The Phillies can extend their NL Wild Card lead to a full game when they take on the rejuvenated Astros.
Trailing the Phillies by a full five games in the Wild Card, Houston (77-78) suddenly has their sights set on the Cardinals, who are spiraling out of control in the NL Central. The Astros are coming off a four-game sweep of the Cards with their 7-3 victory yesterday, and now trail the division-leaders by only 3.5 games.
The Phillies keep winning, but so to the Dodgers, who beat the Diamondbacks in the ninth inning yesterday. The Dodgers have Monday off before starting a three-game series at Colorado.
I’ve lost track of Randy Wolf’s unbeaten streak, but it’s a lot – something like 18 or 19 games. Wolf (4-0, 5.47 ERA) remained unbeaten with a 5 2-3 innings effort in a 6-4 win over the Astros on Sept. 17. The Astros counter with rookie right-hander Matt Albers (0-2, 6.00). Roger Clemens was originally slotted for today but was pushed forward to yesterday’s game with St. Louis.




...rookie right-hander Matt Albers (0-2, 6.00)
I am actually salivating.
Posted by: zach | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 02:42 PM
We're going to need a lot of runs off Albers tonight because Wolf is pitching. Hey Randy, feel free to step up and shut me up!
Posted by: Drama Queen | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 02:50 PM
Any predictions on how many times they walk Ryno tonight?
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 02:59 PM
I say 3 times. And he will see nothing to hit from this rookie. I guess Dellucci will be hitting behind Howard tonight. Does anybody know for sure on this. I think I like Conine and Delluci in left and right respectively. Although I think Pat the Bat might be due against a rookie. But I like Conine for the clutch hits. Also it would be great if we could go aahead and clinch this thing and give Bourne "Identity" some playing time to see what he's got.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:02 PM
I think Foghorn starts Burrell tonight because
1) Last home game. Perhaps Burrell's last ever. Foghorn loves that kind of stuff.
2) He's starting to hit some.
Unfortunately I think Foghorn cares more about 1 than 2.
Posted by: Greg | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:08 PM
The Astros scare me.
Posted by: Casey | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:14 PM
Casey,
Good thing is their game ended last, and the got into town real late last night.
Plus they are only in for one game (while it is a game the Astros MUST win).
Still, no reason the phils should lose.
Posted by: Greg | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:18 PM
This game could easily go either way, despite the rookie pitcher. Houston is hot, knows they're technically still in it, wants to avenge sweep last weekend. This will not be an easy game.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:25 PM
We also don't have to worry about Wagner throwing meatballs to his good buddy Biggio.
Still, the 'Stros are really good this time of year and a loss here would hurt us almost as bad as it would them. I'll have the beer ready tonight...
Posted by: Casey | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:25 PM
I don't know ... rookie pitcher, ERA above 5.00; time was, this is exactly when the Phils bats would go quiet.
Posted by: Maverick | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:33 PM
I am guessing Dellucci and Conine start tonight against the righty Albers.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:41 PM
Phillies.com is listing a new starter for the 'Stros -- Sampson.
Posted by: John | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 03:44 PM
Astros.com also listing Sampson. Foxsports and Yahoosports still show Albers.
Posted by: Billy Mac | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 04:08 PM
The Phils are just as hot as anyone right now. Hot or otherwise, with a rookie right-handed pitcher with an ERA over 5.00 and that lineup, the Astros should by all rights be counting this as a loss already. Yeah, it's Wolf, but if the numbers are any indication he's at least better than this kid. With our lineup that should be enough.
I know, should be seems to have hurt the Phillies this year, but I feel like things will be different for the last games of this season.
Posted by: zach | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 04:12 PM
Sampson, Albers, it doesn't matter.
Posted by: Tony | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 04:28 PM
Matters to me! Sampson has had some success in the bigs, while Albers hasn't. No matter how limited that success may be, this isn't a positive development.
Although I do wonder why he wasn't announced as the starter in the first place.
Hopefully the Phils are so locked in they won't even notice.
Posted by: John | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 05:04 PM
Not to be a wet blanket, but everyone on here is all ready to buy playoff tix. Let's clinch first...how many times has some no name pitcher f'd us up this year? HOld on, it's gonna be a bumpy last week of the season.
