Jamie Moyer (3-5, 7.42) goes in search of elusive career win No. 250 when the Phillies try for the sweep today at 1:35.
I have a hunch the cagey vet, who's lugging the league's worst ERA on his 46-year-old shoulders, will finally get his win today and halt a five-game drought, going 0-4 with a 9.64 ERA during that span. The reason: Washington sucks. It's the worst team I've seen in ages. Use this thread to discuss the game, the Antonio Bastardo decision, how the Phils wil integrate J.C. Romero back into the roster, and whatever else you'd like to discuss on this beautiful final day of May. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.




I think it's important to distinguish between "stuff" and "command". A 98 mph fastball, or 2/3 plus-level offspeed pitches constitutes as "stuff". I'm not sure Bastardo fits that description, although I have read where he's added an improved slider to his repertoire this year. But what he has showed over the last several years is increased command, able to hit his spots and make pitches. I'll gladly take a kid with 90 mph fastball and average offspeed stuff with great command over a 98 mph heater and no ability to hit his spots.
Posted by: anon | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 11:38 AM
To give you an idea about the important issues that are being tossed about in my subsconscious . . . I actually had a dream last night that I was watching Bastardo's major league debut. I'm sorry to say that the debut in my dream turned out about as well as clout thinks the real debut is going to go. He hit the first 2 batters with pitches, walked a few more, and left after allowing 8 runs in the first inning. True story. I really dreamed that.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 11:55 AM
If Moyer's to get No. 250, it will have to be one of these wins like last night's, where Moyer manages to pitch 5 ugly innings & the Phillies score a bunch of runs to give him a cheap win. Unfortuantely, I don't see that scenario unfolding today. Lannan isn't great, but he's head and shoulders above the Nationals' other starters. It's not too likely that the Phillies can pound out 8 runs against him -- unless the Nationals help them out with a bunch of key errors, which, fortunately, is always a distinct possibility with the Nationals.
I sure hope Moyer gets to No. 250 soon because I can't imagine Cholly pulling him out of the rotation until he gets there.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:03 PM
From the last thread:
I agree with Sneed that this isn't a "showcase" start for a trade.
First off, we're in a battle for first place, and it's June already, so the FO is going to bring up a guy based on whether they think he can win games at the major-league level, first and foremost. Simple as that.
Secondly, the way he's pitching in the minors, the best way to "showcase" him would just be to let him sit there and keep dominating.
I also agree with JW that bringing up Bastardo instead of Carrasco is a nice way to both try and take advantage of Young Johan's real nice run of pitching, and also to protect the long-term asset of Carrasco by not throwing him to the wolves before he's ready. You can ask Gavin Floyd, Homer Bailey, Phil Hughes, and plenty of others how that turned out.
Posted by: Jack | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Also, on the last thread, someone asked what more Michael Taylor had to prove in AA given his number so far (and they are great-- .344/.400/.617).
I believe the FO wants to see him do it for at least a full year at the high levels (AA/AAA). Right now, he seems like a "can't-miss" prospect, but people forget that a year ago at this time he was a 22-year old in Low-A who wasn't ranked in our Top 30 prospects and had struggled in Short-Season ball the year before.
That's a long way to come in a year, so you can see why the FO wants to take a little bit of time and make sure the progress is sustainable. Besides, there's no room for him right now, or even probably next year, in the starting lineup. Which makes me think he's a prime trade candidate...
Posted by: Jack | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:12 PM
I'm a lot more worried about Moyer than I am about Bastardo. It's one thing to have to find replacements for one, or even two, starting pitchers ... but w/ Myers now out for the foreseeable future, the Phillies are on the verge of having to replace a full 3/5 of their rotation. Moyer didn't even pitch well against the freakin' Marlins (a team he has historically owned) his last time out. Today, Jamie is facing a thoroughly awful Washington team, but he put up numbers practically identical to that aforementioned Marlins start (6 IN, 7 H, 4 ER, 2 BB, 5 K, 1 HR) in his only start vs. the Natinals this season (6 IN, 8 H, 4 ER, 2 BB, 5 K, 1 HR). Let's just say I'm less than optimistic.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:19 PM
I'm with Jack. Carrasco isn't ready, otherwise he'd be here already. The best we can hope is that the mere speculation that he may be needed at the big league level soon might be a nice kick in the rear for the kid. Time to start preparing like it matters.
