According to SI.com, New York will receive three good-looking pitching prospects for Gary Sheffield, who will have his contract extended for two additional seasons beyond his remaining one year, $13 million deal.
A deal like this would have wiped the Phillies system completely dry of pitching, so it is something of a relief to see Sheffield ticketed for pitching-deep Detroit. Plus, the extension is reportedly through 2009, at which point Chase Utley and Ryan Howard will be owed millions in arbitration.
Both the Yankees and Tigers benefit, but an extra hat tip goes to Yankees GM Brian Cashman, who has now upgraded his organizational pitching depth in a significant way, while replacing Sheffield with the younger Bobby Abreu. Granted, Cashman had the maximum leverage of Abreu’s no-trade, coupled with the Phillies urgency to deal him by the deadline. Without it, none of this unfolds the way it did for the Yankees.
Sanchez is a bonefide stud prospect, one of the best looking power hurlers in the minors. He went 10-6 with a 2.63 ERA between Class AA and AAA. Class A pitchers Kevin Whelan and Anthony Claggett round out the trade, according to a Tigers source. Both are former collegian pitchers, and both appear to be high-caliber.
But Sanchez is the key. Along with Philip Hughes, rated as the best right-hander in the minors by Baseball America, the Yanks are positioning for a mini youth movement in their starting rotation. This is absolutely, positively their best strategy.
So what does this mean for our Phillies? Obviously, Sheffield has been taken out of play. It’s bound to draw parallels to the Pat Burrell situation, but I would remind readers that Sheffield’s circumstances, contract, etc. are very different. Burrell, who is protected by a no-trade clause, has reportedly agreed to be moved to only three teams, and all three have shown no interest. The Yankees, on the other hand, had the ability to do what was in their own best interest.
Still, this deal illustrates – to some surprise – that good teams are willing to deal young pitching for somewhat dubious veteran power.




Tremendous trade for the Yanks and all made possible by the Abreu ripoff. Good teams trade vets for quality prospects. That's the Marlins model, the Indians have done it and now the Yanks following suit.
Bad teams dump trade vets for garbage or for nothing at all. Then the money they save is either misspent on more garbage or not spent at all. That's the Phillies model.
Posted by: clout | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 04:53 PM
What does it take to get Detroit's pitching scouts/talent evaluators to Philadelphia? Where are they finding all of these young fireballing kids, to the point that they can now afford to trade some away? Just ridiculous.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 04:55 PM
I am very glad Sheffield was not traded to the Phillies, especially after hearing the trade terms of the extended contract and giving up pitching prospects. Gillick dodged a bullet there.
Who are the three teams Burrell is willing to go to?
Posted by: Lake Fred | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 04:56 PM
NY, Boston, and SF.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 04:58 PM
NYY, to be specific.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 04:58 PM
Thanks Willard. Since those are the teams, we don't really need to be wasting anymore time talking about Burrell being traded. We just need to hope his injuries heal, so he'll be more productive hitting behind Howard next year.
Posted by: Lake Fred | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 05:09 PM
I am kind of shocked that Dave Dombrowski made this trade. Dombrowksi doesn't get nearly the press that Beane, Epstein, etc. get but he is one of the sharpest GMs in the industry.
That said, I am really glad that Sheffield didn't end up on the Phils. Whether or not he would have but up numbers next year is totally debateable. Guess we have to wait for next season to prove that.
The bigger point is that Sheffield would have been a very temporary band-aid for this club. With Howard, Utley, and Hamels, this club has a window of about 3-5 years to actually put together a really good team. Granted, they need some pitching and have a few holes but alot of teams have the same problems.
What I want to see from the Phils is some kind of organizational strategy that leverages around their core (Hamels, Utley, Howard) and makes this a playoff/championship-caliber team. Wade failed here by locking up the wrong guys.
Not exactly sure what Gillick is doing though. He is trying to unwind Wade's contracts and he is just about finished (with the exception of Burrell). I don't question that Gillick wants to win, but I still think the Phils' owners view this organization as a bean-counter would. Revenue/Expense.
I still think the Phils' are blowing alot of smoke and when the offseason ends, they will have a lower payroll than they opened last season with. If anything, I think last season convinced the Phils that they can contend without adding alot to this team.
Posted by: mg | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 05:17 PM
hey! JD Drew is a free agent! wouldn't he be perfect for our team!?? hahaha....kidding, obviously
Posted by: BenJah | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 05:46 PM
Barfield and Sheffield trades in 2 days, look like things could move very quickly starting Sunday.
I'm relieved that Sheff is off the market, I didn't want the Phils to loose some of the good pitching they have in the minors.
Posted by: Bob D | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 06:11 PM
This deal has a similar ring to the Thome trade with Chicago last season. Both the White Sox and Tigers ended the season on top of their game (although Detroit came up short). It's kind of an "if it ain't broke, break it" strategy, which often works.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 06:13 PM
Bob: Right, and the Phillies don't have anyone the same caliber as Sanchez. It would have taken Carassco, Gio and probably their next best pitcher to top that package.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 06:15 PM
this offseason might be one of the craziest in years.
Posted by: carson | Friday, November 10, 2006 at 07:35 PM
Keith Foulke just declined his player option with Boston. Would the Phils have any interest in him? I know he has an injury history, but he possibly could be a valuable piece to this pen. He didn't allow a run in September while pitching in 11 games and if you go back a little further, he was only scored upon in one game since his return from the DL on August 18th. He also only walked 7 batters in 49.1 IP and had a WHIP of 1.19. I do like Speier and Borowski, but Foulke could be an interesting candidate nonetheless. If he is healthy, he is better than Borowski as a possible closer if Gordon breaks down.
Posted by: Jon | Saturday, November 11, 2006 at 09:17 AM
"dubious" is the key word in that post.
Sheffield's attitude wouldn't have blended well with this clubhouse, and knowing his penchant for voicing his oft-maligned opinion, it would only have taken one critical quote for the fans to put him against the firing wall.
Posted by: Paul | Saturday, November 11, 2006 at 11:31 AM
I think Cashman wins again. But then, he can make the gamble because he can spend his way out of any mistake or misfortune. Clout, you should keep in mind that the Yankees' MO for years has been to trade prospects for what they need in mid-season, something they haven't been able to do much lately because their farm system was thinned by rarely having top draft picks. Of course, it helps when someone is willing to trade you Bobby Abreu for a sack of beans. But basically I wouldn't count on seeing these young pitchers as Yankees; they have about the same chance of making the majors in July when they're traded to whomever is dangling a battle-tested starter.
Posted by: Alby | Saturday, November 11, 2006 at 12:27 PM
I have to think Sanchez is likely to see time in pinstripes - most of the reports I've read online say he should be ML-ready next season.
Posted by: ae | Saturday, November 11, 2006 at 01:06 PM