more of a Polanco style 2B than an Utley style but he's a legit prospect. Hopefully he continues to develop.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:36 AM
He fell to #20 on the fans vote at PhuturePhillies simply because far too many voters over there have no idea how the minors work.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:38 AM
Plus, NEPP, you refused to join me in voting for him because you have a thing for Domingo Santana.
;P
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:43 AM
Santana is in his 3rd pro season when most US prospects are seniors in HS. His upside is legit.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:44 AM
Actually, what amazes me is that some folks continued to prefer Harold Garcia and, amazingly, Austin Hyatt. And some people there voted for Derrick Mitchell which kinda says everything right there.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:44 AM
I still think Jiwan James at #11 was the most ridiculous of the votes so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:45 AM
NEPP - I agree, actually. I'm a big Santana fan. I was just yanking yer chain.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:45 AM
NEPP - But he got dem tools, baby. Jiwan James is like Makita.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:46 AM
I thought the Mitchell thing was a joke at first...but they kept at it. Same with Hyatt. Suddenly, Hyatt is "throwing mid-90s" blah blah blah. Or perhaps he sits 92ish like all the game reports state. Just because a guy hit a velocity once in relief doesnt mean he will or could do it regularly.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:47 AM
LOL: "to get chubbed up about"
Yeah, the Derrick Mitchell write-ins were truly bizarre.
Jiwan James may have been a reach there, but I don't think i'd call it "ridiculous".
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:48 AM
I'd put James down around 18-20 if it were me. He's a long-shot at best due to the late position change and raw skill set.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:49 AM
It's nice to see something like 27/26 K/BB from one of these kids for a change.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:51 AM
Yeah...its definitely nice to see some actual baseball skills out of a prospect instead of "he's raw but projectable" or "Sure he struck out 150 times in 250 ABs but WOW, look at those tools!"
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:53 AM
Domingo Santana at #13 was slightly surprising to me. He struggled last year, probably due to him moving along too quickly, but NEPP is right. The kid is 18 years old and is prospect with a lot of promise.
Posted by: Bay Slugga | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM
(Phone rings four times, answering machine clicks on...)
"Hey, this is JC, I am either getting with the ladies or throwing heat..leave a message" (click)
"Yo JC, you gotta help me man, YO, if you are there pick up, bro...come on..okay, guess not... gimme a call back...for real, bro...peace...this is San Larazo, talk to you later I guess..."
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:02 AM
If Hernandez can continue to play good defense, get on base at the .374 clip he's done so far, and steal bases at the 75+% rate, he may well have a future in MLB.
Andy, I'm not ranking them, but what's wrong with Austin Hyatt? He's a little old for the level, but he had a nice year in 2010. If he can make the adjustment to AA this season, and perhaps get pushed to AAA (like Happ did in one season), we'll see if they really have anything in him.
Have you seen him pitch? What's his stuff like?
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:03 AM
JW, in the Venezuelan Summer League, Hernandez had a 33/22 BB/K ratio. Granted, not the best competition in the world, but the kid was only 18, when most US kids would have been seniors in HS.
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:08 AM
Weitzel- 'bout damn time you got of Facebook. We Should Be GMs will friend you later today.
Also, glad to see you brought the humor today with the "elfin" jab and "chubbed up about" quip.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:16 AM
I don't know about elfin, he looks part Gelfling.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:26 AM
This is totally off-topic, but I was just over at Phils-ville (JW has a link onthe left).
The third topic down features a video of a little girl who's dream it is to heckle David Wright in person.
LMAO funny.
Go take a look.
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:32 AM
Forget elf jokes, though. If he makes it he'll be L'il Cesar. You can book it now.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:44 AM
awh - She's livin' large.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:44 AM
Vlads is still out there, what would he cost the Phillies? My thinking is you can get him on the cheap even given his great 2010 season, there's your everyday RF solution. He'd hit 35 here even if he missed a month.
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:59 AM
Joe, the problem is that injuries have made Vlad a defensive liability.
Sad, too, because when he was with the Expos he was pretty good defensively.
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:01 AM
Vlads was an awesome fielder in his day. But no matter who will be playing RF this season they will not be defensive stars, I say give it a shot, given his age and condition he may settle for a platoon. Plus a great mentor for Brown who probably grew up watching him play.
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM
Andy, I went over to the Onion SportsDome.
