The Phillies have non-tendered Eric Bruntlett, who hit just .171/.224/.238 in 118 plate appearances in 2009. In addition, right-handers John Ennis and Tyler Walker, catcher Paul Hoover and infielder Andy Tracy were granted free agency, according to the Daily News. [Link]
Beerleaguer: It would have been hard to produce less if he tried. Bruntlett’s lone highlight was an unassisted, walk-off triple play Aug. 23 at Citi Field. Otherwise, his season was actually worse than rarely seen outfielder So Taguchi the season before. There’s no sugar coating it: It was the worst, full-season offensive showing I’ve ever seen. Bruntlett actually produced considerably less than Taguchi, a 22 OPS+ compared to Taguchi’s Ruthian 55.
Some of it wasn’t his fault. After an encouraging spring, E-Brunt struggled to get on the field after serving as Pat Burrell’s defensive caddy the season earlier. The additions of Ben Francisco and John Mayberry at various points in the season also hurt, and Charlie Manuel was reluctant to compromise run production in his middle infield, so Bruntlett basically gathered dustmites in his beard.
Nevertheless, you can’t deny the absurd highlights. The triple play. All the others occurred in the 2008 postseason: a ninth-inning home run off hot-shot rookie David Price in a Game 2 loss to the Rays; the walk-off run on “The Little Squib that Did” in Game 3; and the eventual winning run in Game 5 of the World Series. Then in 2009, he scored the first run on Jimmy Rollins' game-winning hit in Game 4 of the NLCS. For all his faults, it’s quite a distinction to be involved in so many big moments in Phillies history. Lord knows there haven't been many.
From here, the Phillies will be seeking better depth and versatility, something they've really needed for a couple of seasons. They’re very thin in the minors. It’s possible Jason Donald would have been the guy to replace Bruntlett in 2010 prior to his trade to Cleveland, but now the Phillies will be forced to make ends meet via trade or free agency. I'm sure the Phillies have been preparing for this.
Bruntlett is arbitration eligible, but he's likely to receive only a minor league deal, at best. Vaya con dios, Gnome.
As for the others, only Tyler Walker is worth mentioning; he actually played a bigger role than Bruntlett this season. There was some thought that Walker could possibly handle the ninth inning, but as soon as that chatter started in early September, he immediately fell off a cliff and never factored into the Phillies' postseason plans. He'll land on his feet somewhere, possibly on a major league deal, but more likely a minor league one.




He also scored the first run on Jimmy Rollins' game-winning hit in Game 4 of this year's NLCS. Goodbye, E-Brunt!
Posted by: dmac | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:20 PM
Could some argue that we actually lost the trade with Cleveland, because now we will have to overpay in free agency for something that would have been almost free if we hadn't traded it? Off course not, we can't argue that, it's silly, because we won't know the results of that trade for at least 5 years.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:26 PM
If there was ever a year to have taken a middle infielder in the Rule 5 draft it was last year.
I'm guessing any minor league kid could have contributed more with fielding, or as a pinch runner, or as a situational guy than Bruntlett did all year. All in all good ridance to a complete waste of a bench spot on a world series team.
Posted by: Rolo | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:29 PM
Goodbye Gnome, for you, one last post of the hypno-gnome.
Posted by: Pete Happy | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:29 PM
Smoky Joe: "sorry clout, I just can't let that belt-high softball go. Your 5 little words completely moved your argument from weak to ridiculous. Just about every trade involves an established journeyman for prospects, or younger mlb players. Most times it also involves a "seller" and a "buyer". Things like service time, salary, short-term vs long-term are as important (if not more) than carrerr productivity of each asset. But based on your criteria, it's pretty easy to make an educated guess on who will win every trade. Once again, why even bring up a point of argument if it's so ludicrous as to not require a stance, or is not "arguable" until after-the-fact, when there is no room for argument?"
This is pretty incoherent, but if I understand you correctly, you're saying that judging a trade by who got the most talent and how they play for their new teams is not a good way to judge a trade because of financial factors.
