Funny how one flaw makes a Ferrari lose its luster.
That’s how many fans must be feeling as the club gets set for four with Milwaukee. They’re thinking, ‘What does it matter as long as the Phillies can’t finish?’ Morose, but on the mark. Morose is my middle name lately. One reader emailed to say he “detected a certain wistfulness” in my posts, a yearning for something different. Perhaps, but maybe there’s more: perhaps a deep mistrust of where Brad Lidge and the Phils are taking us. Such a glaring variable from the 2008 formula has been stuck in my craw for months. Otherwise, the similarities run deep, which doesn’t exactly inspire a virtuoso's touch. Do you realize that hitting leaders Shane Victorino (.295) and Chase Utley (.294) have nearly identical averages from a year ago? It bugs the hell out of me; don't ask me why. Even for this resourceful scribe, capable of 20 column inches on the signing of Pablo Ozuna, this season has often read like a dense chapter of Upton Sinclair.
Oops, forgot to preview the Brewers. Here: Happ vs. Suppan; Lee vs. Parra; Pedro vs. Looper; Blanton vs. Bush.




They need this game so bad
Posted by: MIke Schatz | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:31 PM
This season is heading inexorably toward the conclusion most Phillies fans secretly, in the darkest corners of their black, black hearts, really want and desire. Because the Phillies are not about victory, they are about pain, and last year was kind of disorienting in that way.
Posted by: Steve Jeltz has a posse | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:39 PM
Last season, we were the resilient team who flourished in the late innings and at the end of the season, delivering demoralizing losses to the Mets and others. This season, we're the ones blowing the leads late in games and the come-from-behind wins we had at the beginning of the season are gone.
Posted by: Murgatroid | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:39 PM
And that's basically why I think this season has felt so much more depressing and worrisome than last. Also, after a certain point last season, everything came as a pleasant surprise. This season, if we don't go to the World Series, it'll be a disappointment.
Posted by: Murgatroid | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:42 PM
Murgatroid: I couldn't disagree more. Going to the WS is difficult. I think, with this ballclub, should they not win the division, that would be a disappointment. Going to the playoffs three years running is not an easy feat. If they get there and win a round I will consider than more than successful. They will have proven without a doubt that last year's team was no fluke. Although, honestly, the only ones who seem to still feel that way are the delusional divisional fanbases that seem to think the Mets handed the Phils the WS on a silver platter.
Posted by: doubleh | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:49 PM
Part of it is an inevitable emotional letdown from the heights of last season. We already know that even if they do find a way to make it all the way through, it can't compare to how it felt last fall. We've experienced the pinnacle and everything else is just gravy. It simply can't mean as much; all the hurdles have been long since cleared, and the wistfulness is for the greater intensity of meaning which has gone more conspicuously missing than Brad Lidge's command.
Meaning or not, however, another part of it is that everyone knows they aren't going very far at all in October, and it's going to suck to deal with unhappy ending looming copiously in the headlights.
Posted by: RSB | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:50 PM
Saw this on Twitter today: When you say “Hang tough,” I hear, “We have no better strategy than letting you stand there being punched."
Sound familiar, Mr. Lidge?
Posted by: valo | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:51 PM
With a better team (save the 'pen) this year than last, it will be hard to not feel disappointed.
Time for Cholly to earn his pay.
Posted by: joe l | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:51 PM
Technically, once you win the WS, everything that follows seems like a disappointment unless you repeat.
However, I think this has been a great season so far. The worrisome part is how Cholly and the FO don't see the Lidge problem.
The Phils can win in spite of it, though.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 05:54 PM
Ummm, not to throw off this Debbie Downer whinefest, but I'm actually really enjoying this season. Yeah, the Lidge situation is adding an uneasiness that I prefer wasn't there, because it sets up the possibility of an especially heartbreaking ending, but on the whole I'm still really excited about the upcoming postseason and the possibilities that come with that. The fact that we won last year makes this year that much better, because we can just enjoy the games without the "25 years with no title" monkey still hanging on our backs. Yes, anything that happens this year is just gravy, but I really like gravy, and it sure beats eating sh*t like we used to.
Posted by: Brian G | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 06:48 PM
You guys are nuts. Last year at this time, we had no idea if we were going to make the playoffs, and more importantly, we had not idea how our Phillies were capabale of playing in the playoffs. Those 3 games against COL in 2007 didn't teach us much.