The original unedited version is posted there:
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/channels/sportsdome/
If you have younger kids I wouldn't recommend it.
It's pretty raw - R-rated, IMO.
But "funner" than the version on Phils-ville.
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Rollins
Polanco
Utley
Howard
Guerrero
Victorino
Francisco
Ruiz
?
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:13 AM
Vlad can't play out there anymore.
As others have noted, it's really a shame because Vlad was one of the best pure all-around players I've ever seen when he was younger. He won the MVP with Anaheim, but his last couple years in Montreal were unbelievable. He was consistently a .300/.400/.600 hitter with 40 HRs, 20 SBs, and a gun in RF (though his range was never great).
Posted by: Jack | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:18 AM
Joe C, more likely it would be:
Rollins
Polanco
Utley
Howard
Guerrero
Ibanez
Victorino
Ruiz
Though IMHO, Vic and Polly ought to be flipped.
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM
I agree he's not the player he was, but isn't he the best option out there? Fills your right handed bat need and your other RF platoon man? In this park he can duplicate the year he had offensively with Texas. It's more a statement on how little options are out there, but we can't go with what we have.
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM
390/400 SLG? OK, he's not a 5 tool player, but you don't need one for a shortstop. Can he defend, can he get on base at a good clip, is he fast, those are my 3 requirements for a good shortstop. 4 out of 5 tools, basically.
So if his OBP is .350 or better, great. Hopefully he keeps progressing then.
As for Guerrero, hell NO! There's a reason teams look at him exclusively as a DH. He can't run anymore. Putting him in the OF regularly is just asking him to hurt himself. So for an NL team, he's essentially a RH power bat off the bench, not a full time player. Even as a DH with Texas he wore down over the stretch (his stats were little better than league average), and this was without playing in the field regularly. So he hasn't aged well at all. He'll be 36.
Unless the Phillies get an RH bat through trade, Francisco is basically it, and he's actually a slightly above average RF, statistically (last year NL average OPS for RF's was .778, for AL it was .791).
Francisco's OPS+ year by year:
2008 (499PA) : 105
2009 (459PA) : 106
2010 (197PA) : 104
His numbers will almost certainly see a boost hitting behind Ryan Howard as well. So if you can find a league average free agent who can defend well, and be cheaper than 1.5 million (Francisco's arb salary is 1.175 million), I'll be all ears.
Posted by: The_GodfatherSJP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM
AWH totally forgot about Rauuuuul. I agree Vic and Polly can be flipped, just thinking of what the opening day lineup would look like, and from the sounds of Cholly Vic may be in the doghouse and therefore start out batting low.
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM
NO! Increasing the PA volume is awful. They can turn up Dan Baker, if they must, but turning up the volume on music and assorted BS is a terrible idea. Has anyone been to an NBA game lately? Didn't think so, but if you end up at one notice how annoying and needy the whole thing feels. The Phillies don't need that vibe.
Posted by: gobaystars | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM
Jack, Vlad is also a Phillie killer. I hater it when he came to the plate when they played the Phils.
He'd be a lock for the HOF and considered the greatest RHH of all time if he had only hit against the Phillies pitching of that time:
Lifetime vs the Phillies: .371/.465/.739
During his peak years from ages 22 - 32 (11 seasons - never hit below .307):
.325/.392/.581
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM
Would have preferred Andruw Jones instead until the Yanks grabbed him. At least he would have been better defensively, worse with the bat though.
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:37 AM
"Can he defend, can he get on base at a good clip, is he fast, those are my 3 requirements for a good shortstop. 4 out of 5 tools, basically. "
If he's a 2B this low, I don't think he'll ever be a SS.
If he turns out to be the reincarnation of Luis Castillo (of an earlier era, obviously), that would be a very nice thing.
Posted by: Edmundo | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:39 AM
Yeah, what's up with the early doghouse for Vic? I'm thinking it is the Clearwater Strategy to allow time for Rollins to make peace with his body in yoga class while Vic and Cholly banter.
Posted by: Meyer | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:39 AM
Vlad 2010:
.300/.345/.496, 29 HR, 115 RBI
"(his stats were little better than league average),"
Ummm, Godfather....Padrino, what do you think is league average?
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:39 AM
Vlads numbers are first ballot HOF all the way. His years with a brutal club in Montreal were unbelievable, and he single handedly crushed the Phillies game after game while he was there.
