Hoping to avoid a third-consecutive shutout, Cole Hamels (5-2, 3.92) and the scuffling Phillies try to stop the bleeding tonight against Mike Pelfrey (6-1, 2.86) and the Mets. First pitch is 7:10.
Best of the press notes: Here's the damage, compiled by the Phillies' press office: Since starting the month 12-3 (.800), the Phillies have dropped six of their last eight. Over that span, the Phillies have been outscored 37-15 and have been held to one run or fewer five times, including three shutouts. In that eight-game span, the Phils are hitting .203 (52-256) with a .182 average (10-55) with runners in scoring position. By comparison, over their first 15 games of May, the Phils outscored their opponents 97-45 and hit .308 (162-526) and .295 (41-139) with runners in scoring position.
Notes: Carlos Ruiz and Wilson Valdez will bat 7-8. Hamels will look to build on a solid string of starts. He's 3-0 with a 2.36 ERA in May. The Phillies are 7-2 when he starts.






Feliz has been awful but Beltre has clearly been a better player especially defensively.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:19 PM
I'm making this stat up but you know I'm probably right: the Phils lead the league in "relievers who come out and throw balls."
Posted by: bananagrabbers | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:19 PM
The defense has been atrocious. All manner of errors, mental and physical.
long strike, there
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:19 PM
sweet pitch by durbin.
shame Hamels isn't still in here.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:21 PM
Why not double switch here and put Francisco in left?
Posted by: Jay | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:21 PM
Both Ben Fran and Dobbers clearly need another start.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:22 PM
MG, Phils offered Beltre a contract and he turned it down. A better offer than what the Sox gave him. My Sox fan friend tells me his defense has been awful. Old fashion, yes, but Beltre has 7 errors.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:22 PM
Jay: Because if your pitcher's only coming in to face one batter, a double switch is pointless. Why lock yourself in to using a specific hitter next inning in the pitcher's spot?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:23 PM
Phils relievers have the 4th best WHIP in the NL, which doesn't speak directly to your point, banana, but there it is. Least number of total BB.
Bringing in Bastardo was a some over-thinking there.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:25 PM
Bastardo has looked really good this year in low-leverage situations. On the rare occasion that he has been asked to pitch in a more meaningful situation . . . not so good.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM
lefties are hitting .161/.250/.226 against Durbin this year.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:27 PM
Pull'em. Cholly put Bastardo in a high leverage spot where he could succed and failed for the 2nd time in a row. Hard for Chollh to trot him out than in garbage time.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:28 PM
BAP, I was just thinking of putting in Ben for defense as well but it looks like he went in another direction.
Posted by: Jay | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:28 PM
Salami anyone?
Posted by: BloodStripes | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:28 PM
The only way this drought can end is with Howard getting a hit off Feliciano. That is the least likely way to score that could (or could have) happen(ed) tonight.
Posted by: Noah | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:31 PM
Exorcism. Now.
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM
Long time nemesis feliciano.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM
Boy, is this team pressing.
A three run lead never seemed so insurmountable.
Posted by: gjs | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM
Our bench is just brutal. We could probably do better just by calling up 5 guys from AA or AAA, and it would be substantially cheaper.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM
90% of this game is 1/2 mental... Go Vic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:35 PM
b_a_p: I can't tell the difference between the bench & the starters anymore.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:35 PM
Valdez swings at a bad pitch....Benny Frank K's....this whole offense is stinking up the joint
oops, there goes shane making me look like an idiot
c'mon Polly, make up for that stinkin' error
Posted by: awh | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:35 PM
Another hit for Vic. 3 singles including a texas leaguer. He is red hot!!!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:36 PM
Sit down. Terrible night for Polanci at the plate and in the field.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:38 PM
I used to think it was crazy talk that knuckleballers could mess up your swings for a week.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:39 PM
Historically bad. I'm expecting a token run in the 9th and then a sweep. Last time shut out in 3 straight by one team, 1969 vs. the Mets.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:39 PM
This feels like the kind of game where the Phillies will score a couple of meaningless runs in the 9th inning, to pad their stats a little. But nothing that will be enough to actually win the game, mind you.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:39 PM
GEEEEZUS... To everyone who ever called me a troll -- please know this feels about the same as late September, 1964.