I disagree. As someone posted here earlier, the financial factors are not nearly as relevant as the personnel decisions.
I also disagree with your assertion that any time a team trades prospects for established talent that it's easy to figure out who will get the better end.
Posted by: clout | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:34 PM
I was actually mildly surprised they didn't tender a contract to Walker. I distinctly remember that, one of the reasons they signed him in the first place was because he had another year or two before he became a FA. Since he pitched reasonably well for them this year, I would have thought they'd resign him to fill a role similar to what he filled last year. But I guess his rising price tag makes him a lot less appealing for that kind of role.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Based on comments on the last thread, it seems people are expecting Condrey to be cut loose too. My question is why? He was the last man in the bullpen a few years ago but each year he's become more and more important, while posting very respectable numbers.
Before his injuries this year, he was one of the more reliable relievers. Considering other injuries and uncertainties in the pen, just why are people so quick to let Condrey go? Is it a money thing? Injury concerns?
Posted by: krukker | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:38 PM
BAP: Isn't Walker arb eligible? He made $750,000 lst season and had a pretty good year. Maybe if he goes to arb he gets $1.5M. In this market as a FA he doesn't get that much. I'm guessing the same motivation applies to Condrey.
I think there's gonna be a ton of guys removed from 40-man and non-tendered by the Dec. 1 arb deadline.
Posted by: clout | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:40 PM
clout, if it's incoherent to you, it may say more about your reading comprehension than my communication skills. And your response was such a stalwart example of poor debating skills: someone eralier said...And "the person who posted earlier" was you. You're the one who disregards fiancial matters as grounds for a relevant argument concerning baseball matters. Financial factors not as relevant as personnel decisions? Do you live in space? Is that why you keep analyzing issues in a vacuum?
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:41 PM
bap, I said the same thing about Walker on the previous thread.
They obviously know something we don't (yeah, awh, like what they're thinking). I wonder if Mathieson's recovery from multiple surgeries is progressing well enough that they're counting on him.
Posted by: awh | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Clout, is there a distinction between a good trade, say, one in which your team gets better or fulfills team needs, versus "winning" a trade in which you simply get the better players? Certainly we can imagine myriad situations in which a team gets better - perhaps even good enough to win the world series - but still loses a trade. Is that really such a bad thing?
Posted by: Phillies Red | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:43 PM
Rolo, you stole my temporary handle!
Posted by: awh ( formerly rolo...formerly AWH) | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:44 PM
I shall pour out a beer tonight for my fallen homie.
But rest easy this night, Eric, we will be watching your highlights for decades, and you'll be remembered more fondly than Mookie Wilson.
Posted by: Unikruk | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:46 PM
SmokyJoe: No, it wasn't me who posted that. And, yes, making the right personnel decision is more important than making the right financial decision.
Posted by: clout | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I will have nightmares tonight about a wild eyed gnome.
Posted by: Lake Fred | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:48 PM
Don't feed the troll.
Posted by: CJ | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:52 PM
Phillies Red: Absolutely. And the Alexander for Smoltz trade is a classic example. Alexander had an immediate positive impact on the Tigers. But over the long term, the trade was obviously lopsided in favor of the Braves. Whether that's the case with Lidge for Bourn is too early to say. That was my original point and one might be surprised that it set off a firestorm of controversy. But those "the world is round" type of statements (which awh says makes me MOTO) frequently set off controversies here because so many posters think the world is flat.
Posted by: clout | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:52 PM
P Red, excellent post!
Posted by: awh | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:55 PM
clout must be an academian, because he definitely is not any kind of businessman
sorry CJ, that was the last one.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 01:57 PM
I often joke about a player being an automatic out, but this season Bruntlett was an automatic out! That being said, he made the awesome triple play this year, blasted a meaningless 9th inning home run in Game 2 of the '08 World Series, scored the go ahead run in Game 5 of the '08 World Series. And filled in alright for Rollins last year when he was hurt. Years from now, I look forward to being able to answer the 7th inning trivia question when they ask about the triple play. Until then, Au Revoir Mr. Bruntlett and hello Nomar! Or whoever the hell they decide to get.
