A recent conversation on talk radio got me thinking how much better baseball was as a kid.
The topic focused on whether morning show personality Rhea Hughes should renew her season tickets next season. Her answer depended on whether Ed Wade returned as general manager.
She’s not alone in that sentiment, but it’s not something a kid would ever consider.
When I was a kid, I came up with a plan to live inside a janitor’s closet in Veterans Stadium so I could go to games whenever I wanted. Of course, the adult in me now says “You would be eaten to death by rats if you did that.”
It's just another example why adults never get it. I used to get it, and at some point, I lost it.
Earlier in the year, I e-mailed a group of bloggers about getting together for a game and suggested taking in a Reading Phillies game next April. The kids would still be at school and they couldn’t interfere with the purity of the sport, I said.
“Kids,” I said “ruin baseball.”
It's the opposite, though, isn't it? It's us loud-mouthed adults who don't get it.
By saying “kids ruin baseball,” I was missing the point. Baseball is better as fantasy, and it always has been. You don’t need to be 10-years-old to view it that way, and I’m constantly trying to figure out ways to rekindle that naiveté – to view it, once again, as escapism.
Baseball is also better when you believe in it, when you buy into the illusion that the Phillies are playing for your honor. After writing Beer Leaguer for over a year now - purely as a hobby and exercise in writing - I still get the most enjoyment out of writing players as characters in an epic saga.
As the calendar rolls over to October, it’s fitting the season I dubbed “the year of the veteran players” comes down to the final game, with nine men fighting to keep their playoff dreams alive.
Since April, chapters have been ripped up and replaced. Old favorites were replaced by new ones, and new protagonists were created to carry this story forward into a sequel.
Today, the 162nd game of the year, represents baseball at its purest form – nine men in white against nine men in black, pushing toward the last page. Only after the final page is turned will there be a question whether the author made the right choices. For now, the author is invisible and only champions exist.




I've got goosebumps. Excellent writing. I look forward to your posts every day and am usually rewarded with thoughtful, well written prose. Thanks.
Posted by: Mike | Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 11:34 AM
Great job, per usual. I am hoping against hope today. I guess I have a kid's perspective of the Phils. I have enough things to worry about then compound my angst railing against "ownership" and Ed Wade. Let's find out on the field of play where it all matters. Go Phils!
Posted by: lurker | Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 12:10 PM
Thanks, guys. Jim Salisbury has a wonderful, genuine article in the Inquirer this morning as well. His excitement never seems phony or forced. He's been tremendous this season.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 12:42 PM
Baseball was better as a kid, because I could say things like "Von Hayes is my favorite Phillies player!" and people's reactions would be "Aww, how cute," instead of "What, are you nuts?"
Baseball was better as a kid, because my mom had Sunday season tickets to the Vet, and every other weekend during the summer meant a Phillies game and a 14-and-under giveaway.
Baseball was better as a kid, because it's supposed to be. Make a baseball fan at 6, and they'll be taking their grandkids to the ballpark at 60.
Posted by: Deanna | Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 10:52 PM
Hey, I know where you're comin' from when you say that kids can ruin the game. I feel like most of the kids running around the ballpark are little monsters, but don't paint me as a bitter old coot because I say that. The kids who really love the game are a real pleasure. Every once in a while I get to sit next to one and it's just great. Unfortunately, most of the kids I encounter at games are nothing but loudmouthed, spoiled little junkfood recepticles who could care less about what's going on down on the field. Nothing we can really do about that however, so I guess we've just gotta grin and bear it and enjoy it when we come across the ones that get it.
Posted by: Ted Cogswell | Monday, October 03, 2005 at 12:45 AM
Ted:
Haha ... you're starting to convince me I was right the first time.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, October 03, 2005 at 03:36 AM
By "loud mouthed" you mean "passionate", right?
Posted by: Tom W | Monday, October 03, 2005 at 08:00 AM
Nope, "loudmouthed" was right.
Posted by: Ted C | Monday, October 03, 2005 at 01:41 PM
I thought Ted was talking about Pat Burrell for a minute there.
Posted by: David Gorgos | Monday, October 03, 2005 at 02:43 PM