After announcing Clayton Kershaw as his Game 1 starter, Joe Torre will follow with Vicente Padilla, Hiroki Kuroda and Randy Wolf. Meanwhile, the Phils have made Cole Hamels official for Game 1.
Last series, Beerleaguer picked Cliff Lee
as his key to the division series and it turned out to be a rather good guess for the strapping young lad indeed. So here we have the Championship Series, and I gotta admit I'm at a loss. Many of the experts expect a seven-game series and Vegas anticipates a Dodgers win. The only clear vision includes plenty of goose eggs lining that scoreboard. Considering the quality of the pitching, four games slated at
Dodgers Stadium, and with raw conditions setting into the Northeast, these roaring lineups could be reduced to
a purr.
Also clouding the crystal ball is the fact that the Phils haven't announced their rotation beyond Hamels, much less a roster, which makes this next statement a little risky: Pedro Martinez will be the key for the Phillies.
Let's face it: Everyone wants to see what a future Hall-of-Famer can do in the 80-degree heat, returning to the place where it all started, slotted into Game 2 against Padilla. But the Phillies can't afford to get suckered into the novelty of it. Pedro hadn't even shaken off the rust before spending these last 14 days crusting up again. If Charlie Manuel makes this call, as Jayson Stark believes he will, then he must be absolutely certain. He's got a tested arm sitting there in Joe Blanton, no matter how well he showed out of the 'pen. Not to sell the Phillies' late-game heroics short, they can't afford a three-inning dud, considering how tough it will be to rally against this formidable Los Angeles bullpen.
Meanwhile, here's your Dodgers X-Factor: Kuroda, who will start Game 3. There's a reason Joe Torre flew all the way to Arizona to watch his Japanese right-hander make 50 pitches in a simulated game: the Phillies can't hit him.



Just get me to the plate, boys.
Posted by: Mr. Ryan Howard | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:17 PM
Another smart move by Torre, keep Padilla away from Phillies fans who could easily get him off his game.
Posted by: gjs | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:26 PM
PE-DRO, PE-DRO, PE-DRO, PE-DRO
Posted by: NEPP | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Padilla #2? His stats in starts vs teams like the Nats, Pads and Giants, make his return to the NL look OK. But seriously, #2?
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:41 PM
The goal for the Phillies is to win 1 game in LA out of the first 2. Padilla pitching game 2 really gives us the upper hand in that game, and if Hamels dominates in game 1, we could be in even better shape coming back to Philly.
Even if we lose both in LA, we have Lee in game 3 against Kuroda. While Kuroda has killed the Phillies, there comes a point where any good offense will get to a pitcher. With the confidence this team has, this time it might happen.
Posted by: AL | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Can/Will Hamels pitch at the top of his game this NLCS?
Re: Game 2; It's important this game be well-pitched to bounce back from a Game 1 loss if such should occur. Does Charlie have to announce before Game 1 is over?
Posted by: GBrettfan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:48 PM
Murphy tweets: Hamels in game 1. Manuel says Blanton and Happ will be avail in bullpen first two games. He didn't announce a game 2 starter, but...
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:51 PM
Game 1: Hamels
Game 2: Pedro
Game 3: Lee
Game 4: Blanton
Game 5: Hamels
Game 6: Lee
Game 7: All hands on deck
Bastardo will be off the roster in favor of Bruntlett, which is why Happ will be forced back to the 'pen. That way, we get another lefty out there to use as needed and run out 2 RH starters against the righty-heavy Dodgers lineup.
We didn't sign Pedro to be afraid to run him out there in a warm-weather NLCS game against Vicente Padilla. And frankly, I have faith he will get the job done.
Posted by: Petey Pablo | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 08:02 PM
Jason Stark said on Missanelli today that Charlie was leaning toward Pedro. What JW just posted would confirm this.
Posted by: donc | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 08:04 PM
To me, the keys are Rollins and Victorino. They need to get on base and get in the heads of Dodgers' pitching. It would be very nice to see the team continue its (surprising) trend of hitting with RISP, though I'm not necessarily counting on it.