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM
Vlad and the Big Hurt are probably my all-time favourite non-Phillies. Vlad killed us for years but it was cool to watch.
My favorite Vlad story is the time he was on first and running on the pitch, which was a fly out. By the time it was caught he was nearing third and tried to cut across to first, bypassing second all together. So much love and respect for Vlad. If the Phillies were a non-contender I would want him here just for kicks.
Posted by: gobaystars | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM
Can we sign Vladdy and Pedro?
Posted by: Jbird | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM
I agree Thomas was awesome as well. Everytime you thought he had an off year and was on the decline he came back with 45-130 and over .300 average. Didn't the Phils pass on him for Jeff Jackson?
Posted by: Joe Cowley | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM
Yeah after seeing him play RF in the playoffs last year for Texas, there is no way I put him in the field. At this point he is strictly a DH. I'm just hoping D Brown wins the RF job outright in ST.
Posted by: Mego | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM
Rube won't sign Vlad because we're getting "younger and more athletic."
{tee-hee}
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM
Though I love how they both hit, I think at this point, Manny could play OF better than Vlad and that is not saying anything.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:03 PM
Different topic:
Chooch is getting some love from Jayson Stark on his All-Underrated Team:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=6044419
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:04 PM
Finally the truth comes out about Fielder Jr. Vegeterian my a$$:
Prince Fielder Explains Complexities Of Salary Arbitration Using Cheeseburgers
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/prince-fielder-explains-complexities-of-salary-arb,18897/
Posted by: MG | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:04 PM
facebook. gross. necessary i GUESS, but gross.
Posted by: craig_one | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Craig,
Come on, it's necessary for us to see which Beerleaguers are really fat high school girls who wear "Mrs. Utley" jerseys to the park and email the team for pictures.
Posted by: Ed Snider | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM
If Hernandez were capable of playing SS, he'd already be doing so. He's a 2B.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:18 PM
***Prince Fielder Explains Complexities Of Salary Arbitration Using Cheeseburgers***
Is anyone else thinking of that Phil Hartman SNL skit when he plays Bill Clinton...
"There's gonna be a whole bunch of things we don't tell Mrs. Clinton..."
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 12:20 PM
Ronnie Belliard is still available. Played for 825K last season.
I wonder if he has anything left in the tank?
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 01:58 PM
mlbtr has a nice rundown of the FA SP still available.
They obviously affect the trade market for Blanton.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/01/remaining-free-agent-starters-by-innings-pitched.html
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 02:02 PM
I'm pretty nuetral on Hernandez. I guess his plate discipline is his greatest strength and it surely is a crucial skillset - but nothing I've read or heard really gets me too high on his status as a prospect. I mean what are we talking about here, the next coming of Jason Donald?
Posted by: jason.tp | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 02:05 PM
I think he's probably a better defender than Donald but obviously has less pop in his bat.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 02:29 PM
Andy: How did Moose Mattair do?
Posted by: clout | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 02:59 PM
NEPP: Actually, the position switch is a reason to OVERRATE James, not underrate him. To put up the numbers he did in only his sceond season asa position player is no small feat.
That said, most toolsheds are gambles that fail. But James is like sitting with a pair of Kings and a Jack in 5-card stud. Golson was like sitting with a pair of 3s. Hewitt was like playing with 4 cards.
Posted by: clout | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 03:03 PM
****To put up the numbers he did in only his sceond season asa position player is no small feat.****
Let's see what he does outside of Low A ball.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 03:05 PM
NEPP: I totally agree with that and want to see the same thing from Hernandez, who is 20, which is not young for NY-Penn.
Posted by: clout | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 03:10 PM
AWH:
Context of Line is Guerrero wearing down over the stretch. Therefore, that line about being "his stats were little better than league average" refers to his performance in the second half.
To wit:
AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS/
1st Half: .319/.364/.554/.919
2nd Half: .278/.322/.426/.748
AL Average for DH 2010: .252/.332/.425/.757
Ergo, my statement is correct.
Read better, please.
Posted by: The_GodfatherSJP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 03:29 PM
***I totally agree with that and want to see the same thing from Hernandez, who is 20, which is not young for NY-Penn.***
So do I.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 04:40 PM
clout - fortunately no one's voting for the Moose. But Overbeck's already made it onto the slate, right next to Mitchell.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 04:59 PM
"I guess his plate discipline is his greatest strength"
No. He gets on base and is really fast and he plays good defense. The fact that he also has good plate discipline does not make THAT his greatest strength.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 05:01 PM
Isn't it elvin?