This year, we are a lock to make the playoffs and we know that Hamels, Utley, and crew are killers when the pressure is on.
Boo-hoo, our closer sucks and we lost a tough game to the Marlins. I am still a hell of a lot more optimistic on September 24 2009 than I was on September 24 2008. How can you not be?
Posted by: Spitz | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 06:50 PM
"This season is heading inexorably toward the conclusion most Phillies fans secretly, in the darkest corners of their black, black hearts, really want and desire. Because the Phillies are not about victory, they are about pain, and last year was kind of disorienting in that way."
I find this ridiculous. Where does this come from? Why do people think Phillies fans - any fans - want to lose? Stupid. You support a team, you want them to win. There is no psychological thing. I want them to win. Not even in the darkest pit of my heart I want to lose. That makes no sense.
What I really think is this whole shenanigan is what we're expecting. I mean, what sure-brained person doesn't think the Phillies 2009 campaign will rest solely on the shoulders of Brad Lidge in the ninth inning of a playoff game? Probably in the NLCS, probably in game five or six.
It's an inevitability. Because we know the score. And Charlie Manuel's failure to follow logic and keep Lidge away from high-pressure situations only makes this expectation greater. Nobody wants anything bad; we just see the writing on the walls because it only makes sense.
Posted by: Timothy Malcolm | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 06:51 PM
Hi all-
We're off to Milwaukee for the games on Saturday and Sunday. I thought it would just be a little gravy at the end of the season...now I am feeling a LOT more pressure about these games. If they look good (again)- there's hope, but if they look like they've been looking lately- it's gonna be a short postseason, indeed.
I feel discouraged.
And of course, since Joe Blanton has pitched about half the games on national basic cable this year, we get to see him yet again on Sunday. Nothing personal, I like Joe a lot, but variety is the spice of life!
Have a good evening.
Posted by: phargo | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 06:52 PM
Spitz, you're making too much sense. Cut it out!
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 06:54 PM
Not sure I've ever enjoyed a Phillies season more than this. The knowledge of a WS behind me and the promise of another postseason ahead of us.
The Phils have played GREAT this year despite some bullpen short-comings. We've won more than 60% of our games over the last about 40 games.
No team goes into the playoffs without flaws. I'm confident our flaw won't prevent us from being a top contender for the crown yet again.
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 06:54 PM
CJ, are you serious? Um, don't you realize that ever other contender other than the Phillies has absolutely no chinks in their armour. I mean, don't let recent results fool you - Yankees starting pitching is not only fine, they are unstoppable. And the Dodgers - don't get me started with them...I mean, I bet they could sweep us even WITHOUT Clayton Kershaw.
Posted by: Spitz | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:01 PM
Ibanez scratched with stomach virus, BenFranciscoTreat to start.
Don't want to create a panic, but did Vic give Rauuul the Swine Fluuuuuu?
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:01 PM
"everyone knows they aren't going very far at all in October"
I don't know that at all.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:03 PM
@CJ
No questions asked.
Posted by: dlhunter | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:03 PM
CJ: Agreed 100%. Had that argument with denny b last night when he said this team was a "fraud".
This team has been playing really well and hitting well against some really good pitchers, especially over the last month. Yes, there's one glaring hole at closer, but if the team throws in the towel because of him, I'll eat my own head. (i.e. I'd bet good money they don't)
Posted by: doubleh | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:04 PM
1st Baseman-B level player
2nd Baseman-Saint
SS-Can't hit
3B-Can't hit, too short
LF-Too Old
CF-Too Stupid
RF-Too Wasted
C-Too Short
Bullpen-Stinks
Starters-Pitched too many innings
Ladies and Gents, your 2009 Philadelphia Phrauds.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:08 PM
Old Phan: Ha!
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:09 PM
I remember a panic last year and cry for Aaron Rowand's missing leadership from JW, in a post that pretty much waved the white flag on the season. Two months later, a post recapping our championship parade.
I am well aware of our liability in the ninth inning, but to write off a run in October as impossible is just foolish. Cliff Lee and Cole Hamels, people: these are two legitimate aces. And Joe Blanton has been the most consistent quality starter on the staff. That's three high-quality pitchers pitching Games 1-3 of every playoff series.