Posted by: Petey Pablo | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Let's hope Padilla's 10-cent head gets the better of his million-dollar arm.
Posted by: ozark | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 08:43 PM
Torre really is setting up his rotation for the best possible outcome: Kershaw at home in a friendly pitcher's park, Padilla same (and minus the harassment he would receive at CBP), Kuroda the Phillie killer and Wolf (who hates but is very familiar with) at CBP. Makes sense. Hope it all fails miserably, of course...
Posted by: doubleh | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 08:50 PM
doubleh: Were I Torre, I would switch Wolf and Padilla. I'd take the risk of Padilla in CBP in order to get a lefty starter with a 129 ERA+ who's been great against lefties all season against the Phillies (stronger lefty hitters) into the series before Game 4.
But I agree with Kershaw and Kuroda in games 1 and 3.
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:10 PM
Jason,
For we mortals in the Phoenix area a flight to LA is usually only 45 minutes each way. For Torre and the private, non TSA, flight I am sure it was no sweat to visit Kuroda--but you are right he is a Phillie killer.
Posted by: jazzcat | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:12 PM
Uh no thanks on Bruntlett on the NLCS roster, if Bastardo goes for anyone it should be Park if he's ready.
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:42 PM
Per Todd Zolecki's blog, regarding Pedro possibly starting game 2:
But interestingly, while Manuel and Dubee liked what they saw yesterday, Martinez didn't.
"I threw on the sides and in the bullpen but that's not enough," he said. "I threw two innings of BP yesterday, but that's pretty much it. I'm going to let Dubee and Charlie make the decision. My two innings of BP were a little bit erratic, wild a little bit."
-----What does everyone think of those comments by Pedro? Something to worry about? Or not?
Posted by: GBrettfan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:50 PM
It seems like every other team somehow manages to find room for a "speed guy" on their roster. We have no such option. I'm always fearful that that will come back and haunt us one of these games/series...
Posted by: Scott | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:51 PM
GBrettfan: I saw that, & wondered the same thing. Of course I worry about everything, so I'm just gonna hang out awhile & wait for the optimist faction to blow sunshine up my ass.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:54 PM
GBrettFan, my feeling is that it could be a little bit of gamesmanship on the part of Pedro and the Phils... Just my 2 cents, but it may mess with the mindset of the Dodgers going into the unknown of having to face the '09 version of Pete...
Posted by: DelawareVol | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:55 PM
Phylan, we need another position player. We needed another one in the first series and got lucky to not have it bite us in the anus.
We don't need 12 pitchers. Even 11 pitchers is probably excess, when there are 2 off-days in this potential 7 game series. Cholly is going to ride his 4 starters, and at MOST 5 relievers (Lidge, Madson, Eyre, Durbin and probably Happ). Park or Myers (whoever makes the roster) would only pitch in a blowout or in extra innings. The final guy (whoever it is) won't likely ever see the field, unless of extreme conditions. Plus as we saw in Series 1, Cholly could use one of his 4 starters in relief too, if needed.
You don't need 2 pitchers (the 11th and 12th guy) who will never contribute a meaningful thing in this series. You very likely MIGHT need that 6th guy off the bench to contribute something though.
Bruntlett, while a liability at the plate, does give Chuckles an extra pinch-running option (instead of using your #1 pitcher to do so). And he gives them defensive versatility (instead of sticking Cairo in the OF in the 9th inning of a clinching game).
One of these days, we are going to get stuck in extra innings and not have any bench options left and lose a game because we have Chan Ho Park or Joe Blanton taking hacks in a key spot, instead of a guy who is actually paid money to swing a bat for a MLB team.
Posted by: denny b. | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:56 PM
Why do we need another position player? One who plays below average defense, especially in the outfield? We seemed to do fine in the DS without him, and keeping him off the roster prevents Charlie from using him in completely unnecessary situations and letting his terribleness infect the game when it's important, which he loves to do for some reason.
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 09:58 PM
Phylan: No one is advocating using Bruntlett as a pinch-hitter in a big spot. But did you like Cliff Lee pinch-running? Did you like Miguel Cairo playing in left field?
