ESPN senior baseball writer Jayson Stark, author of the new book "Worth the Wait: Tales of the 2008 Phillies," drops in to answer the first in a series of softball questions.
Beerleaguer: Why did the Phillies win the World Series? Briefly explain the philosophy, performances and decisions that formed the foundation for a champion.
Jayson Stark: Thanks for the easy opening question. BRIEFLY sum up why this team won the World Series? How do I do that? It took a whole book to explain that. But here, I think, was the biggest thing: I said on ESPN 950 last year this time, that coming out of spring training, that team had win-the-World-Series upside. What we didn't know then was that they'd have enough pitching to pull that off. But beyond how their staff stayed amazingly healthy, an even bigger factor was this: The incredible sense of purpose they played with in September and October.
Unlike the Cubs, who were swallowed by the pressures of trying to rewrite their history, this group of Phillies almost used the quest to put their stamp on franchise history as fuel. It's almost unheard of for a team to talk out loud about doing that, while it's in the midst of a grueling run through October. But this team did. They were a team on a mission, and it showed.
Look, obviously, a lot of things broke right for them. But it was more than that. I was talking with one GM the other day as his team was playing the Phillies, and he was complaining about how he had no leaders on his team. The team the won the World Series certainly didn't have that problem. The leadership the Phillies get from Chase Utley in his own way, Jimmy Rollins in his own way, Jamie Moyer in his own way, etc., makes them unique. And it sure showed up last October.
Tune in next time when Jayson summarizes the last decade of Philllies baseball in 100 words or less, then segues into a critique on the history or religion, which I've asked Jayson to send via text message.
Book signing: Jayson will be signing copies of his book Sunday at 11 a.m. at Bright House Field in Clearwater.






Coaste throws out a runner from his knees!
Posted by: Goody | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 03:20 PM
Where's davethom???
Posted by: AWH | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 03:22 PM
I'm looking forward to this book. It seems to be a definite step up from the slapped-together, cash-in-now books that have already been published about the WFC.
Posted by: KidCarnivore | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Dammit, you beat me to it Jason. I have an interview coming up with Stark on my blog too. Guess I'll have to ask some off-the-wall type questions so I'm not copying you.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 03:47 PM
Re: The Mayberry chat on last thread. Obviously there's some folks who have no clue as to the significance of an 18/3 K/BB ratio, in terms of projecting MLB regular season stats, especially as it applies to a player with a minor league career AVG of .255.
I LOVED the trade for Mayberry. Still do. But get real.
Posted by: clout | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 03:50 PM
Bruntlett went 2 for 5 and raised his average to .350 so far this Spring.
And Rule 5 guy Mosebach got bombed again...
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:00 PM
I am glad to see Bruntlett having a good spring. You to think that he was at least partly wondered about his job given the number of utility INFs the Phils signed this offseason.
If Bruntlett can rebound to hit .250 or .260 and keep his walk rate up so that he has a solid OBP, then Bruntlett has some value to this team even if he .SLG is around .300.
Posted by: MG | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:06 PM
Phils really have given every opportunity to Mosebach this spring. Either there is something they really liked about him or they just aren't about what they have seen from Koplove/Majewski for the last spot in the pen. Probably a little of both.
Posted by: MG | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:08 PM
They really have given him a chance to see if he can consistently harness his stuff, which is quite good at times. Ashame he hasn't.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:10 PM
I'm somewhat concerned about the state of the BP. We've been in every game so far in ST, but it's been the BP that's given up handfuls of runs late in the game.
Posted by: doubleh | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:12 PM
I agree with clout. This guy would kill us in pinch hitting situations this year.
Posted by: Albert | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:15 PM
If Park does win the 5th starter spot, the middle relief looks like this:
Durbin/Eyre/Condrey with 2 other candidates from a mix of Happ, Koplove, Majewski, and a few others.
Most people seem to think the bullpen is deep and going to be a strength again to this team the first 2 months. I don't see it right now. If Park wins the 5th starter spot, the middle relief has the look of something that will be quite mediocre until Durbin is able to duplicate his very solid performance from last season. Otherwise, you really just have a bunch of guys back there who are interchangeable bullpen parts.