I think people are making a big deal out of nothing here re: Bastardo's "stuff" and "repertoire." Most, if not all of us, have never seen him pitch live, so it's quite hard to say what he is or isn't yet. We know what his numbers are historically and what he appears to be or could be, but were mostly dealing in the abstract. I think two starts next week will help us get some more perspective on whether his K totals are a fluke or if his fastball really does have movement that can't be understood on Baseball Cube.
Posted by: sneed | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Maybe Jamie will be inspired by the fact that not only is he going for 250 (again), and that with a win the Natials will be the first team in the majors with a two-digit magic number.
I hope as that Bastardo does well, but odds are that he'll have his struggles. The best I can hope for is that he'll be at least as good as Myers; meaning that for every couple of good starts he'll thow up an Eaton.
Posted by: Doohickey | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:19 PM
You can also ask Tim Lincecum, whose major league ERA stood at 5.88 after his first 9 starts. Or Cole Hamels, whose ERA was at 5.71 after 12 starts. Or Mike Pelfrey, who was battered around in each of his first 2 seasons.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that I've never really bought the notion that it does some kind of long-term damage to a pitcher's psyche if he's brought up too soon & struggles at first (didn't Floyd win 17 games last year?). Maybe the likes of Bailey & Hughes just weren't that good to start out with. Or maybe they WILL eventually be good, but they just went through the same rookie problems that a lot of touted pitching prospects go through.
I wouldn't call up Carrasco either. But it's not because I think a call-up would do long-term damage. It's because his AAA numbers say he'll be a liability, not an asset, if called up right now.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Baseball Cube (voice).
Posted by: Jack | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:23 PM
On Hughes...all Yankees prospects tend to be overrated just on the basis of them being Yankees. The same with Kennedy. Why they didn't trade them for Santana will never be known..other than that Cashman bought into his own propaganda apparently.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:26 PM
NEPP: I think the Yanks didn't trade for Santana because they knew they could get Sabathia the next year just for the contract, instead of both the prospects and the contract they'd need to give up for Santana. Not a bad decision.
Posted by: Jack | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:32 PM
I'd rather have Santana...but that's just me.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:32 PM
I know you guys are excited about bastardo, but dont expect big things from him right away. I remember last year when jonathan niese was dominating the minors, but didnt pitch well in the bigs.
Posted by: metsfan08 | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:45 PM
NEPP - At this point I'm thinking Santana would much rather have the Yankees.
I'm hoping that the Phils will send down Mayberry quickly and bring up Westbrook. We're gonna need two or three touchdowns to pull this one out today. If we get'em in the first quarter, maybe Moyer can get his "Big Win."
As for why his getting to some arbitrary number is more important than the team, I am at a loss.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:49 PM
i watched is last start in aaa against the bisons...he looked confident and he threw strikes but he did not miss bats and he did not throw above 90 miles an hour. that does not sound like santana to me. i think it's a terrible comparison.
Posted by: Dukes | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Niese was 11-8, with a 3.13 ERA and 144 strikeouts in 164 innings at AA and AAA last year. Those are nice numbers, but hardly "dominating" ones. Hughes and Kennedy, however, are good examples of guys who did have dominating minor league numbers & still got battered at the major league level. I'm hoping for the best, but expecting the worst, from Bastardo.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:54 PM
random mets troll: "I remember last year when jonathan niese was dominating the minors..."
Niese's 2008 numbers:
WHIP=2.0; H/9=12.9; HR/9=1.3; ERA=7.07
Clearly. Dominating. Numbers.
People were probably just shaking in their cleats when he was due to pitch.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:54 PM
mea culpa
I posted the guy's major league numbers by mistake.
Thanks to bap for getting it right.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Of more immediate importance than Bastardo or Jonathan Niese . . . it's a Sunday game. Day game after a night game. Left-handed starter on the mound for the Nats. Lots of runs needed with Jamie Moyer on the mound. Please, please, please, Cholly, DO NOT START ERIC BRUNTLETT AT 2nd BASE.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Does anyone have the espn insider?
Posted by: Sam | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:02 PM
Maybe not dominating, but these numbers are pretty good :
2.97 ERA, 8.17 K/9, 2.97 BB/9, .25 HR/9
Ladies and gentlemen... Carlos Monasterios
Posted by: Dave X | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:02 PM
Sam, I refuse to pay for something I can get for free through blogs.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:03 PM
b-a-p:
Yeah. Hunt down, call up and start Terry Tiffee instead!!!
