The 33-year-old hurler spent then last five seasons pitching in the Far East, helping lead the KIA Tigers to the Korean League title in 2009.
Originally a 22nd-round selection by the Padres in 1997, Guttormson has been out of affiliated baseball since 2001. His professional claim-to-fame came in 2006 with the Yakult Swallows of Japan when he became the first pitcher to throw a no-hitter in an interleague game. Last season, Guttormson was part of a dominant KIA pitching staff, going 13-4 with a 3.24 ERA, forming a 1-2 North American punch that included former Phillie Aquilino Lopez (14-5, 3.12), who led the league in innings pitched. Korean teams are allowed two foreign players on their roster. Guttormson is also a dangerous hitter, as seen in this footage. The signing was first reported by Baseball America.






22th?
Posted by: Your Fourth Grade Teacher | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:16 AM
I think its actually 22nd...not 22th...making JW correct.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:27 AM
I think the first comment might have inspired the edit.
Posted by: Eagle Eye Cherry | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Is there such a thing as an on-line red pen?
Posted by: A-Train | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:41 AM
Yes,The Cloutinator
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:51 AM
I prefer 22st.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Try to stick to the topic at hand, and the topic is Rick Guttormson.
*crickets chirp*
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 10:56 AM
In other interesting news... this from today's Inky:
"Jared Fogle, of Subway ads fame, will be in camp today to visit fellow pitchman Ryan Howard."
I can't help but wonder who will have a greater impact on the big league team this year, Jared Fogle or Rick Guttormson. JW - How do you keep allowing Baseball America to scoop you on these things?
TWO.MORE.DAYS (until some slightly less ridiculous filler)
Posted by: Deutsche Phan | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:03 AM
Guttormson's other claim to fame:
http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/newsstand/discussion/american_pitcher_fails_japan_drug_test/
Posted by: GrandSlamSingle | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Looking over my old baseball cards recently, I wonder if Joe Torre was taking that hair growing agent.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:38 AM
Guttormson? Expat from where? Didn't he medal in the Nordic combined event? I love watching Amaro stockpile arms this time of year. I'm guessing the young guys at AA and AAA don't like it so much.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:38 AM
Heard Stark on with Mike and Mike this morning. He was raving about Hamels conditioning and work ethic. Apparently he's as ripped as a string bean can be. Also said that Hamels topped out at 77 mph last spring due to lack of preparation. He said he's been throwing gas already just in bp sessions. I'll take my encouragement anywhere I can find it.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:44 AM
Sorry to weigh in late on the Great Blanton Debate of 2010... and I really only have clout's summary on the last thread to go on.
Joe Blanton is 16-8 in his 1+ year with the Phils with an ERA+ of 105, pitching 266 innings in his 44 starts (an average of 6 innings per start). And now he's signed for a reasonable amount for his age 29, 30 and 31 seasons.
And it cost us a couple of prospects, one of whom pitched in 20 ML games before needing Tommy John surgery and the other of whom had a slightly disappointing debut at AAA last year.
So... sure... in the 2011 season, one or both of those guys might be succeeding in the majors. The odds are against it (as it is for every prospect), but it's possible. In the meantime, we'll likely have another 30 starts from Joe Blanton with an above-average ERA+ as the Phils attempt to go to their 3rd straight World Series.
I just can't imagine very many scenarios in which I'll shed a tear over that deal. But, hey... we're all entitled to our opinion.
Posted by: CJ | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:46 AM
I know this morning's topic isn't former Phillie greats but every time I see a picture of Sen. Bunning he is holding up one, two or three fingers as if he is fighting off some spirits of Gus Triandos or Clay Dalrymple.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Outman and Cardenas are mediocre (at best) prospects who will likely be little more than replacement level in their careers. Blanton has been an above-average innings eater for a multiple pennant winning team...
I fail to see why anyone would think that Phils fans will regret that deal in 10 years.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Clout just got clouted by a lynch mob. He parses words like a white house special prosecutor to belittle people. When a hole is found in one of his carefully crafted C.Y.A. statements he gets pimp slapped. Turn about is fair play.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:51 AM
****Also said that Hamels topped out at 77 mph last spring due to lack of preparation. ****
Funny, I remember him being in the low to mid 80s for most of the Spring and early April.