We had 3 pitchers (Kendrick, Pedro, Bastardo) combine to pitch to 1 batter in the NLDS. We had at least one too many pitcher. There's additional off days in the NLCS, so that reduces even more the need for extra pitchers. The simple fact is that the need for a pinch-runner or fielder arises more often in a key situation than the need to use Kyle Kendrick (or whoever you deem the last pitcher in the pen to be).
If you are arguing that Mayberry should be the extra player instead of Bruntlett, I might agree with you. But I DO NOT agree that another pitcher is more important than another bench player.
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Who the heck pitches game 7?? Pedro?? Happ?? Blanton? Drabek?? (just kidding)
Posted by: Marc H | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Leslie Gudel tweets:
Bowa on fans in LA vs Philly "I tell the players they should all play in the northeast at some point, then they wouldn't be so sensitive."
Hear that, Russell?
Posted by: doubleh | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Pedro, the gamesman, might be selectively wild.
Posted by: Meyer | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Marc: Either Pedro or whoever throws Game 4 (presumably Blanton). Wouldn't be surprised to see Pedro shift to the pen after Game 2, and Blanton be in line for games 4 and 7. Another reason why you don't need an additional bullpen pitcher. One of your starters can move to the pen.
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:17 PM
I'd still rather see Berry called up to pinch run than have Gnome anywhere near the playing field.
Gnome cannot hit.
He runs average.
He fields below average at every position he plays. In fact, he had miscues at every position he played this season even with very few chances.
Just say NO to GNOMES. Cairo is no different in the outfield than Gnome is. They probably both can't play it.
Posted by: aksmith | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:19 PM
Is it possible to bring up anyone in the organization? If so, what about the outside the box thinking of using Taylor as the 25th man? Surely he's got more speed then Bruntlett and could play the outfield just as well. His bat is untested but at most he'd be an extra-inning desperation pinch-hitter where Bruntlett has been abysmal anyway.
Posted by: Alex | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:29 PM
Thought it might be interesting to see all the lefties Wolf has faced so far this year as opposed to just looking at his overall numbers against LHP. NL West opponents top the PA numbers obviously.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/shareit/Wn8FX
Posted by: Sophist | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:32 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/15/sports/baseball/15yankees.html?_r=1&hpw
Shattering the arriva derci abreu factions assumptions about Bobby Abreu?
I can't remember a series where any team, much less both teams, are poised to start a 4th/5th guy in game 2 due to environmental factors instead of unavailability of higher slot starters. What's up with that? With that said, I'm intrigued by the prospect of Pedro going in LA. I like him in the big yard on the big stage. Still, if he can't go 5, he should be on tap for game 4 in Philly.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:42 PM
This vegas predicts a Phillies win in six.
Don't forget that Vegas odds are set by the predicted cash coming in on a team and its popularity. (Las Vegas is an suburb of LA)
It will be interesting to see how a sunshine team like the Dodgers plays in raw conditions in Philly. I like our boy’s chances at home regardless of whose pitching for LA.
Posted by: vegas | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:44 PM
sources say kendrick and myers off roster, park and gnome in
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM
vegas, poor punctuation notwithstanding, I share your confidence. Should be a good series, though. I love a rematch.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM
@Jack you can make it Mayberry if you want because I really don't give a sh**, but Bruntlett doesn't belong on a Major League team, much less a Major League team's playoff roster.
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:55 PM
Chan Ho in, Brett Myers out?
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/phillies_zone/Myers_off_the_NLCS_roster.html
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:55 PM
@Alex - playoff rosters are limited to only those players who were on the 25 man roster at some point in the season, and on the 40 man roster prior to September 1st. So Taylor would not be eligible.
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:56 PM
Martino tweets:
Pedro Game2
Kendrick off, Myers off
Bruntlett in, Park in
The Gnome and Kendrick?
Posted by: vegas | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 10:56 PM
If you're going to start a righty in game 2, make it Blanton. Pedro pitched well in 5 starts but it's a small sample size and he's coming off a neck injury having not pitched since late September. What a dumb choice. Blanton is too valuable to be used as a long reliever.