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:39 PM
EF: So consecutive knuckleballers means we have to put up w/ 2 solid weeks of this crap?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:40 PM
Vic was the only guy paying attention at the Team Meeting.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:40 PM
The thing that is bugging me most during this slide is the hang dog, poor-me expressions on many of the Phillies faces. No anger. No fight.
Toward that end, I hope Reyes gets to the plate, so they can knock him down.
Posted by: gjs | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:40 PM
If we can keep it to save situation maybe Frankie can help us get a run. Frankie usually makes it fun. At least he did with the Angels. A lead off walk. A steal. Groundout, runner moves to 3rd. A strikeout. Then a wild pitch to break the slump. Easy. We still get dusted but we take take that run to Florida full of confidence. Slump over
Posted by: BloodStripes | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:42 PM
gjs -- Who'd do that?
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:43 PM
Can't Francouer count? That's 3 bud.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:43 PM
b.s. - that's some convincing BS!
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:44 PM
I will consider it a moral victory if we score a run in the 9th. It's really all I have left.
Posted by: Murgatroid | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM
Bruce - Its May. Grab a beer and relax.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM
For all the talk of the meaningless runs scored on Sunday, at least we're only talking about 3 straight shutouts.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:47 PM
000 000 004
Posted by: BloodStripes | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:47 PM
Just one more thing -- is Ryan-Ho sayin't "...jus' get me to the plate, boys." Or what???????????
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:47 PM
This is one of the few guys I loathe on the Mets. Usedto love seeing him fail on the playoffs with the Angels.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:49 PM
Is it at all possible the Phillies are no longer stealing signs and and therefore can't hit?
Posted by: Bay Slugga | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:51 PM
MG -- Trying to do just that. Sorry for the butchered attempt at melding "J-Roll" and Ryan Howard. Bad attempt...
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:51 PM
some of the outs in this game remind me of the outs against Matsuzaka.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:51 PM
Bay Slugga - check the post from the first page. The Phils have had similar hitting problems before. Many times actually.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:53 PM
That was a misfake pitch and Howard did nothing with it. Betting against this team tonight was easy money.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:53 PM
Do the Phils have any leaders? You know, guys for whom you would be afraid of who if you didn't do your best would challenge your manhood; like Aaron Rowland. I find it odd that professional baseball players need the manager to call for a team meeting because I was of the assumption that athletes at this level would be extremely motivated to perform well and win. And when they lose like the Phillies have done this past week one would hope that at least one player would rise to the challenge and call for a team meeting.
If your manager has to tell you to come to the ball park several hours before game time to take extra batting and fielding pratice you don't have any team leaders, because a team leader would lead by example.
Right now I see little inspiration or leadership with this ball club.
If Jason Weitzel can contact some sports writers I would like to find out which Phillies players are coming to the park early for extra practice.
Posted by: kuvasz | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM
MG: Exactly. That's why the stealing signs BS is nonsense -- the Phils have just taken so many bad swings this week.
Posted by: bananagrabbers | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM
If you had told me they'd be shut out 3 games in a row I would have told you that you were full of it.
Posted by: awh | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM
Good thing for the Phillies they don't have to face the home crowd for awhile. This team would get booed mercilessly at the Bank and they would deserve every bit of it.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM
Phils couldn't even score a run against the Baltimore bullpen at this rate.
It doesn't get any worse. 46 scoreless out of 47 innings. The only way is up.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM
This is a legitimately serious question: How many runs have the Phillies scored since being accused of stealing signs?
Posted by: JPB705 | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:55 PM
you never think it could get this bad with this team. But it's pretty obvious they aren't even remotely as good as we had thought.