Posted by: That Dude | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 05:15 PM
I agree, there's an unwarranted overconfidence taking hold here. It's okay to be excited, but the postseason is harly a foregone conclusion. I can't believe Paul Hagen said flat-out today that they'd be in. You can't possibly tell from here. You can look at matchups, stats, road records all you want - no one has any idea what will go into determining the outcomes of the next seven games.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 05:25 PM
Lineups
Phils
1. J Rollins, SS
2. S Victorino, CF
3. C Utley, 2B
4. R Howard, 1B
5. D Dellucci, RF
6. P Burrell, LF
7. M Lieberthal, C
8. A Nunez, 3B
9. R Wolf, P
Astros
1. W Taveras, CF
2. M Ensberg, 3B
3. L Berkman, 1B
4. L Scott, LF
5. C Burke, 2B
6. J Lane, RF
7. E Bruntlett, SS
8. H Quintero, C
9. C Sampson, P
Posted by: Billy Mac | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 05:44 PM
Interesting lineup for the Astros, definitely offense oriented. No Biggio, no everett, no ausmus.
Posted by: Mike | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 05:51 PM
I don't think anyone except Paul Hagan (if he) took that seriously. If you know the Phils you know there's a good chance they'll still come up short. I just think there's a better chance they won't, and am reasonably confident about the game tonight (even though it's Sampson now and not Albers).
I agree it won't be smooth sailing but I expect the turbulence to come against the fish and gnats, not so much tonight.
Posted by: zach | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 06:16 PM
Burrell is my favorite! I love when he visits me on Del. Avenue. Hopefully tonite is not his last home game in this town :(
Posted by: Bailey - Show & Tell | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 06:27 PM
He's the hottest guy in this town since Daulton.
Posted by: Bailey - Show & Tell | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 06:29 PM
Houston should not scare anyone right now.
They got very lucky to sweep the Cardinals this past weekend, for two reasons:
1. Houston counted on lots of 9th inning runs to win, against a terrible, injury plagued Cardinal bullpen.
2. The Cardinals are not good on the road this year (34-47), worst in their last 9 years.
The Astros are not playing well right now, they're just lucky.
Posted by: duder | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 06:35 PM
Beerleaguer, there's a little hiccup in this post. The Dodgers beat the Diamondbacks last night, not the Pirates.
Posted by: fletch | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 06:48 PM
FWIW, Albers is a decent young prospect, not yet big league ready. Sampson is organization filler, 28, a middle reliever at best.
Posted by: clout | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 06:58 PM
Remember, that guy from the Cubs Whalrond, or whalrus, or Narwhal? Either way that guy was a minors lifer and he did pretty good against us. Or wait was that the Yu guy. I dunno, but lets knock this guy early so we can get to Brad "I'm about ready to jump of the" Lidge.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:04 PM
Wolf just got a workout.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:07 PM
And again.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:09 PM
Does randy just want to get everyone out himself tonight? greedy fella.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:09 PM
Wolfie looking good so far.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:10 PM
Nevermind
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:10 PM
This guy is dangerous.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:11 PM
fine k right there. shame about his location with berkman, but he was working hard to keep it tight in on lance. I don't think the bb's are going to go away for a while yet - but I'm really hoping gillick takes a chance on him next year.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:13 PM
I still like Conine instead of Burrell.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:15 PM
so much for matt albers. surprised they went with a right hander against us tho'. no way howard gets a pitch tonight.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:15 PM
That was uugly Utley.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:17 PM
doh. of course this was posted in the line-up earlier on.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:17 PM
This guy is looking like the lovechild of Nolan Ryan and Roger Clemens.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:18 PM
it drives me nuts that we only saw 7 pitches in the first.
Posted by: That Dude | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:19 PM
Rollins and Utley had over-anxious at-bats. Understandably, everyone's amped, but tone it down a little and let the guy show everyone what his pitches are before swingling wildly at everything.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:19 PM
yeah, guy like this, you want to be as patient as. Still, if yesterday is anything to go by, they'll have relaxed by the 3rd. Hope randy holds the 'stros till then.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:21 PM
I like Wolf's moxie in big games.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:22 PM
was that three straight fastballs by wolf there? Wolf is not messing about!
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:22 PM
Jason Lane looks like he has Pat Burrell syndrome. Guy just took 3-1 & 3-2 fastballs right down the pipe.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:23 PM
I love having three fast-working pitchers in Wolf, Lieber, and Hamels. None of this walking around the mound between pitches crap. That's why I hated Millwood. Well, that and he sucked.
Posted by: Casey | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:23 PM
THese next three batters is where this guy is going to earn his big league paycheck.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:23 PM
Wolf seems like he is thrilled for a chance to pitch in a game this big. Making the most of it so far.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:24 PM
Howard walk, Delluci single, Burrell homer. Bank it.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:25 PM
that sir, is some confidence. my god. They're pitching to the howitzer!