I think it is a safe bet to say that if the Phils don't get far in the playoffs, it will be because of the 9th inning. However, it's just reactionary and knee-jerkish to say that because of the 9th inning, the Phillies won't go far in the playoffs. They have the staff and lineup to dominate a series. Back off the Lidge, er, ledge: these Phils have as good a chance as any NL team to win the league.
Posted by: Iceman | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:14 PM
Re: Race for best record
To me, the key is finishing ahead of the Cardinals. If we do, we get the Rockies at home in the first round. If we don't, we get the Dodgers on the road in the first round.
I'd much rather face the Rockies with home-field. It'd be nice to secure home-field in the NLCS as well, but if the Dodgers play the Cardinals in the first round, we might still have home-field if the Cardinals win.
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:18 PM
Old Phan: Haha.. I really enjoyed the too old, stupid, and wasted for our OF. Well done.
Posted by: Brian G | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:20 PM
Regarding my buddy Rob Neyer's link, he is being disingenuous when he says he doesn't know if a 2-inning closer can work.
Neyer was in KC in the late 70s and early 80s when Dan Quisenberry, a submariner, was there and was one of the best closers in baseball.
Quiz led the league in saves 5 times in 6 years and damn near all of them were 2+ inning saves. He pitched 130 innings a year as a closer.
Posted by: clout | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:22 PM
I'm glad the optimists are posting right now. We need to move the pendulum the other way a little bit. Repost from last thread:
Awesome stat from Stark:
"Maybe the best argument for the Phillies' October readiness: Since May 1, Lee, Hamels and Blanton are 7-1, with a 1.75 ERA, against other prospective playoff teams."
Those are insane numbers, against playoff teams, not little sisters of the poor. But to some beerleaguers, apparently, those samples are poor indicators of what will happen in the postseason. And Lidge or Madson must not have appeared in any of those games in the 9th inning.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:22 PM
Carassco pitching for the Indians on MLB channel
Posted by: J96 | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Also, because it just seems to be the nature of sports, the 9th inning will probably be a non-issue in the playoffs. Usually the things we dread the most never come to fruition. We worry about those things we can't control, and then we find out later that we worried for nothing. Such is life.
I'm looking for Lee, Hamels, and Blanton to go deep into games, and the 3-run HR to be their best friend.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Old Phan - That was brilliant!
Posted by: GrandSlamSingle | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Oh, and I'm going on record right now to predict monster contributions from Pedro Martinez & Raul Ibanez in the playoffs. One is the quintessential competitor who lives for the big moments and has been doubted for the better part of the last three years. The other is the consummate professional who has never had the opportunity to be a key contributor for a team during the post-season.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:33 PM
We've all been talking about how Happ has to go to the bullpen if the lefties don't come back. But if both Eyre and Romero do get back, and Myers and Park don't, then you have to move Pedro to the pen, right?
So many things up in the air right now. I think the Happ/Pedro decision comes down to which arms (lefties or righties) make it back to the pen the healthiest. If it's the lefties, you send Pedro to the pen. If it's the righties, you send Happ. If it's both, it's a tough call, but one from a position of strength. If it's neither, well, we pray.
Posted by: Jack | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 07:59 PM
It will take Cholly about 5 seconds to decide between a healthy Pedro and a healthy Happ. In fact, he already has.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:07 PM
RBI Single with a runner on 1st. Very Nice.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:17 PM
smokyjoe: for those of us not watching, how exactly did that go down?
Posted by: Brian G | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:18 PM
@Timothy Malcolm: I find it sort of amusing that you called my (joking, sort of) post about people wishing for the Phillies to fail so as to restore the natural order of things "stupid," and then followed it up with foreboding musings about inevitability and Brad Lidge on the mound in the late innings of a crucial NLCS game. I stand corrected--no fatalism there at all, Mr. Calvin!
Posted by: Steve Jeltz has a posse | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:18 PM
Pounce!