Posted by: TK | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:56 PM
kuvasz - Did you just join us? Have you been watching this team for 3 years? A week doesn't erase what this team has accomplished.
Teams go through bad stretches. Get over it.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:56 PM
The Phillies offense has had rough stretches in each of the past few years, but none this overwhelmingly awful:
The Phillies were shut out 7 times in '09. They have been shut out 5 times already in '10, 4 of those coming in the past 5 games.
The last time the Philles were shut out in a series, & the last time the Phillies were shut out in 4 of 5 games: 1974.
That's now 46 of the past 47 innings, & 27 innings straight, in which the Phillies have not scored so much as a single fucking run.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:57 PM
The bright side in all this is we're still miraculously in first by a game and a half. And despite no help from the rest of his team, Cole continued his hot streak.
Posted by: Murgatroid | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:57 PM
Wow. Well, if the team is true to form they will start winning again within a few games as they will no longer have a lead in the division. That seems to light a fire under them.
They're too good to be this bad forever. Aren't they?
Posted by: GBrettfan | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:58 PM
Only time will show some of you people to be the idiots that you are. It's amazing that some people can watch baseball almost every day and still not get it.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:58 PM
Mets deserved to sweep the Phils. Outplayed them in every single aspect this series especially defensively and the small fundamentals.
Every divisional winner goes through at least terrible stretch a season. Phils need to find a way to get their bats going. Personally, I think they lose 2 of 3 in Florida. Hope I am wrong but don't like the matchips or the Phils track record in Florida.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:58 PM
How many runs since sign stealing accusation?
53 runs in 14 games=3.78 per game, including a gazillion shutouts.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:59 PM
Gtown - Bill Baer counted 4 stretches last year equal to this stretch of futility. Apparently the Phils weren't as good as we thought they were last year either. 5 in 2008. Maybe not then either.
Or maybe teams go through tough stretches and it has nothing to do with heart or leadership or trying to hit HR.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:00 AM
Problem with this stretch too is that they are going to play ab Interleagur stretch in 2 weeks where it is east to see this team going 3-6 or so in 9 games.
Posted by: MG | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM
Cole did well, and so did Shane. The rest of them will snap out of it eventually.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM
I DESERVE BETETER THAN 0 RUN SWTF
Posted by: CHAMLES | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM
If they really needed to, I think the Phils could come up with another way to steal signs that doesn't involve the bullpen coach using binoculars.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM
tough series for those phils. caught the mets at the wrong time guys. i thought this team was dead a week ago.
it must be killing rollins that he is missing these mets games
Posted by: metsfan | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:02 AM
Unreal. The days of the team confidently laying 5 or more runs on the other team night after night seem like ages ago.
Nice effort by Cole, totally wasted.
Hopefully the team will regress to the mean soon. Not time for Chicken Little or anything, but this is getting ridiculous. Got to think they are going to really take it out on some pitchers in the very near future, but this was a horrible tone to set with the Mets.
Posted by: Bob | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:03 AM
Sophist: "Equal" in what way?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:03 AM
Phils started the month hitting .290/.354/.498 with 109 runs in 19 games. Apparently leadership and heart ebb like the tides. I guess that means the full moon is the end of all this, and tomorrow a new moon, day, whatever. The Mets were turning things into gold, some of you appear to be practicing voodoo, Werth is a werewolf.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:04 AM
Also, this sign stealing crap is ridiculous. The story was overblown in the first place, I can't believe it hasn't died down yet. Explain to me how having binoculars in the Coors Field bullpen gives us a significant advantage. Also, in past instances of sign stealing (the New York Giants in the Bobby Thomson pennant year), teams actually hit worse while they were stealing signs. Look it up, Rob Neyer wrote about it not that long ago. Sign stealing is NOT the reason we're struggling and I'm really getting sick of hearing about it.
