
Cole Hamels (3-2, 4.53) and the 22-13 Phillies set their sights on the sweep against Conestoga High product Dave Bush (1-3, 4.24) and the Brewers tonight at 8:05 on ESPN Sunday Night Baseball. Paul Hoover and Wilson Valdez remain in the lineup. Carlos Ruiz is reportedly getting an extra day and could be good to go when the Phillies return home tomorrow. Before the game, the Phils made a surprise announcement that Jimmy Rollins is heading home from Clearwater, and pending the outcome of a quick physical, could be activated from the disabled list tomorrow.
[Jump to the newest comments]
what's the latest news on Chooch?
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:09 PM
Old Phan: "Ruiz said he's ready to go but Phillies are giving him an extra day of rest. He caught a bullpen and felt no pain.
(Matt Gelb via Twitter)
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:11 PM
Thanks, G
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:12 PM
Another Vic fail as a leadoff guy. Oh, wait..
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:15 PM
I'm gonna miss Vic in the leadoff spot. He's red hot, & faster than Rollins. I'm just hoping Jimmy doesn't have a long readjustment period.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:21 PM
Another frigging blackout. Kiss my ass, Bud Selig.
Posted by: Doohickey | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:23 PM
Whatever else you could say about Hamels, his control has always been among the best in baseball. This year, though, he just can't seem to throw strikes.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:41 PM
You know... that Wilson Valdez has been red hot... but it won't matter. Stupid Charlie will plug Rollins right back into the starting lineup.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:42 PM
b_a_p: It's not a lack of control, it's bad luck.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:44 PM
Gonna miss that Paul Hoover. He's burning hot right now... but I'm sure ol' Cholly will simply plug Ruiz right back behind the plate when he's healthy.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:44 PM
That was a really, really good swing by Hamels. Maybe he's decided he simply converting to the infield.
Posted by: Timothy Malcolm | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:45 PM
CJ, are you comparing Vic to Hoover and Valdez?
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:46 PM
so, what happens when/if rollins is activated tomorrow? does valdez get sent down or does castro go on the DL? i just don't understand the phils - its like they just aren't comfortable unless they have a short bench. what the f*ck is going on with castro? they just going to have an unavailable player sitting on the bench indefinitely? its ridiculous.
Posted by: f4f | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:54 PM
f4f: Castro is available, per Cholly in the pre-game, I believe.
Posted by: Hope SE | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 08:57 PM
f4f: Castro appeared on Monday, so he can't be that unavailable. However, in light of Valdez's start today, I wouldn't be surprised if they DL Castro to give him more time to heal.
Posted by: AFish | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:00 PM
So was it Barry Bonds that f'ed up Ryan Howard?
Posted by: Brian G | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:06 PM
@Brian G
No, the blank check contract extension did.
Posted by: dlhunter | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:08 PM
Intentionally walking Hoover. That's something you don't see everyday.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:12 PM
Is there a word for a ground-rule double bandbox?
Posted by: bake | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:12 PM
Old Phan: Yes... you figured me out. Valdez and Hoover = Vic.
Perhaps my point is that J-Roll had posted a sparkling 391/516/739 with an OPS+ of 226 before getting injured and that maybe it's not such a bad thing that he goes back into the lead off spot where he was flourishing.
Or maybe we should listen to all the Beerleaguer geniuses... after all, we know how effective conventional wisdom is around here.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:13 PM
That was only the 2nd intentional walk of Hoover's career.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:15 PM
BAP - I'm surprised it was even his second!
Is it just me or has Howard been pretty dissapointing on both sides of the ball since he signed that contract?
Posted by: Dukes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:18 PM
Worst thing Howard is doing is not hitting HRs.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:22 PM
bake: I don't know what the word is, but Miller Park is a ground-rule double bandbox, and it has cost the Phils runs today and yesterday.
Posted by: Hope SE | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:23 PM
Does Chase have someplace he needs to be after the game?
Posted by: Doohickey | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:25 PM
It's just you, Dukes.
Posted by: Doohickey | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:26 PM
Re: Lineups from the last thread. There are old school guys like Dusty Baker and Charlie Manuel and there are new school guys like Tony LaRussa.
For Baker and Manuel newfangled stuff like OBP is not a consideration when drawing up a lineup.
For guys like LaRussa, a lineup is the product of numerous computer programs.
Ludwick would never in a million years bat 2nd in a Manuel or Baker lineup nor would the pitcher hit 8th. And a guy with a career OBP of .330 would never lead off a LaRussa lineup.
And the bottom line difference is maybe 1 or 2 wins a year, if that.
