Cole Hamels (10-10, 3.06) works to extend his 25-inning shutout streak when the Phillies and Marlins play the second in South Florida.
Preview: Lately, the effectiveness of Hamels' newly crafted cutter has become more and more apparent. Adding a third, late-breaking hard pitch has kept hitters from sitting dead-red fastball. And when they get a fastball, it's zipping in at 94 mph. As a result, Hamels has looked mighty dominant with no signs of slowing. It's been a good year for the cutter actually with the addition of Roy Halladay, Hamels and Jamie Moyer twirled a good one before he got hurt. ... Career minor-leaguer Adelberto Mendez (1-0, 0.00) can't possibly fool the Phillies twice. Mendez pitched a six-inning one-hitter against the Phillies on Sept. 6. ... The Phillies confirmed that Roy Oswalt will pitch Friday and Kyle Kendrick on Saturday, meaning that Hamels, Roy Halladay and Oswalt are lined up for the Atlanta series beginning Monday. ... Standard lineup tonight. Jimmy Rollins is still a little worse than day-to-day with no word on when he'll return to the lineup.




From last thread: Just to inject some substance into the debate about UZR sample sizes, this is from the Fangraphs UZR Primer:
"In fact, the year-to-year correlation of OPS for full-time players, somewhat of a proxy for reliability, is almost .7. UZR, in contrast, depending on the position, has a year-to-year correlation of around .5. So a year of OPS data is roughly equivalent to a year and half to two years of UZR."
Only an idiot would call others "idiot" for using a season's worth of UZR to examine fielding performance.
Posted by: sifl | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:12 PM
Link: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-fangraphs-uzr-primer/#12
Posted by: sifl | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:12 PM
Clout, are you asserting that the average of three unreliable numbers results in a reliable number? Yikes thats naive.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:18 PM
Is the start delayed? If so, appreciate any solid guesses as to probable duration. Need to call home and have teh recording extended before I get on this plane . . .
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:21 PM
Spitz: Can't ANY statistically significant sample size be broken into smaller parts which, if taken alone, would be unreliable? If so, wouldn't it also follow that mutliple samples which are too small to be reliable can be combined into one larger sample which IS reliable?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:24 PM
The Good News: I have Phillies tickets for this coming Friday & Tuesday, which gives me a Roy/Roy Double Header of sorts.
The Bad & Ugly News:
"Kendrick will start only two more games this season, both against Washington." - Matt Gelb
Kendrick vs. the Natinals in '10: 3 GS, 12.71 ERA, 2.471 WHIP, Opponent Slash Line of .404/.475/.654/1.129, Kyle's worst numbers vs. any team he has faced this season.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:25 PM
Hugh: Should be starting soon.
Posted by: Scott | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:25 PM
Danke schoen
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:26 PM
BAP - yes, any statistical sample can be broken down into smaller parts, but the average is only meaningul if enough of those smaller parts are used to compute it. In other words, a batter's OPS for a game is not meaningful. The same stat averaged over 3 games is also not meaningful. But over 162 games, it suddenly starts to mean something.
Think about it from a standard deviation or a standard error perspective. The standard deviation of any sample of three is very large. Why? Because a sample of three is meaningless.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:30 PM
Nats up 2-0 over ATL.
Posted by: CarlosBeltransexual | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:30 PM
Nats up 2-0 in the 2nd.
Posted by: Old Phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:31 PM
Washington up 2-0 on a Dunn home run.
Posted by: Tray | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:31 PM
Love this ballpark...and this defense.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:32 PM
That was fast.
Posted by: Old Phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:33 PM
Polly!!!
Posted by: Little Ollie | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:33 PM
No AAA journeyman one-hits this team twice.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:33 PM
Chase really chased that one...
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:34 PM
Spitz: That's more or less what I was saying. If one season of UZR is too small a sample size to be reliable, I don't know about the validity of simply averaging 3 unrealiable numbers. But you could certainly take the overall average based on 3 seasons of data.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:36 PM
Fvcking A...Howard better be okay.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:36 PM
His name is Dan %$#@!
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:37 PM
Dan Uggla is "the most prolific power-hitting 2nd baseman in history?" Are these guys for real?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:37 PM
****Dan Uggla is "the most prolific power-hitting 2nd baseman in history?" Are these guys for real?****
You caught that "gem" too?
Ridiculous.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:38 PM
Livan Hernandez, RBI double.