Posted by: ozark | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:20 PM
Utley was running on the pitch, Howard hit a gapper to RF that was cutoff by the center fielder, who slipped a little when turning to throw. Utley just kept running, but Howard didn't want to make an out on the bases and pulled up.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:21 PM
Quick poll of Beerleaguers. Choose 1:
A. Brad Lidge will pitch in a 9th inning save situation tonight
B. Brad Lidge won't pitch a 9th inning save situation tonight
C. There will be no 9th inning save situation tonight because we'll be more than 3 runs ahead
D. There will be no 9th inning save situation tonight because we'll be losing or tied
At the risk of not taking a stand, I'll vote for Option C.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:25 PM
I guess there should be an Option E: There will be no 9th inning save situation because Happ pitches a complete game.
If both (C) and (E) happen, either answer will be considered correct.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:28 PM
In the postseason last year, Lidge came in with a four-run lead twice, a three-run lead
three times, a two-run lead once, and a one-run lead twice, both times in the World Series.
If 2009 Lidge had been pitching for the 2008 Phils in the playoffs, we can assume that two World Series wins would have been blown, and at least one other playoff game. Face it, they're gonna need someone to pitch the ninth in some close games in this postseason as well, and if that person ends up being Lidge, they will lose, simple as that.
Posted by: timr | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:28 PM
bap - B. It'll be a roller coaster ride of awfulness.
Posted by: king myno | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:29 PM
That last post was simply meant to stem the tide of postseason optimism here before it got out of hand.
Posted by: timr | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:34 PM
Carrasco had one of those blowup innings in the 4th against the Tigers.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:35 PM
3-0 popup by Jimmy on a pitch that would have been ball four. How in the world can Charlie give JRoll the green light? That is terrible managing.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:36 PM
Way to go slugger.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:36 PM
J-Roll given the green light on a 3-0 count. Bad idea.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:38 PM
That AB was Rollins in a nutshell. 3-0 count. 1 pitch away from getting a runner to scoring position with their best hitter for average coming up. And what does he do? He swings and pops up.
Since when does a .245 hitter with a .690 OPS get an unconditional green light in all situations? That was just heinous.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:39 PM
Happ is looking like closer material.
Posted by: bullit | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:43 PM
12 pitch inning, 3 strike outs, all swinging. Ladies and gentleman, your postseason closer.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:47 PM
bap: I vote for A, and I hope he blows it again. We can afford to lose now, if it will put another nail n his coffin, and ratchet up the pressure for Cholly to do something other than say "he's my man".
Posted by: goody | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:47 PM
Don't understand the doom and gloom either or the Phils "really need this one." BS. NL East is locked up and the Phils should have some needed time to sort out some of the issues in the bullpen. Hopefully they get a couple of guys back and are ready to roll the dice come Oct.
As for this series, the only things I remotely care about are seeing Happ and Pedro pitch. Split and keep marching forward to the inevitable division wrap up.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:49 PM
Don't worry about J-Roll. It's nothing Milt Thompson can't fix.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:49 PM
in the pre-game show they gave some insane stats on opponents BA againt Happ in varous situations. i wish i could remember them.
Posted by: bullit | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:55 PM
Interesting...or not?
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:55 PM
It's the bottom of the 9th and the Phils are up 2-1. Happ has thrown 120 pitches. Everyone in the dugout except Lidge gets sick and starts puking.
Do you
a) Let Happ pitch in the 9th
b) Bring in Lidge
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:56 PM
I would rather the Gnome pitch the 9th over Lidge at this point......
Posted by: skeeter | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:58 PM
substitute dugout for bullpen
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:58 PM
Howard just wiffed on that. Way to help the pitcher.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:59 PM
Old Phan: If b), then everyone on BL starts puking...
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 08:59 PM
That's an E-3, regardless what the homer scorer says. Seems like they've been adding up lately.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:01 PM
People keep talking about '93 today it seems and Williams but they seem to forget the fact the Wild Thing had a very solid NLCS against the Braves and just had those 2 notable meltdowns against the Blue Jays.
What everyone seems to conveniently overlook is that bullpen largely stank in the playoffs and was really shallow all year. Stiffs like Thigpen and Mason saw meaningful apperances in both the NLCS and World Series and it was not exactly like LA and West were world-beaters either.
If the Phils can get a few guys back (and that is a big "if") and stop the insanity with Lidge as the closer (leave him off the roster), this team should have a capable enough bullpen to patch it through for another postseason run.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:01 PM
And, hey, if Pedro can throw 130, the young whippersnapper certainly should be able to do the same.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:01 PM
Scott, good point.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:01 PM
Fun fact : If Lidge pitches like he did last year, this game is for win #100. With an above-average closer, say 4-5 blown saves instead of 11, this Phillies team would be challenging the franchise win record by the end of the season. It's a really good team with an astonishingly bad closer.
