Reigning Cy Young winner Tim Lincecum goes in search of his fifth win as Cole Hamels and the Phillies look to get off the schneid in San Francisco.
Howard: Ryan Howard opus is done, but to post 48 hours after the news first broke would be really bush. So I’ve been slicing the main points into 140-character bursts and walking myself through the pros and cons on Twitter, since posting to a mobile phone with one free hand is often the only way to do it these days. Follow me here. On a related note, I’m working on ways to better integrate social networking and Beerleaguer without sacrificing the old-school appeal of the comments thread. You might have seen prompts to sign in using Typepad, Facebook or Twitter. I urge everyone to at least create a Typepad account with your own customizable avatar. Or not. I doubt Clout would do it, but NEPP did it. MPN did it.
Lineups are posted: Standard set against Lincecum, pictured right on the set of "Better Off Dead" (I want my two dollars!)
Lidge update: Mike Drago covered Brad Lidge’s rehab in Reading and reported that he was much sharper than in his one-inning appearance on Friday. “He threw some nasty sliders in striking out the side in the sixth inning; overall he struck out four of seven batters. The only one who reached against him did so on an error.” Drago marked his fastball velocity between 89-91. Meanwhile, Stephen Strasburg started for the Senators and lived up to the hype.




i signed in with facebook, test
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:21 PM
Wait a minute...we canz have Avatar?!?
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:30 PM
Signed in with Typepad, but no avatar :(
Posted by: UD Hens | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:39 PM
89-91? Bleh.
Posted by: Matt | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:40 PM
I thought he meant it would show up by our posts in the comments...it is on my profile though.
Not a major issue.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:43 PM
If Lidge is fully healthy, why has he lost 5-6 mph on his fastball in 3-4 years? He's actually seen a steady decline in his avg FB velocity from its high water mark of 96.0 in 2005 to 90ish now.
He's not ancient (only 33) so it shouldnt be purely age related.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:46 PM
On paper, today's game is a certain "L." Day-time Cole, offense running on fumes, get-away day game before a day off and a home stand, injuries to key players, going against one of the best pitchers in baseball.
All that said, I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who knows that this just SMELLS of a Phils win. Not quite sure how to explain it, but following the Phils for years has shown me that whatever is a "certainty" will only prove to be certainly wrong with this team. If gambling were legal, I may or may not have even dropped $50 on the Phils today.
Yet another litmus test for Mr. Hamels. Curious to see where he nets out today. There's only so many "big starts" I can watch him let me down before I give up hope altogether that he has ace potential.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:47 PM
Can I sign in using my Friendster account?
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:48 PM
<- That is where the avatar could go
Posted by: UD Hens | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:50 PM
And Reading's gun is pretty generous.
Posted by: JeffS | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:50 PM
The same gun had Strasburg at 94-95...when he typically throws a good bit higher than that.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:52 PM
A Couple Tweets Of Interest:
@JSalisburyCSN - "Jimmy Rollins is jogging, not close to running, he said. Said his timetable for return is still first two weeks of May."
@ToddZolecki - "Today's Lineup @ SF: Victorino CF, Polanco 3B, Utley 2B, Howard 1B, Werth RF, Ibañez LF, Castro SS, Ruiz C, Hamels P."
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:54 PM
I had spent a whole 7 minutes looking for a good picture to put next to my name. Jesus flipping the bird, I am sorry you all can't enjoy it with me.
Posted by: Reverend | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:55 PM
I will not cow to your demand of integrated social networking! Or at least not today...
I disagree with your "Bleh", UD Hens. The speed is not the best (but not bad) but K-ing 4 of 7 batters seems good to me, even if they're minor leaguers. And on that note...
