Following the acquisition of Aaron Rowand, Phillies outfielder Jason Michaels could fall to fifth in the outfield depth chart. If the price is right, GM Pat Gillick shouldn’t hesitate in shopping him.
If the Phillies traded Jason Michaels midway through 2005, would you have noticed?
Becoming more like the Invisible Man, losing out to Kenny Lofton most games, Michaels has never quite cleared the hump toward a starting job. Believed to be an underused commodity by some - citing his high on-base percentage (.399) and good glove – a share of supporters believe he’s been unjustly jipped out of a fair shot in center field.
If I was blogging about some non-contender like Pittsburgh or Kansas City, I would settle for full-time J-Mike. But since my obsession lies with a team with a $95 million payroll - the hometown nine are fine in making him No. 10 or 11.
Entering his fifth season, and no-doubt miffed from the acquisition of Aaron Rowand - who's good enough to play all the time - Michaels should be flipped for something they could actually use. His opportunity to start in Philadelphia is finished, and his chance at decent playing time may be limited.
The good news for J-Mike - and the Phils - is he’s reportedly getting some nibbles. If that’s the case, the Phils need to get while the gettin’s good.
Frankly, I’ve seen all I need to see from J-Mike. I like his patience and I like his glove a little, but he’s a wimp at the dish and daft base runner.
Still, according to Gillick, Michaels and Victorino still factor in to the Phillies plans somehow. From Phillyburbs.com:
According to Gillick, both Jason Michaels and Shane Victorino - both considered possible starters before the Rowand deal - are still in the Phillies plans. Gillick even floated the idea of playing Burrell at first on certain days against left-handers to get Michaels playing time and give Ryan Howard a break.
Let me ask this question: Have you seen anything from the Phillies in the last two seasons that indicates they value J-Mike enough to sit Ryan Howard in his second season and move Pat Burrell out of position just to make room for him? Gillick's statement strikes of cultivating buzz for a player who should be traded.
As for that on-base percentage, the Phillies had the highest OBP in the National League last year. They can spare it, especially with all the other holes that could be filled.
For sale: Serviceable CF with good OBP. Can start or platoon. Asking 3B, P or RP, veteran or prospect, OBO.
Michaels nightcap:
How would another top pitching prospect sound in a swap for Michaels, giving the Phils three new arms before the winter meetings?




I like your thoughts. Who do you think would be interested in Micheals? Toronto, Florida, Pittsburg?
Posted by: Ivan | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 02:21 PM
Believe it or not, the Yankees, who are reportedly grumbling about missing out on getting Rowand.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 02:31 PM
Actually, the Yankees have been nibbling at him, haven't they?
I'd be amazed if we could get anything worthwhile with Michaels. If the PHILLIES don't need him, how much do other teams need him. Sure the Yankees, but they won't give up much for him. He'd be better off in a package.
ps: What do you mean by "wimp at the plate"? Out of curiosity...
Posted by: Ed | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 02:32 PM
Ha! Strong word, wimp, but I'm happy to defend my choice in using it. He doesn't get the bat extended. He never opens up to drive one. No homers against LHP last season is wimpy with a capital "W". For a CF, I think it's ok, but anything else, PH, LF, RF, no thanks.
I'm not sure many teams have an outfield as good as Pat Burrell, Aaron Rowand and Bobby Abreu.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 02:59 PM
I think Jason meant that he doesn't have much power.
Posted by: Tom G | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 03:02 PM
Ah, gotcha. I was imagining something like "he shies away from pitches inside" or "he refuses to bat against guys who throw over 95" or something funny like that.
Posted by: Ed | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 03:09 PM
the yanks have been after michaels since the end of the season and up to the rowand trade, have been told repeatedly that he wasn't available. the fact that they were asking about endy chavez last year tells me they are REALLY unhappy and desparate to replace the departed bernie williams.
i agree with ed, though, is really not going to fetch too much by himself. a decent reliever, maybe. certainly not a quality starter or anything more than a part-time positin player. he played well last year, but really struggled in '04 when marlon byrd imploded.
gotta love gillick's approach, though. he's a master at stating the favorably plausible.
Posted by: gr | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 03:43 PM
News Flash - Wagner signs with Mets for 4 years, 40 mil (plus 5th year option with $3mil buy out).
I'm glad the Phillies didn't overpay for him. That's just ridiculous money.
Maybe now they'll get Wickman and Gordon.
Posted by: Ed | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 05:17 PM
J-Mike will end up in either NY or LA. I heard the Dodgers are asking about him plus the Yanks are high on him. Also, I think that we will see an Abreu trade at the winter meetings that will create an opening for Victorino to start probably in RF. It makes a lot of sense financially.
Just my opinion, but that's what I think.
Posted by: theragtopguy | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 05:23 PM
By my calculations, and these could be wrong, the Phillies now have $67.25 million committed to 11 players plus Thome for 2006. I have also included the possible salaries for arbitration and non-free agents. The Phillies seem to have about $15 million to "play" with now that Wags has gone to the Metropolitans -- thank you Omar for the #18 and #31 picks in the amateur draft!
Numbers in millions
Wolf 9 (Final Year)
Lieber 7.25 (2007 7.5)
Lidle 3.3 (Final Year)
Cormier 2.5 (2007 3 or
.5 buyout)
Lieberthal 7.5 (Final Year)
Bell 4.5 (Final Year)
Abreu 13 (2007 15,
2008 16 or
2 buyout)
Perez .7 (2007 club
option)
Rollins 4+1 (2007-08
7+1,
2009-10
7.5)
Rowand 3.25 (2007 5 or
3.25)
Burrell 9.5 (2007 13,
2008 14)
Thome 5.5 (2007-09 5.5
per)
Total 67.25
Opening Day 06 95~
Remaining 27.75
Arbitration Eligible/non-Free Agents
Padilla 4.5?