In re: Niese
An apt comparison if you ignore the H/9s (9.3 for Niese, 6.7 for Bastardo) and K/9s (8.3 for Niese, 10.1 for Bastardo).
But really, all I really hear is: the Mets promoted someone who did much suckier than the FO led people to believe, so that's gonna happen to everyone else, too.
I'm skeptical. But I skeptically believe that Bastardo would do better than Niese's first partial year (inadvertantly posted by stupid ole me above).
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:05 PM
Wow, Dave. And to think we gave up almost NOTHING to get that guy!
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:06 PM
ya i agree nepp but it says something about park stoping a peavy trade.
Posted by: Sam | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:09 PM
Lineups posted... standard 1-8 for the Phils with Coste catching an hitting 8th. We've got the three lefties in the middle again.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Well, isn't Coste Moyer's regular guy anyway?
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Sam, if its a typical "insider" article, then its merely a rehash of this article in the local paper:
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/20090531_On_Baseball__For_Phillies__hurdles_to_a_Peavy_deal.html
Same issues you are mentioning.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Dave - Just wanted to quickly point out that the Washington offense is not that bad. In fact they're third in the NL in OPS, behind Philly and LA. (Of course, that has a lot to do with facing Philly pitchers, but whatever).
Posted by: TNA | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:32 PM
NEPP: Day game after a night game... so it was gonna be Coste no matter who was pitching.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:35 PM
By the end of next season, Ryan Howard should be 2nd on the Phils career HR list behind just Michael Jack Schmidt.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:36 PM
it looks like the nats have assembled a lineup of 1st basemen, with thick, power- hitter bodies. the problem is, they can't all play 1st base.
Posted by: bullit | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Quite a hike to reach MJS though.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:48 PM
he never even caught the ball, horrible call by the ump and good call by the third base ump to correct it.
did vic run through a stop sign?
Posted by: redbeard | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:51 PM
For those who haven't seen Bastardo, don't think Santana. Those comparisons are laughable.
Think Odalis Perez. That is who he reminds me of.
He doesn't have "great" stuff. But, he is sneaky with his fastball. Like a shorter version of Happ. It seems to surprise hitters and gets on them quicker then they expect.
Carrasco has far more upside and has pitched much better then his record and ERA would indicate (as I showed with graphic evidence the other night). But, he is not quite ready.
Neither is Worley; although he isn't far away either.
I thought they would likely go with Carpenter, as he was the "safe" choice and he has been pitching well in his past 2 starts in LV. But I am fine with AB too. He has earned his promotion.
Posted by: denny b. | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:56 PM
Why Cholly is batting the 3 lefties back-to-back-to-back against a left-handed pitcher is beyond me. It was one thing to do that when Ibanez was raking, but he was 3 for his last 18 coming into this game.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 01:56 PM
So, interestingly enough, HP ump Dana Demuth has the 3rd Smallest strikezone in MLB according to Hardball Times.
Doesn't bode well for Jamie overall today.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:01 PM
The Nats have that "lets get out of town ASAP" look to them today. Lots of early swinging.
Not going to take much to get them to roll over and play dead.
Posted by: denny b. | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:01 PM
denny: "Sneaky with his fastball" also sounds very much like Happ -- another guy who was unloved by the scouts.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:04 PM
"Why Cholly is batting the 3 lefties back-to-back-to-back against a left-handed pitcher is beyond me."
"The Gut" hasn't had the strongest of series.
That lineup, is taylor-made for an opposing manager, to mix-and-match in the late innings. Its a good thing its Washington.
Both, Werth and Ibanez look like they could use a day off (Werth especially). Hopefully, that Mayberry kid they brought up gets more then 1 AB per week soon (he's had 1 AB since last Sunday).
Posted by: denny b. | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Awful swing by Werth.
He absolutely needs a day off.
C'mon Chollie, you have an option now.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Good thing we started Coste.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Bench Chooch, now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *sarcasm*
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Coste woulda hit that one clean outta th...
I mean - good job, Costey!
Count down to davthom telling us to trade Ruiz: 5...4...3...
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:08 PM
That was a nice way to flip the lineup over.
Coste, by the way, is starting to silence those who were sure he couldn't hit anymore. It's not that he couldn't hit anymore. It's that he's an extreme streak hitter and when he's bad, he's horrific.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:09 PM
Coste has posted a 1.213 OPS in May...
