This afternoon’s marquee matchup between rookie Cole Hamels and future Hall of Famer Roger Clemens may carry the headline, but the subplot finds an Astros team that has broken the Phillies hearts for two seasons.
There’s an excellent piece by Don Bostrom of the Morning Call previewing this series with the Astros. It's not online, otherwise I’d link to it. In it, Bostrom summarizes the last two years of this series. The
Phillies have not defeated the Astros since May 18, 2003, and many of the losses have been backbreakers, particularly last season. He
also talks about Pat Burrell, who has yet to get a hit off the Astros since Citizens Bank Park opened in 2004,
and was 1-for-18 against them in 2005. Ironically, as part of the club's 2004 Winter Tour promotion before the park opened, a promotional rendering of the new scoreboard had the Phillies beating the Astros on a walk-off Burrell home run.
It's not going to get any easier for Burrell today. Roger Clemens (6-4, 2.29 ERA), maybe the best pitcher in the National League, last faced the Phillies July 27 of 05, and dominated them in a 3-2 win.
That was hardly the worst of it. The Phillies were Wild Card leaders when the Astros entered Philadelphia last Labor Day. Here’s what happened, as summarized by Bostrom:
Sept. 5: Astros 4, Phillies 3: Houston scores four runs off Brett Myers in the first and holds on for the win, putting them in the WC lead
Sept 6: Astros 2, Phillies 1: Wagner gives up a run in the ninth to take the loss in his first career outing against his former team.
Sept 7: Astros 8, Phillies 6: Bobby Abreu’s two-run homer caps a rally that gives Philadelphia a 6-5 lead entering in the ninth. Wagner’s career-best streak of 26 saves comes to an end when a two-out error by David Bell leads to a game-winning, three-run home run by Craig Biggio.
The previous post referenced expectations, psycology and pressure. Luckily, Cole Hamels (7-7, 4.50 ERA) wasn’t around for all that. Hamels allowed just one run in eight innings of Wednesday's 5-1 win at Washington. He has never faced Houston.
At 67-70, Houston is still in the Wild Card hunt, and playing well. They’ve won seven of their last 10. Meanwhile, the Phillies are coming off a disappointing split in a winnable series with Atlanta. They dropped 1 ½ games back of the front-running Padres.




It's been almost three years, and Burrell hasn't hit a walk-off homer at CBP yet. Promotional jinx.
The big mystery in regards to the Astros is, who designed that orange star with two sides missing, and why? If the bottom two sides were instead removed, the star would also look like an A for Astros, it'd make more sense.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 02:49 PM
Is the inside of the star supposed to look like Texas?
Also, game 3 against the Astros is a perfect example of why its ridiculous to blame a player like Abreu for a teams struggles.
Raise your hand if you remembered Abreu hitting a crucial two-run homer in the most important game of the season. I'm one of his biggest fans and I only barely remember it because of this post.
Wagner and Bell lost that game, and possibly the season...better performances from other players and Abreu is remembered last year as a clutch player leading the team to the WC. Bell makes an error and Abreu's effort is forgotten.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 02:58 PM
I actually remember that homer, and that game, very well. At the time, it seemed to me like Abreu was stepping up, he looked like more of a go-to guy, seemed somewhat more intense. He then went on to have an injury-plagued and unproductive September...and then came the walk parade and umpire-snitching of 2006. Anyway, the point being that of course he had his share of big moments for the Phillies. Even days before he was traded, there was that 2-run double in the ninth off Trevor Hoffman. I won't remember him as a poor clutch hitter. My issue with him is purely that his approach to the game was not team-oriented in general, and in my estimation it did not have a good effect on the players around him, particularly as his tenure with the Phils grew longer and with greater stature.
So the inside of the star is Texas. I guess that's it...pretty abstract though. Lame logo.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:10 PM
Ramon Ortiz had a no-hit bid going into the 9th against St. Louis but lost it on an Aaron Miles hit. That would have been right up there with Jose Jimenez.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:13 PM
nice start by hamels. Ye guys probably a)take this for granted and b) get bored of me saying how rare it is for me to enjoy a game like this, but having the mlb tv going in the background whilst I cook dinner is a joy. Harry, LA and my tomato sauce. pretty damn fine.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:14 PM
Jason: Don't forget Bud Smith.