Posted by: MG | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:18 PM
Madson has been good, and so has Eyre (aside from yesterday). Lidge and Durbin may be a bit behind schedule, but they have been fine in limited action. The others don't really concern me. The Condreys of the pen will fill their roles fine, we don't need them coming in and pumping 100mph fastballs with a sub 2 ERA. Bullpen really isn't an issue aside from the final spot or another lefty. No worries here.
Posted by: Albert | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:21 PM
A middling Double-A starter with an 88/69 K/BB ratio doesn't seem like a good use of a Rule 5 pick to me. I'd rather go after someone that possessed at least one asset, like the ability to miss bats, or speed, or high on base.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:24 PM
JW--nice find, Stark is a big timer nowadays, a great connection to have even if its just a one question interview once inawhile.
re: bullpen
Its pretty disturbing that Condrey will be one of the 'locks' in our pen to start the season.
I loved what he did for us last year, but for him to be one of the sure things is not very comforting.
Posted by: thephaithful | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Im feeling MUCH better about Werth after his last few weeks of mashing, including today off of Roy Oswalt who was the best USA pitcher in the WBC(which might not be saying much).
I was definitely among the group who were getting a bit worrisome when our lone RH power bat came to camp out of shape and most likely hungover. As long as he gets back to form, he can party it up all he wants in the offseason.
Posted by: thephaithful | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:33 PM
j: Agree with you about the use of a Rule 5 pick on Mosebach. I recall that, on the day of the dragt, a lot of us were scratching our heads about the pick. He may throw hard, but that hasn't translated into high strikeout totals at any level.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:46 PM
Maybe they like Mosebach a little and are throwing him so much that he'll stink it up and Angels will just say, Aw, you can keep him?
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:47 PM
A RH power bat in th OF that parties too much, I can't remember the last time we had one of those!!!
Posted by: Reverend | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:48 PM
EFF: I had that same thought a week ago and ripped for saying it. But thats exactly what I think they are doing.
Posted by: Reverend | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:50 PM
I hope Utley goes to LF more this season. It seemed like he fell in love with the HR last season. I gues his constantly pulling the ball could be because of his hip problem.
He's beter off driving the ball in the gaps and getting doubles (as a few on here have mentioned) than trying to hit HRS
Posted by: James L (Forever a Phillies fan!) | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:51 PM
If anyone wants to relive the pain of 1993, MLB Network is showing "Baseball Seasons" right now and it's all about that glorious run. F' you, Joe Carter!
Posted by: doubleh | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 04:51 PM
Rev,
I was kinda kidding. Don't think any of our relievers are hurting for innings, probably.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 05:06 PM
Albert - We'll see. If Park wins the 5th starter spot and with Romero out for the first 2 months, the bullpen isn't going to be the same anchor it was pretty much all of last season.
Couple of guys including Condrey and Durbin are more likely to revert to their career numbers a bit (especially if you look at their peripheals) and the Phils' bullpen for whatever reason was ridiculously good at not allowing XHB last season.
Nearly everyone in the bullpen last year was way below their career norms in rate of XHB and HRs allowed including Lidge who only allowed 2 HRs in nearly 70 innings. Not saying he becomes a batting practice pitcher but much more likely Lidge gives up 5-6 HRs instead in a similar amount of innings pitched. Even 4 more solo shots would have raised Lidge's ERA to 2.50 last year.
The bullpen will still likely be at least decent because the backend guys are pretty solid/consistent (Madson/Lidge) as long as they are healthy. I am just not crazy about the middle relief especially the first 2 months if Park wins the 5th starter spot.
Posted by: MG | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 05:15 PM
It's been said before, but Bruntlett's spot on this team is guaranteed. Who else can play SS?
Posted by: CJ | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 05:42 PM
My candidate for RH bat off the bench went 0-3 today. He also gave up 8 hits and 4 runs.
Posted by: Goody | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 05:42 PM
Goody - funny.
In re: Mosebach
Maybe they liked his FB and figured he'd get mashed in ST and, as a middling AA pitcher no one would want to give them $25K for him; and they could keep him.
(How's that for drink-the-kool-aid, unfoundedly optimistic, glass's mostly full, rose-colored everything thinking?)
