The opening series of 2006 couldn’t have ended worse for the Phillies, or their optimistic fans, falling 4-2 to the Cards and watching Jimmy Rollins’ hitting streak end at 38.
Opening week featured unpopular players doing unpopular things, and unpopular decision-makers making unpopular decisions.
Starting at third base, the more things change, the more they stay the same. When GM Pat Gillick signed infielder Abraham Nunez to a two year deal, that should have ended David Bell’s days against right-handed pitching. Even Bell knows it. He was a .199 trainwreck against right-handers last season. Against Jason Marquis, yesterday’s right-handed starter, he was 0-5 lifetime. Certainly, Bell would be second, or even third on the depth charts for this game, behind Nunez and Alex Gonzalez, the second third baseman signed by Gillick. Hint, hint.
Yesterday, Bell was inserted into the lineup anyway and went 0-4, leaving five men stranded. This is nothing new. Batting seventh last season, the funeral Bell often tolled with men on and two outs. And to throw salt on the wouds, he committed two errors.
Mike Lieberthal, the other half of the now-infamous black hole, did better at the plate, going 1-3 with an RBI double in his third-consecutive start.
Lieby, the only player who is even less popular than Bell, finished a less-than-textbook series behind the plate. He couldn’t hold baserunners. He was not on the same page as his pitchers. And in Wednesday’s loss, ended the game with a bases-loaded ground out.
If that wasn’t bad enough, starting pitching, considered by some the team’s big weakness, couldn't last longer than five innings. Cory Lidle (0-1, 5.40 ERA) was the best of the bunch, but let it slip away in a four-run fifth. Until then, he was in control and had only thrown 59 pitches, primed to last at least through the seventh.
The rainclouds that seem to follow manger Charlie Manuel wherever he goes have tracked him into 2006. Indeed, his tactical strategy was the team’s black cloud last season, and he’s already made several questionable choices in the early-going, giving the start to Bell yesterday, reuniting the black hole and pairing Jon Lieber with Lieberthal on opening day.
What's next?
An opening sweep shouldn’t be taken lightly, but if there’s any lesson, it’s that momentum only goes as far as the next game. The Phillies spring training momentum dried up the moment Scott Rolen planted a grand slam deep into the seats.
Make no mistake: Clearwater is an imaginary place.




Great summary.
Posted by: Corey | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 09:49 AM
one extra note: during rollins' hitting streak, he hit .379. kenny lofton, in that same time period, hit .402. hitting streaks are nice, but...
Posted by: gr | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 10:22 AM
What do u mean GR?
Posted by: That Dude | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Nice work J. The headline made me chuckle. I'm sad to see Jimmy's streak end, it was truly exciting every time he came up to bat.
Lets just hope the Cardinals are THAT good and the Fightins aren't THAT bad.
Posted by: enrico | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 10:35 AM
First, we the fans, all agree on these over stated gap fillers. The truthe is we are all just watching the hour glass drain instead of being cut thru with Gillick's molding torch. Oh, what a spring day that will be.
It's players like these that let you know who the kiss up's and unrealistic reporters and sports people are.
Everyone knows the names of the rotting wood in Philly land. (a catcher, 3B, a couple hockey defensemen and some guy who can hold a pigskin for a foot).
It's not taking shots. Just reality. Ask not the few.
We just need some guys to take there jobs and not there flaws.
I'll take any of the prospects over this glimor of outside corner repitition. Watching kids grow is better than the paint drying approach.
In Gillick we also trust.
Posted by: ace | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 10:48 AM
I refrained from writing anything negative about the end of Jimmy's streak because I was delighted for him throughout his run. My only comment would be, why in the world did a guy who rarely bunts let alone for a basehit, give up an AB in the middle of a 38-game hitting streak to try and drop one down with a terrific fielder on the mound? I know ballplayers have to rely on instinct much of the time, but is there anything wrong with sizing up the situation before stepping into the batter's box? Jimmy is quoted as saying he saw everyone playing back, but two things must not have occurred to him: the pitcher never "plays back" and he can't bunt.
Posted by: Tom Goodman | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 10:51 AM
I liked Hagen's insertion of Melvin Mora's supposed interest in playing for the Phillies. For anyone who missed his column today, he's got a clip from the Washington Post about how Mora has broken off negotiations for a new contract with the Orioles; he's a free agent after this season.
Now that would be a good 3B solution, eh?
In the meantime, I say not to worry where Bell is concerned. I believe it is more that just wishful thinking when I submit that his days as a Phillie are seriously numbered. Gonzalez has 1 AB so far, I believe. He's too good to be plastered to the bench like that. It's ridiculous having three third basemen. Bell is useless to this baseball team. Gillick didn't sign him. Unless he starts putting up 3-for-4's every day, he's gone.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 11:43 AM
i mean i would prefer that rollins turn into a better hitter. i guess that's stating the obvious, but i had a stat i wanted to throw out in the meantime. i'm afraid this streak means rollins will never mature at the plate.