Posted by: dmac | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:16 PM
I sure don't take it for granted, Oisin. Having access to Harry Kalas and the Phils anywhere in the country, or in your case the world, is a very comforting taste of home.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:20 PM
You beat me to it. The key to the Scott Rolen trade. Immediately tore his labrium, and never topped 85 mph on the gun again.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:21 PM
Watching Clemens - someone who has *completely* perfected his craft - is truly amazing.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:31 PM
Clemens v. Nunez...uh oh!
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:38 PM
Sorry RSB, I thought you had referred to Abreu as unclutch before, but I may be confusing your opinion with other posters.
Not exactly a contraversial point but Joe West should have been fired a long time ago...he has such a big zone, and is unbelievably inconsistent.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:46 PM
C'mon Pat, start swinging when Clemens takes the ball back from the catcher!
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:55 PM
Or, don't swing. Stinkin' bum.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 03:58 PM
Joe West is one of the top five most unfortunate aspects of major league baseball.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:01 PM
Wish they hadn't mentioned the P word just now. dammit.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:09 PM
Is it a jinx if we mention...uh...you know...?
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:09 PM
RSB that's something I never went to test enough to get a decent-sized sample.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:12 PM
I;d vote against mentioning anything (though I don't know what you are talking about!). No superstitious reason, just more fun to talk obliquely about things and keep some mystery alive.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:17 PM
Cheers the cuz. nice one.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:19 PM
Holy sh*t, that was a bomb...way to go Cole!!!...just bear down and worry about the W now.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:20 PM
Would jinx it, did jinx it.
Posted by: BushLig | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:21 PM
I'll trade a homerun if it gets Clemens out of the game.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:21 PM
Hey cuz, the word is "intact", though it's not surprising an a**hole like you can't use a word containing "tact" appropriately.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:23 PM
53 and the lead!!!!!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:29 PM
Phew. howitzer's trajectory goes longer and further than the rocket. its like nasa's experiments in the 50s in reverse . . .
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:30 PM
He's beginning to carry this club. It could be all the way to october if we're lucky.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:33 PM
They really have to hold on and win this game. I'm tired of teams pulling off dramatic late-inning wins in the Phillies' yard, they have to start winning these close games at home. Plus, it'll get the Astros' win streak against them off their backs.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:34 PM
I'm pissed about that homerun. a poor hitting club, a ump with a generous strike zone, a day game where the shadows are interfering - hamels will be waiting a while before it all comes together like that. Suppose next time he'll know better.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:36 PM
Its the Phillie way is'nt it? A perfect game broken up by someone having his 1st ML AB and he hits a homer. Still Hamels is killing it today!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:40 PM
Hamels is averaging 11 pitches per inning. We could be lucky and not see the bullpen tonight.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:43 PM
I would've liked to see Geary or White facing Ensberg there. Fortunately Hamels was able to keep that run off the board.
Hopefully Gordon will be his old self and yet another late loss can be averted. They really need every game right now the way Florida is playing.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:56 PM
Flash is finally back eh? Phew. Good news.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 04:57 PM
Rollins has to try to steal this base. If he gets caught, he gets caught. You have to try it.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:06 PM
the last thing they need is another extra innings game after the weekend just gone. Not good at all.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:11 PM
Perfect pitch right there. The beat goes on for Utley. I think we're looking at another heartbreaker here.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:11 PM
33rd steal(17 straight)in 37 attempts for Rollins
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:11 PM
Yep, I'm giving up now so I can eihter be surprised or not totally disappointed and deflated.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:13 PM
Normally I like Gordon here, but I have a bad feeling...tough spot in your first game back.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:13 PM
Never mind, it's Madson
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:14 PM
Here we go with the ninth inning patchwork again. Matt Smith? Good luck, man, it's only Lance Berkman. I don't know about this move here.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:17 PM
Ummm...while I like the idea of turning Berkman around, why waste a guy like Madson for two batters? Manuel obviously knows more than we do about who is tired, available, etc., but this is a VERY curious move.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:17 PM
I just don't think this team is good enough to be able to afford to have Charlie Manuel as its manager. When all is said and done, he probably loses us 2-3 games a season. Good guy and I'm sure he's great for "cohesion" and "chemistry" and all that intangible nonsense, but he makes bad decisions.
