Down 6-2 in the seventh, all one could feel was despair - for the ballgame, for the season. Then the Phillies scored six runs in the eighth, won 8-6 and restored hope, all in the time it would take to heat a casserole.
The Brewers entered the game 21-0 when leading after seven innings. It was impossible to think the offense could pull it out, but that’s exactly what they did. Snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Terrible at bats for seven innings were erased by spectacular at bats in the eighth, primarily against Milwaukee setup man Derrick Turnbow.
The Phillies have seen their share of highs become lows. This was the biggest shift the opposite direction. Geoff Geary’s seventh-inning flameout inspired this response in the comment thread: "Guess we'll see when Howard gets back, and to a lesser extent Madson and Gordon. But right about now, it's tough to see the light at the end of this tunnel." My next post came 35-minutes later. "I see the light!"
Let’s be honest: There are many problems with this team. They haven’t found a way to bridge the gap to Brett Myers. And without Ryan Howard, the patchwork offense is limited.
There are problems, but along with Myers, who's shaping up to be a very special closer, there are positives. It’s been a long time since the starting rotation threw in a clunker. They’ve actually pieced together the longest string of quality starts in years, according to Elias Sports Bureau. The offense is average or slightly above right now, which means they need to take advantage of opportunities like last night.
One can only hope the Phillies can carry this into the rest of the home stand. If four years of blogging has taught me anything however, it’s that momentum is only as good as the next day's starting pitcher. Stay tuned ...




"momentum is only as good as the next day's starting pitcher"- thanks Weitzel, that harsh reality is that Eaton is our starter tonight.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:06 AM
Well, you could look at it this way; perhaps even knocked around fifth starters can ride the momentum of last nights phantastic final...plus, the guy's last outing wasn't so bad. No time like the present to get it together, Adam.....are you listening, Adam?....Adam?
Posted by: bigmyc | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:19 AM
Phillies owed Milwaukee one from last season when the Phils were the ones who kept blowing it late.
Wheeler said something during Utley's at bat on how he's never seen a team apply the shift against him, but I definitely remember the Brewers doing it last season.
My favorite all-time shift was the one Tampa Bay put on Howard last season, which included Tomas Perez moving from third base to left field.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:21 AM
I'm happy for Milwaukee and all, as they're a great story in this young season, but I hope we clobber them for 4 straight.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:32 AM
Speculation in the Bronx is that, with lefthanders Sean Henn and Mike Myers already in the bullpen, the Yankees don't have room for Ron Villone. Amaro, citing tampering rules, declined to comment on what interest the Phillies might have in Villone beyond saying, "What we need, what we'd like to have, is somebody with some experience who would help [manager Charlie Manuel] hold down the game." Another Phillies baseball man said he didn't know if the Phillies were interested or not, but added: "Would he make us better? I sure think he would." Villone's Yankee contract calls for a $2.5 million salary if he's promoted. If he becomes a free agent, however, agent Scott Boras is free to negotiate the best deal he can get.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:56 AM
My favorite part of the game was the fact that they got all those hits against Turnbow, who owned the Phils last year. His dominance of the Phillies was part of the reason that there was chatter in the off-season about trying to obtain him. Now, they've shaken that mental part, not just with Turnbow, but in general. They have to feel like their offensive "spurtability" means that they're never really out of a game.
I'd still much rather have consistency than one or two innings every game where the Phils put up 4, 5 or 6.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 10:05 AM
We may have Eaton going, but they have Claudio Vargas. Vargas' stats, on the surface, seem to indicate that he is a good starting pitcher, however looking deeper he is more like his average self. His WHIP is in the 1.6 area. ERA is respectable in the mid 3.00 range. He is striking out a lot of people, but a few of those games have come against the (Until last night) non-hitting Cardinals, and I think one against the Astros.
Eaton: has not been near as bad recently as the beginning. Hopefully he can get it together, at least within the repectable range, and the Phils have a chance. Can't really ask for a whole lot more. A complete game would be nice, but I'm not buying.