Posted by: Tray | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:40 PM
Jurrgens has had some rough outings lately. Anyone know who Atlanta plans to put up against our big 3?
Posted by: Little Ollie | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:42 PM
Cole might be due for a bit of a clunker.
Posted by: denny b. | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:47 PM
It's early but Cole looks off.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:48 PM
So BAP, are you saying that a 3 season average of UZR is a reliable measure or not? I am arguing that if you believe a single season UZR is meaningless, than a 3 season average of UZR is equally meaningless.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:48 PM
Hamels or KK...you decide.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:48 PM
Hamels gives up one run
Posted by: 3r0ck | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:49 PM
This is what we get for praising our pitching staff for 3 days straight.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:50 PM
Hamels looks like total crap tonight. There's no "Fast" in his "Fastball". Maybe it'll just take him awhile to get warmed up ... *crossing fingers*
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Hamels hopefully settles in and goes 7 or 8.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Not so bad.
Posted by: Little Ollie | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:52 PM
http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=3442&playerid2=1679&playerid3=&position=2B&page=8&type=full
Just Sayin'.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:53 PM
Last fastball at 93. Nothing to sneeze at.
Posted by: Little Ollie | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:53 PM
Spitz: It depends what you mean by a 3-season average. If you mean adding up his 3 unreliable single-season UZRs, & dividing by 3, then, yes, that would be unreliable. But I have a hard time seeing what would be unreliable about recalculating his UZR based on 3 years worth of data, even though any 1 year would be too small to be reliable in and of itself.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:53 PM
As for what Atlanta is likely to do next week...
I believe that if they stay in their same spots, the Phils would get Jurrjins, Minor and Hanson next week.
My guess, is that Jurrjins (who has been scuffling) moves to Sunday afternoon and Lowe is pushed back to Monday to start Game 1.
So, I think the likely matchups are:
MON- Hamels vs Lowe
TUES- Halladay vs Minor
WED- Oswalt vs Hanson
Posted by: denny b. | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:56 PM
Does that Hit make Cole Hamels "the most prolific power-hitting Pitcher in history"?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 07:58 PM
Slugging Through Age 30:
Dan Uggla: .487
Chase Utley: .523
Rogers Hornsby: .570
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:00 PM
If Mendez got to face the Phillies every time out, he might well end up as the most prolific starting pitcher in history.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:01 PM
Take it for what it's worth, but the statement about Uggla probably is connected to the fact that he just became the first second baseman in Major League history to have four consecutive 30 homer seasons.
Posted by: Scott | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:02 PM
BAP, you would get the same result either way. The average of three yearly averages = a three year average.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:07 PM
Scott: Obviously, that was the basis for their assertion. But it's still pretty far out there. I mean, Uggla's a fine power hitter & there haven't been a whole lot of power-hitting 2nd basemen. But, until & unless he has about 5 more similar seasons, the words "Dan Uggla" and "baseball history" do not belong in the same sentence.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:07 PM
Remember Uggla's misplays in the 2008 all-star game? The one where Lidge threw like 100 pitches in the pen and the game was almost called? That's the only tie to baseball history Uggla has thus far.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:10 PM
Nats up 4 to 0 in top of 4th
Posted by: 3r0ck | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:11 PM
Spitz: Not true. For example, let's say Player A has the following numbers over 3 years:
Year 1: 100 AB, 30 hits, BA .300
Year 2: 500 ABs, 120 hits, BA .240
Year 3: 500 ABs, 120 hits, BA .240
The average of his 3 single season batting averages is .260 ((.300 + .240 + .240)/3)
In actuality, his batting average over that 3-year span is .not .260, but .245 (270/1100).
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:12 PM
BAP -- The Fangraphs quote I posted is pretty clear that there's nothing inherently unreliable about a full season of UZR. There's nothing "magical" about 162 games that gives BA, OPS, or any other offensive stat, either. Is 110 games reliable for offensive stats? At all? I think so.
Posted by: sifl | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:19 PM
Remember when Jayson Werth was freakishly good at getting 2-strike hits?
Posted by: J.R. King | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:20 PM
I guess last night's hit was a fluke for Werth.