Posted by: Murgatroid | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:05 AM
Stay tuned for a couple days as Mets fans will wonder why all their pitchers who dominated the mighty Phils will be giving up buckets of runs.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:05 AM
Gtown - stretches of 5-10 games with similar R/G and BA/OBP/SLG numbers. Check the post either on the first page here or over at crashburn alley.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:06 AM
Maybe you guys aren't giving enough credit to the Mets pitchers. We all know the Mets have one of the best rotations in the league.
Posted by: wally | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:07 AM
Boooooooooo!!
Posted by: JBird | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:08 AM
Sophist is right, they are going through a slump. It happens.
However, I maintain that I am right as well. The reason the scorless streak is so long is that they continue to fail to get guys in from third with < 2 outs. Even slumping teams can score runs in situations where a run can score without s hit.
They wouldn't be scoring 10 runs a game with adequate situational hitting alone, but they would at least be scoring.
Posted by: Gsl | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:08 AM
Sophist -- Now that I've calmed down a bit, I disagree. A championship team -- Halladay sealed that deal -- could not be been shut out 5 times by May '10, 4 of those coming in the past 5 games (thanks, GTown Dave). Since we can't "back up the truck" someone has to go down/sit down (Ibanez) and someone has to come up (Dominic Brown).
Dammit, lead, follow or get out of the way. Inconceivable the DiMaggio-led Yankees (at the beginning of the season, weren’t we on the cusp of that greatness?) could ever have undergone this...
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:09 AM
Sophist: All I know is there hasn't been a 5 game stretch at any point in the past 2 seasons in which the Phillies scored a total of 3 or fewer runs, let alone all 3 of said runs in a single inning, let alone all 3 of said runs on a single hit. We'll just have to wait & see how the next 5 games pan out to add "-10" to the equation.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Gsl - Polanco put a ball in play with a man on third and hit into a DP. Sometimes there's just nothing going right. The Phils stole a bunch of bags tonight, and are simply not getting the hit with RISP *or* the productive out w RISP. It's not for lack of trying. Hamels bunted a man over just fine tonight.
Starter
Phils: 3.93 ERA, .741 OPS, 1.27 WHIP
Mets: 4.02 ERA, .761 OPS, 1.51 WHIP
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM
The solution to this isn't to try to do something drastic and end up doing something stupid. And the reason we're struggling isn't because we don't have the guts or leadership or any of this crap. It's a slump and it's frustrating and baffling, but it happens. Trying to blame it on a particular player or the lack of some intangible won't improve anything. We just have to wait and eventually they'll get out of it.
Posted by: Murgatroid | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:13 AM
Hard to imagine that you believe that any recent struggles are the fault of Ibanez, Bruce.
Posted by: Gsl | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:14 AM
When it rains it pours?
Posted by: GBrettfan | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:14 AM
Edit: My mistake in that last post. It actually took 2 hits for those 3 runs to score, but all 3 were scored in the same inning. Jeez, that seems like about 100 years ago now ...
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:14 AM
Bruce the 2008 World Champion Philadelphia Phillies had the following streches
April 5-10: 6 games, 20 runs, .231/.326/.392
June 3-12: 9 games, 33 runs, .226/.318/.365
June 17-26: 8 games, 15 runs, .181/.257/.252
August 1-9: 8 games, 21 runs, .207/.321/.368
August 14-21: 7 games, 19 runs, .203/.252/.323
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:15 AM
Now that your cheaterish club cant steal signs anymore your team sucks. With their confidence shot what will become of this overrated ball club? I wonder...
Posted by: Go Mets! | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:15 AM
I'm not worried. If the biggest problem with this team is that they're not scoring runs, I'll take my chances. They'll score plenty of runs. Everyone relax.
Posted by: Jack | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:17 AM
Binoculars Binoculars Binoculars.
Posted by: Cant Score a Run | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:19 AM
Sophist- yeah no argument. Wasn't trying to imply that it was the result of lack of effort.