Bottom Line: Phils are probably going to strike out a lot against this guy tonight. THey need to make him work and take some walks, getting to the bullpen. Vargas is mistake prone and has control issues, so if the Phils are patient then they should be able to get some chances.
Posted by: Parker | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 10:09 AM
Todd Walker got released yesterday....might be worth a shot. Certainly rather have him than werth
Posted by: mm | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 10:41 AM
I hope Manuel keeps Dobbs in the lineup against all these righties. Dobbs has really been on fire lately.
"Sometimes"-Hit Nunez may have 5 errors now (Helms 6, total 11 for our 3rd baseman), but his defense at 3rd is the best we got, and should remain in the lineup because his empty batting average is about the same as Helms' empty batting average. I'm not saying Nuni should remain the starter, but for now, Helms' bat does not outweight Nunez D and bat.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 10:43 AM
I wish Walker could play some SS, because he'd be a nice addition to back up all infield positions.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 10:44 AM
Said Helms spotted Turnbow wasnt throwing his splitter and he and Manual told the boys to jump all over the fastball.
Nice spot Helmsy, maybe this will be the shot in the arm you need !
Posted by: phanatics brother | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:14 AM
Todd Walker has and LSU pedigree and was a CWS star. He's got to be better than Werth-less.
Today is my birthday. Will the Phillies give me a birthday win? With Eaton on the mound against a good pitcher in Vargas, I'm not sure I'll get my birthday wish. To get a win tonight, we're going to need the big bats early and often.
Posted by: Lake Fred | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:33 AM
This is, again, probably an 82-88 win team. They could be better if the rotation keeps it up, Howard comes back strong, and the bullpen solidifies. They could be worse if Moyer suddenly acts his age, the high-cost starters don't represent, and Howard can't come back at least to his 2005 level.
The biggest problem is that I don't see the Mets or Braves going away. No, Perez and Maine probably won't be this good all year, but Wright and Delgado finding their bats will make up for some of that dropoff. And Atlanta has a lineup as good as ours, a much better bullpen, and a far superior manager/GM tandem.
Posted by: dajafi | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:41 AM
Walker is LH, so he doesn't replace Werth. He is also strictly a PH / DH now. He is terrible defensively at 2b and hasn't played much 3rd, so he is not really a utility type. Dobbs gives you more than Walker.
Happy B-Day Lake Fred.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Helms' comments made me wonder whether Helms just works better as a pinch hitter. The guy clearly knows the game, but as a starter, you need to focus on many different things. When you're pinch hitting, there's one task, one focus. And Helms may thrive in that role. No wonder he was so effective as a PH in the past.
Meanwhile, there is statistical evidence proving Nunez performs better as a starter. There's nothing wrong with Nunez hitting 8th, if Helms can deliver like this off the bench.
Posted by: Malcolm | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:45 AM
dajafi, good post. Most people here thought the Mets or the Braves would be good. Few that they both would be good, and I agree that both look be there the entire season. There are only so many playoff spots and I cannot see the Phils overtaking both of these teams after such a poor start. And I don't think the Phils have the pitching (starting and relief) to sustain the necessary winning streaks to do so. We can't keep scoring 6 + runs a game.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:46 AM
No disagreements with Dajafi. Combine that with the record in one-run games and in extra innings, and it's still an 82-87 win team.
Posted by: Mike H. | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 11:58 AM
malcom, i love helms off the bench, so we agree there. but we have to demand better than nunez as the primary solution at 3B.
Posted by: bathtubhippo | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:03 PM
Sarge said the same thing about Turnbow's splitter after the one he bounced about 6 feet in front of the plate -- the hitters could confidently sit dead red. I noticed that both Helms and Dobbs hit fastballs that were quite a bit low, out of the strike zone. The surprising thing, as many noted during the game last night, was that Yost left Turnbow out there to take such a beating.