Sure that's not a typo and its supposed to be 87 mph, not 77 mph?
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:52 AM
****every time I see a picture of Sen. Bunning he is holding up one, two or three fingers as if he is fighting off some spirits of Gus Triandos or Clay Dalrymple.
****
Every time I see a picture of Sen. Bunning, I want to smash his face into a plate-glass window...its odd how the mind works sometimes.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:53 AM
Swallows. hehehe. I know the Swallows play at Meiji Jingu Stadium but I swear I heard people chearing for the "New York Swallows" at a Flyers game a few years back. What gives?
Posted by: gobaystars | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:55 AM
NEPP -
"****Also said that Hamels topped out at 77 mph last spring due to lack of preparation. ****
Funny, I remember him being in the low to mid 80s for most of the Spring and early April.
Sure that's not a typo and its supposed to be 87 mph, not 77 mph?"
I believe Stark was actually referring to Hamels' first BP session in Spring Training when he was topping out at 77.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:56 AM
I heard Stark on the radio this AM, too. He said he came into spring training last year hitting 77 in his first bullpen session. He says he's throwing harder in Clearwater now than he threw at any time last season. The gist of his comments was that he didn't spend the off-season on the rubber chicken circuit and swilling margaritas by the pool. He came into camp well into his throwing routine. I don't think I expected anything less of a guy who 2 years ago said he wants to win a cy young and throw a couple no-hitters. Carlton pitched like sh!t in '73, too. Not to start those (unwinnable) comparisons again.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:59 AM
****I believe Stark was actually referring to Hamels' first BP session in Spring Training when he was topping out at 77. ****
I can believe that. I thought he meant all of Spring Training. Thanks for the clarification.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 11:59 AM
NEPP and Chris: Not a typo. He claimed that Hamels topped out at 77 for all of spring training. I know that last spring his velocity was down but I remember it like NEPP does. But he seemed to be refuting the 80's stuff. Could have been a cover-up by the Phils FO last spring or Stark could just be wrong. Either way, what he was saying about him was encouraging. Apparently, he's looking like the Ole King Cole.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:04 PM
Maybe I misunderstood him, but I took him to mean all of spring training.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:06 PM
I could have misunderstood Stark. I recall clearly that Hamels had trouble with his velocity and it was hindering his ability to throw an effective change. If he topped out at 77 in spring training though, I would think he would have gone North on teh DL.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:11 PM
Son of the God-Dragon! Man, what a name, what potential for a fanclub.
Posted by: Unikruk | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:16 PM
Chris in VT: "Outman and Cardenas are mediocre (at best) prospects."
And that opinion is based on what exactly? BA and Sickels certainly don't agree with you.
Is it possible you don't know what you're talking about?
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:24 PM
So, I'm having a discussion on the Top Phillies of the past 40 years...here's what we've come up with so far (open to opinions from BLers)...also alternates are in parenthesis...)
1B - Ryan Howard (Pete Rose)
2B - Chase Utley (Juan Samuel)
SS - Jimmy Rollins (Manny Trillo)
3B - Michael Jack (Scott Rolen)
LF - Greg Luzinski (Pat Burrell)
CF - Garry Maddox (Dykstra...maybe Vic in a few more years)
RF - Bobby Abreu (McBride, Eisenreich?...its a really thin position Werth is great but he's got all of 1.5 years there as a starter)
C - Mike Lieberthal (Bob Boone, Darren Daulton)
LHP - Steve Carlton
RHP - Curt Schilling
CP - Tug McGraw (Lidge, and a slew of other 1 hit wonders)
It started off with an off the cuff statement by me of "List the top 10 Phillies of the past 40 years...I'd bet nearly half of them are currently on the roster."