Posted by: baxter | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 05:09 PM
I would like to see what Hernandez can do above the NYPL as well. However while he is not young for the league he is certainly not old for it either, age appropriate would be the most accurate description.
Posted by: Mego | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 06:15 PM
I wanna see an infield of Cesar, Galvis and Mike Martinez at 3B. Let Chooch play first.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 07:21 PM
I want to see Hernandez standing beside the GALVISNATOR (age 21) for a size comparison.
Posted by: Meyer | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 07:26 PM
I know someone tossed this out there before:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=6044419
but, damn, I'd like to be young, upcoming team with any 3 of these guys -- Chooch included.
I sure hope our historically great starting 4 don't have injury problems. Because our SS, 1B, 2B, 3B, and CF all got hurt last year. Heck, Blanton, Moyer, Madson, Durbin, and Lidge -- even Chooch -- went down for a spell.
I guess that's why they play the games.
Posted by: cut_fastball | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 07:42 PM
Manny signed for $2 Million?
Posted by: Meyer | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 08:30 PM
Manny and Damon to Tampa. This is bizzare.
Posted by: gobaystars! | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 08:51 PM
Boras pitched the idea to the Rays as a "package deal". A Vet Package, what a guy.
Posted by: Meyer | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 09:01 PM
and Vernon Wells got traded. amazing.
Posted by: gobaystars! | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:05 PM
I still can't wrap my head around the Wells deal.
Posted by: gobaystars! | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 10:24 PM
The Wells deal is simple: Somewhat of a salary dump by Toronto, who got back a decent young player in Napoli, and a declining OF in Rivera.
Gee, do you think they did better than the Phillies did in the Abreu trade?
Posted by: awh | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:49 PM
http://msn.foxsports.com/video/MLB?vid=f2434b4e-9f0f-402b-af78-2bf6d696de19
Doc speaks
Posted by: pb | Friday, January 21, 2011 at 11:53 PM
Why would the Angles take him on. The Blue jays won so big on this. He's making $23 mill next year. His contract is massively backloaded. It is insane for the Angels. I can't sort out why they did it.
Posted by: gobaystars! | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 12:14 AM
Mike Napoli is a 28-year old catcher with a career 118 OPS+.
You can make a legitimate argument that he's a better baseball player right now than Vernon Wells. This trade is unfathomably bad for the Angels, and there is no rational explanation for it. You don't give up equal players when one is under team control for below-market salary and the other is signed to the worst contract in baseball.
Posted by: Jack | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 12:47 AM
Looks like Vlad isn't going to Baltimore after all. Perhaps the Rays can go for the trifecta of living statues in the outfield.
Posted by: Will Schweitzer | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 09:22 AM
It's impossible to defend the Angels part of this deal because of the terrible Wells contract, but they are getting money from the Jays and they unloaded their own bad contract in Rivera. Plus, Napoli is a bad defensive catcher more suited to DH.
The Angels are hoping against hope that Wells can somehow find the form he showed in his youth.
Posted by: clout | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 09:41 AM
Hey why can we get a rapidly aging fielder who signing to more than one year is a big mistake who will misplay balls at the most inopportune time...oh, wait a second...
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 09:46 AM
I heard $5 mill from the Jays, which is nothing. This is a strange deal. I don't get it.
Posted by: gobaystars!!1! | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 09:54 AM
Even if Wells has the same kind of year he had in 2010, then he still won't approach the value of his contract.
On MLB Network last night Verducci said the move of Hunter to RF is the right one because at this point Wells is a better CF.
I found that very interesting because, based on the limited number of games I've seen him play, my view of Wells is that he has "Jones Syndrome" - that is, he got fat and happy like AJ and lost a step or two in CF. I haven't seen Hunter much since he went to LAA, so I'll take Verducci's word for it, but IMHO, Wells isn't remotely close to as good as the guy who won 3 straight GG by the time he was 27.
OTOH, b-r.com has him at 3.4 WAR in 2010, and fangraphs has him at 4.0 WAR.