Posted by: Alby | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:08 PM
Random question to start: does anyone know if Bisenius ever pitched for the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Red Barons? Random, I know. There's a Red Barons' uni on eBay with his name on it. I have a collection of Red Barons items (used to live up there), but I don't remember him ever being on the roster there.
Lake Fred- hope they can give you a win like they did for me on Friday. Granted, Burrell hit two home runs so my buddy dogged me for that, but any win's a good win.
J, you're right about the Brewers' putting on a shift for Ut last season.
Posted by: phila fan in dc | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Helms would be a great bench guy, with occasional starts at 3rd or 1st. But to have Nuni as the starting 3rd baseman is a joke. Come July, I hope we try to trade for someone decent with the glove and stick. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad Nunez is actually getting some singles here and there, but how long will it last before we're back to seeing him ground out weakly every plate appearance.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Nice post, dajafi. We got to see the Cubs-Mets game last night and both teams fielded poorly. I am amazed that the Mets lead the league in both BA and ERA. I thought their pitching was supposed to suck. Maybe their poor fielding leads to errors, hence the good ERA!?
Thanks for the birthday wishes, Billy and thanks and a belated "same to you" to DC fan.
Posted by: Lake Fred | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:19 PM
I don't completely mind Nunez as long as he's in the 8 hole. He can do some different things - bunts and situational hitting and the like - to make up for his GIDPs and weak grounders.
I agree there has to be a real upgrade at third, but we all know that isn't happening any time soon. I'd much rather see the 'pen get shored up.
And I just realized that there's two Malcolms on the boards. There's lowercase malcolm and me, uppercase Malcolm. Strange.
Posted by: Malcolm | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Not that flip-flopping Ruiz and Nunez would make a huge difference, but if Nunez continues to play, he should be batting 8th with Ruiz in the 7 hole.
Unfortunately, Barajas probably gets the start tonight.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:26 PM
Any update on Villone?
Posted by: Angus | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Phila Fan
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Joe-Bisenius.shtml
if this is to be believed then he didn't play at AAA Scranton
Posted by: Jobbers | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:37 PM
I thought Helms could've been a good under-the-radar signing this offseason, definitely not the case. If he's the #1 PH off the bench, I'm ok with that, but that means Nunez is starting. Ugh. I doubt there's anything "there", but Steve on 610 keeps mentioning hearing "whispers" of a Troy Glaus trade. I'd like that
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:37 PM
Glaus is getting older now, is constantly injured, and is making a ton of money. With that said, I would love to see him man 3rd base this season. To pry him away from Toronto it would take 2 top prospects (Happ and Carasco possibly).
Posted by: GM-Carson | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:40 PM
LF - last night notwithstanding, the Mets have played excellent defense this year. Mike @ A Citizen's Blog has been pointing out the enormous gap between NY's ERA (best in the league) and fielding-independent ERA (slightly below average) for a while now - see this post, for example. the Mets' excellent DER, compounded by a lot of pitchers who induce strikeouts, is the reason their pitching staff has overperformed so far.
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:48 PM
I agree that Helms as your first bat off the bench isn't bad by any means. He's a great asset as a slightly less than half-time player, and pretty clearly overmatched as a starter. Adding a guy like Glaus (not that I see how there might be a fit; Carson's thought is semi-plausible, but even that might not be enough if there's interest from other teams) would still mean Helms starts once or twice a week, given that Glaus has nagging injuries and Howard arguably should sit against some lefties.
Happy birthday, LF, and here's hoping they get you a win tonight. Unfortunately, my b'day was spoiled by that Andruw Jones walkoff jack. Thanks, Alf...
Posted by: dajafi | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:52 PM
Happy Birthday Fred!
Jason, your sober reminder about momentum and the next day's starting pitcher reminded me of something Larry Bowa used to say that expanded on that thought:
"Momentum is sixty feet, six inches away."
dajafi, good post. I said before the season that their win total would be 86, + or - 10.