Do you really think Strasburg has "lived up to the hype"? He's starting for the Harrisburg Senators, not the real-real Senators.
www.venuing.com/voices
Posted by: YT Crooks | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:58 PM
Even if Rainbow Brite somehow manages to piece together a decent start, this offense has a better chance of curing cancer w/ pine tar & sunflower seeds than it does of scoring 3 or more runs off of Lincecum. I say let's get this loss, & this whole cursed road trip, over w/ ASAP & go home.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 02:59 PM
Rev: It can be seen when we click on your profile. Good stuff. Clearly even Christ Himself doesn't buy this "Hard Luck Hamels" nonsense.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:01 PM
I'll channel clout and say that I'm not terribly concerned about Lidge's velocity. Lidge doesn't use his fastball to strike people out; he uses it to set up his slider. A 90 or 91 MPH fastball has plenty enough velocity to do that. His velocity last year was no more than 91 or 92 but, on the rare occasion that he located it well, he was effective. Command, not velocity, will be the key to Lidge's 2010 season.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:03 PM
Gtown it was either that or Buddy Christ but that picture spoke to me.
Posted by: Reverend | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:03 PM
G-Town, you are a huge Hamels fan, aren't you?
Posted by: Old Phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:03 PM
I love the now being able to sign into Typepad. My computer decided that it was not going to save my cookies for the site anymore and I had to re-enter the name every time and that's why I shortened my handle to "TTI." Now I can post away and have a profile...Awesome
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:06 PM
I'm in the East Bay, where it's absolutely pouring right now. Don't know if it's the same in San Francisco, but there's a pretty good chance that it is. It wouldn't surprise me if there's a delayed start to this game. Unfortunately, this system is supposed to pass through over the next few hours, so I don't think we're going to get out of facing Lincecum.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:07 PM
Old Phan: I record Cole's Comcast commercials to remind me that, if nothing else, he's quite photogenic.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:08 PM
Gtown - I enjoyed that post.
Phils are 4-2 against the Giants when Lincecum starts but 1-2 since 08. Lincecum in those three starts: 23 IP, .782 WHIP, 4 R.
Posted by: Sophist | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:08 PM
YT - that's not my Bleh, it belongs to Matt. Actually, I agree with Matt! 89-91 may be 'lights out' against AA hitters, but probably not effective against MLB hitters.
Posted by: UD Hens | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:09 PM
Tweet from Scott Lauber..."Forgot to mention this yesterday: Roy Halladay T-shirts are still on sale at concession stands here at Rogers Centre"
Posted by: UD Hens | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:13 PM
GTown - I often envision Hamels smashing through the first two plates on that Comcast commercial, theoretically getting up 0 balls and 2 strikes, and then giving up a long HR to the Direct TV plate which would be much more realistic these days than him actually getting the third strike.
Posted by: Chris | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:13 PM
Don't know if the RPhils actually went out and bought a new radar gun because the velocity on the scoreboard last year was always a few MPH above where it normally was. Drabek had a nice fastball but it was 97-98 MPH. Ditto on Zagurski.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:14 PM
@JW -- I'll gladly sign in with TypePad if this means it's better to control Mets Trolls. :)
mike cunningham = HammRadio...
Posted by: HammRadio | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:14 PM
Sophist: Do you happen to have Lincecum's Home/Road splits vs. the Phillies handy? I'm curious.
Chris: I have envisioned the exact same thing.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:19 PM
I thought the Reading gun was 2-4 MPH slow.
Posted by: ozark | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:27 PM
Doesn't Hamels tend to pitch well in California? or is that just LA?
Posted by: Cipper | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:27 PM
I hope we get a chance to see Roy match up with Lincecum when the Giants come to Philly. I can live without seeing him in the playoffs tho.
Posted by: AL | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:28 PM
3 starts in SF for Lincecum against the Phils
09 - 8 IP, 7 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 8 SO.
08 - 8 IP, 4 H, 2 R, 1 BB, 8 SO, 2 HR.
07 - 4.1 IP, 5 H5 R, 5 BB, 5 SO, 2 HR.
Posted by: Sophist | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:32 PM
Ozark - You may be right. Too many things on my plate. Need to concentrate and just listen to the game in the background today.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:35 PM
Sophist: Thanks. Kinda what I feared. Who knows, though. Maybe the Phils offense can pull a Wellemeyer & buck the trend.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:37 PM
Is MLB.com not working for anyone else?