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:24 PM
The list looks like a good start, except Trillo didn't play short. Plug Bowa in there and you're pretty good.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:26 PM
Oops, typo alert, Trillo was supposed to be under 2B with Bowa under SS. I screwed up with cut and paste.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:27 PM
To Hugh: Yeah, I know. Stupid cut and paste.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:27 PM
NEPP, Trillo was a second baseman. Bowa is the alternate SS for Rollins. And Burrell > Luzinski. Otherwise, I agree with your list.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:30 PM
LOL...again on the Trillo thing, I know. I was cutting and pasting from my email and I wasn't reading which names I was putting under which.
I disagree on Luzinski being worse than Burrell
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:32 PM
"Chris in VT: "Outman and Cardenas are mediocre (at best) prospects."
And that opinion is based on what exactly? BA and Sickels certainly don't agree with you.
Is it possible you don't know what you're talking about? "
Outman's recovering from TJ surgery. Cardenas has zero power, and would never displace Utely, Rollins, or Polanco from the lineup. You're telling me that Phils fans are really going to regret trading away a utility IF and injured LHP in exchange for Joe Blanton?
Is it possible YOU don't know what you're talking about?
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:33 PM
Pretty soon we'll be adding "Tuffy Goosewich" to those illustrious names.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:38 PM
Career OPS+
Luzinski - 130
Burrell - 116
As a Phillie
Luzinski - 133
Burrell - 119
# of outstanding ballpark dining establishments:
Luzinski - 1
Burrell - 0
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:40 PM
Samuel over Trillo. I probably give Luzinski an edge on Burrell, but that could be nostalgia. Pretty similar players, albeit, the Bull was more consistent. I'd want to plug Von Hayes in RF even though he moved around center, and first base more than right. I might put Dykstra in center as much as that might be heresy to the secretary of defense. Oh, and Boone at catcher.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:41 PM
As I recall, Cardenas was among the top 3 Phillies prospects on BA and Sickels and a few other lists. He's 22. Before he got hurt, Outman was 4-1, 3.48 in 12 starts. He was in the Phils top 10.
Cardenas was also rated among BA's Top 100 prospects. But you probably know more than the pros, so it was silly of me to question you. And, of course, no pitcher has ever come back from TJ surgery so you're probably right about Outman too. Forget I ever said anything.
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Abreu is the no. 1 right fielder in my book. Hard to fill in after him.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:43 PM
Hugh: Von Hayes? Good grief!
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Goosewich Bozied Gutterstorm.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Meyer: Your mother would wash your mouth out with soap if she heard such language.
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:52 PM
How come Chris Coste isn't on the list? Or Eric Bruntlett?
Posted by: Cipper | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:53 PM
In DavThom's list, Chris Coste is filled in for every position, since he's played each one at some point in his career.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Cardenas was rated in the top 100 in 2008 and 2009, but dropped out this year. Was rated a B- by Sickels recently
Outman was a B- last year according to Sickels, before he went over the rookie limit. His grade would presumably be bumped up by his solid MLB performance, but then again, Tommy John surgery tends to knock a prospect down some as well. So we'll stay with B-.
Both have the chance to be solid MLB contributors (Outman's upside is probably performance similar to...Joe Blanton), but neither project to be stars. So this is a classic example of one in the hand being better than two in the bush. Getting solid, above-average pitching from Blanton right now was worth giving up two guys who project to be average regulars in the future, with a small chance of being better than that (and of course the risk, with all prospects, of never making it at all).
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:01 PM
clout: I'm no fan of Von Hayes. He never lived up to his billing as 'the franchise'. Who do you put in right after Abreu, though? Werth? McBride? Just trying to help. It's like picking the second.best right handed or left handed starter?
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:05 PM
****I probably give Luzinski an edge on Burrell, but that could be nostalgia. Pretty similar players, albeit, the Bull was more consistent****
The Bull gave you at least equal offense in a far less offensive era and in a tougher ballpark (as Burrell played the final half of his Phillies career in CBP, not the Vet). The OPS+ numbers above show a pretty signficant gap between the two. Besides, that pulled pork sandwich is ridiculously good.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:08 PM
I also think Clout is underrating Blanton here. He says he's "only a 3rd starter", but ignores what a good 3rd starter is worth to a team. 200 innings a year of 105 ERA+ is a very, very useful piece, for a team that's contending for titles right now. Worth trading Dom Brown and Kyle Drabek for? No. But worth dealing Cardenas and Outman? Probably.