If, the saber's are to be believed, and 1 WAR is worth $5MM (I read that somewhere - correct me if I'm wrong), then then he was worth somewhere between 17 - 20MM in 2010.
Personally, I disagree.
Posted by: awh | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 09:56 AM
Okay, we discussed this a couple of months back when I suggested picking up the Angels spare before but...I am still under the impression they have a spare RH OF at this point. Those not closely watching CA of LA baseball...who is their expected lineup now? I believe they still have an expendable OF.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM
Yes, his name is Bobby Abreu. Perhaps you've heard of him.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM
I will pick him up from the airport tonight if they make it happen.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM
The best move for the Angels defensively now would be Wells and Hunter in the corners with Bourjos in CF. Abreu should stick to his best position, "hitter."
Wells is the most overpaid player in baseball right now, and I don't think it's even close. Panic move by the Angels. If they were prepared to pay 23 mil per they could have had Crawford easily. Hell, it would've been smarter to give Beltre 23 mil a year than take on Wells' contract.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 10:19 AM
I am very disappointed about the Wells trade. I always hoped it would be the Mets that picked up his bloated back filled contract.
Now I have to hope they resign Reyes to a 7 year deal and he blows out his hammy dancing in the clubhouse.
Posted by: Not Ralph | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM
The Angels went hard after Crawford & didn't get him. Then they went hard after Beltre and didn't get him. I guess they had money to burn so they decided to burn it.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 11:35 AM
" If they were prepared to pay 23 mil per they could have had Crawford easily."
Chris, that is exactly right.
The amazing thing is that in the Crawford deal, the HIGHEST annual salary is 21MM in 2017. The same is true of the Werth contract - 21MM.
They are both, IMHO, better palyers right now than Vernon Wells.
Posted by: awh | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Woke up to the Wells trade...thought I was in bizarro world when I saw it.
What in the world are the Angels thinking? Are they getting a TON of money in return?
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM
The stupidity of the Vernon Wells trade is so indisputable that it has even produced unanimous agreement among Jack, clout, NEPP, and awh.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 01:13 PM
And Lo, he opened the sixth seal and there was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth and the moon turned red.
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 01:16 PM
the wells trade is one of the worst i can remember (for the angels). if they had received $25 million it might have made some sense, but i'm not even sure about that. the jays gm locked up exec of '11 even if he sits on his hands for the next 11 months.
Posted by: Conshy Matt | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 01:19 PM
Vernon Wells makes $23 million this year...I mean, damn.
Even if you "account" for that $5 million and add it all to this year, its $18 million. Anyone want to take a shot on what his line will be this year? He'll have to repeat his 2010 and continue to do so until the end of his Age 35 season to make the contract even somewhat reasonable. And that doesnt include giving up Napoli. Granted Napoli doesnt have the greatest defensive reputation but his bat behind the plate is well worth putting up with him.
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 01:29 PM
Again, Napoli might be poor defensively, but he's a 28-year old catcher who has a 118 OPS+ and who made $3.6 million last year.
He could be Edward Scissorhands back there and that's still about 15 times more valuable than Vernon Wells and his contract.
Posted by: Jack | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 02:14 PM
The Angels probably could have gotten Wells simply by offering to take on his salary...and yet they said "here have Mike Napoli too". I mean...damn.
Posted by: NEPP | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 02:18 PM
Somehow figure out a way to trade Blanton or Kendrick for Galaraga.
Posted by: rauls grandpa | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 02:35 PM
BAP - "The Angels went hard after Crawford & didn't get him. Then they went hard after Beltre and didn't get him. I guess they had money to burn so they decided to burn it."
I doubt they went very hard after either player if they had this much money to burn...if they had offered Beltre 4/86 (what Wells will make over the next 4 years) he would have jumped at it in a second. They would have signed a more valuable defensive and offensive player at a more valuable position, which also happened to be a major need for them. Instead they're paying that money to Vernon Wells. And they gav away legitimate major leaguers for the right to do so. Their GM should be fired on the spot. That is pure incompetence.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 02:38 PM
""The stupidity of the Vernon Wells trade is so indisputable that it has even produced unanimous agreement among Jack, clout, NEPP, and awh."
And simultaneously!
It is, indeed, a bizarro world at times.
Posted by: awh | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 02:43 PM
I LOVE this trade.
(Actually I'm only saying that so the world doesn't end.)
Posted by: Andy | Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 02:49 PM