76 if they really fell apart (injuries, etc.), 96 if everything went right, including Chollie's decisions. For them to get to 96 wins they have to win 78 more games, that is, play at a .629 clip. To do that they would have to really beat up on both the Braves and Mets from here on out. Very unlikely. To get to 86 wins they need to win 68 of the remaining 124, a .548 clip, much more likely given the bullpen situation, and probably not good enough to make the postseason.
Posted by: AWH | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:57 PM
Carson, Ruiz has to bat 8th behind Nunez to provide Nuni "protection" in the lineup.
Posted by: AWH | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 01:02 PM
Dobbs has been pretty good at first base. He is supposedly also a third baseman. Why not play him against righties at third until he plays himself off (hopefully never). Nunez is a switchitter so he can pinchhit or play defensively when we have a lead or need a double switch. I still like Helms against lefties. I think Dobbs started one game at third earlier in season and had a hit if I recall.
Posted by: fljerry | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 01:30 PM
It might be time for Manuel to give Rollins a rest, too. He looks like he could use one. Maybe tonight would be a good night for it.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 01:33 PM
Jobbers- I saw that website too. Maybe he didn't actually play in a game but he was moved from Reading to Scranton at some point later in the season?
Posted by: phila fan in dc | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 01:41 PM
AWH, you crack me up. I can't stop laughing after reading your post about Ruiz having to bat 8th behind Nunez to provide Nuni "protection" in the lineup. ROTFLOL!
Posted by: Lake Fred | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 02:41 PM
Phila Fan
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20061211&content_id=148213&vkey=pr_t501&fext=.jsp&sid=t501
http://phuturephillies.com/tag/various-topics/destination-philadelphia/
Both these links talk about Bisenius in 2006 and neither of them mention him being at Scranton
Posted by: jobbers | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 02:49 PM
Smoltz getting hurt last night is a good start to getting past the Braves. Hopefully Wickman stays hurt. Chipper is due for a groin pull any day now. And I wouldn't be surprised if Andrew Jones breaks his back with one of those ridiculous swings of his.
Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 02:49 PM
ae, thanks for the link on the Mets analysis. The writer felt the Mets will falter later in the season, but that the Braves were more solid. I feel the Mets are still better than the Braves, however, either way it looks tough for our Phillies. If the Phillies want to get to the post-season thaey can't depend on other teams losing. The Phillies need to win every time out, even when Eaton the Dog pitches.
Posted by: Lake Fred | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 02:51 PM
Lake Fred, glad you took the Ruiz/Nuni post the way it was intended.
Posted by: AWH | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 02:53 PM
Jobbers- thanks for the help. After messing around with the MiLB website, I found this:
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=l_pit&lid=117&period=playoff&y=2006
Looks like our boy Bisenius pitched 1.1 Innings during the International League playoffs.
Posted by: phila fan in dc | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 02:56 PM
Here's how it shapes up:
Phillies remaining opponents records:
378-393 .490
Mets and Braves:
48-27 .640
Remaining opponents without Mets/Braves:
330-366 .474
Analysis:
With 124 games remaining, 29 are against the Mets and Braves. Phils are 6+ games behind both teams, and MUST beat them head up (currently Braves 1-5, Mets 1-3) in order to catch one of them, as it can be expected that both teams will fare reasonably well against their other competition. They also have to clobber the lousy team like KC and the Nats. Period.
Posted by: AWH | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 03:04 PM
Correction: 26 of the remaining games are Mets/Braves.
Posted by: AWH | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Weitzel - I thought Cholly should have rested Rollins on Sunday in preparation for the Brewers series. Rollins has been taking some bad ABs lately and not taking any BBs.
Posted by: MG | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 03:22 PM
AWH - Interesting post. Still think the magic number for the Phils is 90 wins. Means the Phils need to go 72-52 or .581 winning percentage to even get to 90 wins.
Basically comes down to if the strengths of this team (starting pitching, offense) are enough to overcome the weaknesses (defense, bullpen). I just don't see it even with a pretty weak schedule.