Posted by: Tray | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:20 PM
Holy crap is Smith slow to the plate!!! Not good for a LH reliever
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:20 PM
Matt Smith looks a bit like Jeff Conine. Good luck buddy.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:21 PM
Good job Smithy!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:28 PM
Nice job, it worked out. Phew, for now. Would it be too much to ask for a walk-off win?
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:29 PM
Alright Matt Smith!!! Even though I don't like burning Madson in what could be a long game, Manuel deserves credit for at least thinking about creative ways to help the team win.
I criticized him a lot because he just used to throw pitchers out there according to his rotation regardless of the situation...is it possible for a manager his age to still be learning?
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:30 PM
oh...my...god! C'mon Pat!
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:31 PM
oh, please, someone score howard. but now thurston is pinch hitting for burrell? Wrong move.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:32 PM
I was wondering why they had a right-hander to face Howard...I don't blame them, especially with the 'protection' the Phils have coming up.
Oh! Thurston hitting for Burrell! Wow...that's even more stunning, to me. But I like it.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:32 PM
WTF...Thurston for Burrell...have you lost your fucking mind Charlie?!?!?!?
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:33 PM
Oisin, I imagine he'll be bunting?
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:33 PM
Ok, he'll probably bunt
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:33 PM
doh. should've thought of that. this is why I don't try to second guess manuel for a living.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:34 PM
I still don't like the move...Qualls is nothing special...Burrell can hit him
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:34 PM
Ah Christ. Where's Greg Gross when you need him.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:35 PM
awful bunt. can conine give us our money's worth?
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:36 PM
See
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:36 PM
please, charlie, put up someone for nunez. please. I don't want to see a dp here.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:37 PM
Clutch Conine! Load 'em. Astros are scared!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:37 PM
Nunez? Isn't there *anyone* else on that bench? Hernandez? Dellucci?
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:37 PM
Cmon Looch get out of your slump right here
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:39 PM
someone hold victorino down. he's going to go off like a badly opened champagne bottle.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:40 PM
Dellucci has turned into Dale Sveum. What happened...
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:41 PM
dammit hernandez. lean into that ball. would it kill ya?
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:41 PM
dellucci's average is plummeting towards his career average. why you pinch-hit with one out with someone who strikes out so frequently is beyond me.
Posted by: sean | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:42 PM
done, we're done. sigh. This ain't a wild card team.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:43 PM
That's awful. They deserve to lose this game, and I'm sure they will. Why this team can't win tight games at home is an eternal mystery.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:43 PM
scratch that. this isn't anything but a .500 team.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:44 PM
What an inning. Bonehead move by Garner to walk Howard, but Manuel decides to make up for it by taking out a guy with a .900 OPS so he can bunt, all while leaving Howard on the bases and not pinch running.
The bunt play is so complete Manuel, never going for the kill, always with the conservative play...he just doesn't get it.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:44 PM
Sure glad we had Dellucci & Hernandez up there with the bases loaded instead of that bum Abreu. He would've just stood there and walked. RSB is right, what a bum. This team is way better without him. And hitting Thurston for Burrell? Charlie is a genius, right?
Posted by: clout | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:45 PM
Now we get White and not Gordon? Manuel wants to lose this game!
RSB, when a team can't win close games...look to the guy in charge.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:46 PM
kdon, in Manuel's defense, Burrell's bat has been super-slow of late, and he wasn't going to do a thing off Qualls. If they get the bunt down, they win the game.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:46 PM
Into extras. We are done. Bye bye win.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:47 PM
I bet they squeeze here.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:49 PM
Geez, maybe they should have.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:51 PM
I see RSB is beginning to realize having Dellucci in there instead of Abreu really does cost you games.
Posted by: Tray | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:51 PM
We can only hope that the Astros are just as pathetic, but this game is probably as good as over.