Twice now where he's crapped the bed again.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:20 PM
GTown, I think Livan Hernandez has usurped Hamels "the most prolific power-hitting Pitcher in history"
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:20 PM
Zolecki: A Look At The '11 Phillies Schedule
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:21 PM
This is really frustrating to watch. This pitcher sucks and we're just letting him slip away inning after inning.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:21 PM
sifl: I take no position on whether or not a full season of UZR is reliable for what it purports to measure. I was just commenting on the notion that, if 1 season of UZR is junk, 3 seasons must be junk too.
Personally, I think UZR is junk over any time period, for reasons that have been disussed here ad nauseum.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:22 PM
BAP, good point. I was assuming the yearly averages would be roughly the same sample size.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:23 PM
These Marlins' announcers make Wheels, McCarthy & Sarge look like Hall of Fame broadcasters.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:24 PM
"And while it warms my heart any time a Howard throw does not involve the left fielder..."
Aksmith, that line had me laughing pretty hard.
And for the record, I think it's a mistake that the Phillies aren't swapping Halladay and Hamels in the rotation for the ATL series. (If they did, they'd Doc/Hamels/Oswalt, in that order, in both ATL series) If things hold out as they are, and the season goes down to the last game (which it most likely will), and the Phillies make the playoffs, they will need to pitch Halladay on short rest to start the NLDS. As of now, Hamels would be lined up to pitch game one.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:24 PM
We demand extensive softball experience for our ballgirls...too funny.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:25 PM
Enough UZR talk - we need Chooch to motivate some RUiZ talk.
Phils have a good opportunity to pick up some unexpected ground on both ATL and CIN tonight - they need to capitalize.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:26 PM
TMac, how is the Lakewood/Greenville game on the Toyota MAJOR LEAGUE Scoreboard?
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:27 PM
Maybe Mendez will hurt himself running to 1B again. At least Cole appears to have settled in.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:28 PM
The Phillies ought to go back to demanding a certain amount of attractiveness -- like, any -- in their Ballgirls.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:29 PM
This game feels like a loss. Cole's control is off and, for reasons completely mysterious to me, the Phillies can't hit this AAA pitcher.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:30 PM
Is this the guy that threw out Howard?
Posted by: Steve | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:30 PM
Cole has settled in...what an Ace.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:30 PM
Fatalotti - do you have some sort of crystal ball that says that ATL and Philly will be seperated by 1 or 0 games 17 games from now?
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:30 PM
The Phils have a team of ballgirls that play softball games, hence the softball requirement.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:32 PM
I wonder how accidental that was.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:33 PM
Don't look now, but Hamels is close to his first 200 strikeout season. Also, accodring to B-R.com, Roy Oswalt is on pace for 204 Ks this season.
Have we ever had a season with 3 pitchers who had 200 strikeouts?
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:33 PM
The Phils have a team of ballgirls that play softball games, hence the unattractiveness.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:34 PM
***The Phils have a team of ballgirls that play softball games, hence the softball requirement. ***
I had no idea...that's cool.
Valdez is quite predictable at times.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:34 PM
Uggla looks pretty not lousy tonight.
Posted by: Old Phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:35 PM
You can't hope to stop Wilson Valdez ('s double plays), you can only hope to contain Wilson Valdez ('s double plays).
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:35 PM
Interesting trivia question I heard today:
Only 4 active RHP have had at least 4 seasons w/ 200+ Strike Outs. Name them.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:36 PM
You know how they sometimes have those skills contests during the All Star break? Maybe next year they can have a skills contest for grounding into DPs. Valdez would be the heaviest favorite since the Bird/Jordan/Magic Olympic Dream Team.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:36 PM
Fatalotti, are you sure? I thought the last series was Fri-Sun, with the NLDS beginning Wed. If that's so, Doc would get 5 days between starts.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:37 PM
BTW, that was Exxon's 19th GIDP in just 311 PAs.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:37 PM
What phillie is named Sanchez. Because uggla just threw him out according to tmac
Posted by: HammRadio | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:37 PM
Spitz, no crystal ball, but I think it's far more likely that those 3 games in ATL at the end of the season mean something (at least the first 2) than that they won't. Even if Atlanta is out of it, the Phillies will have to get really lucky to have locked up the 1 seed before that series.
Plus, wouldn't it be good to get Hallady lined up now so that he can go into game 1 of the NLDS, never having thrown on short rest?
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:38 PM
Cole has amazing stuff.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:39 PM
Ok, I think I misunderstood. How do the Phils propose to pitch the last series, if not Doc, Cole, Oswalt?