Posted by: Greg V. | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:01 PM
Chris Coghlan in the NL Rookie of the Year. J.A. Happ finished a close second.
Posted by: CJ | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:01 PM
SmokyJoe: Winning games is good business for a baseball team.
Posted by: clout | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:02 PM
AWH:
Stole: Nope, at least not consciously; perhaps your posts were so well written and thought provoking that I subconsciously projected myself...err nevermind
Did I know it was taken: NO, new to the site
I'll pick a new handle
Posted by: Rolo (but not for long) | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:09 PM
I wouldn't mind seeing Walker back. I'd give Hoover a minor league deal and say good bye to Bruntlett, Tracy and Ennis. I didn't even know Ennis was still on the 40 man roster, I thought he was gone after 2007...
I wonder if Cairo will replace Bruntlett or if the Phillies will fill that spot with someone else.
Posted by: philsphan | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:15 PM
BAP...I thought the same thing about Andy Tracy. He offered a little insurance if Ryan got hurt. He was a competent bat.
Posted by: A-Train | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:16 PM
clout for GM! Now ther's a guaranteed winner.
I can only speculate about what would go on, but it would probably sound something like this:
"If owner don't give me a five-year extension right now you'll be the stupidest owners af any franchise on the planet. After all, you can't possibly evaluate the job I'm doing for at least 5 years. You can't possibly have enough information before then."
Posted by: awh | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:18 PM
Even if the Phils had a good replacement for Gnome in the minors, Charlie wouldn't use him much unless he had to. He doesn't like to use younger players. He prefers veterans...even if they can't play any more.
Posted by: A-Train | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:23 PM
I will offer Gnome a minor league Lawn Jockey contract if he can prove he can keep the birds off my lawn.
Posted by: Omar Minaya | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:24 PM
A-Train: You are 100% correct.
Manual doesn't want to use rookies or young kids EVER. That's why he moved Happ to the Pen and let that old Vet Moyer keep on pitching in the starting rotation, man I hated that move. Oh wait, you mean he kept the rookie in the starting rotation? Really? A rookie? Maybe you are only somewhat correct...and Charlie didn't play any kids because his regulars were really really good.
Posted by: Knox | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:38 PM
Will Gnome open his own Fish joint in Ashburn Alley?
Posted by: A-Train | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Maybe Gnome can put his Stanford degree to use as a white collar working stiff.
Posted by: ozark | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:43 PM
Local boy Andrew Bailey (Paul VI-Haddon Twp) wins AL ROY.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Maybe Gnome can apply to be the Mets new hitting coach.
Posted by: mvptommyd | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:45 PM
I wonder if Bruntlett made his eyes do that when Amaro said hit the road.
"Ruben ... you are getting very sleepeey..veryy sleepeey....now repeat after me.. I will sign Eric B to a 3 year deal worth 15million...."
Nice try but Gnome tricks dont work on me !!
Posted by: phanatic's brother | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 02:49 PM
It just doesn't seem right that our rainy-day poster boy was let go on such a bright, sunny day. It should have happened on friday the 13th.
Posted by: goody | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Steve Carlton will be here in Reading on Dec. 5th for 2 hrs. of autograph signing. I didn't know he did this type of thing, I always thought he was a very private person.
Posted by: goody | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 03:23 PM
Grat job Rube, only (4) months tooooooo late !!!!! I still cant believe this @#$@$!$#%, was still on this team come playoff time..I still cant beleive this team went six deep in the World Series with this bench and blowing 20 games out of the bullpen..Cant wait till March..
Posted by: dick-allen15 | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 03:41 PM
dick-allen15: Agreed. The more I look back, the more remarkable it all seems.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Monday, November 16, 2009 at 04:05 PM
Didnt Bruntlett set up the triple play with an error too?
Posted by: J | Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 07:16 AM