Posted by: BushLig | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:51 PM
I don't know how you can say that Burrell wouldn't get a hit of Qualls, RSB, especially considering Conine ripped a double...do you really think Conine is a better hitter than Burrell? If we are talking Lidge or Clemens, I agree that a bunt might be called for, but Qualls is nothing. Burrell is a mistake hitter and Qualls makes mistakes.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:51 PM
Great job by The Beard. Win or lose, this has been a great game.
Posted by: clout | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:54 PM
kdon, check out Burrell's bat speed the past several games. It's nonexistent. Qualls is throwing mid-90s. Normally, I wouldn't advocate removing a guy with extra-base power, but I haven't seen extra-base power from Burrell in a long time. I think they wanted to go with a bunt there, and it's not a bad idea.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:55 PM
Also, you can of course fault Thurston for failing to get the bunt down, but this is a perfect example of how Manuel puts players in positions to fail. He basically tells the entire world he is going to bunt, so Ensberg is about two feet away and the 1B is charging. In addition, there is a very slow runner on first, so Thurston knows he has to be absolutely perfect to adavance the runner. Manuel put him in a position where failure was likely.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:56 PM
Yeah, as if that was even Abreu's turn in the order. Dellucci is a pinch hitter there, ignoramus. That's such an asinine comment.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:57 PM
Burrell should have been given the chance. Imagine his confidence boost if he did do it. If he does'nt nothing changes. He's an everyday player who could do with a boost. Just by taking him out his confidence plummets. Charlie is thick.
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:57 PM
Just because it's an obvious bunt situation doesn't mean a guy can't get one down. The Phils apparently have no one on the entire team who can bunt. Maybe they should have sent a pitcher up.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 05:59 PM
I agree with BloosStripes. If Burrell is so bad that he can't take swings against a mid-inning reliever, he shouldn't be in the game to start with. I'll trust your scouting report RSB, but Burrell has gone the opposite way a lot recently and he draws a lot of walks, either way it puts pressure on the Astros
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
RSB: Hey you're on the record as saying Dellucci and whoever else is replacing Abreu is better.
Posted by: clout | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
I'm not talking about that particular at-bat, obviously. Odds are Abreu would have made an out as well. But over time, having Delucci in there instead of Abreu is going to hurt your offense. He's been playing over his head all year and he's going to revert to his averages. Did you really think he was going to hit over .300 all year?
Posted by: Tray | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
Is Pat that bad of a bunter?
Posted by: Bob D | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
this game is turning into mental torture. lets see how many phillies can't hit average relievers.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
kdon, bloodstripes: I'm with you. Burrell could've done way more things to advance the runner, walk, hit, grounder, than Thurston, who's basically a Triple A player. i mean if it's the bottom of the order, maybe, but batting Joe Freaking Thurston for the guy who bats 5th in your lineup? Again RSB now feels obligated to support every move Charlie makes. In for a dime, in for a dollar.
Posted by: clout | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:01 PM
awesome
Posted by: Bob D | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:02 PM
excellent. my whinging reverse curse loosens up utley.
damn, he's getting a good backrub from jimmy.
Posted by: Oisin | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:02 PM
You rule Chase!!!! More respect for Howard, he absolutely grooved that 3-1 pitch.
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:03 PM
Chase Utley!!!! Hero swing!! Phils finally beat the astros!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:03 PM
Damn, the signal from MLBTV went out, I love those interviews right after the game!
Posted by: kdon | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:05 PM
Uts breaks his slump big time!
Posted by: clout | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:05 PM
I love surprises and love it when the Phils prove me wrong after I had given up. I'll swallow my pride. I was wrong! Phils are tough! Woo hoo!
Posted by: BloodStripes | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:06 PM
No, I'm not on record as saying that, Clout, so stick it up your ass.
kdon, right on, Utley got that pitch because Howard was on deck. Amazing how he affects the game even when he's not even the batter. But how about Utley coming through? It's awesome to see him come around and get such a big hit, and for the Phils to win another game they looked like they were going to squander.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:06 PM
Now for Colorado to beat the Padres
Posted by: Bob D | Monday, September 04, 2006 at 06:06 PM