Posted by: Dave X | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:02 PM
These first three innings, both offensively and defensively, are examples of why some posters are going a little overboard with the negativity. I know they pretty much have it locked up, but could they play some sound baseball anyway, just for kicks and giggles?
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:02 PM
Yeah, lets have Happ throw 120+ pitches when he is coming off an injury and has a tender arm. That's makes a world of sense.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:03 PM
MG - I certainly am not suggesting Happ should go anywhere near, much less beyond, 120 pitches. Our manager often seems to have ideas of his own on such matters, however.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:05 PM
That is definitely composure that Rookies are not supposed to have, and a certain closer rarely shows.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:05 PM
Old Phan: I don't want Happ throwing 120 pitches when he's coming off an injury. I turn the ball over to one of the guys who's puking.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:07 PM
With a league average closer and a league average leadoff hitter we'd be past 100 wins tonight. But what fun would that be.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:07 PM
BTW, I think Howard's defense has regressed to the mean in the second half of the season.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:07 PM
Offense needs to pick this team up tonight. Suppan has been his usual mediocre self tonight.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:08 PM
This time, I'm with b_a_p. Bring in Mr. Creosote over Lidge.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:08 PM
BAP-Then I will add....
C)Bring in puking pitcher.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:09 PM
Just get the runner over Bako . . .
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:10 PM
I think they should have Bako bunt Feliz to third for Happ...
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:10 PM
I was on the same wavelength as you on that one MG.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:11 PM
I hate the bunt in this situation. I'd rather have a GIDP that scores a run.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:12 PM
Good execution this inning so far. JRoll better take a freaking pitch here.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:12 PM
Popout, or Double Play?
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:13 PM
As I said last night, Jimmy is actually swinging the bat well. The problem is that he makes poor contact on pitches out of the zone, and he can't lay off them.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:14 PM
Smoky: Nah, a bunt was fine there. They now have 2 chances to score 2 runs. Of course, they'll fail, but that's beside the point.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:15 PM
Off course, I wouldn't totally blame Jimmy for not taking a walk, what with Vic's history w/ runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:15 PM
Excellent AB by JRoll. Make this stiff throw a strike in the zone.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:16 PM
Time for Vic to Man Up.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:17 PM
It's like clockwork
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:18 PM
Smoky: See, after I disagreed with you about the bunt, that's where you're supposed to say, "Look, pal, I made a perfect prediction on Jamie Moyer's stat line in the last game -- right down to the number of innings pitched & hits allowed. I know far more about baseball than you could ever dream of knowing."
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:19 PM
Could they let this terrible pitcher off the hook more? It's infuriating. He's thrown 82 pitches in 4 innings, and the Phillies have only scored 2 runs. Unacceptable.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Ugh. At least the Phils were patient that inning though but man they have sucked with RISP since the ASB. Can't buy a hit (or even a SAC fly) in most of the time since August.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Did Utley's last pitch of the at-bat slow down to slow motion for everyone, or just me? It was pretty trippy.
Posted by: tg082 | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:22 PM
That sucked ass.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:22 PM
BAP, I'm not trying to be negative, but this team shows certain tendencies that the manager completely disregards. It's assinine.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:23 PM
Saint Utley has turned into Saint Crappy this month.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:23 PM
Gaaa!
Ah, who cares, Happ's on pace for 18K tonight.
Posted by: Unikruk | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:24 PM
I won't feel too bad for Uts when he misses the 100 RBI plateau this year. He's had plenty of opportunities that for sure, they all have.
Posted by: timr | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:24 PM
Joe - Such as? JRoll, Vic, and Utley were all patient and didn't force a bad swing and worked the count. I don't mind those innings as nearly as much when you see JRoll or Vic swing at some piece of crap pitch out of the zone on the first pitch.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:24 PM
Ah, well, Mahatma Utley.
TG, that happened here,too. Now there are audio problems, too.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:25 PM
This whole ballgame is a mess! The camera and the sound is totally fucked up!
Posted by: Greg V. | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:25 PM
I'm gonna guess Utley hasn't had a bases load hit since at least the ASB.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 09:25 PM