I'm on record as saying we overpaid at the time. But Blanton has been significantly better than I thought he'd be, and contributed valuable postseason performance (yes, Clout, that IS worth something), and Cardenas hasn't developed any power and Outman has gotten injured and will miss most of his Age 25 season.
Interestingly, looking in the archives, Clout liked the Blanton trade, saying our window was closing, and that getting a reliable starter for the postseason was worth it "no matter how Cardenas turns out."
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:09 PM
FWIW, I did mention Von Hayes as a RF contender in the original discussion based on his 3 years as a starter there...Abreu is easily #1 though.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:19 PM
Jack: What is your definition of the word "wonder"? How about "twinge"?
Did you even read the original post?
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:20 PM
I liked the trade at the time and now. Unless Outman or Cardenas develops into a perennial AS/HOF player, it was probably a pretty good fair trade for both teams.
Its not nearly at the level of a Doyle Alexander or Ryne Sandberg type trade...barring a massive surprise from Outman, Spencer or Cardenas.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:20 PM
Clout: As I said yesterday, "wonder" is a great thing. I wonder if Freddy Galvis will hit 30 HRs in a season someday. What do you think?
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:25 PM
Jack: You think the chances of Outman and Cardenas making it are the same as Galvis hitting 30 HRs?
Interesting.
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:26 PM
And that sounds to me like a "win-win".
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:27 PM
Clout: I think we can wonder about a whole lot of things.
Posted by: Jack | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:31 PM
NEPP: Regarding the ballpark dining establishments statistic... I look forward to the day that "Elvis'" opens in left field at Harry Kalas Memorial Park.
Posted by: Deutsche Phan | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:33 PM
I think NEPP's list is pretty good. I strongly favor Bob Boone though over the other two. Guy was a helluva receiver. In fact when he retired I think he was like one or two in games caught for a career. He almost never missed a game. Tough as nails.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:40 PM
Would we have won a WFC without Blanton? I don't think so. If that's the case, the trade was well worth it no matter what the kids do.
Posted by: A-Train | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:48 PM
Nepp: For Centerfield wouldn't Ashburn be the #1? Maddox was a great defender but I don't walk around in Maddox Alley
Posted by: Reverend | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:52 PM
NEPP kept it to the last 40 years so that he would not see the name Bunning again today.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:54 PM
Gutterstorm?
Posted by: Andy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:57 PM
Rev: I think NEPP was only going back 40 years. Otherwise Whitey is a no brainer. I saw on the MLB channel the other day that only one outfielder ever had 500 putouts in a season. It was Whitey....he did it 4 times. Incredible.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 01:59 PM
My poetic liscence is expiring along with my Unemployment Compensation at the end of the month thanks to you know who.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:01 PM
clout - So you're really arguing that a younger version of Castro and a guy recovering from TJ surgery who might one day be as good as Blanton weren't worth the trade?
We can "wonder" about anything. But what we KNOW is that Blanton has given the Phils a season and a half of above average production that helped them win 2 pennants and 1 WFC. Would the Phils have won the division in '08 without Blanton? What about '09? Highly unlikely. Without that trade, the Phils are still wallowing in roughly the same position they were in '06, competitive but not good enough to get over the hump.
Are you really contending that isn't worth Outman and Cardenas?
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:13 PM
"Jack: You think the chances of Outman and Cardenas making it are the same as Galvis hitting 30 HRs?
Interesting."
Making it? Big deal. Your 'argument' has been that *maybe* these guys become Sandberg and we regret this trade forevermore. Let them "make it" and be solid major leaguers. Phillies won a WFC, end of story.
Posted by: Mick Shrimpton | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:19 PM
I believe Cardenas and Outman were going to win 8 HoFs? Now they just have to "make" it?