I actually figured they really don't spend a lot of time scouting for their Rule 5 draft. They really don't have any extra roster space anyway.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 06:15 PM
I have no worries about the bullpen either. Backend is solid with Madson and Lidge. Last year we started with Lidge on the DL and Gordon. You cannot really look at Durbin's numbers as a starter and expect him to regress. He is a fastball/slider pitcher, much better suited to be in the pen. I would like to have enough lefty, but I think we are fine with Eyre and Happ until JC is off the restricted list. Condrey is your long guy. If our key concern is who replaces Rudy Seanez' role in the 6th inning, we are in good shape this year.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 06:28 PM
hey, clout -
Homers and RBIs tend to make people forget about K/BB ratios.
K's are a part of being a power hitter.
Posted by: Doc | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 06:36 PM
Results haven't followed Mosebach in Spring training, but you can understand why the Phils would take a chance on him. He throws a sinking fastball in the mid 90's with an inconsistent yet nasty slider. I like the thinking of taking a failed starter with a big arm and trying to make him a reliever. It seems to have worked with Durbin.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 06:40 PM
Doc -
Fopr a minor leaguer k/bb tells you what kind of strike zone and pitch judgment the kid possesses. In a regular season he would not be facing the AA/AAA pitchers who have struck him out way too easily so far. Nor would he face the varied collection of AA/AAA/AAAA guys, marginal middle relivers, and really good pitchers who are working on pitches and not quite at optimal level yet that he's seen in ST. If he is up at major league level, he'd be facing major league pitchers every day. I hazard to guess they would do better (at least initially) than the 3/18 posted by ST slop.
Please. He looks really good. He may turn out to be an amazing deal. His declining (as ST progresses) numbers show that Mayberry needs to spend some time honing his pitch/zone recognition.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 07:09 PM
Doc: "Homers and RBIs tend to make people forget about K/BB ratios. K's are a part of being a power hitter."
I don't disagree, but it depends on the ratio and it depends on the HRs and RBI.
How does this line look: .221/.260/.420
You be happy with that?
Posted by: clout | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 07:59 PM
I think that's a FANTASTIC line, clout.
Back to reality though, Mayberry isnt ready for MLB pitching.
I also wonder if they are letting Mosebach get pounded so they might keep him. He does throw very hard afterall.
Posted by: NEPP | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 08:40 PM
Breaking News: Phillies acquired Jack Taschner for Ronny Paulino, according to David Murphy at the Daily News
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/phillies/42034026.html
Posted by: J.R. King | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:24 PM
From Todd Zolecki, via Facebook: "Todd Zolecki is writing a story about the Phillies trading Ronny Paulino the Giants for lefty Jack Taschner. "
Posted by: sully | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Paulino's gone for Taschner via MLBTradeRumors.
Bleh
Posted by: ZT | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Well, if you look at it from the standpoint of trading Jamarillo for Taschner. Paulino is a talent who could put it together someday, but Taschner can help this team this year and Marson needed to be the next man up at catcher and have all the at bats at AAA.
Posted by: B-Mac | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:42 PM
Taschner? Eegads. Last year in 48IP he gave up 57 hits and 26 ER. His WHIP was 1.68.
Unimpressed.
Posted by: doubleh | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:48 PM
Surprised at how quickly they gave up on Paulino, but this team needed another lefty.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:48 PM
Meant to say it's a big upgrade if you look at it as Jamarillo for Taschner. Looks like he was pretty unlikely with a high BABIP last year, so maybe his .279 BA vs. LHB is a bit of a misnomer. I have been fairly impressed with him watching him in the past, so I think he could be more helpful to the team than having a guy like Majewski in the pen.
Posted by: B-Mac | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:49 PM
And considering he's a lefty, his splits aren't that wide. He's equally ineffective at getting out lefties AND righties.
His splits:
vs. LHB 29H 21RBI 2BB .279AVG
vs. RHB 28H 15RBI 14BB .308AVG
He did have 23 SO vs. LHB vs. 16 against RHB, but...MEH.
I hope change of scenery Romero-izes him.
Posted by: doubleh | Friday, March 27, 2009 at 10:56 PM