Like Mike Lieberthal sitting out a day game, blogging the morning after a 1:05 p.m. business person’s special is bad for my health. I'm sitting this one out, stretching my brain in a different direction, and turning my attention toward football at my dear Alma Mater, Penn State. At the very least, use it as an opportunity to get to know me better.
Penn State football is less than a month away. As a fan, I’ve been largely MIA since graduating State in 2000, making the Eagles my team du jour since walking away with my degree.
Other than the Phillies and Eagles, I’m pretty fairweather with my teams. Penn State was pathetic last year (4-7) and I didn’t watch a single down. I’ve also had limited chances to watch games because my previous residence, a cabin outside Kutztown, didn’t have cable. It barely had anything. Now I have high-definition cable and I'm living large (up 15 pounds from last year).
I must admit I’m a little tired of the Eagles and the whole Chickie’s and Pete’s scene. Call me a snob, but it’s tacky, and the T.O. situation is blown way out of proportion. I can feel my tastes shifting back toward those no-nonsense white helmets, JoePa's hemmed pants and good, clean breakfasts at the Waffle Shop, That's like heaven, and sparkling green jerseys, Dhani Jones' bow tie and Pat's cheese steaks are like hell.
College football’s great downfall, in terms of "sport," is sticking fans and teams with a buzz-killing postseason structured around sponsorships and dollars.
However, the practical way to view the situation is those dollars translate into more resources for the academic institution. After all, it’s football, and in a university setting, football is a marketing tool and a cash cow, in addition to a fan institution and tradition.
The rabid sports fan doesn’t see it that way. Football, business and education collide just when they’d like to see helmets collide in a bracketed, unhindered playoff system. Fans often blame a system based on "rankings" for bringing down the sport, but that’s a byproduct of the beast.
In that respect, the pro game is better because the frenzy continues unhindered until the Super Bowl.
For me, Penn State has always been about the six games or so one can attend in Happy Valley every season and absorb that electric atmosphere, playing familiar division rivals. Besides the ’94 Rose Bowl against Oregon, I could barely pay attention to any bowl game I’ve seen since then.
There’s nothing as mind-numbing as a game played a month and a half after the season featuring Penn State against some random team like Texas A&M. I’d rather see Penn State play another game against a division rival, like Purdue, if they finish with similar records.
Rankings, wins and BCS numbers are debated indicators, but they’re everything in college football. In an 11-game season, who you play and when is vital, and PSU has a relatively easy docket this season, aside from an unwinnable game on the road at Michigan.
Here's the schedule:
| Saturday, Sept. 3 | South Florida | Home | 3:30 PM | ||
| Cincinnati | Home | 12:00 PM | |||
| Central Michigan | Home | 1:30 PM | |||
| Northwestern | Away | More | |||
| Minnesota | Home | More | |||
| Ohio State | Home | 7:00 PM | |||
| Michigan | Away | More | |||
| Illinois | Away | 7:00 PM | |||
| Purdue | Home | More | |||
| Wisconsin | Home | More | |||
| Michigan State | Away | More |
They enter 2005 with a solid team defense that didn't allow more than 21 points a game last year. That's incredible for the college game.
It’s a favorable schedule overall and very easy early, but tough in the middle. They have a very good chance to go 4-0 including a win at Northwestern before facing Minnesota at home, then Ohio State at home. At worst they’ll be 4-2 after those two games. I'd say State has a chance to upset OSU more than Minnesota, a team that always seems to play well in Happy Valley.
Then they hit the road for two games, first against Michigan for their annual pummeling (4-3), followed by a winnable game at Illinois (5-3), but watch out for those back-to-back road games.
Even if they split the next two at home against Purdue and Wisconsin, they're still 6-4. Michigan State never impressed me, so I call that a win away from State College. That puts them at a very good 7-4.
The Big Ten will beat each other up again this season. State has a legitimate chance to finish second or third in the conference, maybe with as many as eight wins. I see nothing worse than a 6-5 finish.




While I didn't attend PSU (I attended James Madison U., the ahem I-AA National Champions), most of my family did, and so I follow the Nittany Lions just a bit...and I have to ask why you dodged the BIG question: should JoePa retire?
Posted by: Tom G | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 01:01 PM
JoePa should stay as long as he likes.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 01:04 PM
I think Joe should retire after this year if they're able to produce a respectable (i.e., winning) 2005 season.
The thought of losing a seventh straight game to Michigan makes me ill.
Posted by: Tom W | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 01:10 PM
Another Tom posting a commment!!! Yikes. Well, Jason, I certainly learned more about you. You write as well about football as you do about baseball, no small achievement given that your passion for the former doesn't come close to your passion for the latter.
Speaking of baseball passions, how about that Swing And A Miss reverse jinx yesterday? I write that Bobby has lost his stroke and sense of the strike zone and, bam, a grand salami in the first inning and another hit the same say. I say Chase has been struggling a bit lately and, boom, a home run.
Uncanny. I should start predicting who ISN'T going to win the lottery.
Posted by: Tom Goodman | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 01:46 PM
You are lucky you guys don't play B.C. this year. I grew up a State fan, but after attending B.C., State took a back seat. I went up to PSU 2 years ago to watch BC roll over JoePa's squad, it was awesome. I also brought my current room mate, PSU '03 alum, and sometimes guest author on the700Level, Scott R. up to Chestnut Hill last year to watch the ninny lions get lit up. It was a great time as well. I look forward to more PSU insight, and Scott has season tix, so he should give us some good reports from the sccene, that is if he remembers any of it.
I haven't lost my love for the Chickie and Pete's scene just yet. You have to love it for what it is.
Posted by: enrico | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 01:47 PM
LIke I said in a post earlier this week, I attended Hawk Hill, but the lack of a football team allows me to keep my childhood allegiance at State College. Great post, Jason. And weighing in on the question of the day, I think JoePa should be allowed to coach as long as he wants.
Posted by: Jeff Martin | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 04:16 PM
not that I have anything at stake, but I believe he should stay as long as he wants as well, and i just hope however it all ends, it is on a high note of some kind. JoePa represents everything that is good about college athletics.
Posted by: Tom G | Friday, August 05, 2005 at 05:28 PM