...in 22 ABs.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:10 PM
If Moyer wants his 250th he better stop making stupid errors.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:11 PM
nice flip howard, i hope moyer didnt break his hip
Posted by: redbeard | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Coste is a very good backup catcher, & a very mediocre everyday catcher.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Ruiz and Coste have both been warm lately with the stick. Ruiz is about 100 points higher with his BA, from where he was last year at this time.
Marson also has been swinging it better at LV, since they moved him into the 2 hole.
All the catchers hit!!! WHOOO!!! HOOOO!!!!
Posted by: denny b. | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Coste is a backup catcher... that's the point. In limited at bats, i.e. the right situations, he'll produce. There aren't many good backup catchers out there and Coste is among the better ones.
Posted by: CJ | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:13 PM
I would've given Mayberry the start over Werth, who is really slumping right now.
I also agree with bap that the most logical comparision for Bastardo is Happ, another lefty fb-changeup guy with decent velocity and very solid K/BB numbers in the minors.
Posted by: Jack | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:13 PM
Nice take out slide by Lannan. I bet if it had been Utley he would have added a forearm shiver.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:14 PM
Natinals do indeed look like they'd rather be on their way home.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:16 PM
CJ: In the early part of the year, w/ Chooch out of the lineup, Coste was stinking up the joint & Beerleaguers were howling for his head. Now if Chooch had been lost for the season, they may have had a point. But he wasn't, & that kind of shortsighted attitude gave no credit to Coste for being what he is: a very good backup at a very difficult position.
Franzke just mentioned that, if you remove the Natinals (against whom he is hitting .360) from J-Roll's stats, he would be batting .190 ... Ouch.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Snyone tell me what Moyer record is with Coste catching vs. his record with Ruiz catching? I'm too lazy to look it up.
Posted by: clout | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:21 PM
no
Posted by: Snyone | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Dave -
And if you remove all the other teams, J-Roll would be hitting .360.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:24 PM
I think Utley and his .244 avg for May can't wait for June.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Andy: Don't kill the messenger. Even those notorious homers, the Phils' broadcasters, know who the worst everyday player on the team is.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:26 PM
FWIW, Moyer has an identical tOPS of 114 for both Ruiz and Coste.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:28 PM
NEPP: Thanks. For some reason I thought he was much better with Coste catching.
Posted by: clout | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:29 PM
I can't seem to find ERA and W/L records for them...where's Sophist when you need him?
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:31 PM
Wasn't killing anyone. There are always ways to slice and dice stats to make them look how you want. Compare Utley's May to Rollins for instance.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:31 PM
Awww, *bleep*!!! :-[
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:32 PM
Both Myers and Hamels have pitched better with Coste than Ruiz.
Fans tossed ball back in. Then Shane tried to bean the ballgirl with it.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:32 PM
The Nationals' pitching is truly horrendous. Still, a .271 winning percentage? With a starting lineup that is third in the league in runs scored & OBP, and second in slugging percentage? Considering he's in his third year, and also lost 102 games last year, I'd be shocked if Manny Acta lasted the season.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:35 PM
l.a. is going off a bit about the state of umpires in mlb. good stuff
Posted by: redbeard | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:36 PM
72 pitches through 4 for Jamie.
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:38 PM
Getting fired would be the best thing that ever happened to Manny Acta. I can't even begin to imagine how miserable it must be to have to try & work for & w/ a franchise as utterly inept as the Natinals.
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:39 PM
The Happ-Bastardo comparisons are OK to a point. But there are key differences:
Happ had a better BB/9 AND had more than 200 IP of Trip A experience under his belt when he came up.
Also, BAP's assertion that scouts aren't wild about these guys isn't quite right. Both have been considered above-average prospects, although scouts have rated Happ higher than Bastardo, probably because his command has been consistently good while good command is a recent thing with Bastardo.
Bastardo has a nice cut fastball that ranges 88-90 mph, a decent changeup (not as good as Happ's) and an improving slider (probably equal to Happ's curve).
Posted by: clout | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:41 PM
If he pitches one more scoreless inning, Moyer will get his ERA under the magic 7.00 mark -- the gold standard for measuring whether a guy is an effective major league starter.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:42 PM
NEPP: Yeah, and he basically doubled his pitch count last inning.