Posted by: Matt | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:47 PM
Did they recalibrate the gun in Reading this year? Last year, it showed Flande and Drabek throwing faster than other parks did.
Posted by: JeffS | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:48 PM
Is it just me, or is MLB Gameday FUBAR for anyone else?
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:48 PM
I'm kind of excited that we might get to see a no-hitter today.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:48 PM
Please explain why a lead off hitter with an 2-o count swings at the next pitch.
Posted by: jr | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:49 PM
Utley has hit a bunch of FB like that since ARI, hasn't he? Warning track.
Posted by: Sophist | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:51 PM
Not to jinx it but MLB.com is working for me so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:53 PM
If this follows the usual pattern, we'll all spend the first 2 or 3 innings talking about how Cole is really dealing. Then all hell will break loose around the 3rd or 4th.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:54 PM
Early tight strike zone . . . not a good thing for Hamels & his fastball.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:56 PM
No perfect game for Cole.
Posted by: Greg S. | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:57 PM
Hamels was locating his FB very well to Renteria there and didn't get a single call.
Posted by: Sophist | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:57 PM
LA already bitching about the umpires. Only took 1/3 of an inning.
Posted by: Matt | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:57 PM
b_a_p: In light of the Phillies' recent offensive struggles, the Phila. Daily News should change their Home Run Payoff Inning to be that in which they project Hamels will melt down & start serving up the meatballs.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 03:58 PM
Way too many pitches here so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:00 PM
20 pitches per will knock him out by the 6th.
I'll temper my enthusiasm and say that Cole has been okay so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:01 PM
Jr - Please explain why a lead off hitter with an 2-o count swings at the next pitch.
they re just 2 overanxious~!
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:01 PM
Yeah, 3-ball counts to 3 of the first 4 hitters. Not a great sign.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:02 PM
Power outage continues . . . now a career record power slump for Howard.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:04 PM
"LA already bitching about the umpires. Only took 1/3 of an inning."
That's how long it took for people to bitch about Hamels.
Posted by: Pizzda | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:04 PM
Lincecum is putting on a clinic so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:05 PM
it's going to be a long game and a longer flight home
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:05 PM
Alice Cooper is dealing.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:06 PM
Hey, Mitchie Mitchie Mitchie...Mitch Kramer...we're looking for you pal!
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:06 PM
Oh Lordy. Gonna be a long game.
Posted by: Matt | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:06 PM
4 of 6 outs via strikeout. Good start for Lincecum. Not for the Phils. Going to be one of those games, I suppose.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:07 PM
Glad my radio in the office is not getting reception. Can't stand to hear LA make excuses for the Phillies. Total homer.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:08 PM
A lengthy rain delay would be fabulous right about......now.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:08 PM
Lincecum has an amazing delivery. No one can see the ball.
Posted by: Pizzda | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:09 PM
Best pitcher in the NL in action. His evolution has been amazing from a guy who had a tremendous arm but often overthrew & had too many fastballs to a guy who now simply can use 5 valid weapons against you.
Watching Pedro used to be an event when I lived in Boston in the late 90s/early 00s. Watched Lincecum when I could in '08 in SF and would love to watch his mojo if I still lived out there.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:09 PM
27 pitches for 2 inn for Lincecum..
PMS had 21 in the 1st inn alone
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:09 PM
C'mon now, you have to be happy about the Met fans who are going to start coming on here talking trash. I mean, wasn't 2009 boring in that sense? lol
Posted by: Steve The Met Fan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:10 PM
Some more crackpot Beerleaguer blog fixups in my Greasemonkey script (remove posts from trolls, highlight posts, comment links, etc.) I don't know if any it can be integrated into BL, but there are a few ideas in action that some may find useful.
Posted by: joe l | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:11 PM
Is the strike zone as small as Game Day is showing?