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Zolecki reports it, too:
Brett Myers said tonight that the Phillies have told him he is not on the NLCS roster.
"I'm (ticked)," he said.
Chan Ho Park will take his place, a team source said. Park has not pitched since Sept. 16 because of a strained right hamstring, but Park said he feels healthy. Myers said he had a feeling he would not be on the NLCS roster once the Phillies did not pitch him in Games 3 or 4 of the NLDS against the Colorado Rockies at Coors Field.
Myers said he had nothing else to say, but the normally boisterous right-hander sounded hurt by the decision.
The Phillies also have decided to carry 11 pitchers in the NLCS, instead of the 12 they had in the NLDS. Eric Bruntlett will be on the roster. He replaces Kyle Kendrick.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Even though Bruntlett just might be the worst positional player this year in MLB (or at least one of the worst), it makes sense to carry a 6th bench player who will likely get used 1-2 in this series over a 12th reliever that Cholly won't use unless he is literally left with no recourse in an extra innings game.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:02 PM
@Phylan: You are not correct. Anyone in the Phillies organization on 8/31 can be on the postseason roster. They would just replace an injured player (e.g., Ennis, Moyer or Romero). That said, calling up Taylor makes no sense.
Posted by: AFish | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:06 PM
Yeah in an extra innings game we're sure going to thank god we left off that extra PITCHER for a positional player with below-average defense and an OPS+ of TWENTY-F***ING-ONE
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:08 PM
Bruntlett will just have to pitch, too! ')
Nah, seriously, I'm sure Charlie and Dubee weighed all the possibilities and then made their choices accordingly. Unfortunately, you can't have it all. Fortunately, the days off should help in the event of an extra inning game. Durbin, Park, the starters in the pen, can all go more than one inning, too.
Posted by: GBrettfan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:16 PM
that means Bastardo is still around. I think it makes sense Martinez goes in game 2 because is it is in LA warmer and where he came up. I see the logic of keeping Happ in bullpen when your other two are a rookie and the other has a sprained ankle and lose bodies in his arm. you need lefthanders for Andre eithier but... I don't have much confidence in Pedro. Maybe Wolfe is going 4th because game is in Philly.
Posted by: slocs | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:19 PM
It makes no sense to keep bastardo on the roster unless Charlie will actually use him. Not so sure he will based on the NLDS. Glad to see we're only carrying 11 pitchers though.
What are Gnomes splits vs Sherrill? Maybe we can PH him for Howard in the 8th
/sarcasm
Posted by: Petey Pablo | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:25 PM
Blanton should be the starter in Game 2 but it was pretty clear from the last series that Cholly has trust in 3 relievers:
Blanton as a long-reliever and Eyre/Madson at the end of the game.
He will go to a Happ, Park, or Lidge in this series but I bet all of these guy remain the second-tier options in this series too.
Posted by: MG | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:30 PM
i dont have to tell any of you this but when you do not have home field advantage the goal is to win one game of the first two, i think padilla going in game 2 gives us the best chance to do this. I cannot believe that he is starting the second game of the NLCS for the dodgers, just unreal if you really think about it.
Even though Tampa had home field for the WS, you'd be hard pressed to think that their fans are all that formidable, and we all saw how many phils fans where there. While the LA fans aren't us, they arent pushovers either, I'm excited to see how this team reacts to starting a series on the road
Posted by: Mike Scuilli | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:32 PM
The thing is if you're going to use Blanton at all I think it should be for short relief, in the 7th, 8th or (gasp) 9th. He's too valuable to just use in the case of your starter bombing. All of that being said, I still think he should be starting game 2.
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM
That should read "if you're going to use Blanton in relief at all"
Posted by: Phylan | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Someday, many years from now, someone from the Phillies organization is going to explain their fascination with a guy who can barely run, can't field well and can't hit at all. And they'll tell us why they keep bringing him back.
I'm guessing the reason will be they own stock in Pepcid. But I have scratched my head raw over the last few seasons trying to figure out why he is still on a major league roster and I'm completely at a loss.
Posted by: aksmith | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 11:59 PM