Posted by: MG | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 03:31 PM
It is nice to see that we have moved into first place tie with the Mets in runs scored in the National League East with 196 Runs, with Atlanta and Florida at 184 and 183 respectively.
The issue remains pitching - Gordon and Madson both being injured, Garcia our main offseason hope not available and only now coming around (his last two outings have been more than acceptable let's hope he will be able to build on it now), and Eaton the Fifth Starter giving up tons or runs (even though he is 3-3); we are 47 Runs above the Mets in runs given away.
Our record should be 20-18 not 18-20 based on our runs scored/runs given up those two losses could be attributed to Madson not revealing his injury, or poor tactical managing by Cholly - you can choose your answer depending on your outlook. I like our 3rd coach at the moment, I think he is making good percentage choices - the last 2 years post VUK were horrible, the worst I had ever seen.
So far "you are the weakest link!" has been Werth who was signed to provide some righthanded outfield power he was courted by a number or teams - here is hoping he produces, or when Howard comes back he is released with Chris Coste getting those right handed at bats as a pinchhitter in the late innings and delivering ala Roy Hobbs.
Here is hoping that both Madson (who was showing signs of success before he went on the DL) and Gordon return to give us solid 7th and 8th inning men, and push Geary back to his successful role as a 6th-7th inning guy to hand the ball to when a game is still close.
Our offense is fine, will be better when Howard comes back. Barajas, if he reverts to his mean .238 career bating average will be just what he was signed for, one year back-up defensive insurance. Imagining that Ruiz and Coste were ready for a 162 game defensive grind is not unlike thinking that Nunez and Helms and Dobbs are the defensive answer at 3B.
How do we improve aside from Howard, Gordon, Madson, and Garcia coming back from injury, and Eaton and Barajas reverting to their means?
We need a 3B third baseman, and two relievers. Not Cormier/Villone quality (but I bet we will be overpaying for Villone by tomorrow).
Adrian Beltre is underperforming (.240) with a huge contract for the Seatle Mariners
a place where GM Gillick has been able to trade before, if the Mariners fall out of the race we have the money to take on his contract now, because of Gillick's stewardship. Oft injured Troy Glaus of the Toronto BlueJays is also a possibility as well if they become sellers. Think of what our fans would want if we were trading them away - Top minor leaguers and someone like Rowand who is at his highest trade value at the moment. If it was Rowand and a minor leaguer for Beltre I would do it, if it were 2 minor leaguers for Glaus I would do it as well.
It is just not as easy as many think to snap ones fingers and get a 3B man who will not become a David Bell in the second half of his contract. Josh Fields of the Chicago White Sox (who is batting .252 in AAA)
could be had for Rowand is my 3rd choice, and drafting a 3B in the up comming 2007 Draft my 4th.
As for relievers, hopefully one will emerge from AAA, I am sure liking Clay Condrey ATM, but if one of the fireballers got it together (including those on the 25 man roster like Rosario) that would be a good thing. Noone is trading a top set up reliever for less than Rowand (if Madson and Gordon come back that would be ideal),
and I would use him only in a trade for a 3B man.
Posted by: SirAlden | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Based on nothing but a gut feeling, I think Gordon coming back as a decent anything (setup/closer) may not happen. At the very least, I hope he can come back and throw a good innning here and there. Those years of getting overused by Torre have really done a number on him.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 03:56 PM
Rowand and a minor leaguer for Beltre is insane. Beltre is an albatross - he has zero trade value right now. the Mariners have no right to expect anything more than a salary dump if they want to get rid of him. I'd gladly take him - between the effects of CBP and NL pitching I think he'd do well here - but I'm thinking CJ Henry. why, he's a first round draft pick, don't you know.
Glaus has a FNTC and is playing out of his mind. Toronto would want a ton for him - never going to happen. (I'd be more interested in reviving the Rowand-for-Rios talks, since Rios is playing good but not great right now.)