Posted by: thephaithful | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:31 PM
I'm still trying to get my mind around clout's notion that Ivan DeJesus was a superior fielder to Larry Bowa. Bowa was definitely older but, DeJesus was a butcher on the order of Juan Samuel and then some. Human error machine some years. And don't try to convince me the stats say otherwise. I have had that opinion since I was 12 years old and I won't let it go.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:31 PM
8 WFCs while being HoF that is
Posted by: thephaithful | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:32 PM
I think Clout's passion behind this silly argument is partly driven by his respect for Billy Beane. Many smart baseball fans seem to think that Beane can do no wrong, and I assume Clout falls into that camp.
Posted by: Spitz | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:40 PM
**Unsolicited Two Center Alert**
I re-read these last, tedious posts about the trade issue. I have to back clout up on one thing. After reading his initial post, all of the post following completely misinterpret what he said. A taste of his own medicine, for sure, but it still happened.
I read the post to mean that of the recent emptying of the farm system, one trade that may be somewhat regrettable is the Blanton deal -- based on what Blanton added (and will add) to the team and how Outman and Cardenas may turn out.
If I'm reading it the way clout meant it, I don't see what all the fuss is about. I think it's a pretty reasonable statement. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:41 PM
Er...**Unsolicited Two Cents Alert**
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:42 PM
Sorry I skipped right over the last 40 years part.
Meyer: My poetic liscence is expiring along with my Unemployment Compensation at the end of the month thanks to you know who.
So it is Clout's fault! Haha
Posted by: Reverend | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:46 PM
No I only have myself to blame not Big C. My early retirement will soon be over and I will only be left with my Maple Street Press Phillies Annual 2010 and my translations of the Mahabharata.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:51 PM
Blanton's a "#3" pitcher, but he was probably our second best pitcher in the 2008 postseason. 18 innings, 6 ER. Sure, it's easy to pretend that's easily replaced, but only Hamels had more success with lots of innings.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 02:53 PM
A federal investigation that is expected to touch a number of professional athletes in a number of sports will cover a second Mets player. Several media outlets have reported that the same investigators who last week met with Jose Reyes intend to interview teammate Carlos Beltran concerning his involvement with Anthony Galea, a Toronto doctor, who is under investigation for the sale of an unapproved drug, among other things.
mlb.com
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:01 PM
Meyer: ah be nice to Sen. Bunning, he's just trying to enforce the Pay-go rules this senate placed on itself and then is promptly trying to ignore. The unemployment thing will go through eventually and you'll get your money. That's what happened with my wife during the last extension squabble.. . and if it means they have to take the money from some other ridiculous program to fund it, all the better.
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:06 PM
Harry Reid only needs 51 votes to override Bunnings' objection, there are 59 democrats in the Senate. Bunnings' objection is useful for political reasons, The Dem's get to go out and convince guys like you that the Republicans hate unemployed people and don't care that you are going to starve. . . .But back to baseball.
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:14 PM
EFF: why would Reyes and Beltran be involved with a sketchy Dr. in Toronto if they weren't taking banned substances?
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:15 PM
JBird: That may be what he says he's doing, but Bunning's been ignoring PayGo for a long time by voting for other spending. He's a fraud*.
*He may actually be trying to stick it Sen. McConnell (r-KY) with this.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:19 PM
Bed's Beard: A fraud in Washington you say? I've never heard of such a thing. Do you suppose others know about this? We must alert the press immediately!
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:23 PM
R. Billingsly: Interesting how you could read that as it was written, but the emotional munchkins couldn't.
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:24 PM
Chris in VT: Are you dyslexic?
Here is what you posted: "Outman and Cardenas are mediocre (at best) prospects."
That's what I was responding to, a comment that was silly and false.
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:26 PM
JBird,
You are as ignorant as Senator Bunning. You need 60 votes to invoke cloture to end a filibuster, not 51. This is precisely what has been discussed every day before and after the Mass. special election.
Posted by: JJG | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:27 PM
Anyway, it's an objection to a unanimous consent. it can be overturned with a simple majority, and there is a simple majority willing to overturn it. But the Majority leader won't schedule the vote...so back to baseball? How is there no actual baseball worth discussing yet?