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:11 PM
With command like this, it's not a matter of if, but when, Hamels is going to melt down. It will undoubtedly happen the 2nd time through the lineup.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:12 PM
LA is right to freak out. This strike zone is ridiculous.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:12 PM
it also looks like a trifecta for lousy umpiring - a lot of pitches on the corner - aren't being called strikes
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:13 PM
LA is going nuts on the radio
"if hamels gets thrown out for arguing i wouldn't blame him one bit"
Is it really that bad?
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:14 PM
Somehow Lincecum is having no problems with it.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:14 PM
Its a small zone but its not that brutal. LA needs to just shut up.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:15 PM
Is this the CB Bucknor crew? They are among the worst in MLB in my opinion.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:15 PM
If the umpire is that bad, then why does Linecum have 19 strikes out of 27 pitches and 4 Ks?
Posted by: phlipper | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
I'm as hard on Hamels as anyone, but DeMuth's strike zone is utterly insane. Cole is getting squeezed beyond belief.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
by the tine this inn is over at least 40+ pitches for PMS
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
To read Beerleaguer's comments thread, you'd think that every time one of our pitchers stinks, it's the umpire's fault. Seems to me the same guy has been calling balls and strikes for the Giants' pitchers, and they don't seem to have any trouble throwing strikes.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
Lots of pitches that could go either way at this point. Glad I don't have to listen to L.A. whack out about it. I know some like him but he annoys me to no end.
Good test for Hamels though, see how he keeps his composure.
Posted by: The Truth Injection | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
NEPP:Objectivity like that will get you mocked.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
42 pitches for Cole.
Cole would help himself out if he had better control.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:16 PM
"I don't know why the giants would even bother swinging" - LA
Hahaha, it's starting to get annoying, but it IS pretty funny
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:17 PM
Valid point, phlipper. A lot of swinging strikes from the Phils, though.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:17 PM
Easy to throw strikes if the other team's pitcher is waving feebly. Sadly, Cole also thew him a couple of balls, first.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:17 PM
Honestly at this point, I think Lincecum can just throw it over the middle every pitch and the phillies couldn't do anything about it. That's the kind of slump they are in.
Posted by: kart racer | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:17 PM
If Cole had some consistency on his location, he'd probably get the borderline calls. Lincecum hits his spots, Cole doesn't and he pays for it.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:18 PM
I think the difference between Hamels & Lincecum so far is that the Phillies batters are swinging, whereas the Giants batters are not.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:19 PM
while looking at the Game-day graphics Tin Lincecum was getting a lot of the borderline pitches, where PMS wasn't
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:19 PM
As far as the umpiring goes, I asked a question based on what Game Day was showing (i.e. balls within their "strike zone" called balls). LA is definitely a homer, though, so you can't go by him.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:19 PM
BAP & Phlipper - There have been 6 pitches so far that Hamels has thrown that looked like clear strikes on GameDay & on the TV yet were called balls.
I agree with Dave. DeMuth's strike zone is about 2 inches above the knee and below the letters with nothing on either corner so far.
MLB wants to speed up the game and then calls utterly ridiculous strike zones like this.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:19 PM
for the record i'm not saying i agree with LA, i can't actually see the game so no comment on that one. Jim Jackson isn't all that bad at this baseball thing
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:19 PM
Jim Jackson got a smooth voice. He has that going for him.
Posted by: kart racer | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:21 PM
The difference is that Ruiz has to move his glove to catch it while Molina is frozen...borderline calls go against you when you miss your spots consistently and Cole has been doing that.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:21 PM
goes for the corner and misses.
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:22 PM
the phillies batter-
Script -
pitch1 ,
pitch2
pitch3 -swing and ground ball out - absolutely no discipline at the plate - it's ridiculous
Posted by: holy mackrel | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:22 PM
If Hamels is PMS (completely appropriate btw) L.A. is OTR.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:22 PM
You can throw a message pitch to an umpire? I didn't know you could.
Posted by: tightlines | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:22 PM
OK, that was hilarious. Cole & the entire Giants team started to walk off of the field, & DeMuth called a Ball. You show 'em who's the star, Blue!
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:23 PM
Did linecum just throw the ball over the umpire's head? Sending a message? ballsy
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 04:23 PM