Posted by: clout | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:32 PM
Doohicky = ass
Posted by: Dukes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:34 PM
6-0 Flyers.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:38 PM
Make that Hoover's third IBB.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:41 PM
Hoover is having a day to tell his grandchildren about: 2 intentional BBs, a double & a runner caught stealing.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:41 PM
Cole, Cole, Cole . . . it's a 2-0 count. Take the damn pitch.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:43 PM
Cole might've been able to help his own cause there by taking ball 3.
Posted by: Doohickey | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:43 PM
Think he swung through a take sign? If not, why wasn't he given a take sign in the first place?
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:43 PM
I don't think Pedro Feliz makes that play.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:52 PM
And neither does Dobbs it's safe to say.
Phils need to blow this one open this innings. Still a patented Hamels bad inning from losing this game.
Posted by: Spitz | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 09:57 PM
bap: disagree, that was a slow chopper that any 3B with good reaction makes. Anything not hit hard Polanco has gobbled up so far this year, but anything hit hard almost always finds its way thru.
not sure if thats something he can improve with more reps or maybe just something you have/don't have. hopefully the former, but his bat has more than covered up for that.
Posted by: thephaithful | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Here we go.
Posted by: Matt | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:12 PM
Oh look, Cole Hamels is pitching again. Thank God. I was wondering where he was.
Posted by: Malcolm | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Stepped away for a few innings; returned just in time to see Buttercup unravel. Wonderful.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:13 PM
hmm -does Hamels go back out fo the 7th?
I think I would.
Posted by: thephaithful | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:15 PM
Hard to fault Hamels for a 6-inning, 2-run performance. Blame some bad luck on offense, coupled with a lack of timely hitting. Unfortunately, though, this game has now entered "This feels like a loss" territory.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Did Paul Hoover ever think he'd be so intimidating that he'd be walked intentionally twice in a game?
Posted by: twitter.com/jtramsay | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:21 PM
I don't like the idea of bringing Hamels back out for the 7th, but if it's a choice between that or Romero I'll take the former.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:23 PM
Let's see, team that has scored the most runs in the league has 2 runs in 6 innings vs a pitcher (which is, of course, a 3.00 ERA). Time to call that pitcher names and fret.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:24 PM
They've got Romero up in the bullpen.
Channeling b_a_p, this feels like a loss.
Posted by: philwynk | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:24 PM
I know it's not true, but bringing JC in always makes me feel like we're conceding the game. Does it have that effect on anyone else?
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Yep, this is a loss. If 14 men reach base, you've got to score more than 3 runs.
Not that I have any faith in Romero, but Cole ought to be done. He's at 106 pitches.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:26 PM
What is the Phillies record in "This feels like a loss" games? Has to be over .600, right?
Posted by: AFish | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:26 PM
106 pitches in 6 innings. Well. BTW, "Buttercup" works for this guy -- nice call, GTown Dave.
W/O Happ, we might have a 2 1/2 pitcher rotation...
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:27 PM
I don't buy the idea that a ground-rule double can cost a team a run. That's what was hit. If the batter hadn't hit a GRD, who knows what he would have hit instead. Maybe just a pop-up or something.
Posted by: bake | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:29 PM
giving up 2 runs is NOT a meltdown. Sorry.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:30 PM
JC is playing on borrowed time. If the Phils weren't wining games or if it was the end of July, the JC experiment would be over.
Posted by: vegas | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Interesting move to bring Durbin in but I like it.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:33 PM
bake: That's funny logic. It was a ground-rule double because it bounced over the fence. If it hadn't bounced over the fence, it would have still been a double, only the runner on 1st would have scored.
I guess using Hamels turned out to be the right move after all. It got us out of a JC Romero appearance, so I can't complain.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:34 PM
Is it really a disaster for a starting pitcher to give up his first 2 runs in the 6th? Hate, hate, hate.
Posted by: BobbyD | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM
Charlie is actively managing the pitching staff tonight.
Posted by: vegas | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM
I totally agree... the brewers intimidating bullpen, the brewers incredible home record, the complete inability of the phillies to ever score runs, the fact that the phillies are notorious for just plain-old giving up late in games and the fact that the phillies currently have the lead. All those things make this feel like a loss.
Posted by: PhillyJoe | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM
Old Phan: It was a mini-meltdown. He was one strike away from getting out of the inning, & gave up 2 HR. Overall, though, that was a very nice outing for Cole. I'm impressed. The abject terror I felt watching Romero warming in the pen only makes me appreciate it more.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM
Was the '08 Hamels a mirage? No #2 starter -- aka Hamels -- routinely gets gassed after 6 innings. Time to move on?
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:36 PM
"106 pitches in 6 innings."
In baseball, games are decided by the number of pitches thrown.
Posted by: Klaus | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:36 PM
C'mon Durbin. Just focus on getting this weak hitter out. Let Weeks steal 2nd if necessary.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:38 PM
"Is it really a disaster for a starting pitcher to give up his first 2 runs in the 6th? "
If it's Cole, yes. Anyone else, no.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:39 PM
Good. Didn't want to see Braun with 1st and 3rd there.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Fun with syllogisms:
1) Meltdowns are unique to Cole Hamels.