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 04:05 PM
Rowand is a free agent next year, so if we trade its going to be a team that is looking to win pennant this year. How many of those will be willing to give something up that would hurt their team. If Toronto wants to trade Rios for him, then they would have to make sure Rowand would sign a new contract.
If we are not in pennant race in July, we will probably take whomever we can get for him. thats what happens when you have free agency. Its also possible the Phils may want to sign him up for a few more years and not trade him.
Posted by: fljerry | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 04:20 PM
Isn't a reason the 'Jays would consider trading Rios is that they have a hot shot OF prospect to replace him?
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 04:30 PM
Beard - I'm not certain, but as I recall the Jays needed a CF, and their prospects were more corner OF types.
fljerry - that's true. Boston could really use a decent CF this year.
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 04:37 PM
Beltre is not viewed as an Albatros in Seatle. Glaus is oft-injured.
If everyone wants a 3B man. Who do you want - who is going to trade him to you - and for what?
Anyone trading for Rowand will be coming to terms with him before the trade takes place, or they will not be giving anything up for him.
Posted by: SirAlden | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 04:54 PM
Alden, Beltre is making $12M a year from now until 2009 - more than 10% of the Mariners' payroll this year - and is hitting .240/.303/.411. that is the very definition of an albatross.
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 05:04 PM
to expand on that - Abreu wasn't an albatross for us, and we got absolutely nothing for him (except for "salary relief"). the Mariners are in a much, much worse position with Beltre, who has a worse track record and worse contract.
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 05:05 PM
Beltre's had one monster year, and then got paid big time for it. His other years are decent, but not for $12mil.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 05:08 PM
I find it ironic that people insist that Gillick made a bad move not holding out for more talent for Abreu, and not realizing that there was no talent to be gained his huge salary.
I also find it ironic that the same people think that we can get Beltre or Glaus for nothing when both play the infield, where there are no other options.
Who do you want to trade for and what do you think it will take? Beltre for CJ Henry?
You think Seatle is down with that trade? lol
If you argue that we should have kept Abreu and not traded for Garcia and his salary, that is fine, I will agree to disagree. Saying we didn't get value for Abreu is just silly. There is a free market, we dumped 27 million of salary, and this year Abreu is batting .239.
Posted by: SirAlden | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 05:43 PM
Alden, if you can't see the gigantic contradiction in that post, I can't help you.
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 05:56 PM
If noone offered better prospects would you have kept Abreu and 27 million dollars of expenditure? If you kept Abreu with his .239 salary and not had a spot for Victorino and his stolen bases, and his league leading outfield assists would you be happy?
Addition by subtraction. Support the argument that keeping Abreu would be a good move - not "we shuda gotten mure fur da boi Abreu iz liked hem", when there were no offers for Abreu with the trading deadline coming up. Trading Abreu for exactly what we got instead of keeping him was great for the Phillies.
We saved 27 MILLION Dollars, and Victorino got his shot.
Posted by: SirAlden | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 05:58 PM
Alden, thanks for accurately transcribing my poor grammar and spelling.
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 06:04 PM
Not talking directly to you AE.
My question is for anyone - would you as GM not traded Abreu?
I see that we got 27 Million Dollars in Savings that allowed us to trade for Garcia and have room for other salaries in the future, we opened a spot for Shane Victorino, and 4 marginal prospects.
Either someone agrees with that or would rather have kept Abreu, expended 27 Million Dollars, and not had a spot for Victorino, or the 4 marginal prospects.
Either or.
Posted by: SirAlden | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 06:22 PM
I would've kept Abreu, the savings just allowed us to sign people we never should've signed in the first place (Eaton, Barajas, Alfonseca), and no one could've known he'd be batting .239 so far. Nor do I think that'll continue. Personally I would've kept Abreu, traded Rowand for bullpen help, and started Victorino in center. Rowand looks really good now but again, we all thought he was obscenely overrated as recently as a month ago before he went on this (most likely fluky) tear.
Posted by: Tray | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 06:39 PM