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:28 PM
Bunning's reasoning for the first no vote was that he was missing his UK basketball game...he's a POS regardless of the "politics" behind the vote.
Posted by: NEPP | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:29 PM
Hugh: "DeJesus was a butcher on the order of Juan Samuel and then some."
Wow, you couldn't be more wrong. The guy was a good field/no hit who only had a career because of his glove. Read the sports pages from those days. He had no power at all and his career OPS+ was 77.
Yet he was an everyday player for 8 years. You think that was because he was good in the clubhouse?
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:32 PM
NEPP: But you have to admit his slider was murder on righties.
Posted by: clout | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:33 PM
Now that its March I am feeling like weighing in.
I loved Jim Bunning as a Phillie, but have never had much use for him as a senator. Politics aside, there have been stories for the last several years suggesting that there are signs that he is experiencing some sporadic dementia. If true, very sad for him, but not okay in a senator.
I want to cast my vote for the Bull in LF. He was a much more consistent hitter than Burrell and certainly the offensive leader on the team through most of the 70's (yes, ahead of Schmidt). He also finished 2 for MVP twice.
Posted by: GreysFan | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:34 PM
JJG: it's an objection to unanimous consent not a filibuster. Besides, there are republicans who will vote for it, like Susan Collins so there's your 60. Calling people ignorant isn't nice. Below are links for you, if you care.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6213XI20100302
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/02/is-bunning-conducting-a-filibuster/
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:34 PM
BB and JBird -
That's the problem with our government as it is currently constituted...When Republican bills were going through a Rep. controlled senate, Bunning had no problem ignoring PAYGo. When Democrats are pushing bills through a Dem. controlled Senate, suddenly he has to take a stand on principle. It's all BS.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:35 PM
Chris: BS indeed. they're all bums but a couple who are few and far between. They all play the game. I have much more respect for the one's who stand on their principles all the time no matter which side of the aisle they populate.
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:38 PM
Jim Bunning developed his screwball pitch after his HOF induction.
Posted by: Meyer | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:38 PM
Jbird: Might want to enroll in a Poli Sci class.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:40 PM
Clout - no, I stand by that statement. Outman is recovering from TJ surgery and will miss his entire age 25 season. At best, he could hope to have a career similar to Blanton's, if his rehab and recovery goes well (which is not the sure thing you seem to think). Cardenas will be a career utility IF, basically a younger version of Juan Castro. Neither one is a great (or even good) prospect at this point.
The trade was most definitely worth the price, considering the value the Phils have received and will continue to receive from Blanton.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:41 PM
With Martino's story about Happ and his new 2-seamer, how far back to earth (regression to the mean) do people expect Happ to fall. I've seen him mentioned among the players most likely to vastly underperform their 2009 numbers. But at the same time I see him getting projected to a 4.2-ish era and I think I'd be pretty happy with that. Would anyone be unhappy with that?
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:42 PM
Not surprising that Beerleaguers are big on following and arguing about politics too, considering we have people like clout, who can't just disagree with someone but has to resort to calling them "emotional munchkins".
But this is a baseball blog. Let's keep it that way, and avoid the political topic du jour. There are plenty of other places where people can get that fix.
Posted by: Brian G | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:44 PM
Chris in Vt: Well aware. I work with these folks down here in DC. And they didn't just ignore PAYGo, they let it expire in 02.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:44 PM
I expect Happ to be roughly .500 with low double-digit wins and a 4.5-ish ERA...In other words, a solid #4 starter, which is what they need from him.
Anything better would just be gravy.
Posted by: Chris in VT | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:45 PM
Bed's Beard: you can check the links I posted above and see that 1. it's not really a filibuster so they don't need 60 and 2. even if it was a filibuster, they have the 60 votes to overturn it. I took poli-sci 10 years ago.
Posted by: Jbird | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:46 PM
Agree with Clout. DeJesus was a good glove man. When the Phillies got him he was a better defensive shortstop than Bowa at the time. Bowa was definitely on the way down. He was still decent but DeJesus was better. At his best Bowa was one of the 5 best shortstops I ever saw.
Posted by: donc | Tuesday, March 02, 2010 at 03:48 PM