Posted by: GBrettfan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:39 PM
195th K on the year.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:41 PM
GBrett, the last series against ATL begins on 10/1. The NLDS begins on 10/6, with 4 days between the two dates. The pitcher who gets the ball in game 1 of the ATL series is lined up to pitch game 1 of the NLDS (should the Phils make it) on normal rest.
If they go Hamels, Halladay, Oswalt in this upcoming Atlanta series, it would be Hamels, Halladay, Oswalt in the final ATL series. If that's the case, either Cole gets game 1 of the NLDS on regular rest, or Doc gets the ball in game 1 of the NLDS On 3 days rest.*
*This assumes that no pitcher pitches on short rest during the regular season.
By the way, Hamels is striking out everyone.
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:42 PM
196th K on the year.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:42 PM
75 pitches through 4....lucky to have him go 6 tonight :(
Posted by: Steve | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:43 PM
Hamels, after that 1st inning, has simply had unhittable stuff tonight. His fastball and changeup are both working and he's just mowing these guys down.
His pitch count is rising though so he might only go 6.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:44 PM
Fatalotti, given the last month, I think I'd rather have Cole pitch game 1 of NLDS...especially if the Phils have the option of taking the 5 games in 8 days and not having anyone go on short rest the entire series!
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:44 PM
cole is dealing but it looks like we'll only have him through 6, unless he gets a real quick inning. how is this mendez guy shutting us down again? i can accept last week, since it was the first time facing him -- they should be teeing off on this guy today
Posted by: seattlephan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:44 PM
I'd go Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt in any playoff series. Split the RH arms with probably the best LHP in the NL right now.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:45 PM
Shane Victorino for president....er are Hawaiians considered citizens? haha JK. but seriously, he should be our full time lead off guy....anyone got his numbers from the 1 spot this year?
Posted by: Steve | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:46 PM
Gtown: Halladay & Vasquez are 2. Still thinking (or, more accurately, looking names up on the Internet). I'm thinking at least 1 of the other 2 is some older guy who is pitching relief now or whose best years are behind him.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:47 PM
75 pitches, 14 swinging strikes for Cole.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:48 PM
The baseball gods just love 5 hour downpours when you try to plan your rotation 3 weeks in advance. And the way the top 3 are pitching right now, It doesn't matter what order they pitch in the playoffs.
Posted by: goody | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:48 PM
Steve: 300 AB .283 / .345 / .480 / .825 11 HR, 41 RBI, 19 SB, 23 BB, 39 K
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:48 PM
"I'm thinking at least 1 of the other 2 is some older guy who is pitching relief now or whose best years are behind him."
Jose Contrares?
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:48 PM
****.er are Hawaiians considered citizens****
Only if they're really from Kenya...JK
~voted for him~
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:49 PM
My expectations for this inning are dropping rapidly with that flyout. I can easily see K, K here.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:50 PM
What they most likely will do, at least according to Zolecki:
I messed up, they can go Hamels, Doc, Oswalt in this upcoming series, and then switch Halladay and Hamels in the finals series:
9/14, FLA: Hamels, 5
9/15, FLA: Halladay, 4
9/16, OFF
9/17, WSH: Oswalt, 4
9/18, WSH: Kendrick/Worley, 6
9/19, WSH: Blanton, 5
9/20, ATL: Hamels, 5
9/21, ATL: Halladay, 5
9/22, ATL: Oswalt: 4
9/23, OFF
9/24, NYM: Blanton, 4
9/25, NYM: Hamels, 4
9/26, NYM: Halladay, 4
9/27, WSH: Oswalt, 4
My guesses from there on out:
9/28, WSH: Kendrick/Worley, 9
9/29, WSH: Blanton, 4
9/30, OFF
10/1, ATL: Hamels, 5 or Halladay, 4
10/2, ATL: Halladay, 5 or Hamels, 6
10/3, ATL: Oswalt, 5
Who knows what they'll do, but they are going to have to flip Halladay, Hamels at some point, if they want Doc going in game 1 of the NLDS. Why not now?
Posted by: Fatalotti | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:50 PM
well I think that solves it then, Gtown. I definitely think Shane should lead off for good.
Posted by: Steve | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:50 PM
"And the way the top 3 are pitching right now, It doesn't matter what order they pitch in the playoffs."
Exactly.
Posted by: Old Phan | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:50 PM
b_a_p: Your thinking is correct. Hint - Two of the Four are teammates.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 08:50 PM