Myers 3.5?
Utley .35
Howard .35
Fultz 1
Geary .35
Michaels 1
Madson .45
Floyd .35
Tejada .35
Brito .35
Victorino .35
Ruiz/Pratt .35/1.25
A. Lopez .45
Tom Gordon or Bob Wickman would seem to be worth our first round draft pick this year. The Padilla 8th inning experiment now also seems to be worth a shot. I also think that exploring a trade with the Dodgers for Derek Lowe and perhaps Duaner Sanchez makes a lot of sense... perhaps Bobby and either Tejada or Brito? We could also use some muscle off the bench.
Note that the Phillies might have as much as $24.8 million coming off the books in 2007 -- which could be nice depending on the free agent market/arbitration cases.
Posted by: MPN | Monday, November 28, 2005 at 10:29 PM
I'm not as in favor of dealing Abreu for that package, but I'm right there with you on your bullpen approach, MPN.
Experimenting with Padilla in the 8th is precisely what I had in mind. I'm undecided on the free agent options at closer, but they need to sign one of them, maybe Gordon, maybe Farnsworth. I don't know. Anything they get will be too expensive and only make me angry something better isn't already in place, so I'm resigning my position on who they should get.
I'd also like to see what this Yoel Hernandez is all about in spring training. He's been groomed as a fireball closer in our own system and has pitched well in Venezuela this fall.
What a concept: developing an in-house answer to a position that's demanding $8-10 million a season on the open market, including a $47 million contract for a pitcher with 42 career saves.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 12:28 AM
I like Padilla's stuff and all, agreed that he has the stuff to close or set-up, but......
I have serious doubts about his mental makeup. During the season, remember when somebody would make an error behind him? He would act like a petulant child on the mound and shortly thereafter would serve up a grapefruit or two. Now, can you imagine that happening in the 8th or 9th inning? We can't afford to be experimenting with him in that role in my opinion. Not next year when we will be on the verge of fielding a playoff team (hopefully).
I just don't think that they could afford a couple of losses incurred by experimentation with Padilla as a closer or set up guy. Leave the guy as a starter or trade him (better yet). The man is a classic case of million dollar arm and 10 cent mental makeup.
Let Gillick trade Abreu, I'd go for Derek Lowe, a good ground-ball pitcher. Of course, LA would have to give us somebody else decent, I don't know this Sanchez guy.
Posted by: theragtopguy | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 12:45 AM
padilla as closer seems less reliable to me than urbina, and i wouldn't have been jumping at the chance to put him in that role even before his offseason escapades. i'd rather go for a FA or even give a rookie the chance...
if we're trading abreu we had better be getting some damn good players in return, and lowe just isn't that great. i'm most concerned by his increase in HR allowed this past season, which could be a big concern in CBP. i see him as at best the #3 pitcher in our rotation. trading abreu, even a possibly aging abreu, for a guy like that doesn't exactly get my heart racing, even with a decent reliever like sanchez. i know the pitchers out there aren't really marquee names, but why dump one of our biggest trade chips for a guy like lowe?
Posted by: ae | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 04:31 AM
JW: Yes, I'd forgotten about Yoel, too. Good point. Plus he'll be a very cheap alternative.
Also, you may be right on the Abreu package. I keep thinking about what "fair value" might be to him. Now that we have traded Thome, Abreu's value may have actually increased because teams won't be able to lowball us. The best alternative, as I think you've pointed out in the past, might be to wait until the July trade deadline and get back a package more in our favor.
AE: Yes, his HRs may have gone up but his GB/FB ratio is still a ridiculous near 3:1.
Posted by: MPN | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 09:01 AM
More Hot Stove Stuff
"The Yankees talked to Philadelphia about a trade for a center fielder, not only Jason Michaels but also Bobby Abreu, just-acquired Aaron Rowand and Endy Chavez. While the Phillies will listen to offers for any of their outfielders, they seek pitching. The Yankees offered reliever Scott Proctor, but the only Yankees pitcher the Phillies like is Chien-Ming Wang, and the Yankees do not want to trade Wang."
http://www.nj.com/yankees/ledger/index.ssf?/base/sports-0/113324718996070.xml&coll=1
"And with Bigbie as a valuable chip, the Rockies are exploring trades for catchers Yorvit Torrealba and Josh Bard and will soon inquire about Philadelphia outfielder Jason Michaels, perhaps expendable with the Phillies' addition of Aaron Rowand."
http://www.denverpost.com/rockies/ci_3260486
Posted by: MPN | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 09:51 AM
Hi Guys - new here to this site. I am a die hard Phillie fan, but also a huge Red Barons fan. (AAA team of the Phils) I've watched all of these guys year after year. Michaels was never a star with the Barons. Though he did have some highlights. I am hoping to see him get trading. Though he was very nice and a pleasure to meet - I'd love to see him go to Toronto and play. I also want to see Victorino get a shot and getting some ABs. He was also very nice to meet this past year.
Talk to you all soon.
Brad Adams
Posted by: RedBaronBrad | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 02:39 PM
J-Mike may be a wimp at the dish, but give him a few beers and put him outside an Old City club at 2 a.m. with a cop in front of him, and look out!
Posted by: Tom Durso | Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 03:07 PM