Polly put it in play but technically pop ups are in play too. You just hope for solid contact in those situations. More often than not, good hitters ( like the phils have) will get that done. The fact that, for whatever reason, it isn't happening lately is the biggest bummer for me. And biggest culprit for the consecutive scoreless streak.
Posted by: Gsl | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:20 AM
Gsl -- A big contract and feeble output. Make an example. No one is immune. Sorry, Raul. Chill.
And if that doesn't work, (gulp) Utley? Just a few games...
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:21 AM
"I'm not worried. If the biggest problem with this team is that they're not scoring runs, I'll take my chances. They'll score plenty of runs. Everyone relax."
Agreed. They will find a stronger pair of binoculars and get back to their gritty, winning ways.
Posted by: Go Mets! | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:22 AM
Sophist -- Excellent point. Except losses in May hurt just as bad as those in the last week of September, and we've lost 5 straight. BTW, the bleepin' Muts have won 5; 3 on our watch. I wish someone besides Werth (or J-Roll) was playing for a contract!
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:26 AM
Bruce, how many times in the past few years have the Phils had 4+ games losing streaks. Plenty.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:29 AM
Lol trolls are gaining confidence and starting to come out of hiding. You know how to describe people who only get bold after the outcome is assured? I do.
Posted by: Gsl | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:31 AM
Sometimes, when the Phils score like 17 runs, I foolishly wish they could use some of those runs tomorrow. Lately, I've been wondering if these losses are just hte flipside of those wins. they're just randomly putting up 44 zeroes in the last 45 innings. I would hope a massive correction is possible but, that's not necessarily more likely than the recent drought.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM
Hugh- it's crazy. I remember making posts early in the season about how amazing it was that the Phils were scoring runs and multiple runs in such a high percentage of innings. Obviously it wouldn't last, right? Things seem to be evening out on us all at once.
Posted by: Gsl | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM
Sophist -- how the !@#$ do you waste this pitching? Against the bleepin' Mets? I can't reconcile losing with this team for the ages. I want 18 out of the next 20 and painful fear in the eyes of our opponents. By the end of June.
Yea it's over the top, but dammit, after the 1985 - 2002 dead zone (save '93), I want retribution and domination. A team I can tell my grandson about (if I live that long!!).
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:38 AM
no one fears the phillies. no one ever has. most of my mets fan friends fear the mets more than the phillies. the mets have handed the phillies their success ...
Posted by: baseball fan | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:41 AM
Bruce, be happy you had 12 full seasons in the bigs and that your name never became synonymous with "losing pitcher"
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:50 AM
What is the point of putting the 3 up on there? 27 innings of shut about ball and abuse from the Mets. Nuff said.
Posted by: Joe | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:52 AM
Hugh -- Saw Bruce R. twirl a 2 hitter at the Vet on a bitterly cold spring evening, probably in 1986... for about 5 2/3. Phils lost.
He was the can't miss pitching prospect of that lost era. I still have his baseball card. It's worth about $0.35.
Posted by: Bruce Ruffin | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 12:59 AM
Sophist, I have been watching regularly the Phillies since June 21, 1962, when I watched Art Mahaffey pitch out of a bases loaded 1st and beat the Cubs 3-0. I know enough about baseball and life to consider your remark nothing less than a pompous insult.
I know what I am talking about vis a vis leadership. You may well be an esteemed stat geek but know quite less about the importance of the personal intangibles of leadership and its place in team dynamics.
Right now, the team lacks on-field leadership. Which, by the way, if you too were watching, the '07-'08 Mets lacked, which contributed strongly to their late season collapses, and helped allow the Phillies be WFCs.
The last balls-to-the-walls leader the Phillies had was Rowland in 2007. Since then no one but Rollins has shown enough piss and vinegar to naturally claim leadership, and he's not on the field, and was in 2007-2008, and was the entire point about a lack of field leadership.
Posted by: kuvasz | Friday, May 28, 2010 at 01:28 AM