Ibanez triple, nice!
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:43 PM
Come season's end, someone will need to put together a video cataloging the lowlights of Nationals 2009 outfielding.
Posted by: Klaus | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:45 PM
They should do the steal second, hope Bard throws the ball into CF play here.
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:46 PM
Nice AB by Werth. Set's up Feliz for one of his favorite plays.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:47 PM
andy: haha you were almost right.
Posted by: thephaithful | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:47 PM
great job by werth
Posted by: CRD | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:47 PM
The Nats defense is a joke.
Posted by: Jack | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:48 PM
The Nationals really need their Kelly Leak.
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Hernandez must really, really like us.
b-a-p: The "gold standard" line is, to my mind, an instant classic. Thank you.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:48 PM
All you need to know:
2009 Phillies starting pitching > 2009 Nationals fielding
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:50 PM
I was at the game last night and went to look up for far Howard's bomb really went (432ft) compared to what CBP told the fans its was (475ft).
And when i checked, I saw something pretty interesting:
Rual Ibanez's HR off of Chein-Ming Wang in the 7th inning at Yankee stadim is the longest HR in 2009 @ 477ft.
Posted by: thephaithful | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:51 PM
thephaithful: On indirect fire, like the Ryno moonshot, you have to include the arc of flight, not just straight line distance.
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:53 PM
To continue the Bad News Bears analogy, perhaps the Nats can get Jennie Finch to be their Amanda Whurlitzer.
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:56 PM
thephaithful: Where did you get the 432 ft. measurement? I just bought myself a nifty new rangefinder, & was gonna use it to find the distance from the seat where Howard's ball landed to the plate the next time I'm at the ballpark. Keep in mind it's possible that the CBP estimates track the entire arc of the flight of the ball rather than straight line distance.
Also, is it just me, or does anyone else remember Charlie saying something to the effect of "If he's here, he's gonna play" w/ regard to Mayberry staying w/ the big club after the Yankees series? And has Mayberry started once since then? No. How many PAs has he had since then? One. So I'll ask once again the question I've asked so many times before: "What the f*ck was Charlie talking about?"
Posted by: G-Town Dave | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:57 PM
MPN - By the end of the season, Acta will, most likely, look a lot like Walter Matthau.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 02:59 PM
Here's a question for clout or someone else, why not place Brett on the 60 day DL if he'll be out for an extended period? Is this because of the room we already have on the 40 man roster, or is this a favor to Brett dealing with MLB service time?
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:00 PM
Andy: Yeah, I look forward to seeing him on the Green Line Metro some day pouring some bourbon into a can of Schlitz then lighting up a Garcia Vega.
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:02 PM
How to hit against WSN.
Hit a flyball to RF not exactly right at Dunn. If it lands more than 20 ft away, take extra bases liberally.
Nice swipe Uts.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:02 PM
gtown,MPN: I used Hit Tracker Online.com for the measurements.
They use true distance, which is where the ball would have landed uninterrupted in the actual environment it was hit.
Standard Distance is where the ball would land if it was in a completely nuetral environment - sealevel, 70degrees and no wind.
Posted by: thephaithful | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:10 PM
MPN: Excellent question. My guess is since they have the space they don't need to do that now. They can always do it later and make it retroactive if they need to free a space.
Posted by: clout | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:10 PM
I thought Howard's 1st HR was measured at 432. MLB network said the 2nd one was 493.
Posted by: mikes77phillies | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:12 PM
On tv last night, McCarthy said the 2nd one was 475.
Posted by: Indiana Sarge | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Easily Jamie's best start of the year.
Good Work Pops!
Posted by: NEPP | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:17 PM
"McCarthy said..."
Well, there's the best evidence that it was something else.
Posted by: Andy | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:18 PM
Nice job by Moyer today! Threw 60% of his pitches for strikes, walked no one, only gave up 3H, 1R in 6IP. Looks like he'll get his 250th at last, provided the BP holds them. (My advice, no Durbin today, Jamie needs the W and Durb's struggling a bit.)
Posted by: GBrettfan | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:19 PM
So whatever number it was, 475 or 493, that's calculated as to where the ball WOULD have landed on an even level playing field, correct?
Posted by: Indiana Sarge | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:19 PM
Yes, agreed on the job done by Moyer today. Glad to be proven incorrect... of course, it was against the Nats.
Posted by: MPN | Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:22 PM