2) A meltdown is giving up one or more run.
conclusion:
3) Every other pitcher in baseball has a 0.00 ERA.
Posted by: Klaus | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:41 PM
BAP-- Okay, but it bounced over the fence because it was hit to that spot with that spin on it at that velocity under those field conditions. To say that cost them a run is the same as saying that not hitting 22 home runs last inning cost them 22 runs.
Posted by: bake | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:41 PM
"Charlie is actively managing the pitching staff tonight."
Funny how if Hamels gave up a run when he came back out for the 7th Manuel would be getting blamed for poor management of the pitching staff.
Posted by: Dukes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Cole did fine - He did a great job of keeping us in the game, kept the runs down, kept the HRs solo shots - But he's still searching for dominance. He threw a lot of pitches for 6 innings, too many to be considered dominant.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:43 PM
"I like Ike..." er, um, the old King Cole. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:43 PM
both those balls were inside.
Posted by: Dukes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Baez is warming in the pen. The Phils need more runs.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM
I did not know until I read the sidebar of "Beat Tweets" that Jose Contreras is nicknamed the Big Truck.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM
I don't understand the ying (Hamels sucked) or the yang (Hamels was great). GBrettfan was right. It was a good start but he got a little gassed in the 6th.
Liked Cholly's move to pull Hamels there because Hamels does get prone to giving up HRs when he gets gassed.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM
wow, gameday has those 2 strikes to hoover even more inside than they looked on tv.
Posted by: Dukes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM
Why didn't Cholly double switch there with Durbin if he knew he was going to PH for him in the top of the 8th?
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:50 PM
Whatever it takes, Dude.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Tough pitch to block but I bet Chooch would have kept that in front of him to end the inning.
Cheap insurance run but a run is a run.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:00 PM
Boy, talk about having no game plan at the plate with Utley and Howard.
Posted by: Matt | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Macha must stare down at the bullpen and wonder where the answers are at. Total fail this series.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:04 PM
MG: We should gift Romero to him.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:05 PM
Looking less like a loss now (guess I'm not b_a_p after all)... but I have to tell you, Ryan Howard is ticking me off these days. Yeah, I know, he's usually weak early on, but still, he's ticking me off.
Posted by: philwynk | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:05 PM
I think Howard checked his swing on Strike 2. But I didn't expect a hit from him there, facing a breaking ball pitcher.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:06 PM
Baez = Brewers runs
Posted by: BloodStripes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM
Two runs in 6.2 innings is, what, a 2.70 ERA? Hamels was perfectly fine. Not great, but that's a perfectly serviceable outing. I remember people earlier complaining about Hamels going out every time expecting to pitch a no-hitter, but it seems like Beerleaguer posters have exactly the same attitude.
Posted by: JK | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM
That's how you flip a ball, Howard.
Posted by: Matt | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:09 PM
Castro doesn't make that pivot & strong throw there. Nice play by Valdez.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:09 PM
I know that ball was hit hard, but I like our chances of fielding better with Jimmy out there. Looking forward to having him back in the game.
Oooh, nice place by Chase there! Baez needed that.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:09 PM
Killer double play. Yes Phils!!!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:10 PM
Valdez now knows what a squirrel feels like right before it gets hit by a semi.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:10 PM
(I posted a play late, but I was referring to the liner that Baez ducked and Valdez couldn't snag.)
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:10 PM
Is the Gnome on the Brewers? Oh, wait, that's Corey Hart.
Posted by: Old Phan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:11 PM
Nice play, Valdez.
Posted by: Matt | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:11 PM
So Valdez would make two pretty good plays as I'm denigrating his worth.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:12 PM
A couple of sketchy defensive plays followed by a couple of beautiful defensive plays. Never a dull moment ...
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:12 PM
'Nuff "pithy" sayings. However, with the Phillies' first basemen - and $138mm - it gets late early.
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:12 PM
Wilson Valdez with two great plays there to get them out. The turn at second was a lot harder then it looked and he got the double play.
The play deep in the hole on Hart (not a slow guy) was great. The throw looked like something Rollins would uncork.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:12 PM
winning baseball= great defense and a great leadoff hitter
Posted by: tax accountant | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:13 PM
Two plays that were outs that inning because of Valdez strong & accurate arm.
Castro might have softer hands but Valdez has a much stronger arm & a bit more range it looks like.
Neither guys are pretty similiar offensively but Valdez just brings a bit more to the table defensively & a bit more speed.
Posted by: MG | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:13 PM
Through the meat of the order. Looking good for Jose Consaveus.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM
Great defense by the Phils, there. I couldn't be happier to be being proved wrong.
Posted by: philwynk | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:15 PM