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:26 PM
Oops.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:27 PM
Nothing to hit, eh? Let's hope they keep pitching to him.
Posted by: El Duderino (Casey) | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:28 PM
hey 1 out of 3 aint bad, right?
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:28 PM
Cmon Liebs.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:29 PM
rejuvenated resting every third day lieby is a joy to watch. makes me nostalgiac for the old days. sniff.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:30 PM
parker :
1. Wrong
2. Wrong
3. Again Wrong
So you're like nunez 0-3!
Posted by: dude | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:31 PM
Darn.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:31 PM
erm, obviously not when he pops up . . .
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:31 PM
Yeah, But nunez might go 3 for 3 and that wouldnt be so bad right. Hey after all we got Wolf following him tonight so he has some protection.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:32 PM
parker:
No more stupid predictions. God didn't you learn your lesson from yesterday when that other guy ripped you a new a-hole for making stupid comments?
Posted by: Dude | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:32 PM
Im with Oisin give them 2 looks at this guy and they will figure it out.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:33 PM
Dude you sound a lot like that guy. (Alias?)
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:35 PM
Allright no more predictions.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:35 PM
Just to be clear, dude is NOT That Dude.
Posted by: That Dude | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:36 PM
We need to get Ensberg.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:36 PM
who is this guy david Eckstein?
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:40 PM
ensberg is doing the astros a favour here. I hope wolf's stamina is improving game on game because this is not good.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:40 PM
ah crap, now the walk. not good.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:41 PM
50 pitches for wolf. he's not going 7 tonight.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:42 PM
I dont know about you guys but there is nobody in this lineup that I have more faith in during a pressure situation than Jeff Conine.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:44 PM
so quick question to anyone reading. ye got a bottle of somthin' nice in the event of a win tonight? seeing as how its the phils last home game and everything.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:44 PM
Wolf just demonstrated why he isn't going deeper into games. He messed around with a flopping breaking ball ahead in the count 0-2 to Quintero, who mashed it for a double. he tore ahead of Ensberg 0-2 and then nibbled around with junk for five minutes until he finally walked him. Contrast that to the first and second when he was coming right at hitters, mostly with fastballs. Wolfie, keep it simple, will ya?
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:46 PM
Pitching around Wolfie?
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:47 PM
Parker, I agree. With Conine in the 5 hole, you might think twice about walking Howard. With Dellucci, "percentages" or not, you just don't. Dellucci is not having quality at-bats and has been a surprisingly easy out for about 5-6 weeks.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:48 PM
Wow that was a nice play.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:49 PM
I liked LA's point that wolfie gets worried that people are working out his fastball too quickly. makes sense to me that a returning pitcher who has a lot of experience doesn't want to rely to much on one pitch, but doesn't quite trust his location yet.
Great catch there. nice.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:49 PM
J-Roll would have made it look easier though.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:49 PM
This is a huge inning.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:50 PM
dammit. I thought it was only against left handed rookies that we sucked.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:52 PM
book on the astro's tonight - fastball tight and inside . . .
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:56 PM
just checked wolfies strikes to bbs tonight and despite the high pitch count, he's running an okay 46-22.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:58 PM
then again, the other guy is managing 23-6.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 07:59 PM
my headphones just popped from that foul hit!
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:00 PM
That's crappy. He's pitching well and the pull him out 2/3 way through the fourth? Hope we make garner pay for that needless tinkering.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:05 PM
Is Springer a righty or Lefty?
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:05 PM
If he is a lefty then Garner needs to check his medication.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:06 PM
righty.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:06 PM
Burrell's splits would favor im leaving the righty in.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:06 PM
Good move Garner.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:09 PM
c'mon lieby. one of your lasers from back in the day. that'd be sweet.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:10 PM
God, that was pathetic.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:10 PM
crap. lieby's hot hand positively lukewarm this evening.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:11 PM
Those are the situations that put you in the playoffs if you execute.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:12 PM
J-Roll just looks like a machine out there.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:14 PM
Yes Parker, getting a hit with the bases loaded is important.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:15 PM
Parker, I think that's unfair - with two outs it takes a hit to score a run. You talk about 'executing' - getting the run home by putting the ball in play - when there's a runner on third with no outs or one out. The people who booed there are also being very unfair. Lieberthal's been big for the Phils when he's played this month. Lay off.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:15 PM
Randy's fastball is working because its about 3 years since anyone's seen it ...
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:16 PM
Freakin Jimmerson.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:17 PM
freakin' high curve, more like.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:18 PM
I know it is unfair, I'm just saying. Oh my god Wolf.
Posted by: Parker | Monday, September 25, 2006 at 08:18 PM