Posted by: gr | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 11:53 AM
If by mature you mean take more BB's I'm not sure that will ever happen, however it doesn't necessarily have to for him to mature. The key would be that since he is closer to the plate he can make "better" contact and use his legs. In addition, although getting more BB's would be ideal, if he can TAKE more pitches per AB he will be fine. The difference between hitting 2-1 and 1-2 are enormous.
Posted by: That Dude | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 12:16 PM
Melvin Mora would be a wonderful addition to the Phillies. However, do we really believe the Phillies will eat Bell's contract? RickSchuBlues, I just want you to know that I have no ill feelings towards you, and that I respect you at a poster on this site. I only ask for the same respect.
Posted by: Carson Book | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 12:34 PM
rickschu, i agree that bell's days are numbered and that gillick probably has no real allegiance to seeing him on the field, but c'mon, alex gonzalez is too good to keep on the bench? lifetime average: 244. i know he's cheap and i know he's good defensively, but i've hated that signing since day one. he is not any sort of a solution. he's a replacement for thomas perez and not really much of an upgrade from pieman, circa 2003. if he allows you to cut bell, great, but he's not going to offer any sort of upgrade at the plate. in fact, he has a chance to be worse.
Posted by: gr | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 12:50 PM
Melvin Mora will be 35 next year and wants 3 years 27 million.
No thanks.
Posted by: TD | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 01:02 PM
Eh I dont know, if you give him a 2yr deal and hope the kid we drafted last yr is ready to make the leap you might want to do it. That said I have never been a big fan of Mora and would rather go in a different direction. I would bet as we get to June Mike Lowell will be available if you wan tto go the short term route.
Posted by: That Dude | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 01:11 PM
One of the worst things about Bell is that he provides absolutely no protection for the young and impressionable Ryan Howard. Poor kid will never get a pitch to hit as long as Bell is behind him.
Posted by: Tom G | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 02:17 PM
Floyd is going to come through for us tonight. We need him to. Phillies aren't desperate yet, but if they keep losing, they will be soon.
Let's see another hit streak start J-Roll!
Posted by: Carson Book | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 03:07 PM
One question: Why does Bell bat ahead of Lieby? Bell has a (slight) edge in speed, and Lieby has a (slight) edge in power. The 8 hitter gets bunted to second a lot and most teams have at least a relatively fast player in the eight hole. I know one reason is that Lieby is bad w/ RISP but that is really just two years ago - before that he was fine. Lieby is more of a free swinger and I think is hurt more by batting in front of the pitcher than Bell.
I realize that even if all of this is correct, it probably equals about 5 runs a season, but, hey, that's half a win!
Posted by: kdon | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 03:49 PM
When Bell plays(which should only be 2-3x a week) he should bat 2nd.
Posted by: That Dude | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 03:53 PM
I didn't like the Gonzalez signing either, but I feel like at the very least things need to be changed up.
Concerning Mora, I agree with TD. I think there would be a chance of him giving us a discount if we still have Bobby Abreu onboard, but Mora is not an especially noted defender and his days as a top hitter are numbered as well. While his numbers last year weren't bad, they were a steep drop (from .340/.419/.562 to .283/.348/.474). If he can pick it up again this year, he might be worth a look.
Mike Lowell? Are you kidding? That guy is FINISHED, worse than Bell perhaps.
Posted by: Adam | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 07:20 PM
Far be it for me to defend David Bell, who shouldn't be playing against starting righties under any circumstances, in my opinion.
That said, given that Bell is playing, 7th and behind Howard is the right spot in the order for him. Howard's going to see A LOT of situational lefty relievers this season, and putting a guy who hits lefties exceptionally well behind him will give other managers headaches.
Posted by: Scott | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 08:16 PM
I didn't mean to sound so high on Alex Gonzales...but I do think he'd be an adequate platoon-mate for Nunez. As a left-handed hitter, Nunez would still get the majority of the starts.
And I do not think he is any worse than David Bell. I think Phillies fans would rather see *anyone* play third over Bell, myself included.
Posted by: RickSchuBlues | Friday, April 07, 2006 at 11:50 PM
Well if Lowell is finished he is STILL better than Bell (who actually IS finished). So far Lowel is batting 285 with a 375 OBP (over 900 OPS). Obviously thosenumbers wot hold up, but I'd bet his are btter than Bell's.
Posted by: That Dude | Saturday, April 08, 2006 at 06:49 PM